Prevalence of Tendon Rupture and Tendinopathies Among Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Derived From United States Administrative Claims Data.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of tendon rupture and tendinopathies (TRT) has not been determined in a large population of patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We investigated TRT prevalence among patients with ASCVD and in the general population, using data from the Symphony Health Integrated Dataverse, a large US medical and pharmacy claims database. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study included patients aged ≥ 19 years from the claims database during the identification period (January 2019 to December 2020) and 12 months of continuous enrollment. The primary outcome was evidence of TRT in the 12 months following the index date (first ASCVD diagnosis in the ASCVD cohort; first claim in the claims database in the overall population). Diagnostic codes (ICD-10 and/or CPT) were used to define ASCVD and TRT diagnosis. RESULTS: The ASCVD cohort and overall population included 5,589,273 and 61,715,843 patients, respectively. In the ASCVD cohort, use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT was identified in 67.9% (statins), 17.7% (corticosteroids), and 16.7% (fluoroquinolones) of patients. Bempedoic acid use was reported in 1556 (< 0.1%) patients. TRT prevalence during 12-month follow-up was 3.4% (ASCVD cohort) and 1.9% (overall population). Among patients with ASCVD, 83.5% experienced TRT in only one region of the body. Factors most associated with TRT in the ASCVD cohort were increasing age, most notably in those aged 45-|64 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.19; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.07-2.32), obesity (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.50-1.53), and rheumatoid arthritis (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.45-1.79). Use of statins or bempedoic acid was not associated with increased TRT risk. CONCLUSION: Patients with ASCVD may have greater risk of TRT than the general population, which may be driven by an increased prevalence of comorbidities and use of medications with a potential or known association with TRT.

Patients with atherosclerosis, the main cause of heart attacks, strokes, and peripheral vascular disease, typically require several drugs to control the disease. Some of the drugs used to treat atherosclerosis have been linked to a higher occurrence of tendon tears (or ruptures) or swelling/inflammation of the tendons (tendinopathies). However, there may be other factors present in these patients that increase the risk of tendon injuries that are not related to these drugs. This study used the medical records of over 5.5 million patients with atherosclerosis and over 63 million patients reflecting the general population in the United States to determine the prevalence of tendon injury. Additionally, the researchers looked at other factors that might be related to a higher risk of tendon injury in each group. Over a 12-month period, tendon injuries occurred in 3.4% of patients with atherosclerosis and 1.8% of patients in the general population. In patients with atherosclerosis, factors such as being obese, older (45­64 years), or having rheumatoid arthritis were also linked to an increased risk of tendon injuries. There was no association seen between statin or bempedoic acid use and tendon injuries. These results may help healthcare providers to determine the underlying risk of tendon injuries and guide treatment of this patient population.

Treatment intensification with bempedoic acid to achieve LDL-C goal in patients with ASCVD: A simulation model using a real-world patient cohort in the US.

Background and aims: Guidelines recommend that high-risk patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) be treated with maximally tolerated statins to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. In patients whose LDL-C remains elevated, non-statin adjunct therapies, including ezetimibe (EZE), bempedoic acid (BA), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors are recommended. Methods: The impact of BA and EZE in a fixed-dose combination (FDC) on LDL-C goal attainment was evaluated using a simulation model developed for a United States cohort of high-risk adults with ASCVD. Treatment was simulated for 73,056 patients not at goal (LDL-C >70 mg/dL), comparing BA + EZE (FDC), EZE only, and no oral adjunct therapy (NOAT). The addition of PCSK9 inibitors was assumed after 1 year in patients not at LDL-C goal. Treatment efficacy was estimated from clinical trials. Patient-level outcomes were predicted over a 10-year horizon accounting for treatment discontinuation and general mortality. Results: Baseline mean age of the cohort was 67 years, most were White (79%) and male (56%). A majority had established coronary artery disease (75%), 48% had diabetes, and mean LDL-C was 103.0 mg/dL. After 1 year, 79% of patients achieved LDL-C goal (mean, 61.1 mg/dL) with BA + EZE (FDC) compared to 58% and 42% with EZE (71.7 mg/dL) and NOAT (78.4 mg/dL), respectively. Conclusions: This simulation shows that adding BA + EZE (FDC) to maximally tolerated statins would result in more patients achieving LDL-C goal than adding EZE alone or NOAT.

