Outcomes of Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Carcinoma, with or without Prior Cervical Excision Procedure.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of a prior cervical excisional procedure on the oncologic outcomes of patients with apparent early-stage cervical carcinoma undergoing radical hysterectomy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (2004-2015) was accessed, and patients with FIGO 2009 stage IB1 cervical cancer who had a radical hysterectomy with at least 10 lymph nodes (LNs) removed and a known surgical approach were identified. Patients who did and did not undergo a prior cervical excisional procedure (within 3 months of hysterectomy) were selected for further analysis. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated following the generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control a priori-selected confounders. RESULTS: A total of 3159 patients were identified; 37.1% (n = 1171) had a prior excisional procedure. These patients had lower rates of lymphovascular invasion (29.2% vs. 34.9%, p = 0.014), positive LNs (6.7% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.001), and a tumor size >2 cm (25.7% vs. 56%, p < 0.001). Following stratification by tumor size, the performance of an excisional procedure prior to radical hysterectomy was associated with better OS even after controlling for confounders (aHR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.66). The rate of minimally invasive surgery was higher among patients who had a prior excisional procedure (61.5% vs. 53.2%, p < 0.001). For these patients, performance of minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not associated with worse OS (aHR: 1.37, 95% CI: 0.66, 2.82). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing radical hysterectomy, preoperative cervical excision may be associated with a survival benefit. For patients who had a prior excisional procedure, minimally invasive radical hysterectomy was not associated with worse overall survival.

Role of systematic lymphadenectomy at the time of interval debulking surgery for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma who achieved complete gross resection.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma who achieved complete gross resection. METHODS: The National Cancer DataBase was accessed, and patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with advanced-stage ovarian carcinoma who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery and achieved complete gross resection were identified. Patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy and those who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy (defined as at least 20 lymph nodes removed) were selected for further analysis. Median overall survival was compared with the log-rank test and controlled for a priori selected confounders. RESULTS: A total of 1060 patients were identified. Systematic lymphadenectomy was performed for 125 (11.8%) patients with a median of 29 lymph nodes (range 20-72) removed. Rate of lymph node metastasis was 62.4%. Patients who underwent systematic lymphadenectomy had higher rate of unplanned readmission (8.9% vs 1.6%, p<0.001), and median hospital stay (6 vs 4 days, p<0.001). Median overall survival for patients who did and did not undergo systematic lymphadenectomy was 44.2 and 40.4 months, respectively, p=0.40. After controlling for confounders, performance of systematic lymphadenectomy was not associated with better survival (HR=0.98, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.19). CONCLUSION: Systematic lymphadenectomy is rarely performed at the time of interval cytoreductive surgery and not associated with a survival benefit for patients who achieved complete gross resection.

Molecular landscape of ERBB2/HER2 gene amplification among patients with gynecologic malignancies; clinical implications and future directions.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the prevalence of ERBB2/HER2 gene amplification among patients with gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: The American Association of Cancer Research (AACR) Genomics Evidence of Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) (version 13.1) database was accessed and patients with endometrial, ovarian, and cervical cancer were identified. Patients with available data on the presence of copy-number gene alterations were selected for further analysis. Incidence of ERBB2 amplification following stratification by tumor site and histology was evaluated. Data from the OncoKB database, as provided by cBioPortal, was utilized to determine presence of pathogenic genomic alterations. RESULTS: A total of 6961 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified: 49.1% with ovarian cancer, 45.2% with endometrial cancer and 5.7% with cervical cancer respectively. Overall incidence of ERBB2 amplification was 3.8%. Highest incidence of ERBB2 amplification was observed among patients with mucinous ovarian (14.4%), uterine serous (13.2%), uterine clear cell (9.4%), and uterine carcinosarcoma (7.9%). ERBB2 amplification was rare among patients with TP53 wild-type endometrioid endometrial cancer (0.4%). High incidence of mutations in genes of the PI3K pathway was observed among patients with ERBB2 amplified tumors. CONCLUSION: ERBB2 amplification is frequently encountered among patients with uterine serous carcinoma, and mucinous ovarian carcinoma. In addition, a high incidence was also observed among those with uterine clear cell carcinoma, and uterine carcinosarcoma. For patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, incidence of ERBB2 amplification is low, especially in the absence of TP53 mutations.

