A systematic review of exercise studies for individuals hospitalized with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Focus on the principles of exercise training.

BACKGROUND: For exercise interventions to be effectively reproduced or applied in a "real world" clinical setting, clinical trials must thoroughly document all components of the exercise prescription and ensure that participants adhere to each component. However, previous reviews have not critically examined the quality of exercise prescription of inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) programs. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this review were to evaluate the (a) application of the principles of exercise training, (b) reporting of the frequency, intensity, time and type (FITT) components of exercise prescription, and (c) reporting of patient's adherence to the FITT components in intervention studies for patients admitted to hospital for an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). METHODS: Relevant scientific databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared in-hospital PR with usual care for people hospitalized with AECOPD. Title and abstract followed by full-text screening were conducted independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted and synthesized to evaluate the application of the principles of exercise training and the reporting/adherence of the FITT components. RESULTS: Twenty-seven RCTs were included. Only two applied all principles of exercise training. Specificity was applied by 70%, progression by 48%, overload by 37%, initial values by 89% and diminishing returns and reversibility by 37% of trials. Ten trials adequately reported all FITT components. Frequency and type were the components most reported (85% and 81%, respectively), while intensity was less frequently reported (52%). Only three trials reported on the patient's adherence to all four components. CONCLUSIONS: Studies have not adequately reported the exercise prescription in accordance with the principles of exercise training nor reported all the FITT components of the exercise prescription and patient's adherence to them. Therefore, interpretation of the current literature is limited and information for developing exercise prescriptions to individuals hospitalized with an AECOPD is lacking.

Safety and Efficacy of Inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients Hospitalized with an Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) during hospitalization for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) occurs during a period of disease instability for the patient, and the safety and efficacy of PR, specifically during the hospitalization period, have not been established. Objective: The purpose of this review is to determine the safety and efficacy of PR during the hospitalization phase for individuals with AECOPD. Methods: Scientific databases were searched up to August 2022 for randomized controlled trials that compared in-hospital PR with usual care. PR programs commenced during the hospitalization and included a minimum of two sessions. Titles and abstracts followed by full-text screening and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers. The intervention effect estimates were calculated through meta-analysis using a random-effect model. Results: A total of 27 studies were included (n = 1,317). The meta-analysis showed that inpatient PR improved the 6-minute-walk distance by 105 m (P < 0.001). Inpatient PR improved the performance on the five-repetition sit-to-stand test by -7.02 seconds (P = 0.03). Quality of life (QOL), as measured by the 5-level EuroQoL Group-5 dimension version (EQ-ED-5L) and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, was significantly improved by the intervention. Inpatient PR increased lower limb muscle strength by 33.35 N (P < 0.001). There was no change in the length of stay. Only one serious adverse event related to the intervention was reported. Conclusions: This review suggests that it is safe and effective to provide PR during hospitalization for individuals with AECOPD. In-hospital PR improves functional exercise capacity, QOL, and lower limb strength without prolonging the hospital length of stay.

Collection of patient race, ethnicity, and language data in emergency departments: a national survey.

