Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 67
Filtrar
1.
Am J Health Promot ; : 8901171241255764, 2024 Jun 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38907369

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To describe the well-being supports provided to health care workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in health centers and hospitals. DESIGN: Cross-sectional qualitative interviews before and after implementation of a peer-based support intervention. SETTING: Purposively sampled hospitals and health centers across the US. PARTICIPANTS: 28 site leaders and 56 HCWs sampled from 16 hospitals and 12 health centers. METHOD: Site leaders and HCWs were asked to describe supports available to HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thematic and content coding and analysis of interview responses were conducted using Dedoose. RESULTS: Both site leaders and HCWs identified a range of support resources available. Communication resources were the most frequently cited in both groups. Health care workers reported bi-directional communication, while one-way communication was emphasized by site leaders. Hospitals highlighted counseling support, particularly Employee Assistance Programs (EAP), while health centers prioritized community support. Wellness activities were more prevalent in hospital settings, while health centers offered specific workplace-provided training for HCWs. Health care workers encountered barriers when accessing support, including limited time, fear of stigma, and disruptions to their existing support networks attributable to the pandemic. CONCLUSION: While there are resources for HCWs, the available supports may not align with their needs and barriers to access may limit the effectiveness of these supports. Continued engagement between leaders and HCWs could help better align resources with needs.

2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e244192, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687482

RESUMEN

Importance: Stress First Aid is an evidence-informed peer-to-peer support intervention to mitigate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being of health care workers (HCWs). Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a tailored peer-to-peer support intervention compared with usual care to support HCWs' well-being at hospitals and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cluster randomized clinical trial comprised 3 cohorts of HCWs who were enrolled from March 2021 through July 2022 at 28 hospitals and FQHCs in the US. Participating sites were matched as pairs by type, size, and COVID-19 burden and then randomized to the intervention arm or usual care arm (any programs already in place to support HCW well-being). The HCWs were surveyed before and after peer-to-peer support intervention implementation. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was used to evaluate the intervention's effect on outcomes, including general psychological distress and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Intervention: The peer-to-peer support intervention was delivered to HCWs by site champions who received training and subsequently trained the HCWs at their site. Recipients of the intervention were taught to respond to their own and their peers' stress reactions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were general psychological distress and PTSD. General psychological distress was measured with the Kessler 6 instrument, and PTSD was measured with the PTSD Checklist. Results: A total of 28 hospitals and FQHCs with 2077 HCWs participated. Both preintervention and postintervention surveys were completed by 2077 HCWs, for an overall response rate of 28% (41% at FQHCs and 26% at hospitals). A total of 862 individuals (696 females [80.7%]) were from sites that were randomly assigned to the intervention arm; the baseline mean (SD) psychological distress score was 5.86 (5.70) and the baseline mean (SD) PTSD score was 16.11 (16.07). A total of 1215 individuals (947 females [78.2%]) were from sites assigned to the usual care arm; the baseline mean (SD) psychological distress score was 5.98 (5.62) and the baseline mean (SD) PTSD score was 16.40 (16.43). Adherence to the intervention was 70% for FQHCs and 32% for hospitals. The ITT analyses revealed no overall treatment effect for psychological distress score (0.238 [95% CI, -0.310 to 0.785] points) or PTSD symptom score (0.189 [95% CI, -1.068 to 1.446] points). Post hoc analyses examined the heterogeneity of treatment effect by age group with consistent age effects observed across primary outcomes (psychological distress and PTSD). Among HCWs in FQHCs, there were significant and clinically meaningful treatment effects for HCWs 30 years or younger: a more than 4-point reduction for psychological distress (-4.552 [95% CI, -8.067 to -1.037]) and a nearly 7-point reduction for PTSD symptom scores (-6.771 [95% CI, -13.224 to -0.318]). Conclusions and Relevance: This trial found that this peer-to-peer support intervention did not improve well-being outcomes for HCWs overall but had a protective effect against general psychological distress and PTSD in HCWs aged 30 years or younger in FQHCs, which had higher intervention adherence. Incorporating this peer-to-peer support intervention into medical training, with ongoing support over time, may yield beneficial results in both standard care and during public health crises. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04723576.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Personal de Salud , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Personal de Salud/psicología , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/terapia , Trastornos por Estrés Postraumático/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo Paritario , Distrés Psicológico , Estados Unidos , Estrés Psicológico/terapia
3.
BMJ Lead ; 2024 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38553036

