Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 11: 236, 2011 Sep 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21896188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) within the first 48 hours of intensive care unit (ICU) stay has been poorly investigated. The objective was to estimate early-onset VAP occurrence in ICUs within 48 hours after admission. METHODS: We analyzed data from prospective surveillance between 01/01/2001 and 31/12/2009 in 11 ICUs of Lyon hospitals (France). The inclusion criteria were: first ICU admission, not hospitalized before admission, invasive mechanical ventilation during first ICU day, free of antibiotics at admission, and ICU stay ≥ 48 hours. VAP was defined according to a national protocol. Its incidence was the number of events per 1,000 invasive mechanical ventilation-days. The Poisson regression model was fitted from day 2 (D2) to D8 to incident VAP to estimate the expected VAP incidence from D0 to D1 of ICU stay. RESULTS: Totally, 367 (10.8%) of 3,387 patients in 45,760 patient-days developed VAP within the first 9 days. The predicted cumulative VAP incidence at D0 and D1 was 5.3 (2.6-9.8) and 8.3 (6.1-11.1), respectively. The predicted cumulative VAP incidence was 23.0 (20.8-25.3) at D8. The proportion of missed VAP within 48 hours from admission was 11% (9%-17%). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates underestimation of early-onset VAP incidence in ICUs, if only VAP occurring ≥ 48 hours are considered to be hospital-acquired. Clinicians should be encouraged to develop a strategy for early detection after ICU admission.


Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Estudios Prospectivos
2.
Bull Cancer ; 98(2): 199-208, 2011 Feb.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21349800

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Depression is an important symptom for many palliative care patients but is rarely identified. It's known to reduce quality of life and impact on palliation of physical symptom. These physical symptoms can be improved by an adequate treatment of depression. Many depressed cancer patients are not treated due to the difficulty in assessment. The Brief Edinburgh Depression Scale (BEDS) is widely used within the UK and also in other countries but its use is limited by the lack of translations. In this study, we report the translation and validation of the BEDS in French. METHOD: A group of experts translate the BEDS using back-to-back translation and the standard procedures of the EORTC. All the patients admitted to our Palliative Care Unit between November 2007 and April 2008 were eligible to take part in the study. The French BEDS was validated against the gold standard, a semi structured psychiatric interview (according to the SADS ou Schedule for Affective Disorders Scale). For this study full regional ethical approval was obtained. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients participated in the validation study. The prevalence of depression according to psychiatric interview was found to be 56.3% and the optimum cut-off of the French BEDS was 7, which yielded a sensitivity of 82.4% and a specificity of 68.4%. CONCLUSION: We believe that the French BEDS is a valid and sensitive tool for screening depression, and that it can be used within the palliative care population. Further work might be necessary to extend its use to the wider oncology population.


Asunto(s)
Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica Breve , Depresión/diagnóstico , Lenguaje , Neoplasias/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Traducciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica Breve/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias/terapia , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
3.
J Infect Public Health ; 3(3): 134-41, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20869675

