ERS statement on transition of care in childhood interstitial lung diseases.

Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) are a heterogeneous group of rare diffuse diseases affecting the lung parenchyma in children and adults. Childhood interstitial lung diseases (chILD) are often diagnosed at very young age, affect the developing lung, and can have different presentations and prognosis compared to adult forms of these diseases. In addition, chILD in many cases may apparently remit, and have a better response to therapy and better prognosis than adult ILD. Many affected children will reach adulthood with minimal activity or clinical remission of the disease. They need continuing care and follow-up from childhood to adulthood if the disease persists and progresses over time, but also if they are asymptomatic and in full remission. Therefore, for every chILD patient an active transition process from paediatric to adult care should be guaranteed. This European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement provides a review of the literature and current practice concerning transition of care in chILD. It draws on work in existing transition care programmes in other chronic respiratory diseases, disease-overarching transition-of-care programmes, evidence on the impact of these programmes on clinical outcomes, current evidence regarding long-term remission of chILD as well as the lack of harmonisation between the current adult ILD and chILD classifications impacting on transition of care. While the transition system is well established in several chronic diseases, such as cystic fibrosis or diabetes mellitus, we could not find sufficient published evidence on transition systems in chILD. This statement summarises current knowledge, but cannot yet provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.

Experiences of UK-based adult transition services for interstitial lung disease in childhood: "There's a lot less cushioning".

Interstitial lung disease in childhood (chILD) is rare and no longer purely a childhood issue as many survive into adulthood, and so have to transition from pediatric to adult healthcare services. Transition is a significant life event that has the potential to impact on physical and mental health outcomes. The European Respiratory Society (ERS) statement on chILD transition highlighted the lack of standardised transition services for chILD transition resulting in a haphazard process. This qualitative study explores how young people and parents in the United Kingdom experienced transition from paediatric to adult healthcare services for chILD. Participants (n = 7) were recruited from chILD patient organisations and online communities. We focused on the experience of transition exploring if there were any information packs or support provided for the transition. Such support may be generic, such as "Ready Steady Go" which provides a systematic approach to transition and disease-specific literature. These latter have not been developed for ILD. Data were analysed by constructivist grounded theory. We present a lived experience of transition with themes of lack of transition preparation and planning, challenges of adapting to adult services, and a changing healthcare scene. Due to the complexity of chILD, parents discussed their need to remain, in part, as an advocate for the young person. Respondents provided recommendations for how transition could be improved along with tips for young people who are new to the transition process, which include educating oneself about the condition, learning medical terminology, and reaching out for support.

Diagnostic workup of childhood interstitial lung disease.

Childhood interstitial lung diseases (chILDs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases with significant morbidity and mortality. An accurate and quick aetiological diagnosis may contribute to better management and personalised treatment. On behalf of the European Respiratory Society Clinical Research Collaboration for chILD (ERS CRC chILD-EU), this review summarises the roles of the general paediatrician, paediatric pulmonologists and expert centres in the complex diagnostic workup. Each patient's aetiological chILD diagnosis must be reached without prolonged delays in a stepwise approach from medical history, signs, symptoms, clinical tests and imaging, to advanced genetic analysis and specialised procedures including bronchoalveolar lavage and biopsy, if necessary. Finally, as medical progress is fast, the need to revisit a diagnosis of "undefined chILD" is stressed.

Interstitial lung disease in infancy.

There is a wide differential diagnosis of early onset respiratory distress especially in term babies, and interstitial lung disease (chILD) is a rare but important consideration in this context. chILD manifesting immediately after birth is usually related to mutations in surfactant protein genes, or conditions related to the Congenital Acinar Dysplasia -Alveolar capillary dysplasia - Congenital Alveolar Dysplasia (CAD-ACD) spectrum. There is currently no specific treatment for these conditions, and management is supportive. Prognosis is very poor in most of these babies if onset is early, with relentless respiratory deterioration unless transplanted. Ideally, the diagnosis is made on genetic analysis, but this may be time-consuming and complex in CAD-ACD spectrum, so lung biopsy may be needed to avoid prolonged and futile treatment being instituted. Milder forms with prolonged survival have been reported. Early onset, less severe chILD is usually related to neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia of infancy (NEHI), pulmonary interstitial glycogenosis (PIG) and less severe disorders of surfactant proteins. PIG and NEHI are not specific entities, but are pulmonary dysmaturity syndromes, and there may be a number of underlying genetic and other cause. If the child is stable and thriving, many will not be subject to lung biopsy, and slow improvement and weaning of supplemental oxygen can be anticipated. Where possible, a precise genetic diagnosis should be made in early onset cHILD allow for genetic counselling. chILD survivors and their families have complex respiratory and other needs, and co-ordinated, multi-disciplinary support in the community is essential.

Childhood interstitial lung disease: Family experiences.

AIMS: To present experiences of UK families of children diagnosed with ILD, to inform clinical practice and service development. METHODS: Thirty seven such families completed an anonymous web-based survey between February and March 2014. RESULTS: Median time from first symptoms to diagnosis was 25 weeks. Most reported that they were happy with the overall management of their child. Areas highlighted for development included improved communication especially the need for written information; psychological support (91% reported anxiety). Feeding issues (not described in current literature) were reported by 77% and persisted in 35%. Other requests included better written communication between hospitals with training for smaller hospitals, and improved specialist nurse support for children with ILD. CONCLUSIONS: These family perspectives need to be addressed by professionals looking after these children as well as when planning of future services.

Research in progress: put the orphanage out of business.

Paediatric interstitial lung disease (ILD) is rare and diverse, meaning no single centre will see sufficient children to perform the studies needed to make progress. This EU FP-7 grant will standardise the evaluation of these rare conditions by establishing pan-European multidisciplinary expert panels and establish consensus on treatment protocols and standard operating procedures across Europe. We will work with patient groups to determine optimal treatment end-points and biomarkers. A biobank will be established as a Europe-wide resource for mechanistic studies. Ultimately we aim to do the first randomised controlled trial of a pharmacological treatment in paediatric ILD.