Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 33(7): 1480-1488, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35510408

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA), an ablative method that causes cell death by irreversible electroporation, has potential safety advantages over radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation. Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was performed in a porcine model to characterize safety and performance of a novel, fully-integrated biphasic PFA system comprising a multi-channel generator, variable loop circular catheter, and integrated PFA mapping software module. METHODS: Eight healthy porcine subjects were included. To evaluate safety, multiple ablations were performed, including sites not generally targeted for therapeutic ablation, such as the right inferior PV lumen, right superior PV ostium, and adjacent to the esophagus and phrenic nerve. To evaluate the efficacy, animals were recovered, followed for 30(±3) days, then re-mapped. Gross pathological and histopathological examinations assessed procedural injuries, chronic thrombosis, tissue ablation, penetration depth, healing, and inflammatory response. RESULTS: All eight animals survived follow-up. PV narrowing was not observed acutely nor at follow-up, even when ablation was performed deep to the PV ostium. No injury was seen grossly or histologically in adjacent structures. All PVs were durably isolated, confirmed by bidirectional block at re-map procedure. Histological examination showed complete, transmural necrosis around the circumference of the ablated section of right PVs. CONCLUSION: This preclinical evaluation of a fully-integrated PFA system demonstrated effective and durable ablation of cardiac tissue and PV isolation without collateral damage to adjacent structures, even when ablation was performed in more extreme settings than those used therapeutically. Histological staining confirmed complete transmural cell necrosis around the circumference of the PV ostium at 30 days.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Venas Pulmonares , Animales , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/patología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Catéteres , Atrios Cardíacos , Humanos , Necrosis/patología , Necrosis/cirugía , Porcinos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 62(3): 487-494, 2021 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34212280

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Catheter ablation has become a mainstay therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid innovation over the past decade. Variability in ablation techniques may impact efficiency, safety, and efficacy; and the ideal strategy is unknown. Real-world evidence assessing the impact of procedural variations across multiple operators may provide insight into these questions. The Real-world Experience of Catheter Ablation for the Treatment of Symptomatic Paroxysmal (PAF) and Persistent (PsAF) Atrial Fibrillation registry (Real-AF) is a multicenter prospective registry that will enroll patients at high volume centers, including academic institutions and private practices, with operators performing ablations primarily with low fluoroscopy when possible. The study will also evaluate the contribution of advent in technologies and workflows to real-world clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients presenting at participating centers are screened for enrollment. Data are collected at the time of procedure, 10-12 weeks, and 12 months post procedure and include patient and detailed procedural characteristics, with short and long-term outcomes. Arrhythmia recurrences are monitored through standard of care practice which includes continuous rhythm monitoring at 6 and 12 months, event monitors as needed for routine care or symptoms suggestive of recurrence, EKG performed at every visit, and interrogation of implanted device or ILR when applicable. RESULTS: Enrollment began in January 2018 with a single site. Additional sites began enrollment in October 2019. Through May 2021, 1,243 patients underwent 1,269 procedures at 13 institutions. Our goal is to enroll 4000 patients. DISCUSSION: Real-AF's multiple data sources and detailed procedural information, emphasis on high volume operators, inclusion of low fluoroscopy operators, and use of rigorous standardized follow-up methodology allow systematic documentation of clinical outcomes associated with changes in ablation workflow and technologies over time. Timely data sharing may enable real-time quality improvements in patient care and delivery. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04088071 (registration date: September 12, 2019).


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Recurrencia , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 61(1): 63-69, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32462550

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The prospective, multicenter SMART SF trial demonstrated the acute safety and effectiveness of the 56-hole porous tip irrigated contact force (CF) catheter for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) ablation with a low primary adverse event rate (2.5%), leading to FDA approval of the catheter. Here, we are reporting the long-term effectiveness and safety results that have not yet been reported. METHODS: Ablations were performed using the 56-hole porous tip irrigated CF catheter guided by the 3D mapping system stability module. The primary effectiveness endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia (including atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia, and/or atrial flutter), based on electrocardiographic data at 12 months. Atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence occurring 3 months post procedure, acute procedural failures such as lack of entrance block confirmation of all PVs, and undergoing repeat procedure for atrial fibrillation in the evaluation period (91 to 365 days post the initial ablation procedure) were considered to be effectiveness failures. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients (age 64.8 ± 9.7 years; male 52.6%; Caucasian 96.2%) participated in the 12-month effectiveness evaluation. Mean follow-up time was 373.5 ± 45.4 days. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of freedom from 12-month atrial tachyarrhythmia was 74.9%. Two procedure-related pericardial effusion events were reported at 92 and 180 days post procedure. There were no pulmonary vein stenosis complications or deaths reported through the 12-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The SMART SF 12-month follow-up evaluation corroborates the early safety and effectiveness success previously reported for PAF ablation with STSF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Venas Pulmonares , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Catéteres , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Porosidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
J Atr Fibrillation ; 11(4): 2059, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31139281