Impact of delayed interval cytoreductive surgery on the survival of patients with advanced stage high-grade epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to use real-world data to investigate the impact of delayed interval cytoreductive surgery on the survival of patients with advanced stage high-grade ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: We accessed the National Cancer Database and identified patients diagnosed between 2004-2015 with advanced stage high-grade ovarian carcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and underwent interval cytoreductive surgery. Based on timing between surgery and chemotherapy administration patients were categorized into standard (9-13.0 weeks) and delayed (13.01-26 weeks) interval cytoreductive surgery groups. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test and a Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders. RESULTS: We identified a total of 5051 patients; 2389 (47.3%) and 2662 (52.7%) in the standard and delayed interval cytoreductive surgery groups respectively. There was no difference in complete gross resection rates (53.2% vs 54.5%, p=0.51). Patients in the delayed interval cytoreductive surgery group were less likely to undergo complex surgery (39.3% vs 45.6%, p<0.001) and had lower rates of unplanned re-admission (4.1% vs 2.6%, p=0.003). There was no difference in overall survival between the standard and delayed interval cytoreductive surgery groups, p=0.13 (median 34.3 vs 33.9 months) even after controlling for confounders (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.97, 1.12). There was no difference in overall survival between the two groups for patients with no gross residual (p=0.95; median overall survival 40.08 vs 39.8 months) or gross residual disease (p=0.16; median overall survival 32.89 and 32.16 months). CONCLUSION: For patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer delayed interval cytoreductive surgery may not be associated with worse overall survival.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the overall survival of patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use and outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary debulking surgery with known residual disease status and had at least 1 month of follow-up were identified in the National Cancer Database. Adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as receipt of chemotherapy within 6 months of surgery. Overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori-selected confounders. A systematic review of the literature was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 618 patients with stage II-IV low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery were identified; 501 (81.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, while 117 (18.9%) patients did not. The median follow-up of the present cohort was 47.97 months. There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p=0.78; 4-year overall survival rates were 77.5% and 76.1%, respectively). After controlling for patient age, medical co-morbidities, disease stage, and residual disease status, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR=0.87, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.38). Based on data from three retrospective studies, omission of adjuvant chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery was not associated with worse progression-free survival benefit (HR=1.25, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.95) for patients with stage III-V low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be associated with an overall survival benefit for patients with advanced-stage low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma following primary cytoreductive surgery.

Role of immunotherapy for lymph node positive vulvar melanoma: utilization and outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utilization and outcomes of adjuvant immunotherapy for patients with vulvar melanoma and inguinal lymph node metastases. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients with vulvar melanoma diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who did not have distant metastases, underwent inguinal lymphadenectomy, had positive lymph nodes, and at least 1 month of follow-up were identified. Administration of immunotherapy was evaluated and clinicopathological characteristics were compared. Median overall survival was compared with the log-rank test. Stratified analysis based on clinical status of lymph nodes was performed. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were identified; the rate of immunotherapy use was 25% (75 patients). Patients who received immunotherapy were younger (median 58 vs 70 years, p<0.001); however, the two groups were comparable in terms of clinical lymph node status, rate of positive tumor margins, presence of tumor ulceration, tumor size, Breslow thickness, and performance of comprehensive lymphadenectomy. There was no overall survival difference between patients who did (median 31.08 months) and did not (median 22.77 months) receive immunotherapy (p=0.18). Following stratification by clinical lymph node status, immunotherapy did not improve overall survival of patients with clinically negative (median 35.35 vs 33.22, p=0.75) or positive lymph nodes (median 23.33 vs 16.99, p=0.64). After controlling for confounders, administration of immunotherapy was not associated with better overall survival (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.14). CONCLUSIONS: In this study approximately one in four patients received adjuvant immunotherapy. Immunotherapy was not associated with improved overall survival.

