Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1080, 2020 Jul 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32646397

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The use of electronic referrals (eReferrals) to state quitlines (QLs) for tobacco-using patients is a promising approach for addressing smoking cessation on a large scale. However, QL contact, enrollment, and completion rates are low. The purpose of this study was to examine the eReferral to QL process from the patient's perspective in order to inform strategies for improving QL engagement. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 55 patients who agreed to an eReferral at a primary care visit to 1 of 8 safety-net community health centers in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (September 2017-August 2018). Interviews were designed to explore the experiences of three subgroups of patients who subsequently: 1) declined participation in the QL; 2) were unreachable by the QL; or 3) were enrolled in or had completed the QL program. Analysis was guided by a phenomenological approach designed to identify emergent themes. RESULTS: Reasons for QL program non-completion included changing life circumstances and events making cessation unviable; misunderstandings about the QL; discomfort with telephonic counseling; perceived lack of time for counseling; cell phone barriers; and having already quit smoking. We found that some individuals who were no longer engaged with the QL still desired continued support from the QL. CONCLUSIONS: Participants intentionally and unintentionally disengage from the QL for a wide variety of reasons, several of which are mediated by low socioeconomic status. Integrating QL care with community-based resources that address these mediators could be a promising strategy.


Asunto(s)
Líneas Directas , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Consejo/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio/epidemiología , Investigación Cualitativa , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Cese del Hábito de Fumar/psicología , Fumar Tabaco
2.
J Gen Intern Med ; 35(11): 3234-3242, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32705473

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: Guidelines urge primary care practices to routinely provide tobacco cessation care (i.e., assess tobacco use, provide brief cessation advice, and refer to cessation support). This study evaluates the impact of a systems-based strategy to provide tobacco cessation care in eight primary care clinics serving low-income patients. METHODS: A non-randomized stepped wedge study design was used to implement an intervention consisting of (1) changes to the electronic health record (EHR) referral functionality and (2) expansion of staff roles to provide brief advice to quit; assess readiness to quit; offer a referral to tobacco cessation counseling; and sign the referral order. Outcomes assessed from the EHR include performance of tobacco cessation care tasks, referral contact, and enrollment rates for the quitline (QL) and in-house Freedom from Smoking (FFS) program. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) methods were used to compute odds ratios contrasting the pre-implementation vs. 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month post-implementation periods. RESULTS: Of the 176,061 visits, 26.1% were by identified tobacco users. All indicators significantly increased at each time period evaluated post-implementation. In comparison with the pre-intervention period, assessing smoking status (26.6% vs. 55.7%; OR = 3.7, CI = 3.6-3.9), providing advice (44.8% vs. 88.7%; OR = 7.8, CI = 6.6-9.1), assessing readiness to quit (15.8% vs. 55.0%; OR = 6.2, CI = 5.4-7.0), and acceptance of a referral to tobacco cessation counseling (0.5% vs. 30.9%; OR = 81.0, CI = 11.4-575.8) remained significantly higher 12 months post-intervention. For the QL and FFS, respectively, there were 1223 and 532 referrals; 324 (31.1%) and 103 (24.7%) were contacted; 241 (74.4%) and 72 (69.6%) enrolled; and 195 (80.9%) and 14 (19.4%) received at least one counseling session. CONCLUSIONS: This system change intervention that includes an EHR-supported role expansion substantially increased the provision of tobacco cessation care and improvements were sustained beyond 1 year. This approach has the potential to greatly increase the number of individuals referred for tobacco cessation counseling.


Asunto(s)
Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Cese del Uso de Tabaco , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Humanos , Atención Primaria de Salud , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad
3.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf ; 45(12): 798-807, 2019 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648946

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Guidelines urge primary care practices to routinely provide tobacco cessation care, but quality indicators for the provision of advice and assistance to quit smoking lag. This study evaluated the implementation of a systems-based strategy to improve performance of tobacco cessation care in primary care clinics. METHODS: Changes to the electronic health record (EHR) facilitated staff to document when they ask about tobacco use, advise the patient to quit, offer to connect the patient to a quitline (QL) counselor, and refer interested patients to receive a call from a QL. Medical assistants (MAs) were trained to use the new sections of the EHR, and their roles were expanded to include the provision of brief cessation advice and activation of the QL referral. Primary outcomes were change in tobacco cessation processes preimplementation vs. one, three, and six months postimplementation of the strategy. RESULTS: The increase in performance of tobacco cessation care was significant and sustained at six months postimplementation for assessing smoking status (50.9% vs. 76.3%; odds ratio [OR] = 3.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.80-3.31), providing advice (15.1% vs. 92.7%; OR = 69.3; 95% CI = 51.88-92.60), assessing readiness to quit (22.8% vs. 76.6%; OR = 10.80; 95% CI = 8.92-13.08), and accepting a referral to the QL (1.3% vs. 21.7%; OR = 20.31; 95% CI = 4.91-84.05). CONCLUSION: Key stakeholder engagement informed a system change intervention that includes an EHR-supported role expansion of MAs for QL referrals; these changes substantially increased the provision of tobacco cessation care.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Rol Profesional , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/organización & administración , Cese del Uso de Tabaco/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Femenino , Personal de Salud/educación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Proyectos Piloto , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad/normas , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...