New technique of En bloc vertebral resection in the thoracolumbar region assisted by retroperitoneal laparoscopy in a single prone position: first results.

PURPOSE: To describe the technique and review the oncological and surgical results of the En Bloc resection assisted by retroperitoneal laparoscopy in a single prone position for tumors in the thoracolumbar region. METHODS: Monocentric retrospective case study. Procedure was performed in a single prone position by a dual team of spine and thoracovascular surgeons. An endoscopic balloon was inflated in the right retroperitoneal cavity. A plan was developed between the anterior spine and vena cava as well as abdominal aorta with segmental vessels ligation. Structures at risk were safely protected under endoscopy during horizontal or sagittal osteotomies. RESULTS: From 2021, seven patients aged a median 52 years old (range, 34-67) were included. Involved spinal segments went from T11 to L3. Surgery was aborted in one case due to massive bleeding and ventilating difficulties. There were two partial and four total vertebral resections. Median operating duration and estimated blood loss were 405 min (range, 360-540) and 2.1 L (range, 1.2-19), respectively. Postoperative complications consisted of 1 urinary infection; 1 transient urinary retention; 1 posterior wound infection; 1 pneumothorax; 1 persistent partial motor deficit; 1 transient confusion; 1 pulmonary embolism; 1 CSF leak; 1 subdural hematoma; 1 retroperitoneal lymphocele. All margins were uncontaminated. All patients were alive and ambulatory at last follow-up. CONCLUSION: Early results suggest En Bloc resection assisted by retroperitoneal videoscopy in tumors from T11 to L3/4 disk space is feasible, less invasive and safe. Careful surgical planning and experience in endoscopic vascular surgery are mandatory.

En bloc video-assisted thoracoscopic vertebrectomy for a spinal tumour.

Complex thoracic vertebral tumours remain a surgical challenge in terms of the surgical approach to ensure a complete en bloc vertebrectomy with healthy margins, along with optimal control of the thoracic structures next to the spine. A combined three-port left thoracoscopic posterior approach, with the patient placed in a prone position with selective double-lumen intubation, can be performed in patients with spinal tumours involving soft tissues, for direct access to the thoracic structures, even with T10-T11 vertebral tumours next to the diaphragm. The video thoracoscopic technique with an enhanced view of the posterior mediastinum permits progressive dissection of the descending aorta, oesophagus, azygos vein, thoracic ductus and diaphragmatic pillars from the vertebral body that is involved by the spinal tumour. The complete dissection of those structures from the spine provides a good surgical view of the contralateral pleural cavity to enable complete control of the tumoral mass. A complete en bloc vertebrectomy with spinal cord ligation is then completely and safely performed with Gigli saws above and under the tumour, respecting healthy tissue margins, under video thoracoscopic monitoring of the anterior structures. Finally, a spinal prosthesis is positioned through the posterior access and stabilized with thoracic and lumbar spinal arthrodesis.

Primary Thoracic Endografting for T4 Lung Cancer Aortic Involvement.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to present the results in patients with a T4 thoracic tumor with aortic involvement who were treated with a thoracic endograft before surgical resection. DESCRIPTION: All consecutive patients undergoing a thoracic endograft procedure before an oncologic resection between January 2012 and December 2019 were reviewed in a single-center retrospective study. Included patients had either a T4 lung tumor or a mediastinal tumor invading the thoracic aorta. EVALUATION: Nine patients were included: 7 with T4 lung cancer, 1 with sarcoma, and 1 patient with thymoma. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 22-47 months). There were no endograft-related complications. All but 1 patient had an R0 oncologic resection. Eight patients were alive and free from recurrence at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Use of thoracic stent grafting before surgical resection for patients with a thoracic tumor invading the aorta is a feasible option that obviates the need for extracorporeal circulation and its associated morbidity. This technique could be an alternative strategy in the treatment of tumors invading the thoracic aorta.

Long-term outcomes after chest wall resection and repair with titanium bars and sternal plates.

