Left spermatic vein reflux after varicocele repair predicts pregnancies and live births in subfertile couples.

PURPOSE: Varicocele repair (VR) is proposed to improve fertility in subfertile couples with a poor semen quality. We explored whether the disappearance of a left continuous spermatic venous reflux (SVR) at scrotal colour-Doppler ultrasound (CDUS), an objective evidence for a VR, is predictive for improved fertility outcome in subfertile couples. METHODS: VR was performed by left internal spermatic vein sclero-embolisation in 88 males seeking a consultation for subfertility. Semen analysis and scrotal CDUS were evaluated before and 6 months after VR. Serum levels of FSH and total testosterone (TT) were obtained at baseline. Telephone interview was used to obtain information about fertility outcome. Significant predictors of pregnancy and live births, selected by univariate analyses, were included into multiple logistic regression models to assess independent associations. RESULTS: At the adjusted model, independent significant predictors of pregnancy after VR were a disappeared SVR at CDUS (OR = 5.5, 97.5% CI 2.01-15.4; p = 0.0009) and an improved sperm total motile count (TMC) (OR = 5.5, 97.5% CI 1.4-27.9; p = 0.02). Even live births were independently associated with both disappeared left SVR at CDUS (OR = 4.3, 97.5% CI = 1.6-11.8; p = 0.003) and improved TMC after VR (OR = 4.8, 97.5% CI 1.3-24.2; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: The still controversial effect of varicocele repair on fertility in subfertile couples may reside on the undefined objective methods to document a successful VR and its effect on couple fertility. The disappearance of a continuous left SVR at CDUS after VR was the objective best predictor for subsequent improved fertility in subfertile couples.

Determination of spermatic vein reflux after varicocele repair helps to define the efficacy of treatment in improving sperm parameters of subfertile men.

PURPOSE: A continuous spermatic venous reflux (SVR) at colour Doppler ultrasound (CDU) is an evidence for varicocele, a frequent correlate for male subfertility. We explored whether SVR after left varicocele repair is predictive for changes in semen quality in subfertile men. METHODS: Blood hormones (FSH, LH, and total testosterone) and scrotal CDU were obtained in subfertile patients with left grade II or grade III varicocele on physical evaluation and a poor sperm quality. Semen analysis and CDU were re-evaluated 6 months after a retrograde internal spermatic vein scleroembolisation. RESULTS: The retrospective study included 100 men with a baseline SVR >3 cm/s; 60 men showed a disappearance (group 1) and 40 men (group 2) showed a reduced SVR after varicocele repair. Total motile sperm count (TMC) was markedly increased after treatment (p < 0.0001; F = 35.79) and the increase was more relevant in group 1 compared to group 2 (p = 0.04; F = 4.20). TMC and left SVR values after varicocele repair were negatively correlated (R = -0.218; p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis showed that adjusted SVR after repair negatively predicted TMC change (TMC after repair minus baseline TMC) (ß = -2.56; p = 0.022). Disappearance of a continuous left SVR at CDU after varicocele repair was associated to a better improvement of semen parameters in subfertile men. CONCLUSION: Recording of a continuous left spermatic vein reflux is an objective method to assess a successful varicocele repair aimed to improve sperm parameters in subfertile men.

Embolization of left spermatic vein in non-obstructive azoospermic men with varicocele: role of FSH to predict the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