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Significant improvements in catheter technology, electro-anatomic (EA) mapping and techniques to reduce fluoroscopy during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) are on-going.However, few educational opportunities are available post fellowship for Electrophysiologists (EPs) to understand and integrate them into their practice, preventing wide spread adoption. The impact of observational learning for adoption of new technologies and techniques in the field of cardiac electrophysiology has not been studied. We sought to report the impact of a visit to a high-volume center with experience in new technologies and fluoroscopy reductionto the clinical practice of EPs. METHODS: Between 8/2014 and 10/2017 a total of 150 EPs visited 3 hospitals that perform a high volume of AF RFAs. EPs observed a minimum of 4 RFAs, primarily AF. AF RFAs were performed without fluoroscopy, using Carto 3 Version 4 (Biosense Webster) and intracardiac Echocardiography. There was ample interaction and discussion between hosting and visiting EP. RESULTS: 73 EPs (48.6% of visitors) completed an electronic survey after the visit. The majority reported a significant reduction in fluoroscopy (>50%) and procedure (>20%).68% adopted a rigorous workflow and reported an increase in their confidence level with intracardiac echo (79%), continuous mapping (52%) and the Visitag module (61%). CONCLUSIONS: Observational experience can have an immense impact on the clinical practice of EPs. Further effort should be devoted to such programs and to study in a more systematic way their ultimate impact on patient care.

5.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 40(4): 391-400, 2017 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28151545

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases significantly with age. Little is known about the effect of AF ablation on quality of life and healthcare utilization in the elderly. The objective of this study was to quantify the healthcare utilization and quality of life benefits of catheter ablation for AF, for patients ≥65 years compared to patients <65 years. METHODS: Two multicenter U.S. registry studies enrolled patients with paroxysmal AF. Baseline characteristics and acute outcomes were collected for 736 patients receiving catheter ablation with the Navistar® ThermoCool® SF Catheter (Biosense Webster, Inc., Diamond Bar, CA, USA). Healthcare utilization and quality of life outcomes were collected through 1 year postablation for 508 patients. RESULTS: The rates of acute pulmonary vein isolation were high and similar between patients ≥65 years and <65 years (97.5% vs 95.8%, P = 0.2130). Length of stay for the index procedure was similar between age groups with 82.2% of the older group and 83.2% of the younger group having one-day hospitalization. Disease-specific quality of life instrument scores improved significantly and similarly for older and younger patients at 1 year postablation, compared to baseline. AF-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits were similar or lower in older patients compared to younger patients, as reported at 1 year postablation. CONCLUSION: For older patients undergoing catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF, healthcare utilization parameters were lower or not significantly different than for younger patients, and quality of life outcomes were similarly improved. These findings support the use of catheter ablation as a treatment option in older patients with paroxysmal AF.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/psicología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Ablación por Catéter/psicología , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos , Adulto Joven
6.
Heart Rhythm ; 13(5): 1030-1036, 2016 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26872554