Gaps in Guideline-Based Lipid-Lowering Therapy for Secondary Prevention in the United States: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 322†153 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are not on guideline-recommended statin therapy. We evaluated utilization of statins and other lipid-lowering therapy (LLT), and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), among patients with ASCVD over a 1-year period. METHODS: LLT and LDL-C levels at the first outpatient visit (January 1, 2017-December 31, 2018) and 1-year follow-up were evaluated using data from Cerner Real-World Data, an electronic health record-derived data set from 92 US health systems. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with high-intensity statin use. RESULTS: We identified 322 153 patients with ASCVD (median age 69 years, 58.8% men, 81.8% White). Overall, 76.1% of patients were on statins, with only 39.4% on high-intensity statins. Men were more likely to receive high-intensity statins than women (multivariable-adjusted odds ratio, 1.34 [95% CI, 1.30-1.38]). Increasing age was associated with lower odds of statin use (odds ratio, 0.79 per 5-year increase at 60 years [95% CI, 0.78-0.81]). Patients with peripheral artery disease (odds ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.37-0.42]) and cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.80]) had lower odds of using high-intensity statins than those with coronary artery disease. At baseline, most patients (61.3%) had elevated LDL-C (≥70 mg/dL), including 59.8% of those on low/moderate-intensity statins and 76.1% on no statin; only 45.3% achieved an LDL-C <70 mg/dL at 1 year. Nonstatin LLT use was low (ezetimibe, 4.4%; proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors, 0.7%). Among patients on no statin or low/moderate-intensity statin at baseline, 14.8% and 13.4%, respectively, were on high-intensity statins at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with ASCVD in routine care, high-intensity statins are underutilized, and uptitration and use of nonstatin therapy are uncommon. Women, older adults, and individuals with noncardiac ASCVD are particularly undertreated. Concerted efforts are needed to address therapeutic inertia for lipid management in patients with ASCVD.

Potential Cardiovascular Events Avoided with Bempedoic Acid Plus Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination Compared with Ezetimibe Alone in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Taking Maximally Tolerated Statins.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease who require additional low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering despite maximally tolerated statins have a significant unmet medical need and are at increased risk of future cardiovascular events and a reduced quality of life. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to estimate the percentage of cardiovascular events avoided following treatment with a fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe (BA+EZE FDC) versus ezetimibe (EZE) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated statins across a range of baseline LDL-C levels. METHODS: A Markov cohort simulation model estimated major adverse cardiovascular events avoided over a lifetime horizon among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and baseline LDL-C levels from 80 to >200 mg/dL. BA+EZE FDC was compared with EZE based on mean percent LDL-C reductions versus placebo reported in a phase III trial. Health outcomes for the average patient were extrapolated to a US population of 100,000 persons using evidence on contemporary LDL-C levels from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. RESULTS: Among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease not at the LDL-C goal with maximally tolerated statins, the addition of BA+EZE FDC compared with the addition of EZE was predicted to provide incremental absolute reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events dependent on baseline LDL-C levels at the population level. For those with baseline LDL-C of 101-110 mg/dL (n = 15,237), there were 4.9% (744) fewer events predicted, while for patients with baseline LDL-C of > 200 mg/dL (n = 1689), 10.9% (184) fewer events were predicted through the addition of BA+EZE FDC versus EZE. CONCLUSIONS: Further LDL-C reductions through the addition of BA+EZE FDC to maximally tolerated statins are predicted to reduce major adverse cardiovascular events compared with the addition of EZE. Benefits are potentially greater among those with higher starting LDL-C.

Lipid-lowering therapy and LDL-C control for primary prevention in persons with diabetes across 90 health systems in the United States.