PURPOSE: Varicocele repair in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) was occasionally associated to ejaculated spermatozoa independently from clinical and laboratory measures. We performed a prospective study in infertile men affected by NOA and left side varicocele to find whether or not the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after varicocele repair is predicted by baseline measures. METHODS: Patients with NOA and grade II, or grade III left side varicocele were submitted to hormone analysis and to scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDU). Azoospermia was confirmed in 23 patients aged 25-47 years who were than submitted to varicocele repair through a retrograde internal spermatic vein embolization. Patients were re-evaluated after 6 months. RESULTS: Six months after varicocele repair 12 patients (52.2 %) were still azoospermic (Group 1) while 11 patients (47.8 %) reported ejaculated spermatozoa (Group 2) [sperm count: 1.3 × 10(6)/mL; 0.5 × 10(6)/mL-1.6 × 10(6)/mL (median 25th-75th centiles)]. Serum baseline FSH was lower in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (p = 0.012), while no differences between groups were revealed for all other clinical and laboratory parameters. ROC analysis indicated that baseline FSH level predicted the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment [AUC = 0.811; 95 % Confidence Interval (CI) 0.6-0.9; p = 0.0029]. A cut-off level of FSH <10.06 mIU/mL identified 82.0 % of cases with ejaculated spermatozoa with a specificity of 81.8 % and a sensitivity of 83.3 %. CONCLUSION: Selected patients with NOA may show ejaculated spermatozoa after a non-invasive repair of a left side varicocele, therefore avoiding testicular sperm extraction. Baseline serum FSH was a valuable predictor for ejaculated spermatozoa after treatment.

[MR-angiography with contrast bolus vs digital angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease of the legs]. / Angio-RM con bolo di contrasto vs angiografia digitale nella patologia ostruttiva del circolo arterioso periferico degli arti inferiori.

PURPOSE: Aim of our study was to compare MR Angiography and Digital Angiography in the diagnosis of peripheral vascular occlusive disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-five patients underwent both MRA and DSA examination of the peripheral arterial district. We employed a 1.5 Tesla MRI unit using 3D FSPGR T1-w sequence on coronal scan plane (TR=5.2 ms; TE=1.5 ms; slice=1.5/3 mm; FOV=48 cm; matrix 384x512; TA=16/24 s), before and after automatic iv injection of Gd-DTPA BMA (0.15/0.3 mmol/kg) with a flow rate of 2 ml/s. We evaluated the vascular district from renal to medio-distal tibial arteries. The acquisition of this arterial district required a semi-automatic movement of the examination table. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were carried out according to MIP reconstructions. DSA evaluation, considered as the gold standard, was performed by trans-femoral access using a 4-5F catheter. RESULTS: The MRA examination detected 246 steno-occlusive lesions while 285 were identified with DSA. No statistically significant differences were found among the various degrees of stenotic lesions detected by the two METHODS. The MRA examination had specificity and sensitivity values of: 100% and 84,8% for the iliac axes; 98,9% and 94,3% for the femoral district; 100% and 84,9% for the popliteal district; 97% and 89% for tibial vessels. CONCLUSIONS: MRA showed a high diagnostic accuracy close to that of DSA. On the basis of our short experience we believe that MRA will be a useful method in the detection of various degrees of peripheral artery occlusive diseases reserving DSA for the therapeutical step.

Comparative evaluation of TEE, conventional MRI and contrast-enhanced 3D breath-hold MRA in the post-operative follow-up of dissecting aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To verify the diagnostic potentialities of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), breath-hold 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography (C3D MRA) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients surgically treated for type A aortic dissection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients (21 males and 8 females), surgically treated for type A aortic dissection, were evaluated with MRI using a 1.5 T (GE Horizon Echospeed 8.2) with standard gated SE sequences and breath-hold 3D fast SPGR after intravenous Gd injection (0.2 mmol/kg). 3D MIP reconstruction was obtained. TEE evaluation was performed with a HP 2000 system and a biplane 5 MHz probe. The sizes of aortic root, distal anastomosis, descending aorta and periprosthetic thickening were measured. Regional false lumen and aortic branch involvement were also evaluated. RESULTS: Concordance among TEE, conventional MRI and C3D MRA was observed in the evaluation of aortic root (MRI vs. C3D MRA r = 0.93; MRI vs. TEE r = 0.84; C3D MRA vs. TEE r = 0.84) and descending aorta (r = 0.94, 0.91 and 0.92, respectively). The interobserver variability was also very low. Inadequate agreement was observed for distal anastomosis. C3D MRA was inadequate in the evaluation of periprosthetic thickening; r = 0.73 was obtained between MRI and TEE. For qualitative data: TEE was inadequate in the evaluation of the abdominal aorta and branches. C3D MRA depicted supra-aortic vessel involvement in more cases than the other techniques. CONCLUSION: C3D MRA is a fast and accurate technique in the evaluation of the endoluminal alterations and involvement of the aortic branches. Conventional MRI allows a direct evaluation of the aortic wall and periaortic tissue. TEE is less accurate in the evaluation of aortic branches and abdominal aorta.

