Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
BMJ Open Qual ; 8(4): e000763, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31803854

RESUMEN

Background: Delays to definitive treatment for time-sensitive acute paediatric illnesses continue to be a cause of death and disability in the Canadian healthcare system. Our aim was to develop the SIGNS-for-Kids illness recognition tool to empower parents and other community caregivers to recognise the signs and symptoms of severe illness in infants and children. The goal of the tool is improved detection and reduced time to treatment of acute conditions that require emergent medical attention. Methods: A single-day consensus workshop consisting of a 17-member panel of parents and multidisciplinary healthcare experts with content expertise and/or experience managing children with severe acute illnesses was held. An a priori agreement of ≥85% was planned for the final iteration SIGNS-for-Kids tool elements by the end of the workshop. Results: One hundred percent consensus was achieved on a five-item tool distilled from 20 initial items at the beginning of the consensus workshop. The final items included four child-based items consisting of: (1) behaviour, (2) breathing, (3) skin, and (4) fluids, and one context-based item and (5) response to rescue treatments. Conclusions: Specific cues of urgent child illness were identified as part of this initial development phase. These cues were integrated into a comprehensive tool designed for parents and other lay caregivers to recognise the signs of serious acute illness and initiate medical attention in an undifferentiated population of infants and children. Future validation and optimisation of the tool are planned.


Asunto(s)
Consenso , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Triaje/métodos , Canadá , Enfermedad Crítica , Educación/métodos , Humanos
2.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 19(8S Suppl 2): S4-S9, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30080801

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe practical considerations related to discussions about death or possible death of a critically ill child. DATA SOURCES: Personal experience and reflection. Published English language literature. STUDY SELECTION: Selected illustrative studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Not available. DATA SYNTHESIS: Narrative and experiential review were used to describe the following areas benefits and potential adverse consequences of conversations about risk of death and the timing of, preparation for, and conduct of conversations about risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: Timely conversations about death as a possible outcome of PICU care are an important part of high-quality ICU care. Not all patients "require" these conversations; however, identifying patients for whom conversations are indicated should be an active process. Informed conversations require preparation to provide the best available objective information. Information should include distillation of local experience, incorporate the patients' clinical trajectory, the potential impact(s) of alternate treatments, describe possible modes of death, and acknowledge the extent of uncertainty. We suggest the more factual understanding of risk of death should be initially separated from the more inherent value-laden treatment recommendations and decisions. Gathering and sharing of collective knowledge, conduct of additional investigations, and time can increase the factual content of risk of death discussions. Timely and sensitive delivery of this best available knowledge then provides foundation for high-quality treatment recommendations and decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Muerte , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Niño , Comunicación , Enfermedad Crítica/psicología , Toma de Decisiones , Familia/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/normas , Masculino , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Médicos , Medición de Riesgo , Incertidumbre
3.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 29(5): 919-25, 2014 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24389603

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Perinephric abscesses in children are rare. Infection can come from various areas, and clinical signs overlap with more common etiologies, such as pyelonephritis. Imaging modalities and laboratory investigations help lead to a definitive diagnosis. CASE-DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: We present a case of a 5-month-old infant presenting with a febrile illness and eventual diagnosis of a perinephric abscess causing abdominal compartment syndrome. The infant had no known risk factors, i.e., congenital genitourinal abnormalities or immunosuppression, and was treated successfully following initial resuscitation, appropriate antibiotics, and open surgical drainage. Cultures obtained from the abscess and peritoneal fluid were positive for S. aureus, while blood and urine cultures were negative. CONCLUSIONS: A literature review found 13 studies looking at diagnosis and/or treatment of idiopathic perinephric abscess. With non-specific clinical signs and symptoms, diagnosis can be delayed and rests heavily on clinical suspicion and appropriate imaging. Treatment includes antibiotics alone, or in conjunction with percutaneous or open surgical drainage. In summarizing these studies, a suggestion for diagnosis and basic treatment approach is outlined.


Asunto(s)
Absceso/cirugía , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Absceso/diagnóstico , Absceso/patología , Humanos , Lactante , Hipertensión Intraabdominal/complicaciones , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/patología , Laparotomía , Masculino
4.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 23(6): 490-8, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24347650