Objective: National guidelines recommend statin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. We assessed the extent of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy utilization in community practice. Methods: We evaluated lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels at baseline and 1-year follow-up in patients aged 40-75 years with type 2 diabetes but without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), across 90 health systems in the United States participating in an electronic health record-derived dataset, Cerner Real-World Data. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with utilization of moderate- to high-intensity statin. Results: We identified 241,232 patients with type 2 diabetes (58.1 % on moderate- to high-intensity statin, 7.0 % on low-intensity statin, and 34.9 % on no statin). Predictors of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy included retinopathy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.38), hypertension (aOR, 1.52; 95 % CI, 1.43-1.61), and stage 3 chronic kidney disease (aOR, 1.14; 95 % CI, 1.07-1.21). Women (aOR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.82-0.87), and those with rheumatoid arthritis (aOR, 0.79; 95 % CI, 0.71-0.87), psoriasis (aOR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.75-0.96), and hepatitis C (aOR, 0.40; 95 % CI, 0.39-0.46), had reduced odds of moderate- to high-intensity statin treatment. Utilization of ezetimibe was rare (2.0 %). LDL-C control was suboptimal at baseline (37.0 % and 27.9 % had LDL-C ≥100 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL, respectively). At 1-year follow-up, the rate of moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy utilization was 65.3 %. Conclusion: Increased efforts are needed to improve LDL-C control and LLT use for primary prevention of ASCVD in adults with type 2 diabetes, in particular among women and those with risk-enhancing inflammatory conditions.

Cost-effectiveness of topical glycopyrronium tosylate for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis.

AIMS: Primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAHH) is a condition characterized by excessive sweating that negatively impacts health-related quality of life, with significant psychological and social impacts. Glycopyrronium tosylate (GT) is a topical anticholinergic approved in the United States for treatment of PAHH in patients 9 years of age and older. Our objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of GT as first-line topical therapy compared to topical aluminum chloride from a United States commercial perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Markov model was developed consisting of four health states based on the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) over a time horizon of 5 years with discount rates of 3% for both costs and outcomes. Transitions between health states were driven by HDSS response, defined as an improvement of ≥2 points. Non-responders and those who discontinue could switch to later line treatments or no treatment. Health utility scores were based on HDSS scores, supported by published literature. RESULTS: Over 5 years, GT yielded 0.12 greater QALYs and 0.93 greater LYs with response compared to treatment with prescription aluminum chloride at an incremental cost of $10,584. Relative to prescription aluminum chloride, GT resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $87,238 per QALY gained, $11,349 per LY with response. The ICER fell below $100,000 for 66% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations and below $150,000 for 82% of simulations. LIMITATIONS: This analysis represents a simplified scenario of a hypothetical PAHH patient. Due to sparse data, assumptions were required for treatment patterns, efficacy, and persistence. CONCLUSION: Based on the analysis of incremental cost per QALY gained, GT may be cost-effective relative to prescription aluminum chloride at commonly accepted willingness to pay thresholds.

Treatment Patterns, Depression, and Anxiety Among US Patients Diagnosed with Hyperhidrosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperhidrosis is associated with social and emotional stress due to limitations on health-related quality of life. This study examined real-world treatment patterns and concomitant depression and/or anxiety in patients with hyperhidrosis. METHODS: Commercial health plan members in the US with ≥ 2 hyperhidrosis diagnosis codes and/or antiperspirant prescription claims were identified from January 2010 through November 2017. A control cohort (CC) of patients without hyperhidrosis was matched to the hyperhidrosis cohort on demographic characteristics. Depression and/or anxiety were identified by ≥ 1 relevant diagnosis code or pharmacy claim. A multivariable logistic regression model estimated odds of treatment in the hyperhidrosis cohort, and depression/anxiety in the hyperhidrosis cohort and CC, adjusting for patient characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 44,484 patients with hyperhidrosis were identified, of whom 58.5% were female, with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 36.5 ± 16.5 years (83.5% ≥ 18 years). A small majority of patients (51.6%, 0.69/person-year) received treatment with prescription antiperspirants. Post-index oral systemic therapies, medical procedures, and surgical options were uncommon. At 12 months post-index, 48.4% of the sample had not filled a prescription for extra- or prescription-strength antiperspirants. Compared with the CC (n = 137,451), a higher percentage of patients with hyperhidrosis had depression or anxiety reported during follow-up (41.1 vs. 28.2%, p < 0.001); this corresponded to higher adjusted odds of depression/anxiety in patients with hyperhidrosis [odds ratio (OR) 1.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72-1.80, p < 0.001]. Baseline depression and/or anxiety were associated with lower odds of receiving hyperhidrosis treatment (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.73-0.80), as was increasing age and male gender. Patients with hyperhidrosis also had more frequent incident depression/anxiety during follow-up (18.2 vs. 10.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this real-world analysis, hyperhidrosis was associated with increased odds of depression and/or anxiety. However, relatively low percentages of patients received prescription topical or oral treatments or underwent surgery, suggesting that tolerability, efficacy, and provider awareness may be limiting factors in the effective treatment of hyperhidrosis.

