Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 46(10): 2084-2091, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32715585

RESUMEN

AIM: To compare the recurrence of benign endometrial polyps after office hysteroscopic polypectomy performed with a bipolar electrode (BE) or a small diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal system (HTRs). METHODS: From July 2018 to December 2019 we evaluated the charts of 114 asymptomatic fertile women who underwent office hysteroscopic polypectomy, 1 year before, for a single large benign endometrial polyp (size between 10 and 20 mm) using a 4 mm continuous flow hysteroscope with a BE or a 5 mm HTRs. Patients, divided into two groups according to surgical procedure, each performed exclusively by one expert gynecologist, were scheduled for a 12-month postoperative transvaginal sonography to evaluate the recurrence of endometrial polyps. RESULTS: Forty-eight women of the BE group and 42 of the HTRs group were considered for the 1-year transvaginal sonography follow-up. Five polyps were identified in the BE group and three in the HTRs group (5/48 vs 3/42, P = n.s.). All polyps were removed hysteroscopically (in three out of five and in two out of three cases, respectively, in the same places of the previous polypectomy) and evaluated as 'benign' by the pathologist. CONCLUSION: Office hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy with small HTRs compared to BE revealed at a 1-year follow-up no difference in terms of complete removal and recurrence of polyps. HTRs polypectomy resulted in less pain and significantly quicker time of procedure compared to BE. This data should be kept in mind for patient comfort any time hysteroscopic polypectomy is planned in an office setting.


Asunto(s)
Pólipos , Enfermedades Uterinas , Neoplasias Uterinas , Endometrio/diagnóstico por imagen , Endometrio/patología , Endometrio/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Histeroscopía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pólipos/patología , Pólipos/cirugía , Embarazo , Enfermedades Uterinas/patología , Enfermedades Uterinas/cirugía , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología
2.
Gynecol Endocrinol ; 36(2): 171-174, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31392917

RESUMEN

Surgery is the most frequent treatment in women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. A new medical approach with ulipristal acetate (UPA) has been suggested. The aim of this study was to provide data on effectiveness and safety of UPA in premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids. This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study. Data on all consecutive premenopausal women with symptomatic uterine fibroids referred to three Italian centers were included in a dedicated merged database. Women aged 18-55 years, who received pharmacologic therapy with UPA 5 mg orally once a day, were included in the study. The primary outcome was the percentage of women who underwent surgery after UPA treatment. One hundred and forty-two premenopausal women with uterine fibroids were included in this study. The mean age was 43.2 years. Eighty-one (57.0%) of 142 women treated with UPA had only medical treatment and did not undergo surgery. Surgical treatment occurred in 70, 23, 32, and 8% of the women who received one course, two courses, three courses, or four courses, of UPA treatment, respectively. The incidence of side effects was 10.6%. The effectiveness and safety of repeated UPA treatment courses in reducing number of women requiring surgery is confirmed by real-world data.


Asunto(s)
Leiomioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Norpregnadienos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Uterinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
3.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 45(3): 626-633, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506805

RESUMEN

AIM: This retrospective multicenter study was carried out to evaluate feasibility, effectiveness and patient acceptability of a small diameter hysteroscopic tissue removal system in the treatment of large endometrial polyps (≥20 mm), usually not removed in an office setting. METHODS: Hundred and forty-six women with a single greater than 10-mm diameter polyp considered for polypectomy between April 2016 and August 2017. Sixty-five of these patients had a polyp size greater than 20 mm. All hysteroscopic polypectomy, using Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal system (TruClear 5C System Medtronic), were performed in an office setting with vaginoscopic approach. RESULTS: Procedural success, time to complete the polypectomy and patient pain scores were evaluated. Polyps less than 20 mm were completely removed in 79/81 cases (97.53%). The completeness of greater than or equal to 20-mm polyp removal was achieved in 63/65 cases (96.92%). The median time for polypectomy was 4.19 ± 1.03 min for polyps less than 20 mm and 4.97 ± 1.30 min for polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm, respectively. Pain was minimal and brief, and the mean pain score measured on a 10-point visual analog scale at the end of polypectomy showed no significant difference between the two groups. In 4/79 (5.06%) cases with polyps less than 20 mm and in 4/63 (6.35%) cases with polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm women reported moderate pain. All specimens were adequate for pathologic measurements. CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic treatment of polyps greater than or equal to 20 mm in size with TruClear 5C is feasible and well tolerated in an office setting with no significant difference regarding completeness compared to polyps less than 20 mm, but with a minimal increase in procedure times.


Asunto(s)
Endometrio/cirugía , Histeroscopía/métodos , Pólipos/cirugía , Enfermedades Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto , Endometrio/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedades Uterinas/patología
4.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 25(3): 418-425, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499791