RESUMEN

Incidence rates of bacteraemia and catheter-related infections were measured prospectively amongst haematological patients having long-term catheters and hospitalised in the ambulatory care unit between November 2005 and October 2006. The following risk factors were collected: age, sex, catheter type, follow-up duration, level of personal hygiene, pathology, number of lines of treatment, autograft and erythropoietin treatment. 340 patients were included, having 353 catheters (100 of the Groshong-type, followed during 17,621 days, and 253 of the type with implantable ports, followed during 51,049 days). 0.13 catheter-related infections and 0.07 bacteraemia per 100 catheter days were observed with the Groshong-type catheter, whereas 0.05 (P<10(-5)) catheter-related infections and 0.05 (P=0.048) bacteraemia were observed amongst patients with implantable ports. A multivariate analysis (Cox method taking into account the length of follow-up) on risk factors highlighted a significant effect of the type of catheter on catheter-related infections (Groshong versus implantable port OR=5.74, P<10(-3)), and of several factors on bacteraemia (lymphoma versus other pathologies OR=3.19, P=0.041; erythropoietin treatment OR=2.88, P=0.009; autograft OR=3.35, P=0.011; number of lines of treatment OR=0.68, P=0.047). It was not possible to determine if poor levels of personal hygiene had a significant impact, due to large numbers of missing data. These results, consistent with other studies, are not only useful in validating prevention policy but also in demonstrating lack of catheter traceability.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Atención Ambulatoria , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Femenino , Neoplasias Hematológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 31(4): 388-94, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20156064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The strength of the association between intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired nosocomial infections (NIs) and mortality might differ according to the methodological approach taken. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between ICU-acquired NIs and mortality using the concept of population-attributable fraction (PAF) for patient deaths caused by ICU-acquired NIs in a large cohort of critically ill patients. SETTING: Eleven ICUs of a French university hospital. DESIGN: We analyzed surveillance data on ICU-acquired NIs collected prospectively during the period from 1995 through 2003. The primary outcome was mortality from ICU-acquired NI stratified by site of infection. A matched-pair, case-control study was performed. Each patient who died before ICU discharge was defined as a case patient, and each patient who survived to ICU discharge was defined as a control patient. The PAF was calculated after adjustment for confounders by use of conditional logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 8,068 ICU patients, a total of 1,725 deceased patients were successfully matched with 1,725 control patients. The adjusted PAF due to ICU-acquired NI for patients who died before ICU discharge was 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.4%-14.8%). Stratified by the type of infection, the PAF was 6.1% (95% CI, 5.7%-6.5%) for pulmonary infection, 3.2% (95% CI, 2.8%-3.5%) for central venous catheter infection, 1.7% (95% CI, 0.9%-2.5%) for bloodstream infection, and 0.0% (95% CI, -0.4% to 0.4%) for urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: ICU-acquired NI had an important effect on mortality. However, the statistical association between ICU-acquired NI and mortality tended to be less pronounced in findings based on the PAF than in study findings based on estimates of relative risk. Therefore, the choice of methods does matter when the burden of NI needs to be assessed.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Causas de Muerte , Enfermedad Crítica , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Francia , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Riesgo
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(4): 327-32, 2008 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18462145

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether antibiotic prophylaxis against group B streptococcal infection may be a confounding factor in comparisons of rates of endometritis and urinary tract infection after vaginal delivery. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Maternity units at 48 hospitals in a regional surveillance network in France during 2001-2004. METHODS: The maternity units used a common protocol to establish whether antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated. Risk factors for endometritis and urinary tract infections were evaluated using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: We analyzed 49,786 vaginal deliveries. The percentage of women receiving antibiotic prophylaxis varied widely and significantly among the maternity units (range, 4.4%-26.0%; median, 15.8%; 25th percentile, 12.1%; 75th percentile, 19.0%) (P < .001, by Mantel-Haenszel chi(2) test). The incidence rate of endometritis was significantly reduced from 0.25% to 0.11% by antibiotic prophylaxis (P = .001). There was a decrease in the incidence of urinary tract infection from 0.37% to 0.32%, but it was not statistically significant (P = .251). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in the incidence of endometritis was observed when intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis against group B streptococcal infection was used. However, the proportion of women considered to be at risk of infection varied widely among institutions. Comparisons of rates of endometritis among maternity units, but not urinary tract infection rates, should take into account antibiotic prophylaxis as a significant confounding factor.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Endometritis/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/prevención & control , Streptococcus agalactiae , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Factores de Confusión Epidemiológicos , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Endometritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometritis/microbiología , Endometritis/prevención & control , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Servicio de Ginecología y Obstetricia en Hospital , Embarazo , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Vigilancia de Guardia , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/complicaciones , Infecciones Estreptocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
6.
J Crit Care ; 23(1): 27-33, 2008 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18359418