A systematic evidence-based review of treatments for primary hyperhidrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating) is associated with significant quality-of-life burden yet is often undertreated. With limited FDA-approved treatments, health care providers must determine optimal treatment among approved and off-label options. Key objectives of this review were to reassess, update, and expand a previous systematic review of commonly used treatment options for primary hyperhidrosis, including consideration of aluminum and zirconium compounds. METHODS: We performed a qualitative systematic review of efficacy, health-related quality of life, satisfaction, and safety of interventions, replicating and expanding the strategy outlined in a previous systematic review, with the addition of studies utilizing a within-patient design. We performed a critical appraisal of identified studies to determine risk of bias (RoB) and strength of evidence (SOE). RESULTS: A total of 32 studies were eligible for critical appraisal. Only three studies - two clinical trials of glycopyrronium cloth (2.4%) and one trial of botulinum toxin A injections in axillary hyperhidrosis were rated as "low" RoB; both had SOE ratings of "moderate" for use in axillary hyperhidrosis - the highest rating included in this review. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal treatment choice depends on several factors, including understanding the quality of evidence regarding each treatment's efficacy and safety (considerations of convenience and cost are beyond the scope of this review). In hyperhidrosis, as in other clinical conditions, treatment decisions should be patient centered. At this time, because of the quality of evidence, only imprecise estimates of effect are possible for hyperhidrosis treatments included in this review, and statements about comparative effectiveness are not possible.

Cost-effectiveness of overactive bladder treatments: from the US payer perspective.

AIM: To assess the cost-effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA), implantable sacral nerve stimulation devices, percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation, anticholinergic medications and mirabegron compared with best supportive care (BSC) for management of refractory overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: A Markov model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of treatment options with BSC over a 10-year time horizon. Resource utilization, discontinuation rates and costs were derived from unpublished and published sources. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were reported. RESULTS: Treatment with onabotA 100U produced the largest gain in QALYs (7.179) and lowest estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($32,680/QALY) of all assessed treatments compared with BSC. CONCLUSION: Compared with BSC, onabotA 100U was the most cost-effective treatment option for patients with refractory OAB.

Budget Impact of Appropriate Low-Dose Aspirin Use for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Event Prevention in the Managed Care Setting.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death in adults in the United States and constitutes a substantial portion of overall national health expenditures. Aspirin is generally recommended for primary cardiovascular event prevention based on a given patient's underlying cardiovascular event risk profile, particularly for those aged 50-69 years with a 10-year risk of coronary heart disease of ≥ 10%. Evidence-based clinical guidelines are in agreement for secondary prevention consisting of lifelong, low-dose aspirin therapy following a cardiovascular event. Despite these recommendations, research suggests suboptimal concordance between guidelines and clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the budget impact of appropriate low-dose aspirin use for primary and secondary cardiovascular event prevention compared with current rates of low-dose aspirin use. METHODS: An economic model measuring budget spend for cardiovascular events, aspirin, and aspirin-related adverse events was developed from the perspective of a U.S. payer. The model compared current rates of aspirin use to appropriate rates of aspirin use according to guideline recommendations for both primary and secondary cardiovascular event prevention. RESULTS: For a hypothetical plan with 1 million members, an estimated 18,026 patients were on aspirin therapy for primary cardiovascular event prevention, while guidelines recommend that 55,788 patients should have been on aspirin therapy for this indication. Optimal aspirin use in the primary cardiovascular event prevention population reduced the number of nonfatal myocardial infarctions (MIs; -367), ischemic strokes (-232), and deaths (-60), with an increase in the number of gastrointestinal bleeds (169) and hemorrhagic strokes (98). Evidence-based guideline-compliant use of aspirin for primary cardiovascular event prevention resulted in total cost savings of approximately $4.2 million over a 5-year time horizon. For secondary cardiovascular event prevention, an estimated 48,663 patients were on aspirin, while clinical guidelines recommend that 71,316 patients should have been on aspirin therapy for this indication. Optimal aspirin use in secondary cardiovascular event prevention reduced the number of nonfatal MIs (-515), ischemic strokes (-375), and deaths (-217), with an increase in the number of gastrointestinal bleeds (98) and hemorrhagic strokes (58). Evidence-based guideline-compliant use of aspirin for secondary cardiovascular event prevention resulted in total cost savings of approximately $11 million over a 5-year time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate low-dose aspirin use for primary and secondary cardiovascular event prevention can result in improved patient outcomes with significant cost savings for U.S. payers. As a simple and inexpensive prophylactic measure for cardiovascular event prevention, aspirin use should be carefully considered in all appropriate at-risk adult patients. DISCLOSURES: Development of this manuscript and the corresponding budget impact analysis was funded by Bayer. Coppolecchia, Williamson, and Cameron are employees of Bayer. Carlton, Lennert, and Moradi are employees of Xcenda, a consulting firm that received funding from Bayer to assist in the completion of this study. Khalaf-Gillard was an employee of Xcenda at the time of the study. The corresponding poster was presented at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2017; October 16-19, 2017; Dallas, TX.