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the optimal management of critically ill children who present initially to community hospitals and how best to support the needs of front-line healthcare providers in these settings prior to transfer to the regional academic paediatric health sciences centre. METHODS: A qualitative needs assessment was performed in five community hospitals targeting healthcare providers in leadership and front-line roles who could discuss their experiences of managing critically ill children that had presented to their institutions. Focused individual and focus group interviews of physicians, nurses and respiratory therapists from the participating hospitals were conducted and analysed to identify common themes. RESULTS: Five community hospitals participated in the study with a total of 57 participants and included 36 registered nurses, 4 respiratory therapists, 13 community hospital physicians and 4 paediatric intensive care specialists. Most participants did not report seeing more than one critically ill child per month. The management of very young paediatric patients was reported as a greater source of anxiety than patients presenting in cardiac arrest and despite being more frequently reported, respiratory conditions were identified as the most anxiety provoking and having the greatest educational need. The care required for a single critically ill child was often reported to render the emergency department staff incapable of meeting other patient care needs and was influenced by staffing resources, physical layout and access to proper equipment. Increased comfort and management ability was attributed to previous real-world experience and support from content experts in dealing with acutely ill children. Participants did not use web-based best practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies the need to fully understand the management realities of front-line caregivers of critically ill children in community hospital settings. We demonstrate the need to focus on the management of younger paediatric patients, technical skills development, practice of acute situations with less than optimal staffing resources, and access to facilitated real-world experiences with appropriate supervision and mentoring. Passive interventions such as web-based guidelines should not be used in isolation but as a support to ongoing exposure and engagement by content experts.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Evaluación de Necesidades , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Competencia Clínica , Comunicación , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Crítica/epidemiología , Hospitales Comunitarios , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Entrevistas como Asunto , Ontario/epidemiología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Recursos Humanos
5.
PLoS One ; 8(6): e66951, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23825593

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility of using the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) as an adjunct during hemodynamic assessments by a pediatric medical emergency team (PMET). METHODS: Pediatric in-patients at McMaster Children's Hospital aged under 18 years requiring urgent PMET consultation, were eligible. Patients with known cardiac outflow valve defects, Pediatric Critical Care Unit in-patients, and those in cardiorespiratory arrest, were excluded. The primary outcome was feasibility, and the ease of USCOM transport and application as assessed by a self-administered user questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included the quality of USCOM measurements, and agreement in clinical versus USCOM-derived assessments. RESULTS: Forty-one patients from 85 eligible PMET consultations were enrolled between March and August 2011. A total of 55 USCOM assessments were performed on 36 of 41 (87.8%) participants. USCOM could not be completed in 5 (12.2%) participants due to patient agitation (n = 4) and emergent care (n = 1). USCOM was reported as easy to transport and apply by 97.4% and 94.7% of respondents respectively, not obstructive to patient care by 94.7%, and yielded timely measurements by 84.2% respondents. USCOM tracings were of good quality in 41 (75.9%) assessments. Agreement between clinical and USCOM-derived hemodynamic assessments by two independent raters was poor (Rater 1: κ = 0.094; Rater 2: κ = 0.146). CONCLUSION: USCOM can be applied by a PMET during urgent hemodynamic assessments in children. While USCOM has been validated in stable children, its role in guiding hemodynamic resuscitation and informing therapeutic goals in a hemodynamically unstable pediatric population requires further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Hemodinámica , Ultrasonido , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , Médicos , Proyectos Piloto , Factores de Tiempo
6.
Pediatrics ; 128(1): 72-8, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21690113

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This is the first large multicenter study to examine the effectiveness of a pediatric rapid response system (PRRS). The primary objective was to determine the effect of a PRRS using a physician-led team on the rate of actual cardiopulmonary arrests, defined as an event requiring chest compressions, epinephrine, or positive pressure ventilation. The secondary objectives were to determine the effect of PRRSs on the rate of PICU readmission within 48 hours of discharge and PICU mortality after readmission and urgent PICU admission. METHODS: A PRRS was developed, implemented, and evaluated in a standardized manner across 4 pediatric academic centers in Ontario, Canada. The team responded to activations for inpatients and followed patients discharged from the PICU for 48 hours. A 2-year, prospective, observational study was conducted after implementation, and outcomes were compared with data collected 2 years before implementation. RESULTS: After PRRS implementation, there were 55 963 hospital admissions and a team activation rate of 44 per 1000 hospital admissions. There were 7302 patients followed after PICU discharge. Implementation of the PRRS was not associated with a reduction in the rate of actual cardiopulmonary arrests (1.9 vs 1.8 per 1000 hospital admissions; P=.68) or PICU mortality after urgent admission (1.3 vs 1.1 per 1000 hospital admissions; P=.25). There was a reduction in the PICU mortality rate after readmission (0.3 vs 0.1 death per 1000 hospital admissions; P=.05). CONCLUSION: The standardized implementation of a multicenter PRRS was associated with a decrease in the rate of PICU mortality after readmission but not actual cardiopulmonary arrests.


Asunto(s)
Equipo Hospitalario de Respuesta Rápida/organización & administración , Hospitales Pediátricos , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...