Facility level variation in the utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with higher surgical morbidity for patients with advanced stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate outcomes for advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients based on facility-level utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: Stage III-IV EOC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the National Cancer Database. Percentage of patients managed with NACT was calculated for facilities, reporting ≥120 patients. Facilities with lowest and highest quartile of NACT rate comprised the low and high-utilizing groups. Clinico-pathological characteristics were collected, and appropriate statistical analysis performed. RESULTS: High- and low-utilizing facilities managed on average 54.1% and 25.4% of patients with NACT respectively. Patients managed at high-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65 (p = 0.029), have stage IV disease (p < 0.001) and comorbidities (p < 0.001). Patients managed with primary debulking surgery (PDS) at low-utilizing facilities were significantly more likely to be >65, have stage IV disease, and have comorbidities (all, p < 0.001). Patients undergoing PDS at low-utilizing facilities were significantly less likely to achieve complete gross resection (p < 0.001), and were significantly more likely to experience 90-day mortality (p < 0.001), and unplanned 30-day readmission (p < 0.001). After controlling for age, comorbidities, race, insurance status, stage, grade and histology, high-utilizing facilities trended towards better overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85-0.99). Overall, patients undergoing PDS had better OS compared to those who had NACT (median 42 vs 27 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite treating an EOC population with more advanced disease and comorbidities, high-utilizing facilities have lower surgical morbidity and mortality with no detrimental impact on long-term survival. Careful patient selection to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with PDS is pivotal.

Addition of External Beam Radiation Therapy to Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage IIIC Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma: Utilization and Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate whether the addition of external beam radiation (EBRT) to adjuvant chemotherapy with or without vaginal brachytherapy is associated with better survival for patients with stage IIIC endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 with apparent early-stage endometrioid adenocarcinoma, without a history of another tumor, who underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy and had positive lymph nodes were identified in the National Cancer Database. Those who received adjuvant chemotherapy (defined as receipt of treatment within 6 mo from surgery) and had at least 1 month of follow-up were selected for further analysis. Overall survival was compared between patients who did and did not receive EBRT within 6 months from surgery with the log-rank test. A Cox model was also constructed to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 3116 patients were identified; 1458 (46.8%) received chemotherapy without and 1658 (53.2%) with EBRT. Pathologic characteristics (tumor grade, size, endocervical, and lymph-vascular invasion) were comparable between the two groups. Patients who received external beam radiation had better survival compared with those who did not, P =0.001; 5-year overall survival rates were 83.1% and 77.9%, respectively. After controlling for patient age, race, presence of comorbidities, insurance status, tumor size, grade and endocervical invasion, and the presence of lymph-vascular invasion, the addition of EBRT was associated with a survival benefit (HR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.62, 0.91). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma metastatic to the lymph nodes, addition of external beam radiation to adjuvant chemotherapy may be associated with a survival benefit.

Safety of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with FIGO stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utilization and outcomes of ovarian preservation for premenopausal patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I grade 2 and 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed; patients aged ≤45 years diagnosed between January 2004 and December 2015 with FIGO stage I grade 2 or 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, who underwent hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and had at least 1 month of follow-up, were identified. Overall survival was assessed following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected variables. RESULTS: A total of 2941 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 200 (6.8%) patients did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Rate of ovarian preservation was comparable between patients with grade 2 (n=163, 6.6%) and grade 3 (n=37, 7.7%) tumors (p=0.38). Patients who did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were younger (median 39 vs 41 years, p<0.001) and less likely to undergo surgical lymph node assessment (52% vs 76.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (p=0.94); 5 year overall survival rates were 96.6% and 97%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, including tumor grade, ovarian preservation was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.84). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with grade 2 and 3 FIGO stage I endometrioid carcinoma undergoing hysterectomy, ovarian preservation is rarely performed while no clear detrimental effect on overall survival was found.