Objectives: En-bloc complete resection remains the treatment of choice for localized chest wall (CW) tumors. Titanium bars reconstruction demonstrated encouraging results with satisfactory early outcomes. However, long-term outcomes remain under-reported. The purpose of this study is to evaluate long-term outcomes after CW resection and repair with titanium devices. Methods: From June 2012 to December 2018, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with CW tumors who underwent surgical resection and repair using titanium. Long-term outcomes were assessed. Results: We identified 87 patients who underwent CW tumor resections and titanium reconstruction. Sixty-eight patients were included in the study (excluding benign tumors, Pancoast tumors, palliative surgeries, or clavicle reconstruction). There were 29 sarcomas, 20 isolated CW metastases, eight lung cancers, four breast cancers, three thymic malignancies, two sarcomatoid mesothelioma, and one desmoid tumor. Complete resection was achieved in 64 patients (94%), while R1 resection in four patients (6%). Resection involved one rib in two patients, two ribs in thirteen, three ribs in eighteen, four ribs in nine, five ribs in two, seven ribs in one, partial sternum in fifteen, and full sternum in sixteen patients. No patient experienced flail chest. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates and disease-free survivals were 82.3%, 61.4%,57.3%, and 67.6%,57.3%,52.6%, respectively. Surgical site infection occurred in 18% (n = 12) of cases. Eleven of twelve patients had an early infection (<1 year), which required material removal in six patients. Asymptomatic connector unsealing occurred in 6% (n = 4), with only one re-intervention. Titanium allergy has never been reported. Chronic chest pain (lasting more than 3 months after surgery, with daily use of pain killer) was reported in 24% of patients. Conclusion: CW resections with titanium reconstruction are associated with long-term survivors. Titanium devices were safe, reliable, and achieved satisfactory oncological results with low morbidity and implant-related complication rates.

Pulmonary thromboendarterectomy: The Marie Lannelongue Hospital experience.

Background: Targeted medical therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) entered the field of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) treatment in the early 2010's. Multimodal therapy is emerging as the new gold standard for CTEPH management. Whether this change of paradigm impacted early outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) remains unknown. Our aim is to report our surgical experience in the era of CTEPH multimodal management. Methods: Patients who underwent PEA between 2016 and 2020 were included in the study. Early outcomes were described and compared between three groups of patients: PEA alone, PEA after targeted medical therapy induction and PEA after BPA. Results: A total of 418 patients, 225 males and 193 females, with a mean age of 59±14 years were included in the study. 336 patients underwent PEA alone, 69 after medical targeted therapy induction and 13 after unilateral BPA. Baseline preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance [4.99 (IQR, 1.71-8.48), 6.21 (IQR, 4.37-8.1), 5.03 (IQR, 4.44-7.19) wood units (WU), P=0.230, respectively] and PEA effectiveness [% decrease mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), 24 (IQR, 7-42), 25 (IQR, 7-35), 23 (IQR, 3-29), P=0.580] did not differ between groups. Compared to PEA alone and PEA+BPA, the medical therapy induction group represented the most challenging group with higher baseline mPAP (45±10 vs. 42±11 and 43±11 mmHg, P=0.047), longer circulatory arrest time (30.1±15 vs. 26.6±10 and 19.6±6 min, P=0.005), higher post-PEA extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use (20.6% vs. 8.7 and 9.1%, P=0.004), higher duration on mechanical ventilation [4 (IQR, 1-12) vs. 1 (IQR, 0.5-5) and 2 (IQR, 1-3) days, P=0.005], higher complication rate (85.5% vs. 74.6% and 76.9%, P=0.052) and higher 90-day mortality (13% vs. 3.9% and 0%, P=0.002). Compared to PEA and PEA+ medical therapy induction groups, patients in the BPA induction group were older [72 (IQR, 62-76) vs. 60 (IQR, 48-69) and 62 (IQR, 52-72) years, P=0.005], and underwent shorter cardiopulmonary bypass (191.9±47.9 vs. 222±107.2 and 236.8±46.4 min, P<0.001), aortic cross clamping (54.8±21 vs. 82.7±31.4 and 80.1±32.9 min, P=0.002) and circulatory arrest time (19.6±6.2 vs. 26.6±10.8 and 30.1±15.1 min, P=0.008). Conclusions: Multimodal therapy approach to CTEPH patients did not affect effectiveness of PEA. Medical therapy and BPA could act in synergy with surgery to treat more challenging patients.

