Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Surg Oncol ; 36: 115-119, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33341606

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to analyze the long-term prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence and their impact on quality of life in patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer treated with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + HIPEC). METHODS: This cross-sectional study included a series of patients with advanced and recurrent ovarian cancer treated by CRS + HIPEC, with a disease-free period of at least 12 months after the procedure. Urinary incontinence was evaluated using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF), fecal incontinence using the Wexner test and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire and global quality of life using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were included in the study, with a median age of 55 years (range 28-78). The urinary incontinence rate was 45% and the fecal incontinence rate was 20%. Up to 14% of the patients presented both types of incontinence. The presence of urinary or fecal incontinence generated a significant negative impact on quality of life in relation to patients without incontinence. DISCUSSION: Urinary and fecal incontinence is frequent in the follow-up of ovarian cancer patients treated with CRS + HIPEC. Reconsidering the approach to the pelvis without peritoneal metastases in the peritoneum could modify the incidence of these pelvic floor dysfunctions.


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Incontinencia Fecal/patología , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Incontinencia Urinaria de Urgencia/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Estudios Transversales , Incontinencia Fecal/etiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Pronóstico , Incontinencia Urinaria de Urgencia/etiología
2.
Hernia ; 24(2): 257-263, 2020 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31069579

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of incisional hernia in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies treated by cytoreduction plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains unclear, and the criteria commonly used to indicate their repair cannot be applied in these patients. The objective of this work was to analyze the incidence of incisional hernias in these patients, identify the risk factors associated with their appearance, and propose an algorithm for their management. METHODS: We analyzed a series of patients with malignant pathologies of the peritoneal surface treated by cytoreduction with peritonectomy and HIPEC procedures between January 2008 and June 2017. Only patients with a minimum postoperative follow-up period of 12 months were included. RESULTS: Our series included 282 patients, 28 (10%) of whom developed an incisional hernia during the follow-up period. Fifty-one patients, all with ovarian cancer with peritoneal dissemination, did not receive HIPEC after cytoreduction as they were part of the control arm of the CARCINOHIPEC clinical trial (NCT02328716) or because they did not provide specific informed consent. In the multivariate analysis, treatment with HIPEC (OR 2.56, 95% CI [1.57, 4.31], p = 0.032) and the administration of preoperative systemic chemotherapy (OR = 1.59, 95% CI [1.26, 3.58], p = 0.041) were found to be independent factors related to the appearance of an incisional hernia. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of incisional hernia after cytoreduction and HIPEC is within the ranges described in the literature for other abdominal surgery procedures. The use of systemic chemotherapy and treatment with HIPEC, in particular, were identified as factors related to their occurrence.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/efectos adversos , Hernia Incisional/epidemiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Herniorrafia , Humanos , Incidencia , Hernia Incisional/etiología , Hernia Incisional/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Peritoneo/patología , Peritoneo/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , España/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
3.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 37(6): 543-8, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21489742

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse peritoneal dissemination in advanced ovarian cancer can be treated using optimal effort surgery involving peritonectomy procedures and the administration of hyperthermic intraoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). OBJECTIVE: To report on our experience in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer using peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC through the fast track program. PATIENTS AND METHOD: From September 2008 until May 2010, forty-six patients with primary advanced (stage III-C) or recurrent ovarian cancer have been included in the fast track protocol if they had optimal cytoreduction CC-0 or CC-1 accompanied by HIPEC and there had no more than one digestive anastomosis. RESULTS: The mean peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was 12.35 (3-21). The median operation time was 380 min (200-540). Optimal surgery CC-0 was achieved in 38 of the 46 patients and CC-1 in the remaining 8. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.94 ± 1.56 days (3-11). Major morbidity rates were 15.3%. Paralytic ileus was the most frequent of these. There was no mortality related to the procedure. CONCLUSION: Surgery with peritonectomy procedures and HIPEC in advanced ovarian carcinoma is possible under fast track surgery programs in patients with low volume peritoneal carcinomatosis. Prospective and randomized studies are needed.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma/terapia , Hipertermia Inducida , Neoplasias Ováricas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma/secundario , Carcinoma/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Intestinos/cirugía , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Neoplasias Ováricas/cirugía , Ovariectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Esplenectomía , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...