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To understand the impact of public discourse and reaction around the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare worker (HCW) experiences and well-being caring for patients with COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted 60 min in-depth interviews with 11 physicians and 12 nurses who were providing care to patients with COVID-19 in acute care settings at two health systems in the Western USA. Interviews were conducted in Spring-Summer 2022 using a semi-structured interview protocol that guided respondents through different stages of the pandemic. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data around providing care in the unique social context of the COVID-19 pandemic including: (1) public polarisation and disagreement with science; (2) feelings of hope and optimism during the pandemic and (3) the compounded strain of providing care within this unique social context of the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: To prepare for future pandemics, improved public health communications and social-emotional supports for HCWs are critical to ameliorate the physical and emotional impacts related to the social context of modern US pandemic response.

4.
Vaccine ; 42(8): 1899-1905, 2024 Mar 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38418339

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lyme disease (LD) is the most common vector-borne disease in the United States, with increasing incidence and geographic range. Case incidence peaks among school-aged children. New LD preventives are in clinical trials. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of parents of children aged 5-18 years in states with high or emerging incidence of LD. Our primary outcome was willingness ("definitely" or "probably") for their child to receive an LD vaccine. Our secondary outcome was preference for annual monoclonal antibody injections compared to a 3-dose vaccine series with boosters. Analyses were weighted to reflect parent gender, parent race/ethnicity, and child age by state. RESULTS: Among 1,351 parent respondents, most (68.0 %) would have their child vaccinated against LD, with significantly more being willing in high compared to emerging incidence states (70.4 % versus 63.6 %, p = 0.027). Of parents who were unsure or unwilling, 33.5 % and 16.5 %, respectively, would do so with a provider recommendation. Vaccine safety concerns were among the top reasons for LD vaccine hesitancy. More parents preferred a pre-formed antibody (42.3 %) compared to a 3-dose vaccine series (34.7 %). Significant predictors of willingness to have one's child vaccinated were higher parental education; higher perceived risk of child getting LD; child spending time outdoors daily or weekly; following a regular vaccine schedule; and positive attitude towards vaccines. Significant predictors of preference for monoclonal antibody over a 3-dose vaccine series included prior awareness of LD, living in a rural area, and less positive attitudes towards vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of parents in high and emerging incidence states would vaccinate their children against Lyme disease. Addressing safety concerns will be important, and a health care provider recommendation could also encourage those who are unsure or unwilling. Given the slight preference for monoclonal antibody over vaccine, particularly in rural areas, access to both may increase LD prevention.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Lyme , Vacunas , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Vacunas contra Enfermedad de Lyme , Intención , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedad de Lyme/prevención & control , Padres , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Vacunación
5.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 72(36): 979-984, 2023 Sep 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37676840