Midterm results after covered stenting of the superior mesenteric artery.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the continuing controversy of covered stents (CS) vs bare metal stents, the use of CS in mesenteric occlusive disease (MOD) has been recommended by expert centers. The aim of this study was to report midterm results with CS of the superior mesenteric artery. METHODS: Between January 2014 and October 2019, patients with MOD with a severe atheromatous stenosis or occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery treated by mesenteric CS were included. Clinical presentation included both acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), chronic mesenteric ischemia, and asymptomatic patients planned for major surgery. Demographics, procedure details, and follow-up data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Study end points included primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency. RESULTS: During the study period, 86 patients (mean age, 70 ± 9 years; 57% males) were included. Clinical presentation was AMI (n = 42 [49%]), chronic mesenteric ischemia (n = 31 [36%]), and asymptomatic (n = 13 [15%]). The technical success rate was 97%. A total of 96 stents were implanted, including 86 proximal CS (Advanta V12, n = 73; Lifestream, n = 13). The mean length and mean diameter of the CS were 31.5 ± 6.3 mm and 6.9 ± 0.5 mm, respectively. Additional distal bare metal stents were used in 10 patients (12%) to overcome a kinking (n = 9) or a dissection (n = 1) downstream of the CS. All postoperative deaths occurred in patients with AMI (n = 11, 13%). During a median follow-up of 15.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 15.6 ± 3.6 months), 12 patients (14%) underwent reinterventions for either stent misplacement (n = 3), stent recoil (n = 3), stent thrombosis (n = 2), de novo stenosis at the distal edge of the CS (n = 2), or gastric ischemia (n = 1). At 1 year, overall the primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 83% (95% CI, 83% ± 9%), 99% (95% CI, 99% ± 3%), and 99% (95% CI, 99% ± 3%), respectively. At 2 years, the overall primary patency, primary assisted patency, and secondary patency rates were 76% (95% CI, 76% ± 13%), 95% (95% CI, 95% ± 8%) and 95% (95% CI, 95% ± 8%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mesenteric CS provide very satisfactory midterm results in patients with MOD, with an excellent primary assisted patency rate at 2 years, at the price of a significant reintervention rate.

Outcome of Lung Transplantation Using Grafts From Donors Over 65 Years of Age.

BACKGROUND: The outcome of lung transplantation (LT) is correlated with donor selection. A donor age of 65 years is classically considered a contraindication to lung procurement, and the results of LT from elderly donors remain to be established. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database including all LTs performed in a single institution (Bichat Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France) from January 2014 to March 2019. Donors65 years of age or older were included in the elderly group, whereas donors younger than 65 years of age were included in the control group. RESULTS: The study group included 241 LTs, including 44 (18%) in the elderly group and 197 (82%) in the control group. As compared with the control group, the elderly group was characterized by the following: donors of shorter stature (166 cm vs 172 cm; P = .04) and with less smoking history (14% vs 40%; P = .001), less bronchoscopic abnormality (20% vs 36%; P = .042), and less chest opacity (16% vs 30%; P = .048); and recipients of shorter stature (166 cm vs 170 cm; P = .04) but with similar diagnoses and gravity. There was no significant difference between the groups in any of the outcomes studied, including primary graft dysfunction, 30-day mortality, 1-year survival, chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival, and overall survival. In univariate analysis, the Oto lung donor score was the only factor associated with 1-year survival (score of 6 in alive patients vs score of 7 in dead patients; P = .04); donor age 65 years old or older was not. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully selected lung grafts from donors 65 years of age or older are associated with outcomes similar to those reported with grafts from younger donors Grafts from older donors thus provide an interesting option to expand the donor pool during a shortage.

