Italy: Health System Review.

This analysis of the Italian health system reviews recent developments in organization and governance, health financing, health care provision, health reforms and health system performance. Italy has a regionalized National Health Service (SSN) that provides universal coverage largely free of charge at the point of delivery, though certain services and goods require a co-payment. Life expectancy in Italy is historically among the highest in the EU. However, regional differences in health indicators are marked, as well as in per capita spending, distribution of health professionals and in the quality of health services. Overall, Italy's health spending per capita is lower than the EU average and is among the lowest in western European countries. Private spending has increased in recent years, although this trend was halted in 2020 during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A key focus of health policies in recent decades was to promote a shift away from unnecessary inpatient care, with a considerable reduction of acute hospital beds and stagnating overall growth in health personnel. However, this was not counterbalanced by a sufficient strengthening of community services in order to cope with the ageing population's needs and related chronic conditions burden. This had important repercussions during the COVID-19 emergency, as the health system felt the impact of previous reductions in hospital beds and capacity and underinvestment in community-based care. Reorganizing hospital and community care will require a strong alignment between central and regional authorities. The COVID-19 crisis also highlighted several issues pre-dating the pandemic that need to be addressed to improve the sustainability and resilience of the SSN. The main outstanding challenges for the health system are linked to addressing historic underinvestment in the health workforce, modernizing outdated infrastructure and equipment, and enhancing information infrastructure. Italy's National Recovery and Resilience Plan, underwritten by the Next Generation EU budget to assist with economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, contains specific health sector priorities, such as strengthening the country's primary and community care, boosting capital investment and funding the digitalization of the health care system.

The measurement of relative efficiency of general practice and the implications for policy makers.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare technical efficiency of general practice (GP) delivered by the twenty Regions of Italy's decentralized healthcare system and to determine if it was affected by contextual factors. METHODS: First, we calculated the Regional efficiency scores by means of Data Envelopment Analysis. Then we carried out a regression analysis to investigate the influence of contextual factors on the efficiency in the provision of GP services. RESULTS: Six Northern Regions were identified as efficient using the best combinations of general practitioners to deliver a given level of GP outcomes. Compared with peer benchmarks, inefficient Regions used more (on-call and regular) general practitioners with important underproductions of outputs (e.g. avoidable hospitalizations). The regression analysis showed a negative relationship between efficiency and the Regional total health care expenditures as percentage of its Gross Domestic Product. DISCUSSION: Improving efficiency of GP services delivery is likely to result in reduced health expenditures. Since there is a general tendency in Europe to decentralize governmental systems of countries and Italy can be seen as an extreme example of this trend, we consider our findings of high relevance for international comparative studies on performance of primary care systems.