RESUMEN

Despite the availability of effective vaccines against pneumococcal disease, pneumococcus is a common bacterial cause of pneumonia, causing approximately 100,000 hospitalizations among U.S. adults per year. In addition, approximately 30,000 invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) cases and 3,000 IPD deaths occur among U.S. adults each year. Previous health care provider surveys identified gaps in provider knowledge about and understanding of the adult pneumococcal vaccine recommendations, and pneumococcal vaccine coverage remains suboptimal. To assess the feasibility and acceptability domains of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Evidence to Recommendations (EtR) framework, a health care provider knowledge and attitudes survey was conducted during September 28-October 10, 2022, by the Healthcare and Public Perceptions of Immunizations Survey Collaborative before the October 2022 ACIP meeting. Among 751 provider respondents, two thirds agreed or strongly agreed with the policy option under consideration to expand the recommendations for the new 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) to adults who had only received the previously recommended 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13). Gaps in providers' knowledge and perceived challenges to implementing recommendations were identified and were included in ACIP's EtR framework discussions in late October 2022 when ACIP updated the recommendations for PCV20 use in adults. Currently, use of PCV20 is recommended for certain adults who have previously received PCV13, in addition to those who have never received a pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. The survey findings indicate a need to increase provider awareness and implementation of pneumococcal vaccination recommendations and to provide tools to assist with patient-specific vaccination guidance. Resources available to address the challenges to implementing pneumococcal vaccination recommendations include the PneumoRecs VaxAdvisor mobile app and other CDC-developed tools, including summary documents and overviews of vaccination schedules and CDC's strategic framework to increase confidence in vaccines and reduce vaccine-preventable diseases, Vaccinate with Confidence.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto , Humanos , Vacunas Conjugadas , Personal de Salud , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Actitud
6.
Am J Crit Care ; 32(5): 368-374, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652873

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented conditions for clinicians providing end-of-life care in acute care settings, yet almost 2 years since the start of the pandemic, little is known about its impact on clinicians. OBJECTIVES: To qualitatively explore how clinicians experienced their role as they cared for dying patients with COVID-19 during the pandemic and the impact of these experiences on their lives as health care professionals. METHODS: In-depth, hour-long interviews were conducted by phone in the spring of 2022 at a single time point with 23 physicians and nurses in critical care and emergency department settings from 2 health systems in California. The goal was to elicit perspectives on experiences with end-of-life care and the long-term impact of these experiences. Clinicians were asked to reflect on the different stages of the pandemic, and interviews were analyzed using a thematic analysis. RESULTS: The interviews highlighted 2 primary themes around provision of end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic. First, clinicians described challenges around their clinical duties of providing care to dying patients, which included decision-making dilemmas and professionalism challenges. Second, clinicians described the emotional aspects around end-of-life care situations they experienced, including communication with family members, "being patients' family members" at the end of life, and various degrees of meaning-making and remembrance of these experiences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the sustained and cumulative emotional challenges and burden clinicians are still shouldering more than 2 years after the start of the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cuidado Terminal , Humanos , Pandemias , Investigación Cualitativa , Cuidados Críticos
7.
J Adolesc Health ; 73(4): 679-685, 2023 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395695

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: COVID-19 vaccine uptake remains low for US adolescents and contributes to excess morbidity and mortality. Most research has assessed parental intention to vaccinate their children. We explored differences between vaccine-acceptant and vaccine-hesitant unvaccinated US adolescents using national survey data. METHODS: A nonprobability, quota-based sample of adolescents, aged 13-17 years, was recruited through an online survey panel in April 2021. One thousand nine hundred twenty seven adolescents were screened for participation and the final sample included 985 responses. We assessed responses from unvaccinated adolescents (n = 831). Our primary measure was COVID-19 vaccination intent ("vaccine-acceptant" defined as "definitely will" get a COVID-19 vaccine and any other response classified as "vaccine-hesitant") and secondary measures included reasons for intending or not intending to get vaccinated and trusted sources of COVID-19 vaccine information. We calculated descriptive statistics and chi-square tests to explore differences between vaccine-acceptant and vaccine-hesitant adolescents. RESULTS: Most (n = 831; 70.9%) adolescents were hesitant, with more hesitancy observed among adolescents with low levels of concern about COVID-19 and high levels of concern about side effects of COVID-19 vaccination. Among vaccine-hesitant adolescents, reasons for not intending to get vaccinated included waiting for safety data and having parents who would make the vaccination decision. Vaccine-hesitant adolescents had a lower number of trusted information sources than vaccine-acceptant adolescents. DISCUSSION: Differences identified between vaccine-acceptant and vaccine-hesitant adolescents can inform message content and dissemination. Messages should include accurate, age-appropriate information about side effects and risks of COVID-19 infection. Prioritizing dissemination of these messages through family members, state and local government officials, and healthcare providers may be most effective.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Niño , Adolescente , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Intención , Salud Pública , Familia , Padres , Vacunación
8.
Pediatrics ; 151(5)2023 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37078242