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the costs of hysteroscopic polypectomy using mechanical and electrosurgical systems in the hospital operating room and an office-based setting. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital and center for gynecologic care. PATIENTS: Seven hundred and fifty-four women who underwent endometrial polypectomy between January 20, 2015, and April 27, 2016. INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy performed in the same-day hospital setting or office setting using one of the following: bipolar electrode, loop electrode, mechanical device, or hysteroscopic tissue removal system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The various costs associated with the 2 clinical settings at Palagi Hospital, Florence, Italy were compiled, and a direct cost comparison was made using an activity-based cost-management system. The costs for using reusable loop electrode resection-16 or loop electrode resection-26 were significantly less expensive than using disposable loop electrode resection-27, the tissue removal system, or bipolar electrode resection (p = .0002). Total hospital costs for polypectomy with all systems were significantly less expensive in an office setting compared with same-day surgery in the hospital setting (p = .0001). Office-based hysteroscopic tissue removal was associated with shorter operative time compared with the other procedures (p = .0002) CONCLUSION: The total cost of hysteroscopic polypectomy is markedly higher when using disposable equipment compared with reusable equipment, both in the hospital operating room and the office setting. Same-day hospital or office-based surgery with reusable loop electrode resection is the most cost-effective approach in each settings, but requires experienced surgeons. Finally, the shorter surgical time should be taken into consideration for patients undergoing vaginal polypectomy in the office setting, owing more to patient comfort than to cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Endometrio/cirugía , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/cirugía , Histeroscopía/métodos , Pólipos/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios/métodos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Toma de Decisiones , Electrocirugia/economía , Electrocirugia/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades de los Genitales Femeninos/economía , Humanos , Histeroscopía/economía , Italia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Pólipos/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía
5.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 24(4): 640-645, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28232037

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe safety, tolerability, and effectiveness results through a minimum 2-year follow-up of patients who underwent permanent sterilization with the Essure insert. DESIGN: A retrospective multicenter study (Canadian Task Force classification II2). SETTING: Seven general hospitals and 4 clinical teaching centers in Italy. PATIENTS: A total of 1968 women, mean age 39.5 years (range, 23-48 years) who underwent office hysteroscopic sterilization using the Essure insert between April 1, 2003, and December 30, 2014. INTERVENTION: The women underwent office hysteroscopic bilateral Essure insert placement, with satisfactory device location and tube occlusion based on hysterosalpingography or hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Placement rate, successful bilateral tubal occlusion, perioperative adverse events, early postoperative (during the first 3 months of follow-up), and late complications were evaluated. Satisfactory insertion was accomplished in 97.2% of women and, in 4, perforation and 1 expulsion were detected during hysterosalpingography. Three unintended pregnancies occurred before the 3-month confirmation test. Two pregnancies were reported among women relying on the Essure inserts. Postprocedure pain was minimal and brief; in 9 women, pelvic pain became intractable, necessitating removal of the devices via laparoscopy. On telephone interviews, overall satisfaction was rated as "very satisfied" by the majority of women (97.6%), and no long-term adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The findings from this extended Italian survey further support the effectiveness, tolerability, and satisfaction of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization when motivated women are selected and well informed of the potential risks of the device. Moreover, the results do not demonstrate an increased incidence of complications and pregnancies associated with long-term Essure use. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to nickel may be less suitable candidates for the Essure insert.


Asunto(s)
Esterilización Reproductiva , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Adulto , Trompas Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad , Histerosalpingografía , Histeroscopía , Italia , Laparoscopía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Níquel/efectos adversos , Dolor/etiología , Embarazo , Embarazo no Planeado , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esterilización Reproductiva/efectos adversos , Esterilización Reproductiva/instrumentación , Esterilización Reproductiva/métodos , Esterilización Tubaria/efectos adversos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
6.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 189: 64-7, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25879991

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Polypectomy under hysteroscopic guidance is the treatment of choice for most endometrial polyps, but mechanical or electrical effects at the time of surgery may result in artifactual displacement of tissue with obvious resultant diagnostic problems. The purpose of this study was to record qualitative and quantitative histopathological artifacts and to assess differences between artifacts found in specimens obtained by different surgical polypectomy techniques. STUDY DESIGN: During the period from November 2012 to March 2013, 90 retrospective consecutive polyp histopathological slides and their reports were identified for this study. Initially reported slides were reviewed blind by two histopathologists, who were not provided with any surgical details. The issued reports and those of the reviewing pathologists were then compared. RESULTS: Of the 90 reviewed polyp slides, there was complete agreement on the initial issued report in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of endometrial polyps in an office setting using mechanical instruments, bipolar electrode or a hysteroscopic morcellator provides adequate tissue for histological diagnosis, and there is no difference between these three techniques for adequacy of histological examination, despite the effects of thermal injury or tissue fragmentation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Endometriales/patología , Histeroscopía/métodos , Pólipos/patología , Enfermedades Uterinas/patología , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Artefactos , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pólipos/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades Uterinas/cirugía
7.
Fertil Steril ; 95(6): 2114-5, 2011 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21392751

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the x-ray appearance of Essure microinserts 5 years after their insertion. DESIGN: Prospective controlled study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centers for gynecologic care. PATIENT(S): Forty-five consecutive women with successful hysteroscopic bilateral placement of the Essure devices and postprocedure satisfactory hysterosalpingography confirmation test. INTERVENTION(S): Pelvic anteroposterior x-ray. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Stability and and symmetric appearance of Essure microinsert positions; measurement of the intrauterine distance between the two devices. RESULT(S): After 5 years from their placement, no detachment nor fracture of devices was observed. x-Ray recognition of the device after 5 years showed findings similar to those recorded at 3 months' follow-through hysterosalpingography. CONCLUSION(S): x-Ray evaluation of findings related to stability of position, symmetric appearance, and distance between the two Essure microinserts corroborates the irreversibility and the reliability of the fibrotic reaction that ensured tubal occlusion after devices placement.


Asunto(s)
Dispositivos Intrauterinos , Pelvis/diagnóstico por imagen , Esterilización Tubaria/instrumentación , Esterilización Tubaria/métodos , Adulto , Cuello del Útero , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Histerosalpingografía/métodos , Migración de Dispositivo Intrauterino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Esterilización Tubaria/efectos adversos , Esterilización Tubaria/normas , Factores de Tiempo , Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...