Oncologic outcomes of surgical para-aortic lymph node staging in patients with advanced cervical carcinoma undergoing chemoradiation.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the utilization and impact of surgical para-aortic lymph node staging on the survival of patients with locally advanced stage cervical carcinoma receiving definitive chemoradiation. METHODS: We identified patients in the National Cancer Database diagnosed between January 2010 and December 2015 with locally advanced (FIGO 2009 stage IB2-IVA) cervical carcinoma who did not undergo hysterectomy, received primary chemoradiation and had at least 1 month of follow-up. Two groups of patients were formed based on the assessment method of para-aortic lymph node status - radiologic assessment only versus surgical lymphadenectomy. Overall survival was compared with the log-rank test after Kaplan-Meier curves were generated. A Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders. RESULTS: We identified a total of 3540 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Para-aortic staging was performed in 333 (9.4%) patients. These patients were younger (median age 46 vs 52 years, p<0.001), less likely to have co-morbidities (8.7% vs 15.6%, p<0.001), more likely to have private insurance (48.9% vs 37.8%, p<0.001) and receive brachytherapy (76.9% vs 70.9%, p=0.022). The rate of para-aortic lymphadenectomy was comparable between patients with stage IB2-II and III-IVA disease (9.4% for both groups, p=0.98). Patients who underwent para-aortic lymphadenectomy were also more likely to have lymph nodes categorized as positive compared with those who had imaging only (27.3% vs 13.2%, p<0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who underwent radiologic only or surgical para-aortic lymph node assessment (p=0.80 from log-rank test); 4 year overall survival rates were 62.9% and 63%. After controlling for confounders, performance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy was not associated with a survival benefit (HR 1.07, 95% CIs: 0.88 to 1.31). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with locally advanced stage cervical carcinoma, para-aortic lymphadenectomy was rarely performed and not associated with a survival benefit.

Delay in adjuvant chemotherapy administration for patients with FIGO stage I epithelial ovarian carcinoma is associated with worse survival; an analysis of the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE: The administration of adjuvant chemotherapy within 42 days from surgery is one of the proposed quality measures for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy delay in the survival of patients with stage I EOC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed, and patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with FIGO stage I EOC who received multi-agent chemotherapy were identified. Overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who received chemotherapy <6 weeks and 6-12 weeks from surgery with the log-rank test following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox model was constructed to control for a priori selected confounders. RESULTS: A total of 8549 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy at a median 35 days from surgery (interquartile range 19) were identified; 67.7% received adjuvant chemotherapy <6 weeks from surgery while 32.3% experienced a delay. Patients who experienced a delay were more likely to have comorbidities (18.4% vs 14.9%, p < 0.001), and be managed in non-academic facilities (57.1% vs 53.2%, p = 0.001). Patients who experienced a delay had worse OS compared to those who did not, p < 0.001; 5-year OS rates 85.7% and 89.7%, respectively. For patients with high-grade serous tumors, those who experienced a delay had a 5-yr OS of 81.9% compared to 88.6% for those who did not, p < 0.001. After controlling for age, race, presence of comorbidities, insurance status, tumor histology and grade, performance of lymphadenectomy and substage, chemotherapy delay was associated with worse survival (HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.42). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with early stage EOC administration of adjuvant chemotherapy within 6 weeks from surgery was associated with better overall survival, especially for those with stage IC disease.

Disparities in cancer-specific and overall survival in black women with endometrial cancer: A Medicare-SEER study.