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Written discharge instructions help to bridge hospital-to-home transitions for patients and families, though substantial variation in discharge instruction quality exists. We aimed to assess the association between participation in an Institute for Healthcare Improvement Virtual Breakthrough Series collaborative and the quality of pediatric written discharge instructions across 8 US hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, interrupted time-series analysis of a medical records-based quality measure focused on written discharge instruction content (0-100 scale, higher scores reflect better quality). Data were from random samples of pediatric patients (N = 5739) discharged from participating hospitals between September 2015 and August 2016, and between December 2017 and January 2020. These periods consisted of 3 phases: 1. a 14-month precollaborative phase; 2. a 12-month quality improvement collaborative phase when hospitals implemented multiple rapid cycle tests of change and shared improvement strategies; and 3. a 12-month postcollaborative phase. Interrupted time-series models assessed the association between study phase and measure performance over time, stratified by baseline hospital performance, adjusting for seasonality and hospital fixed effects. RESULTS: Among hospitals with high baseline performance, measure scores increased during the quality improvement collaborative phase beyond the expected precollaborative trend (+0.7 points/month; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.0; P < .001). Among hospitals with low baseline performance, measure scores increased but at a lower rate than the expected precollaborative trend (-0.5 points/month; 95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -0.2; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Participation in this 8-hospital Institute for Healthcare Improvement Virtual Breakthrough Series collaborative was associated with improvement in the quality of written discharge instructions beyond precollaborative trends only for hospitals with high baseline performance.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Niño , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Registros Médicos , Conducta Cooperativa
9.
Vaccine ; 41(16): 2650-2655, 2023 04 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36990828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends shared clinical decision-making (SCDM) regarding HPV vaccination for adults aged 27-45 years who are not adequately vaccinated. The objective of this survey was to understand physician knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding HPV vaccination in this age group. METHODS: An online survey was administered in June 2021 to physicians who reported practicing internal medicine, family medicine, or obstetrics and gynecology (targeted N = 250 in each practice specialty), selected randomly from potentially eligible physicians from a panel of 2 million U.S. health care providers. RESULTS: In total, 753 physicians participated in the survey: 33.3% practiced internal medicine, 33.1% practiced family medicine, and 33.6% practiced obstetrics/gynecology; 62.5% were male and mean physician age was 52.7 years. Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, at least a third of participating physicians in each practice specialty reported having more HPV vaccine SCDM discussions with patients aged 27-45 years in the past 12 months. While a majority of physicians (79.7%) reported being aware of the SCDM recommendation for adults in this age group, only half of physicians answered an objective knowledge question about SCDM recommendations correctly. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that there are physician knowledge gaps related to SCDM for HPV vaccination. To improve access to HPV vaccination for people most likely to benefit, increasing availability and use of decision aids to support SCDM discussions might help healthcare providers and patients jointly make the most informed decisions about HPV vaccination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Adulto , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Pandemias , Vacunación , Personal de Salud , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud
10.
J Adolesc Health ; 72(5): 667-673, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36609120

