Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Acta Neurol Scand ; 138(3): 186-194, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29542107

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess effectiveness and tolerability of first-line and conversion to lacosamide monotherapy for focal seizures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective, non-interventional chart review of lacosamide monotherapy patients aged ≥16 years in Europe. Outcomes included retention rate at observational point (OP) 3 (12 ± 3 months), seizure freedom rates at OP2 (6 ± 3 months) and OP3 and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). RESULTS: A total of 439 patients were included (98 first-line and 341 conversion to monotherapy; 128 aged ≥65 years [25 first-line and 103 conversion to monotherapy]). First-line and conversion to monotherapy retention rates were 60.2% (59/98; 95% confidence interval [CI] 49.8%-70.0%) and 62.5% (213/341; 57.1%-67.6%), respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month retention rates were 81.2% and 91.4% for first-line and conversion to monotherapy, respectively. First-line and conversion to monotherapy retention rates in patients aged ≥65 years were 60.0% (38.7%-78.9%) and 68.9% (59.1%-77.7%), respectively. At OP2, 66.3% of first-line and 63.0% of conversion to monotherapy patients were seizure free. At OP3, 60.2% of first-line and 52.5% of conversion to monotherapy patients were seizure free. In the ≥65 years subgroup, seizure freedom rates at OP2 were 72.0% and 68.0% for first-line and converted to monotherapy, respectively, and at OP3, 68.0% and 56.3%, respectively. Overall, 52 of 439 (11.8%) patients reported ADRs (16.4% in ≥65 years subgroup), most commonly dizziness (5.0%), headache (2.1%) and somnolence (1.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Lacosamide was effective and well tolerated as first-line or conversion to monotherapy in a clinical setting in adult and elderly patients with focal seizures.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Lacosamida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Seizure ; 48: 53-56, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28419947

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Eslicarbazepine-acetate (ESL) is a third generation antiepileptic drug licensed as adjunctive therapy in adults with focal seizures. Efficacy and safety of ESL have been established in real-life setting. However, data about outcomes in elderly patients are scarce. Primary endpoint was to evaluate outcomes of ESL in elderly patients. METHOD: This was a retrospective survey that included patients >65years with focal seizures who started ESL between January 2010 and July 2012 at 12 Spanish Hospitals. ESL was prescribed individually according to real-life practice. Efficacy and safety were evaluated over 1year. These patients were included within the bigger study ESLIBASE. RESULTS: We included 29 patients, most of them males (18). Mean age was 71.2 year-old and epilepsy evolution was 20 years. Eighteen were pharmacorresistant at baseline. At 12 months, the mean dose was 850mg/day, the retention rate 69%, the responder rate 62% and 24.1% were seizure-free. At 12 months, 16 patients (55.2%) had ≥1 adverse effect (AE), that led to discontinuation in 7 patients. Dizziness, nausea and ataxia were the most common AEs. The tolerability profile improved in 4/5 patients who switched from carbamazepine (CBZ) or oxcarbazepine (OXC) to ESL due to AEs. CONCLUSIONS: ESL was well-tolerated and effective in elderly patients in a real-life setting over 1year, with a dose around 800mg/day. AE effects improved in most of who switched from CBZ or OXC to ESL.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Dibenzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Dibenzazepinas/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Neurologia ; 31(8): 523-7, 2016 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25631041

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Ohtahara syndrome (OS, OMIM#308350, ORPHA1934) is an early-onset epileptic encephalopathy (EOEE) characterised by spasms, intractable seizures, suppression-burst pattern on the electroencephalogram, and severe psychomotor retardation. Mutations in STXBP1 -a gene that codes for syntaxin binding protein 1 and is involved in synaptic vesicle exocytosis- has been identified in most patients with OS. PATIENT AND RESULTS: We report the case of a 19-month-old child with OS who displays a previously unreported mutation in STXBP1 (c.1249+2T>C, G417AfsX7). This mutation is located in a donor splice site and eliminates exon 14, resulting in a truncated protein. CONCLUSION: This previously unreported STXBP1 mutation in a subject with Ohtahara syndrome and non-lesional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) broadens the mutational spectrum associated with this devastating epileptic syndrome.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Munc18/genética , Mutación/genética , Espasmos Infantiles/genética , Preescolar , Exones/genética , Humanos , Discapacidad Intelectual/genética , Discapacidad Intelectual/psicología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Espasmos Infantiles/diagnóstico por imagen , Espasmos Infantiles/psicología
5.
Epilepsy Res ; 108(7): 1243-52, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24908564

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed as adjunctive therapy in adults with partial-onset or focal seizures. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a clinical practice setting the long-term efficacy and safety of ESL in patients with focal seizures. METHODS: ESLIBASE was a retrospective study that included all patients with focal seizures who started ESL between January 2010 and July 2012 at 12 hospitals. ESL was prescribed individually according to real-life practice. Efficacy and safety were evaluated over 1 year. Switching from carbamazepine (CBZ) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) was assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-seven patients were included; 78% of patients were taking ≥2 other AEDs at baseline. Most (87%) began ESL because of poor seizure control and 13% because of adverse events (AEs) with CBZ or OXC. After 1 year, 237 patients (72.4%) remained on ESL. At 3, 6 and 12 months, the responder rate was 46.3%, 57.9%, and 52.5%, and 21.0%, 28.0%, and 25.3% of patients were seizure free. The responder rate significantly increased when ESL was combined with a non-sodium channel-targeting drug (non-SC drug) (66.7%) versus an SC drug (47.7%; p<0.001). At 12 months, 40.7% of patients had ≥1 AE; AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 16.2%. Dizziness, nausea, and somnolence were the most common AEs. The tolerability profile improved in >50% of the patients who switched from CBZ or OXC to ESL because of AEs. CONCLUSIONS: ESL was well tolerated and effective in a real-world setting over 1 year. Side-effect profile improved when OXC and CBZ recipients were switched to ESL.


Asunto(s)
Dibenzazepinas/uso terapéutico , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueadores del Canal de Sodio Activado por Voltaje/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...