Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 27(10): 1035-1045, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047790

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and comorbid subsyndromal depressive symptoms are at elevated risk for incidental major depression or anxiety disorders. Using an indicated prevention paradigm, the authors conducted a sequenced multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) to: 1) evaluate the effect of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and physical therapy (PT), together with the temporal ordering of these interventions, on patient-reported global impression of change (P-GIC), mood, anxiety, and pain; and 2) compare the strategies' impact on incidence of common psychiatric disorders over 12-months. METHODS: This intervention development trial compared four adaptive strategies delivered in two stages (each up to 8 weeks), contrasted with enhanced usual care (EUC). The strategies were CBT followed by an increased dose of CBT (CBT-CBT), CBT followed by PT (CBT-PT), PT followed by an increased dose of PT (PT-PT), and PT followed by CBT (PT-CBT). Participants (n = 99) were aged 60 years and older and met clinical criteria for knee OA and subthreshold depression. Response was defined as at least "much better" on the P-GIC. Participants were assessed quarterly for 12 months for incidence of psychiatric disorders. RESULTS: Stage 1 response was higher for PT (47.5%) compared to CBT (20.5%). Non-responders receiving an additional dose of the same intervention experienced a response rate of 73%, higher than for switching to a different intervention. All strategies were superior to EUC (5%). Although not powered to detect effects on disorders, neither intervention strategy nor response status affected 12-month incidence of depression and anxiety disorders. CONCLUSION: As response rates were similar for PT-PT and CBT-CBT, it may be dose and not type of these interventions that are necessary for clinical benefit. For non-responders, this finding may guide providers to stay the clinical course for up to 12 weeks before switching. These results support future trials of SMART designs in late-life depression prevention.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/prevención & control , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/prevención & control , Osteoartritis de la Rodilla/psicología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 24(1): 94-102, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26706911

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Addressing subthreshold depression (indicated prevention) and vulnerabilities that increase the risk of major depression or anxiety disorders (selective prevention) is important for protecting mental health in old age. The Depression-Agency Based Collaborative (Dep-ABC) is a prevention trial involving older adults recruited from aging services sites (home care agencies, senior housing, senior centers) who meet criteria for subthreshold depression and disability. Therefore, the authors examine the effectiveness of partnerships with aging services sites for recruiting at-risk older adults, the quality of recruitment and acceptability of the Dep-ABC assessment and intervention, and the baseline status of participants. METHODS: Dep-ABC is a single-blind randomized controlled prevention trial set in aging services settings but with centralized screening, randomization, in-home assessments, and follow-up. Its intervention arm involves six to eight sessions of problem-solving therapy, in which older adults aged 60+ learn to break down problems that affect well-being and develop strategies to address them. We examined participation rates to assess quality of recruitment across sites and level of disability according to service use. RESULTS: Dep-ABC randomized 104 participants, 68.4% of eligible older adults. Screening using self-reported disability successfully netted a sample in which 74% received home care agency services, with remaining participants similarly impaired in structured self-reports of impairment and on observed performance tests. CONCLUSION: Direct outreach to aging services providers is an effective way to identify older adults with service needs at high risk of major depression. Problem-solving therapy is acceptable to this population and can be added to current services.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/prevención & control , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/prevención & control , Solución de Problemas , Psicoterapia/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Humanos , Masculino , Salud Mental , Selección de Paciente , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Proyectos de Investigación , Método Simple Ciego
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...