Specific Considerations for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation During Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is recognized as organ support for potentially reversible acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, limited resource during the outbreak and the coagulopathy associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) make the utilization of venovenous (VV) ECMO highly challenging. We herein report specific considerations for cannulation configurations and ECMO management during the pandemic. High blood flow and anticoagulation at higher levels than usual practice for VV ECMO may be required because of thrombotic hematologic profile of COVID-19. Among our first 24 cases (48.8 ± 8.9 years), 17 patients were weaned from ECMO after a mean duration of 19.0 ± 10.1 days and 16 of them have been discharged from ICU.

Preclosing of the femoral artery allows total percutaneous venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and prevents groin wound infection after lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: In lung transplantation (LT), femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) usually requires an open approach that may be associated with severe groin wound infection. In endovascular aortic procedures, preclosing of the femoral artery (PFA) with vascular closure devices allows the percutaneous insertion and withdrawal of large-bore cannulae. We sought to evaluate whether this innovative technique could be applied in the specific setting of LT to achieve total percutaneous VA-ECMO and decrease groin wound infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of a prospective database including patients who underwent LT in our centre from January 2011 to December 2017. Patients who underwent peripheral VA-ECMO using the PFA technique after January 2014 (PFA group, n = 106) were compared to those who underwent peripheral VA-ECMO using open cannulation and/or decannulation before January 2014 (non-PFA group, n = 48). The primary end point was the rate of technical success defined as total percutaneous VA-ECMO. Secondary end points included groin wound infections and delayed vascular complications. RESULTS: The PFA technique was technically successful in 98 patients (92.5%). As compared with the non-PFA group, the PFA group was characterized by a similar rate of vascular complications (16.6% vs 11.3%, P = 0.360) and a decreased rate of groin wound infection (18.9% vs 0%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, risk factors associated with vascular complications following PFA included female sex, peripheral arterial disease and ECMO duration. CONCLUSIONS: In LT patients, PFA is associated with a high rate of total percutaneous VA-ECMO, thus preventing the occurrence of groin wound infection.

Optimising Aortic Endovascular Repair in Patients with Marfan Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: In Marfan syndrome (MFS) patients, endovascular repair carries a risk of aortic wall injury, which may result in retrograde aortic dissection, dilatation, or false aneurysm at the landing zones. It was hypothesised that potentially these complications may be avoided using modified practices. This study aimed to describe experience of a specific protocol for endovascular aortic repair in patients with MFS. METHODS: All MFS patients treated by aortic endovascular repair between February 2015 and August 2018 were included prospectively. The following rules were applied: (i) excluding stent grafts with bare stents and barbs, (ii) proximal landing in a pre-existing graft, or (iii) minimising proximal oversizing when landing in the proximal native aorta (<10%), and (iv) distal undersizing for chronic dissection cases. RESULTS: In eighteen patients (55% men, mean age: 47 ± 17 years), the index procedures were initial endovascular aortic repair (n = 10), elephant trunk completion (n = 6), and anastomotic pseudo-aneurysm after thoracic open repair (n = 2). The technical success rate was 100%. Proximal landing was in the native aorta in 11 patients (61%), with a mean proximal oversizing of 2.4 mm (8% oversized). Distal landing in the native aorta was performed in 16 cases (89%), with a mean distal undersizing of 8.9 mm (- 23%). No mortality, spinal cord ischaemia, stroke, or retrograde aortic dissection occurred post-operatively. One type 1b endoleak was observed. The mean follow up was 21.4 months. Aortic aneurysm related mortality was 5% (n = 1) and occurred after distal thoraco-abdominal surgery planned from the outset (prior to endovascular repair). Another patient presented a proximal landing zone complication with aortic enlargement. The mean maximum aortic diameter decreased significantly from 59 mm to 45 mm (p = .0005) after treatment. CONCLUSION: The specific protocol described in this study seems to optimise the results of endovascular aortic repair in MFS patients with significant aortic remodelling.