OBJECTIVES: To examine overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for different racial groups of women with surgically staged endometrial cancer by histologic subtype. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of women with stage I-III endometrioid, serous, clear cell, and carcinosarcoma who underwent hysterectomy as primary surgical staging in the 2000-2016 SEER-Medicare database. OS and CSS outcomes were stratified by race (defined as White, Black, Other), stage, and histology. Survival was assessed with descriptive analyses, log-rank tests and unadjusted and adjusted multivariable cox regression models. RESULTS: Of the 24,142 women identified, 85.5% were White, 8.5% Black, and 6% other races. Receipt of adjuvant therapy differed only for stage III endometrioid: Black women were less likely to receive adjuvant treatment after hysterectomy (61.2% vs. 70.1% White, p = 0.03). For stage I, Black women had worse CSS for all histologies other than clear cell in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. For stage II, Black women had worse CSS for endometrioid histology in unadjusted analyses and similar OS. For stage III, Black women with endometrioid carcinoma had worse CSS and OS in unadjusted analyses, but no significant difference in CSS in adjusted analyses. "Other" race showed improved OS for Stage I endometrioid adenocarcinoma without significant differences in outcomes when compared to White women. CONCLUSION: Across histologies other than clear cell, Black women diagnosed with stage I endometrial cancer had consistently worse CSS, despite similar receipt of adjuvant therapy. Differences in CSS and OS at higher stages disappeared once accounting for treatment disparities.

Patterns of adjuvant treatment and survival outcomes in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: To determine patterns in type and sequence of adjuvant treatment and associated differences in overall survival among women with Stage I uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS: Women with stage I UCS from 2000 to 2015 were identified through the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database linked to Medicare-based claims follow-up data through 2016. Data including demographics, co-morbidities, surgical procedure, surgical pathology and type and sequence of adjuvant treatment were collected. The primary study outcome was overall survival (OS) by type and sequence of adjuvant therapy. Cancer specific survival was also analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 755 women with Stage I UCS were identified. Of these, 56.3% (n = 445) received adjuvant therapy, whereas 43.7% (n = 330) did not. In comparison to no adjuvant treatment, an overall survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone for women with Stage I disease (log rank p < 0.01). Pairwise comparisons did not show a benefit in OS of concurrent RT-chemo, sequential RT-chemo, or sequential chemo-RT, over chemotherapy alone (p > 0.05 for all). Likewise, radiation alone and no treatment were associated with worse OS compared to chemotherapy alone (p < 0.001 for both). Adjusted Cox regression models demonstrated an OS benefit only in the chemotherapy alone cohort for Stage I disease (HR 0.43 95% CI 0.32, 0.60, p < 0.0001), as well as for CSS (HR 0.41, 95 %CI 0.26, 0.62, p < 0.0001), compared to no treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to no adjuvant therapy, an overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was noted with receipt of chemotherapy alone in Stage I UCS.

Role of lymphadenectomy for apparent early stage uterine sarcoma; a comprehensive analysis of the National Cancer Database.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the role of lymphadenectomy for patients with apparent stage I uterine sarcoma. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was accessed and patients without a history of another tumor diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 with an apparent early stage leiomyosarcoma, adenosarcoma, low-grade endometrial stromal and high-grade endometrial stromal/undifferentiated sarcoma who underwent hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy were identified. Overall survival was assessed after stratification by histology with the log-rank test while Cox models were constructed to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 6412 patients with apparent early stage uterine sarcoma who underwent hysterectomy were identified; 2820 (44%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Rate of lymph node metastasis was 3.4% (42/1250) for patients with leiomyosarcoma, 2.3% (19/826) for those with adenosarcoma, 4.5% (21/463) for patients with low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and 7.9% (22/280) for those with high-grade endometrial stromal/undifferentiated sarcoma, p < 0.001. After controlling for confounders lymphadenectomy was not associated with better survival for patients with adenosarcoma (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.17), or low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (HR: 1.17, 95% CI: 0.73, 1.87). Patients with leiomyosarcoma who underwent lymphadenectomy had worse survival (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.28). Patients with high-grade endometrial stromal/undifferentiated sarcoma who underwent lymphadenectomy had better survival (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48, 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of lymph node metastasis in apparent early stage uterine sarcoma is rare while the performance of lymphadenectomy was not associated with a clear survival benefit for all histologic subtypes except high-grade endometrial stromal/undifferentiated sarcoma.

