Caring for a child with retinoblastoma: Experience of Ethiopian parents.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the lived experience of parents of children with retinoblastoma. DESIGN AND METHOD: A phenomenological qualitative study design was used, and a purposive sampling technique to recruit parents of children with retinoblastoma. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to document the lived experience of participants, who were asked to narrate their experiences caring for a child with retinoblastoma, thinking back to the day they learned about their child's condition, as well as their thoughts about the future. The interviews were conducted in Amharic and Oromo language, and audio recordings were transcribed and translated to English. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen parents (seven mothers, six fathers) participated in the study. Collectively, the children of the participants represented all the stages of the retinoblastoma journey (i.e., diagnosis, treatment, remission, and recurrence). Five major themes emerged from the thematic data analysis: (a) reactions when learning the child's condition; (b) receiving health care; (c) costs of caregiving; (d) support; and (e) uncertainties. CONCLUSION: The lived experiences of parents of children with retinoblastoma revealed a significant mental health and psychosocial burden. The sources of mental distress were found to be complex and varied. Holistic care for retinoblastoma should include programs that address the biopsychosocial needs of caregivers.

Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Kessler-10 among Ethiopian adults.

BACKGROUND: Many common mental disorders are underdiagnosed and undertreated in low-resource countries. The ten-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) is a brief screening tool widely used to assess psychological distress. We evaluated the K10's performance in an Ethiopian population by assessing internal consistency and construct validity through factor structure. METHODS: K10 survey responses and sociodemographic data were collected from 1928 adults, including patients and caregivers from a general medical setting, who served as controls of a large epidemiological study. RESULTS: The K10 had good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.83. Results from exploratory factor analyses showed that the K10 had a two-factor solution that accounted for approximately 66% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that a unidimensional model with correlated errors, informed by a theoretical model, was the best fitting model for the setting (comparative fit index of 0.90 and root mean square error of approximation of 0.10). LIMITATIONS: We did not assess the K10's test-retest reliability or its criterion validity (i.e., agreement with a reference measure). CONCLUSIONS: Based on internal consistency and construct validity, the K10 can effectively assess psychological distress among Ethiopian adults for population-based research and potentially clinical screening, consistent with previous findings in this setting. Further studies are needed to test its criterion validity against a reference measure of psychological distress.

Measuring Traumatic Experiences in a Sample of Ethiopian Adults: Psychometric Properties of the Life Events Checklist-5.

Background: Traumatic events. e.g., road traffic accidents, violent conflicts, natural and human-made disasters, are common in sub-Saharan Africa. However, validated trauma screening tools to assess trauma at the individual level are lacking in many sub-Saharan African countries, such as Ethiopia, which limits accurate diagnosis and effective care provision. Objective: We sought to measure trauma exposure among cases and controls and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Life Event Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5) among Ethiopian adults. Method: This study included 4,183 participants (2,255 cases with a clinical diagnosis of psychosis and 1,928 controls without a history of psychosis) from the Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Populations-Psychosis (NeuroGAP-Psychosis) study. We conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to group the items into factors/subscales, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to investigate the best model fit in Ethiopia. Result: 48.7% of participants reported exposure to at least one traumatic event. Physical assault (19.6%), sudden violent death (12.0%), and sudden accidental death (10.9%) were the three most common traumatic experiences. Cases were twice as likely to report experiences of traumatic events compared to controls (p<0.001). EFA revealed a four-factor/subscale model. CFA results indicated a theoretically-driven seven-factor model to be the preferred model by the goodness of fit (comparative fit index of 0.965 and Tucker-Lewis index of 0.951) and accuracy (root mean square error of approximation of 0.019). Conclusion: Exposure to traumatic events was common in Ethiopia, even more so for individuals with a diagnosis of psychotic disorders. The LEC-5 demonstrated good construct validity for measuring traumatic events among Ethiopian adults. Future studies that examine criterion validity and test-retest reliability of the LEC-5 in Ethiopia are warranted.

Growing Ignorance of COVID-19 Preventive Measures in Ethiopia: Experts' Perspective on the Need of Effective Health Communication Strategies.

Despite the recent surge of COVID-19 infections in Ethiopia, we are observing a profound ignorance of preventive measures by the general public and leaders at different levels. This is presenting considerable challenges in the effort to contain and control the pandemic. We believe that the current health communication approach implemented by the health authorities and media outlets need to be redesigned to bring a sustainable COVID-19 preventive behavior. The purpose of this perspective paper, therefore, is to stimulate discussions on effective health communication strategy to help the public persistently practice COVID-19 preventive measures over the long term. We undertook a series of discussions amongst the authors in order to synthesize individual viewpoints into 'experts' perspective' driven by our daily observations and our expertise in the health service research. In light of this, we suggested that an effective health communication strategy need to address context specific situations to avoid temptation to ignore the ramifications of this very serious pandemic. This strategy includes trying to make sense of daily reported COVID-19 cases, being highly selective regarding sources of information, and being sensitive and responsive to religious and cultural factors. The media, health professionals, and leaders need to teach us how to live with the pandemic informed by robust scientific sources.