False lumen embolization in chronic aortic dissection promotes thoracic aortic remodeling at midterm follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Failure of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in chronic aortic dissections can be partially explained by retrograde false lumen (FL) flow through distal re-entry tears. After implantation of a thoracic stent graft, FL thrombosis occurs in less than 50% of the cases. The objectives of this study were to describe the feasibility and outcomes of FL embolization in patients with chronic aortic dissections. METHODS: Between June 2015 and January 2018, 27 patients (mean age, 61 ± 14 years) with chronic aortic dissection underwent FL embolization as an adjunct during or after TEVAR placement procedure. Indications for embolization were (1) symptomatic chronic aortic dissections with pain or rapid growth of aortic diameter (≥5 mm/y) requiring rapid exclusion of the aneurysm, (2) aneurysmal dilatation with persistent FL retrograde flow after TEVAR, and (3) large FL aneurysms (≥55 mm) that might lead to persistent retrograde flow. Twenty patients presented with type B chronic aortic dissections (74.1%) and seven presented a residual type A chronic aortic dissections (25.9%). Eight patients had a previous aortic arch replacement (29.6%). Six patients had previous repair with TEVAR (22.2%). The delay between the onset of dissection and the first endovascular repair was 47 months (range, 3-144). Spinal fluid drainage was used in 74.1% of cases (20/27 patients). Embolization devices included coils and vascular plugs. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100% (27/27). Complete spinal cord ischemia was observed in one patient (3.7%). There was one hospital death from pneumonia after zone 1 supra-aortic trunk debranching with TEVAR and embolization. After the index procedure, FL thrombosis was observed in 81.5% of patients (22/27) on late phase computed tomography angiography. Five patients required two or more embolization procedures, leading to a high rate of complete FL thrombosis (92.6%). One patient presented a type IB endoleak and one patient presented a type II endoleak. Radiologic follow-up was 20 ± 10 months. The maximum thoracic aortic diameter significantly decreased from 63 mm to 54 ± 10 mm (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Embolization of the FL of chronic aortic dissections is technically feasible with a low morbidity rate. The FL thrombosis is observed in the majority of case and promotes favorable thoracic aortic remodeling. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these good results on the thoracic aorta and this technique may, therefore, improve the results of TEVAR in chronic aortic dissections.

Experience of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System in the emergency setting of malperfusion in acute type B dissections.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System (Cook Medical, Bloomington, Ind) in the urgent treatment of acute type B aortic dissections complicated by organ malperfusion. METHODS: Between June 2011 and June 2013, we prospectively enrolled all patients with acute type B dissection (<14 days) complicated by visceral malperfusion and treated by the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System, including a proximal covered stent and a distal noncovered stent. Organ malperfusion was diagnosed during the clinical, biological, and morphologic follow-up of patients admitted to a dedicated intensive care unit (SOS Aorta). End points were 30-day mortality and morbidity, and reoperation rate, survival, and remodelling of the dissected aorta during follow-up. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (11 men; mean age, 60 ± 12 years) were treated in emergency procedures with a median delay of 36 hours. Malperfusions included renal ischemia in all patients, intestinal ischemia in nine, and lower limb ischemia in six. The proximal entry tear in each patient was covered by a stent Zenith TX2 graft (mean diameter, 36 mm; mean length, 170 mm; Cook Medical), supplemented by a noncovered aortic stent (diameter, 36 or 46 mm; length, 164 mm) with a technical success rate of 100%. The left subclavian artery in 10 patients was covered without revascularization. One chimney was necessary to revascularize the left common carotid artery. Six patients required complementary arterial branch stenting for persistent static malperfusion, using eight peripheral stents (five iliacs, three renals). No deaths were recorded during the 30-day postoperative period. Major adverse events were reported in three patients (20%): 1 paraparesis with complete recovery, 1 colonic resection, 1 stroke, and 2 transient renal failures. The mean hospital stay was 14 ± 6 days. During a mean follow-up of 8 ± 3 months, one sudden death, no aortic-related complications, and no reoperations or conversions were recorded. Remodelling with healing of the thoracic false lumen was obtained in 10 patients (67%), and five others had a partially thrombosed false lumen without remodelling. CONCLUSIONS: Used as a treatment for organ malperfusion complicating acute type B dissections, the Zenith Dissection Endovascular System achieved safely and effectively satisfactory clinical results in the short term. The long-term effect of this composite treatment on aortic remodelling remains to be determined.