Outcomes of sentinel lymph node mapping for patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate the overall survival of patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx). METHODS: Patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2015 with pathological stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy and had at least one month of follow-up were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Patients who underwent SLNBx or systematic lymphadenectomy (LND) (defined as at least 20 lymph nodes removed) were selected. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and compared with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to evaluate survival after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 13,010 patients with endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who met the inclusion criteria were identified; 9861 (75.8%) and 3149 (24.2%) patients had systematic LND and SLNBx, respectively. Patients who had LND were more likely to receive radiation therapy (27.4% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001) and chemotherapy (13% vs 8.7%, p < 0.001) compared to those who had SLNBx. After controlling for patient age, race, insurance status, depth of myometrial invasion, tumor grade, tumor size, presence of lymph-vascular invasion and receipt of radiation therapy, the performance of SLNBx was not associated with worse survival (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.21). For high-intermediate risk patients (based on GOG-99 criteria) after controlling for confounders, performance of SLNBx was not associated with worse survival (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.80, 1.44). For intermediate risk patients who did not receive external beam radiation therapy or chemotherapy after controlling for confounders, performance of SLNBx was not associated with worse survival (HR: 1.58, 95% CI: 0.94, 2.65). CONCLUSIONS: SLNBx had no negative impact on the survival of patients with FIGO stage I endometrioid endometrial carcinoma who undergo hysterectomy.

Is there a benefit of performing an omentectomy for clinical stage I high-grade endometrial carcinoma?

OBJECTIVES: Routine omentectomy is generally not performed in patients with endometrial cancer unless there is evidence of gross omental metastases. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the role of omentectomy in the staging of clinical stage I high-grade endometrial carcinoma and its impact on overall survival. METHODS: Patients in the National Cancer Database who presented between 2010 and 2015 with clinical stage I serous, clear cell, carcinosarcoma, or grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma and underwent hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy were selected. Patients who did and did not receive an omentectomy were identified and clinico-pathological characteristics were compared. Overall survival was evaluated for patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 who had at least one month of follow-up following generation of Kaplan-Meier curves and comparison with the log-rank test. A Cox model was constructed to control for confounders. RESULTS: A total of 9097 patients were identified, and 36.3% underwent an omentectomy. Patients who underwent omentectomy were more likely to be managed in academic institutions (50% vs. 44%, p < 0.001). They were also more likely to have an open surgery (48.2% vs. 27.2%, p < 0.001) and receive adjuvant chemotherapy (54.7% vs. 38.2%, p < 0.001). There was no difference in overall survival between patients who did and did not undergo omentectomy, p = 0.61; the 3-year OS rates were 82.3% and 82.2%, respectively. After controlling for confounders, the performance of an omentectomy was not associated with better survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.94, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.84, 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Routine omentectomy may not be associated with a survival benefit for patients with clinical stage I high-grade endometrial carcinoma.

Emergency department utilization by patients with gynecologic cancer in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Payment reform will give oncologists increasing responsibility for how patients with cancer meet unexpected care needs. OBJECTIVE: To differentiate how patients with gynecologic cancers use emergency care, and to assess the characteristics associated with potentially avoidable treat-and-release visits. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, a stratified sample of visits in United States hospital-based emergency departments, from 2010 to 2014. Visits by patients with a diagnosis of gynecologic cancer were selected. Sample weights were applied to calculate national estimates of care patterns and trends. Associations with treat-and-release disposition were assessed with weighted logistic regression. RESULTS: In the study period, patients with gynecologic cancer made an estimated 370 104 annual emergency department visits (95% CI 351 997 to 388 211). A total of 50.2% of patients were treated and released, 48% were admitted, 1.6% were transferred, and 0.1% died. These visits corresponded to over US$1.27 billion in annual charges, with an average charge of US$3428 per visit (95% CI 3348 to 3509). Driven by growing treat-and-release utilization, annual visits increased, while admission rates fell over time. Patients with cervical cancer represented the plurality (36%) of visits; they were relatively younger, of lower socioeconomic status, and had fewer co-morbidities. Models for treat-and-release disposition did not vary significantly across different cancer populations. In the all-cancer model, increased odds of treat-and-release disposition was associated with cervical cancer diagnosis, younger age, lesser Elixhauser co-morbidity, Medicare coverage (OR=1.19; p<0.001), Medicaid coverage (OR=1.25; p<0.001), uninsured status (OR=1.70; p<0.001), and weekend visits. Visits in the northeast, at urban hospitals, and in winter months showed decreased odds of treat-and-release disposition. DISCUSSION: Patients with gynecologic cancers have been using the emergency department at increasing rates, primarily driven by treat-and-release visits that did not result in admission or death. Patients with cervical cancer have higher rates of treat-and-release utilization and may over-use emergency department care.