Development of the Impact of Nighttime Urination (INTU) questionnaire to assess the impact of nocturia on health and functioning.

AIMS: This study describes development of the Impact of Nighttime Urination (INTU) questionnaire to assess nocturia impacts on health and functioning. METHODS: Development of the questionnaire followed an iterative patient-directed process as recommended by current guidance for patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures. An initial 15-item questionnaire was devised based on reviewing the published literature, and then modified through four rounds of semi-structured interviews of 28 individuals with nocturia. In each round, open-ended concept elicitation, followed by cognitive debriefing, was used to assess the questionnaire. Items were modified based on participants' responses and incorporated into the next round of interviews. RESULTS: In all rounds, participants reported that their experiences were easy to recall and report on a daily basis and that the burden of completing the questionnaire was low. The final questionnaire has a same-day recall period. It includes six daytime impact items-having limited concentration, a sense of feeling tired, difficulty getting things done, irritability, not feeling rested, and drowsiness-and four items that measure the nighttime impact of nocturia-patient concern, waking up too early, difficulty getting enough sleep, and feeling bothered by having to get up at night to void. Responses follow a 5- or 4-point scale. The final INTU captures the key concepts associated with nocturia as confirmed by cognitive debriefing. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the 10-item INTU, a nocturia-specific PRO measure, was based on direct input and feedback from patients and has demonstrated that it captures the patient-reported impacts of nocturia.

Development of a new patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure on the Impact of Nighttime Urination (INTU) in patients with nocturia-Psychometric validation.

AIMS: To psychometrically evaluate the Impact of Nighttime Urination (INTU) questionnaire, a new patient-reported outcome measure developed to assess the impact of nocturia on health and functioning in a multicenter, behavioral modification (fluid restriction) study. METHODS: Participants aged 50-95 years with at least two voiding episodes/night for ≥6 months completed voiding diaries and the INTU on 3 consecutive days during weeks 1 and 2 (same day recall) and completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and Nocturia Quality of Life Questionnaire (N-QOL) at baseline and days 8 and 15. Psychometric evaluations of the INTU were conducted. RESULTS: Rasch analysis showed the INTU to be a unidimensional construct, with most items located on the severe end of the symptom severity continuum. In addition to an Overall Impact Score (10 items), exploratory factor analysis affirmed by confirmatory factor analysis identified two domains: Daytime (six items) and Nighttime (four items) Impact Scores (comparative fit index = 0.968; root mean square error of approximation = 0.08). Concurrent validity met prespecified hypotheses, indicating similarity of concepts with the PSQI (correlation [r] = 0.627) and N-QOL (r = -0.784) total scores. The INTU differentiated among patients with different nocturic episode frequencies (P < 0.05 for all three summary scores). Statistically significant decreases were observed in mean Overall and Nighttime Impact Scores at week 2 versus week 1 in responders, indicating that the instrument can detect changes in response to symptom improvements. CONCLUSIONS: The INTU questionnaire demonstrated robust measurement properties and is a suitable tool for assessing the patient-reported impact of nocturia on health and functioning.