PURPOSE: There is mounting evidence of racial and ethnic discrimination in the Canadian health care system. Patient level race and ethnicity data are required to identify potential disparities in clinical outcomes and access to health care. However, it is not known what patient race, ethnicity, and language data are collected by Canadian hospitals. This gap limits opportunities to identify and address inequalities in the health care system. The emergency department (ED) is a major point of contact for many patients accessing the health care system, and is therefore a reasonable place to conduct analysis of patient data collection. This study aims to quantify the proportion of Canadian EDs that collect patient race, ethnicity, and primary language data. METHODS: We identified all Canadian EDs and distributed a survey to 616 EDs across the country. RESULTS: We received responses representing 202 EDs (32.8%). One fifth (20.3%) of responding EDs reported that they collected race and ethnicity data and 38.1% collected primary language data. Reported uses for these data included quality improvement, research, and direct patient care. CONCLUSION: The majority of Canadian EDs do not collect patient race, ethnicity, and language data. This gap limits our ability to identify inequalities in health outcomes or access to health care. Lack of race, ethnicity, and language data also hinders our ability to develop and evaluate programs and interventions that aim to correct these inequalities.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Il existe de plus en plus de preuves de discrimination raciale et ethnique dans le système de soins de santé canadien. Les données relatives à la race et à l'ethnicité des patients sont nécessaires pour identifier les disparités potentielles dans les résultats cliniques et l'accès aux soins de santé. Cependant, on ne sait pas quelles données sur la race, l'ethnicité et la langue des patients sont recueillies par les hôpitaux canadiens. Cette lacune limite les possibilités d'identifier et de traiter les inégalités dans le système de soins de santé. Le service des urgences (SU) est un point de contact majeur pour de nombreux patients accédant au système de soins de santé, et constitue donc un endroit raisonnable pour mener une analyse de la collecte de données sur les patients. Cette étude vise à quantifier la proportion de services d'urgence canadiens qui recueillent des données sur la race, l'origine ethnique et la langue principale des patients. MéTHODES: Nous avons recensé tous les services d'urgence canadiens et distribué un sondage à 616 services d'urgence dans tout le pays. RéSULTATS: Les réponses reçues représentent 202 services d'urgence (32,8 %). Un cinquième (20,3 %) des services d'urgence qui ont répondu ont indiqué qu'ils recueillaient des données sur la race et l'origine ethnique, et 38,1 %, sur la langue principale. Les utilisations déclarées de ces données comprenaient l'amélioration de la qualité, la recherche et les soins directs aux patients. CONCLUSION: La majorité des services d'urgence canadiens ne recueillent pas de données sur la race, l'origine ethnique et la langue des patients. Cet écart limite notre capacité à identifier les inégalités dans les résultats de santé ou l'accès aux soins de santé. Le manque de données sur la race, l'ethnicité et la langue entrave également notre capacité à élaborer et à évaluer les programmes et les interventions visant à corriger ces inégalités.

Association between statins and progression of osteoarthritis features on magnetic resonance imaging in a predominantly pre-radiographic cohort: the Vancouver Longitudinal Study of Early Knee Osteoarthritis (VALSEKO): a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effect of statin use on osteoarthritis (OA) incidence/progression using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a population-based cohort with predominantly pre-radiographic knee OA. METHODS: A cohort aged 40-79 years with knee pain was recruited using random population sampling and followed for 7 years. Baseline exclusions were inflammatory arthritis, recent knee surgery/injury, and inability to undergo MRI. At baseline, current statin use was ascertained. Baseline and follow-up MRIs were read semi-quantitatively for cartilage damage (grade 0-4, 0/1 collapsed, 6 regions), osteophytes (grade 0-3, 8 regions), bone marrow lesions (BML) (grade 0-3, 6 regions) and effusion (grade 0-3). The primary outcome was cartilage damage incidence/progression, while secondary outcomes were incidence/progression of osteophytes, BML, and effusion, each defined as an increase by ≥1 grade at any region. To ensure population representative samples, sample weights were used. Logistic regression was used to assess the association of statin use at baseline with incidence/progression of MRI outcomes. Analyses were adjusted for sex, age, BMI, and multiple comorbidities requiring statin therapy. RESULTS: Of 255 participants evaluated at baseline, 122 completed the 7-year follow-up. Statin use was not significantly associated with progression of cartilage damage (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.17, 4.06), osteophytes (OR 3.48; 95% CI 0.40, 30.31), BML (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.12, 3.02), or effusion (OR 2.38; 95% CI 0.42, 13.63), after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSION: In this population-based cohort of predominantly pre-radiographic knee OA, statins did not affect MRI incidence/progression of cartilage damage, BML, osteophytes or effusion. Therefore, statin use does not appear to affect people with pre-radiographic stages of knee OA.

Safety and efficacy of inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation for patients hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) following an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) reduces the risk of hospital admissions, and improves physical function and health-related quality of life. However, the safety and efficacy of in-hospital PR during the most acute phase of an AECOPD is not well established. This paper describes the protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine the safety and efficacy of inpatient acute care PR during the hospitalisation phase. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Medical literature databases and registries MEDLINE, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, CENTRAL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, WHO trials portal and ClinicalTrials.gov will be searched for articles from inception to June 2021 using a prespecified search strategy. We will identify randomised controlled trials that have a comparison of in-hospital PR with usual care. PR programmes had to commence during the hospitalisation and include a minimum of two sessions. Title and abstract followed by full-text screening will be conducted independently by two reviewers. A meta-analysis will be performed if there is sufficient homogeneity across selected studies or groups of studies. The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes and Study characteristics framework will be used to standardise the data collection process. The quality of the cumulative evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: AECOPD results in physical limitations which are amenable to PR. This review will assess the safety and efficacy of in-hospital PR for AECOPD. The results will be presented in a peer-reviewed publication and at research conferences. Ethical review is not required for this study.