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Published studies of epicardial ligation of left atrial appendage (LAA) have reported discordant results. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to delineate the safety and efficacy of LAA closure with the LARIAT device. METHODS: This is a multicenter registry of 712 consecutive patients undergoing LAA ligation with LARIAT at 18 US hospitals. The primary end point was successful suture deployment, no leak by intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and no major complication (death, stroke, cardiac perforation, and bleeding requiring transfusion) at discharge. A leak of 2-5 mm on follow-up TEE was the secondary end point. RESULTS: LARIAT was successfully deployed in 682 patients (95.5%). A complete closure was achieved in 669 patients (98%), while 13 patients (1.8%) had a trace leak (<2 mm). There was 1 death related to the procedure. Ten patients (1.44%) had cardiac perforation necessitating open heart surgery, while another 14 (2.01%) did not need surgery. The risk of cardiac perforation decreased significantly after the introduction of a micropuncture (MP) needle for pericardial access. Delayed complications (pericarditis requiring >2 weeks of treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs/colchicine and pericardial and pleural effusion after discharge) occurred in 34 (4.78%) patients, and the risk decreased significantly with the periprocedural use of colchicine. Follow-up TEE (n = 480) showed a leak of 2-5 mm in 6.5% and a thrombus in 2.5%. One patient had a leak of >5 mm. CONCLUSION: LARIAT effectively closes the LAA and has acceptable procedural risks with the evolution of the use of the micropuncture needle for pericardial access and the use of colchicine for mitigating the postinflammatory response associated with LAA ligation and pericardial access.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares , Lesiones Cardíacas , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Efectos Adversos a Largo Plazo/epidemiología , Pericarditis , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardiovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Lesiones Cardíacas/epidemiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/etiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/prevención & control , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/prevención & control , Ligadura/efectos adversos , Ligadura/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pericarditis/epidemiología , Pericarditis/etiología , Punciones/instrumentación , Punciones/métodos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
7.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 64(6): 565-72, 2014 Aug 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25104525

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) ligation may represent an alternative to oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the early safety and efficacy of transcatheter ligation of the LAA for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter study of consecutive patients undergoing LAA ligation with the Lariat device at 8 U.S. sites. The primary endpoint was procedural success, defined as device success (suture deployment and <5 mm leak by post-procedure transesophageal echocardiography), and no major complication at discharge (death, myocardial infarction, stroke, Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding type 3 or greater, or cardiac surgery). Post-discharge management was per operator discretion. RESULTS: A total of 154 patients were enrolled. Median CHADS2 score (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥ 75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, transient ischemic attack, or thromboembolism [doubled]) was 3 (interquartile range: 2 to 4). Device success was 94%, and procedural success was 86%. A major complication occurred in 15 patients (9.7%). There were 14 major bleeds (9.1%), driven by the need for transfusion (4.5%). Significant pericardial effusion occurred in 16 patients (10.4%). Follow-up was available in 134 patients at a median of 112 days (interquartile range: 50 to 270 days): Death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 4 patients (2.9%). Among 63 patients with acute closure and transesophageal echocardiography follow-up, there were 3 thrombi (4.8%) and 13 (20%) with residual leak. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial multicenter experience of LAA ligation with the Lariat device, the rate of acute closure was high, but procedural success was limited by bleeding. A prospective randomized trial is required to adequately define clinical efficacy, optimal post-procedure medical therapy, and the effect of operator experience on procedural safety.


Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Ligadura , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
J Cardiol ; 55(1): 1-12, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20122543

RESUMEN

Cardiologists and physicians have witnessed a significant change in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF): antiarrhythmic agents are no longer considered more effective than just merely using compounds that control ventricular response of the arrhythmia with anticoagulation in high-risk patients. Catheter ablation has grown into wider acceptance as an important therapeutic modality in treating tachyarrhythmias. And over the past decade, several studies have clearly established that catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation is safe and effective and is an important alternative therapeutic option to the pharmacological approach. In general, there are two approaches to AF ablation: The anatomical approach, the most popular one, relies on isolation of electrical connections of all four pulmonary veins to the left atrium with or without adjuvant ablations, i.e. additional linear ablations. The second approach is the electrogram-guided approach by mapping and targeting areas of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) which is the main topic of this review. The myriad pathologies leading to and resulting from AF have led to many theories regarding how substrate should be defined and how to reconcile substrate ablation with trigger ablation. The identification of spatiotemporally stable areas of very low amplitude short cycle length CFAE in a sea of otherwise discrete normal amplitude and relatively longer cycle length electrograms led to ablate the CFAE as a marker of abnormal substrate. This pure substrate-based ablation strategy has resulted in remarkable success, including mortality benefit, even in high-risk patients with very long standing persistent AF. In this review, we discuss in detail the prevailing mechanisms underlying CFAE, how to map and ablate CFAE sites, correlation of CFAE areas to those of ganglionic plexi, clinical outcomes of the approach, and the role of CFAE in the hybrid approach of AF ablation using a combination of pulmonary vein isolation and targeting CFAE areas.


Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Mapeo del Potencial de Superficie Corporal/métodos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Electrocardiografía , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...