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare risk factors of early- (E) and late-onset (L) ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: An epidemiological survey based on a nosocomial infection surveillance program of 11 intensive care units (ICUs) of university teaching hospitals in Lyon, France, was conducted. A total of 7236 consecutive ventilated patients, older than 18 years and hospitalized in ICUs for at least 48 hours, were studied between 1996 and 2002. Data during ICU stay, patient-dependent risk factors, device exposure, nosocomial infections occurrence, and outcome were collected. The cutoff point definition between E-VAP (six days) was based on the daily hazard rate of VAP. RESULTS: The VAP incidence rate was 13.1%, 356 (37.6%) E-VAP (within 6 days of admission) and 590 (62.4%) L-VAP were reported. Independent risk factor for E-VAP vs L-VAP was surgical diagnostic category (odds ratio [OR], 1.49 [95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.07]), whereas independent risk factors for L-VAP vs E-VAP were older age (OR, 1.01 [1.01-1.02]), high Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (OR, 1.01 [1.00-1.02]), infection on admission (OR=2.22 [1.61-3.03]), another nosocomial infection before VAP (OR, 5.88 [3.33-11.11]), and exposure to central venous catheter before VAP (OR, 4.76 [1.04-20.00]). CONCLUSIONS: E-VAP and L-VAP have different risk factors, highlighting the need for developing specific preventive measures.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Asociada al Ventilador/epidemiología , Vigilancia de la Población , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
7.
Am J Infect Control ; 34(10): 627-35, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17161737

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In October 2004, The World Health Organization (WHO) launched the World Alliance for Patient Safety. Within the alliance, the first priority of the Global Patient Safety Challenge is to reduce health care-associated infection. A key action within the challenge is to promote hand hygiene in health care globally as well as at the country level through the campaign "Clean Care is Safer Care." As a result, the WHO is developing Guidelines on Hand Hygiene in Health Care, designed to be applicable throughout the world. METHODS: This paper summarizes one component of the global WHO guidelines related to the impact of hand hygiene on the skin of health care personnel, including a discussion of types of skin reactions associated with hand hygiene, methods to reduce adverse reactions, and factors to consider when selecting hand hygiene products. RESULTS: Health care professionals have a higher prevalence of skin irritation than seen in the general population because of the necessity for frequent hand hygiene during patient care. CONCLUSION: Ways to minimize adverse effects of hand hygiene include selecting less irritating products, using skin moisturizers, and modifying certain hand hygiene practices such as unnecessary washing. Institutions need to consider several factors when selecting hand hygiene products: dermal tolerance and aesthetic preferences of users as well as practical considerations such as convenience, storage, and costs.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Dermatitis por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Desinfección de las Manos , Personal de Salud , Jabones/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/normas , Antiinfecciosos Locales/provisión & distribución , Conducta de Elección , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Emolientes , Adhesión a Directriz , Dermatosis de la Mano/inducido químicamente , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Desinfección de las Manos/normas , Personal de Salud/educación , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Salud Laboral , Proyectos Piloto , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Cuidados de la Piel/métodos , Jabones/normas , Jabones/provisión & distribución , Organización Mundial de la Salud
8.
Intensive Care Med ; 32(12): 1987-93, 2006 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17019539

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether gas exchange response to a first prone position session can predict patient outcome in hypoxemic acute respiratory failure. METHODS: Data from a previous multicenter randomized controlled trial were retrospectively analyzed for relationship between PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio and PaCO(2) changes during the first 8-h prone position session to day 28 mortality rate; 370 prone position sessions were analyzed. Arterial blood gas was measured in supine position before proning and in prone position at the end of the session. Gas exchange improvement was defined as increase in the PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio of more than 20% (PaO(2)R) or decrease in PaCO(2) of more than 1 mmHg (PaCO(2)R). MAIN RESULTS: The 28-day mortality rate was 26.5% in PaO(2)R-PaCO(2)R, 31.7% in PaO(2)R-PaCO(2)NR, 38.9% in PaO(2)NR-PaCO(2)R, and 43% in PaO(2)NR-PaCO(2)NR (log-rank 14.02, p = 0.003). In a Cox proportional hazards model the gas exchange response was a significant predictor to patient outcome with a 82.5% increase in risk of death in the case of PaO(2)NR-PaCO(2)R or PaO(2)NR-PaCO(2)NR, relative to the gas exchange improvement response (odds ratio 1.825). However, after adjusting for the difference in oxygenation between day 2 and day 1 the gas exchange response does no longer reach significance. CONCLUSION: In patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure initial improvement in gas exchange in the first PP session was associated with a better outcome, but this association disappeared when the change in oxygenation from day 1 to day 2 was taken into account, suggesting that underlying illness was the most important predictor of mortality in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Hipoxia/mortalidad , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Posición Prona , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...