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Vaccinating adolescents against COVID-19 while avoiding delays in other routine vaccination is paramount to protecting their health. Our objective was to assess parental preferences to have their adolescents aged 12-17 years receive COVID-19 and other routine vaccines at the same time. METHODS: An online survey with a national, quota-based cross-sectional sample of United States parents of youth aged 12-17 years was fielded in April 2021 ahead of FDA's Emergency Use Authorization of COVID-19 vaccine for age 12-15 years. Parents were asked about their willingness to have their adolescents aged 12-17 years receive both COVID-19 and routine vaccines at the same visit and/or to follow their provider's recommendation. Predictors included demographic characteristics, being behind on routine vaccines, and perceived risks and benefits. RESULTS: Few parents were willing to have their adolescent receive COVID-19 and routine vaccines at the same visit (10.6%) or follow the healthcare provider's recommendation (18.5%). In multivariate analyses, demographic characteristics had no effect on willingness, reporting that the adolescent was behind on routine vaccines correlated with decreased willingness (p = .004). Greater concern about the adolescent getting COVID-19 (p = .001), lower concern about the adolescent having side effects from the COVID-19 vaccine (p = .013), and more positive feelings about vaccines in general (p = .002) were associated with higher willingness. DISCUSSION: Few parents would prefer to have their adolescents receive COVID-19 and routine vaccines at the same visit. Understanding what drives willingness to receive all recommended vaccines in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic could inform policies to optimize adolescent vaccination.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Consentimiento Paterno , Padres , Vacunas , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adolescente , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Padres/psicología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Pandemias , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Estudios Transversales
11.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 70: e9-e16, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36402601

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Burnout among nurses negatively impacts patient care experiences and safety. Inpatient pediatric nurses are high-risk for burnout due to high patient volumes, inadequate staffing, and needing to balance the demands of patients, families and team members. We examined the associations of inpatient pediatric nurse burnout with their perspectives on the importance of quality at the hospital, patient experience measurement, quality improvement (QI), unit culture, and staffing. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study at an urban children's hospital. We surveyed pediatric nurses about their perspectives including the single-item Maslach Burnout Inventory. We fit separate regression models, controlling for role, location and unit, predicting outcome measures from the dichotomized burnout scale. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of pediatric nurses reported burnout. Nurses who had more confidence in patient experience measurement, received frequent patient experience performance reports, felt included in QI, and experienced QI efforts as integrated into patient care reported not being burned out (compared to those reporting burnout; all p-values<0.05). More open communication among nurses (e.g., about possible problems with care) and unit-level teamwork were also associated with not being burned out, whereas a larger QI workload was associated with burnout (p-values<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Open communication among nurses and nurses being more involved and valued in QI efforts were related to not being burned out. Research is needed to further examine aspects of QI involvement that reduce burnout. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Supporting open communication among pediatric nurses, engaging them in QI and integrating QI into patient care while minimizing QI workload may decrease burnout.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Enfermeras Pediátricas , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Niño , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Satisfacción en el Trabajo
12.
Pediatrics ; 150(6)2022 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36321386

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The number of youth presenting to hospitals with suicidality and/or self-harm has increased substantially in recent years. We implemented a multihospital quality improvement (QI) collaborative from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019, aiming for an absolute increase in hospitals' mean rate of caregiver lethal means counseling (LMC) of 10 percentage points (from a baseline mean performance of 68% to 78%) by the end of the collaborative, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the collaborative on LMC, adjusting for secular trends. METHODS: This 8 hospital collaborative used a structured process of alternating learning sessions and action periods to improve LMC across hospitals. Electronic medical record documentation of caregiver LMC was evaluated during 3 phases: precollaborative, active QI collaborative, and postcollaborative. We used statistical process control to evaluate changes in LMC monthly. Following collaborative completion, interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate changes in the level and trend and slope of LMC, adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: In the study, 4208 children and adolescents were included-1314 (31.2%) precollaborative, 1335 (31.7%) during the active QI collaborative, and 1559 (37.0%) postcollaborative. Statistical process control analyses demonstrated that LMC increased from a hospital-level mean of 68% precollaborative to 75% (February 2018) and then 86% (October 2018) during the collaborative. In interrupted time series analyses, there were no significant differences in LMC during and following the collaborative beyond those expected based on pre-collaborative trends. CONCLUSIONS: LMC increased during the collaborative, but the increase did not exceed expected trends. Interventions developed by participating hospitals may be beneficial to others aiming to improve LMC for caregivers of hospitalized youth with suicidality.


Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Prevención del Suicidio , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Ideación Suicida , Consejo
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(11): e2241888, 2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36374504

RESUMEN

This survey study assesses how COVID-19 vaccination differs across historical influenza vaccination patterns and whether influenza vaccination changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/uso terapéutico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
14.
Rand Health Q ; 9(4): 18, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36238000

RESUMEN

TRICARE, the U.S. Department of Defense insurance program for eligible service members and their dependents, provides health care coverage to nearly 2 million children under the age of 18. Survey data and prior evaluations indicate that TRICARE-covered children face challenges in accessing pediatric health care, with the greatest challenges among children who have experienced frequent relocations and children with special health care needs. However, TRICARE has not measured pediatric patient experiences in accessing care since 2010. To fill this gap, RAND researchers analyzed national survey data on the experiences of caregivers of TRICARE-covered children and children with commercial insurance, public insurance, and no insurance to identify differences in access to pediatric care, necessary referrals, care coordination support, ability to pay medical bills, and other factors. Additional analyses highlight variations between children with different TRICARE plans, between children who have changed addresses more and less frequently, and between children with special health care needs and those without. The findings should help inform efforts to increase access to care for children across the Military Health System, as well as improvements to programs designed to support military families during relocations and those with children who have special health care needs.

15.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(8): e2227437, 2022 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35921107

RESUMEN

Importance: Children aged 6 months through 4 years have become eligible for COVID-19 vaccination, but little is known about parental intentions regarding, concerns about, or facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination for this age group. Objectives: To evaluate parental intentions, concerns, and facilitators for COVID-19 vaccination for children aged 6 months through 4 years and to help inform the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices' deliberations and recommendations for COVID-19 vaccination for children aged 6 months through 4 years. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study fielded an online survey from February 2 to 10, 2022, among a nonprobability sample of US parents of children aged 6 months through 4 years who were recruited through Qualtrics using quota-based sampling for respondent gender, race and ethnicity, and child age group. Main Outcomes and Measures: COVID-19 vaccination intentions, time to COVID-19 vaccination, COVID-19 vaccination concerns and facilitators, and trusted COVID-19 vaccination locations for children aged 6 months through 4 years. Results: The final weighted sample of 2031 participants (73.5% participation rate) had more respondents who identified as male (985; weighted percentage, 54.8%) or White (696; weighted percentage, 66.2%), were aged 25 to 49 years (1628; weighted percentage, 85.6%), had at least a bachelor's degree (711; weighted percentage, 40.0%), lived in a metropolitan area (1743; weighted percentage, 82.9%) or the South (961; weighted percentage, 43.4%), or received at least 1 dose of a COVID-19 vaccine (1205; weighted percentage, 59.8%). Half of respondents (645; weighted percentage, 45.6%) indicated that they "definitely" or "probably" will vaccinate their child aged 6 months through 4 years once they became eligible. However, only one-fifth (396; weighted percentage, 19.0%) indicated they would get a COVID-19 vaccine for their child in this age group within 3 months of them becoming eligible for vaccination. Vaccine safety and efficacy were parents' top concerns, and receiving more information about safety and efficacy were the top facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination for this age group. A doctor's office or clinic and local pharmacy were the most trusted COVID-19 vaccination locations for this age group. Conclusions and Relevance: These results suggest that only a minority of parents of children in this age group are eager to vaccinate their children within the first few months of eligibility, with widespread concerns about COVID-19 vaccination for this age group. Thus, considerable efforts to increase parental COVID-19 vaccine confidence for children aged 6 months through 4 years may be needed to maximize COVID-19 vaccination for this age group in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Intención , Masculino , Padres , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
16.
Rand Health Q ; 9(3): 13, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837510

RESUMEN

With new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines authorized by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and likely more to come, the (extraordinarily complex) logistics of deploying them have gotten underway. Public health officials across the country face a daunting task: convincing the majority of individuals to queue up for shots while also maintaining a steady supply of doses and efficient appointment sign-ups. The road ahead is still long and, even with increasing vaccination, will still require adherence with other effective public health behaviors, such as mask-wearing. This article addresses the importance of effectively matching the message, the audience, and the sender for messages to promote uptake of vaccination and of such behaviors as mask-wearing. It offers suggestions about how to leverage such factors as variations in risk perception and variation among U.S. subcultures regarding tendencies to follow rules and to act for the good of the group. The authors also review evidence that suggests health messages should engage directly with misinformation to refute it.

