RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: this paper aims to evaluate the main direct and indirect costs of the first laparotomies and laparoscopies in bariatric surgeries with a clinical-economical retrospective and cross-sectional analysis from 2017 to 2020 at a hospital with specialties besides the basic ones in southern Brazil. METHODS: the study sample included 26 participants. The first 13 laparotomies, and the first 13 laparoscopies performed at the bariatric surgery service of the institution were evaluated. The values evaluated in such comparison analyzed the costs of operation and hospitalization. It is important to highlight that, in addition to the cost benefit, other costs take significance in the health area, such as: cost-utility, cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization, in addition to the cost-opportunity that is reassessed in the observation of the broad context associating all the values raised here. The software used for data analysis was Excel version® 365. The economic analysis was performed evidencing the profile of the patients and the direct and indirect costs involved in each segmentation. RESULTS: the direct and indirect costs of videolaparoscopy amounted to BRL 10,108.10 and laparoscopy to the amount of BRL 12,568.14. CONCLUSION: it was concluded that laparoscopy presents more savings in the aspects of all health valuations to the detriment of laparotomy. It was concluded that the videolaparoscopy presents more savings in the aspects of all health valuations than the laparotomy.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Derivación Gástrica , Laparoscopía , Obesidad Mórbida , Humanos , Laparotomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugíaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Introduction: this paper aims to evaluate the main direct and indirect costs of the first laparotomies and laparoscopies in bariatric surgeries with a clinical-economical retrospective and cross-sectional analysis from 2017 to 2020 at a hospital with specialties besides the basic ones in southern Brazil. Methods: the study sample included 26 participants. The first 13 laparotomies, and the first 13 laparoscopies performed at the bariatric surgery service of the institution were evaluated. The values evaluated in such comparison analyzed the costs of operation and hospitalization. It is important to highlight that, in addition to the cost benefit, other costs take significance in the health area, such as: cost-utility, cost-effectiveness and cost-minimization, in addition to the cost-opportunity that is reassessed in the observation of the broad context associating all the values raised here. The software used for data analysis was Excel version® 365. The economic analysis was performed evidencing the profile of the patients and the direct and indirect costs involved in each segmentation. Results: the direct and indirect costs of videolaparoscopy amounted to BRL 10,108.10 and laparoscopy to the amount of BRL 12,568.14. Conclusion: it was concluded that laparoscopy presents more savings in the aspects of all health valuations to the detriment of laparotomy. It was concluded that the videolaparoscopy presents more savings in the aspects of all health valuations than the laparotomy.
RESUMO Introdução: o presente estudo tem como objetivo avaliar os principais custos diretos e indiretos das primeiras laparotomias e videolaparoscopias em cirurgias bariátricas em uma análise clínica-econômica, retrospectiva e transversal de 2017 a 2020 em um hospital terciário do sul do Brasil. Métodos: a amostra do estudo incluiu 26 participantes. Foram avaliadas as primeiras 13 laparotomias e as primeiras 13 videolaparoscopias realizadas no serviço de cirurgia bariátrica da instituição. Os valores avaliados em tal comparação analisaram os custos da operação e da internação. É importante ressaltar que além do custo-benefício, outros custos tomam significância na área da saúde. São eles: o custo-utilidade, o custo-efetividade e o custo-minimização, além do custo-oportunidade que é reavaliado na observação do contexto amplo associando todas as valorações aqui levantadas. O software utilizado para a análise dos dados foi o Excel® versão 365. A análise econômica foi realizada evidenciando o perfil dos pacientes e os custos direto e indireto envolvidos em cada segmentação. Resultados: os custos diretos e indiretos da videolaparoscopia somaram o montante de R$ 10.108.10 e da laparoscopia o montante de R$ 12.568,14. Conclusão: concluiu-se que a videolaparoscopia apresenta mais economia nas vertentes de todas as valorizações em saúde em detrimento da laparotomia.
RESUMEN
We report on a successful laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy due to insulinoma, preserving the spleen and the splenic vessels in a 29-year-old male patient who presented with repeated syncope due to hypoglycemia. The ultrasound exam did not show the pancreatic lesion; it was only the angiotomography of the pancreas that revealed a 3-cm mass located at the transition from the body to the tail of the pancreas. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy was performed using a harmonic scalpel (Ethicon EndoSurgery/UltraCision), without mechanical suturing. There were no intra- or postoperative complications or hypoglycemias during the 6 months of follow-up. When it is performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons, this is a technically feasible procedure, safe for the treatment of benign lesions of the pancreas body and tail.
Asunto(s)
Insulinoma/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Humanos , Insulinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía , Arteria Esplénica , Vena EsplénicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Evaluation of intermittent total pedicular clamping in hepatic resections in non-cirrhotic patients. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was made of 72 patients submitted to hepatic resections using intermittent total pedicular clamping. Patients were placed in 5 groups for analysis according to the duration of liver ischemia (each 20 minutes). Tolerance of liver ischemia was assessed by analysis of postoperative morbimortality and biochemical test. RESULTS: Five patients (6.9%) died during the postoperative period and sixteen patients (23.8%) developed specific complications, however, none of the variables analyzed in this study proved to be an independent risk factor for the development of postoperative morbimortality. The transaminases presented a statistically significant relationship with duration of ischemia (P < 0.002), while the late rise was influenced by postoperative mortality (P < 0.009). Prothrombin time was influenced by the duration of ischemia and by postoperative mortality (P = 0.014) but, on the other hand, the bilirubin levels only showed the influence of mortality (P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate postoperative liver function was better preserved in patients submitted to less than 80 minutes of clamping. The late rise of bilirubin and transaminases and the drop in prothrombin time could be considered indicators of a bad postoperative course.