An increase in multi-site practices: The shifting paradigm for gynecologic cancer care delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the number of practice sites per gynecologic oncologist (GO) and geographic access to GOs has changed over time. METHODS: This is a retrospective repeated cross-sectional study using the 2015-2019 Physician Compare National File. All GOs in the 50 United States and Washington, DC, who had completed at least one year of practice were included in the study. All practice sites with complete addresses were included. Linear regression analyses estimated trends in GOs' number of practice sites and geographic dispersion of practice sites. Secondary analyses assessed temporal trends in the number of geographic areas served by at least one GO. RESULTS: Although there was no significant change in the number of GOs from 2015 to 2019 (n = 1328), there was a significant increase in the number of practice sites (881 to 1416, p = 0.03), zip codes (642 to 984, p = 0.03), HSAs (404 to 536, p = 0.04), and HRRs (218 to 230, p = 0.03) containing a GO practice. The mean number of practice sites (1.64 versus 2.13, p < 0.001) and dispersion of practice sites (0.03 versus 0.43 miles, p = 0.049) per GO increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Between 2015 and 2019, an increasing number of GOs have multi-site practices, and more geographic regions contain a GO practice. Improvements in geographic access to GOs may represent improved access to care for many women in the US, but its effect on patients, physicians, and geographic disparities is unknown.

Utilization and survival outcomes of sequential, concurrent and sandwich therapies for advanced stage endometrial cancers by histology.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact on overall survival (OS) of different modalities of adjuvant therapy for the treatment of stage III endometrial cancer (EC), by histology. METHODS: Stage 3 endometrioid (EAC), serous (SER), clear cell (CC), and carcinosarcoma (CS) patients who underwent primary surgical staging from 2000 to 2013 were identified in SEER-Medicare. Adjuvant therapy was defined by a 4-arm comparator grouping (none; RT only; CT only; combination RT), as well as by an 8-arm comparator grouping (none; RT only; CT only; concurrent CT-RT; concurrent CT-RT then CT; Serial CT-RT; serial RT-CT; sandwich). Modality of RT and CT were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, log rank tests, and multivariable cox modeling. RESULTS: Of 2870 cases identified (1798 EAC, 606 SER, 118 CC, 348 CS), 31.5% received no adjuvant therapy. The remainder received RT or CT alone, concurrent RT-CT, serial or sandwich modalities. OS differed by adjuvant therapy in adjusted and unadjusted models, when combining all histologies, and when stratifying by histology using both the 4-arm, and 8-arm comparator analyses (log rank p < .05, all). By histology, in adjusted analyses, sandwich modality had the greatest improvement in OS for endometrioid, but pairwise comparisons did not identify a superior chemotherapy-based regimen. For serous and clear cell, the greatest improvement in OS was seen with concurrent RT-CT, and for carcinosarcoma, CT alone. CONCLUSIONS: OS for advanced EC significantly differs by histology and mode of adjuvant therapy. Future studies should evaluate the efficacy of combination-based adjuvant therapy versus chemotherapy alone, by histologic subtype and molecular signature.