[Magnetic resonance angiography with contrast media bolus in the evaluation of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta]. / Angiografia a Risonanza Magnetica con bolo di mezzo di contrasto nella valutazione degli aneurismi dell'aorta addominale.

PURPOSE: To investigate the potentials of 3D breath-hold contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis, follow-up and treatment planning of abdominal aortic aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysm underwent MRA. We used a 1.5 T unit (GE Horizon, Echospeed 8.2), a phased array surface coil and 3D Fast SPGR T1-weighted sequences acquired on the coronal plane during patient breath-hold and after contrast agent i.v. administration. A bolus-test was done before angiography to optimize imaging delay time. After 3D MRA a Fast-SPGR T1-weighted sequence was acquired on the axial plane. The 3D MRA source images were processed with the MIP algorithm. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were carried out. Helical CT was performed in 6 cases and DSA in 7 cases. Surgery was the reference standard in 15 patients. RESULTS: MRA depicted aneurysm thrombosis in 22 cases, carrefour involvement in 18 cases and iliac arteries involvement in 3 cases. Accessory renal arteries were shown in 4 cases; iliac artery stenosis was associated in 5 cases. There was agreement between MR and Helical CT and DSA findings: surgery confirmed MRA results in 15/15 cases. CONCLUSIONS: 3D contrast-enhanced MRA can be considered the method of choice in the follow-up and treatment planning of abdominal aortic aneurysms, because it provides both angiographic and tomographic images: this allows to obtain more information, noninvasively and without the use of ionizing radiations.

[3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography in apnea with the rapid infusion of a paramagnetic contrast medium in studying the thoracic aorta]. / Angiografia con Risonanza Magnetica tridimensionale nell'apnea con infusione rapida di mezzo di contrasto paramagnetico nello studio dell'aorta toracica.

INTRODUCTION: We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA in the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with diagnosed or suspected conditions of thoracic aorta were examined with contrast-enhanced MRA. All the examinations were performed with a 1.5 T superconductive magnet acquiring breath-hold 3D fast Gradient-Echo (GE) sequences (TR = 5.9 ms; TE = 1.2 ms; FA = 45 degrees; FOV = 48 cm; thickness = 2-2.5 mm; locs = 30-32; TA = 22-24 s; MA = 512) on the coronal plane. The contrast agent was injected bolus after a bolus-test to evaluate circulation time. RESULTS: Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MRA permitted to correctly diagnose aneurysm in 18 patients, dissection in 13 patients and coarctation in 3 patients. In the former the size and extent of the aneurysmal lumen and its relationship to aortic side branches was demonstrated. As for dissections we evaluated the following parameters: 1) type; 2) presence of intimal flap; 3) thrombosis of the false lumen; 4) dilatation of the aorta; 5) assessment of great vessel origins. MRA data were correlated with those of biplane transesophageal esophageal echocardiography, conventional MRI and spiral CT. In the three patients with aortic coarctation the site of coarctation was correctly identified, the degree of aortic narrowing evaluated and the collateral vessels demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography should be the screening technique of choice in the evaluation of thoracic aorta thanks to its low invasiveness, short acquisition time, large field of view and morphologic resolution. ECG gating is not needed. Limitations are found in the study of wall and periaortic region which are better evaluated with conventional MR imaging.