17.
Rand Health Q ; 9(3): 26, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35837512

RESUMEN

This study presents the results of a congressionally mandated, independent assessment of federally funded health services research (HSR) and primary care research (PCR) spanning the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from FYs 2012 to 2018. Through technical expert panels, stakeholder interviews, and a systematic environmental scan of research grants and contracts funded by HHS and the VA, the authors characterize the distinct contributions of agencies in these departments to the federal HSR and PCR enterprise. The authors also identify opportunities to improve detection and coordination of overlap in agency research portfolios, the impacts of HSR and PCR and how they cumulate across research portfolios, and gaps in research funding, methods, and dissemination. The authors offer recommendations to maximize the outcomes and value of future investments in federal HSR and PCR to better guide and serve the needs of a complex and rapidly changing U.S. health care system.

18.
Am Anthropol ; 124(2): 291-306, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35601007

RESUMEN

We conducted a nationally representative survey of parents' beliefs and self-reported behaviors regarding childhood vaccinations. Using Bayesian selection among multivariate models, we found that beliefs, even those without any vaccine or health content, predicted vaccine-hesitant behaviors better than demographics, social network effects, or scientific reasoning. The multivariate structure of beliefs combined many types of ideation that included concerns about both conspiracies and side effects. Although they are not strongly related to vaccine-hesitant behavior, demographics were key predictors of beliefs. Our results support some of the previously proposed pro-vaccination messaging strategies and suggest some new strategies not previously considered.


Realizamos una encuesta nacionalmente representativa sobre las creencias y comportamientos autodeclarados por los padres con relación a la vacunación infantil. Usando selección bayesiana entre modelos multivariados, encontramos que las creencias, aun aquellas sin ningún contenido sobre vacunas o salud, predijeron comportamientos indecisos sobre la vacuna mejor que las características demográficas, los efectos de las redes sociales o el razonamiento científico. La estructura multivariada de las creencias combinó muchos tipos de ideación que incluyó preocupaciones tanto sobre conspiraciones como efectos secundarios. Aunque no están relacionados fuertemente con los comportamientos de indecisión, las características demográficas fueron predictores centrales de las creencias. Nuestros resultados apoyan algunas de las estrategias de mensajes pro­vacunación propuestas previamente y sugieren algunas nuevas estrategias no consideradas anteriormente. [vacunación, encuesta, cultura acumulativa, bayesiana].

19.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 117: 106768, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35470104

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed health care workers at unprecedented risk of stress, burnout, and moral injury. This paper describes the design of an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of Stress First Aid (SFA) to Usual Care (UC) in protecting the well-being of frontline health care workers. METHODS: We plan to recruit a diverse set of hospitals and health centers (eight matched pairs of hospitals and six pairs of centers), with a goal of approximately 50 HCW per health center and 170 per hospital. Participating sites in each pair are randomly assigned to SFA or UC (i.e., whatever psychosocial support is currently being received by HCW). Each site identified a leader to provide organizational support of the study; SFA sites also identified at least one champion to be trained in the intervention. Using a "train the trainer" model, champions in turn trained their peers in selected HCW teams or units to implement SFA over an eight-week period. We surveyed HCW before and after the implementation period. The primary outcomes are posttraumatic stress disorder and general psychological distress; secondary outcomes include depression and anxiety symptoms, sleep problems, social functioning problems, burnout, moral distress, and resilience. In addition, through in-depth qualitative interviews with leaders, champions, and HCW, we assessed the implementation of SFA, including acceptability, feasibility, and uptake. DISCUSSION: Results from this study will provide initial evidence for the application of SFA to support HCW well-being during a pandemic. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (Clinicaltrials.govNCT04723576).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Distrés Psicológico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Pandemias , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...