Racial disparities across multiple stages of the deceased organ donation process.

Pervasive structural violence causes higher organ failure rates among Black Americans and an excess of Black potential deceased organ donors. Underuse of Black donors would exacerbate organ shortages that disproportionately harm Black transplant candidates. This study investigates racial differences in transit between distinct donation steps among 132 968 potential donors across 557 hospitals and 6 organ procurement organizations (OPOs) from 2015 through 2021. Multilevel multistate modeling with patient covariates and OPO random effects shows adjusted likelihoods (95% confidence interval) of non-Black versus Black patients transitioning from OPO referral to approach of 1.39 (1.35, 1.44), approach to authorization: 1.64 (1.56, 1.72), authorization to procurement: 1.10 (1.04, 1.16), and procurement to transplant: 1.00 (0.95, 1.06). Overall organ utilization rates for Black, Latino, White, and other OPO referrals were 5.89%, 8.18%, 6.79%, and 5.24%, respectively. Adjusting for patient covariates and hospital and OPO random effects, multilevel logistic models estimated that compared with Black patients, Latino, White, and other patients had odds ratios of organ utilization of 1.81 (1.61, 2.03), 3.19 (2.91, 3.50), and 1.24 (1.05, 1.47), respectively. Nationwide in 2022, donor conversion disparities likely lost more than 1700 donors-two-thirds of whom would have been Black. Achieving racial equity for transplant candidates will require reducing racial disparities in organ donation.

Impact of socioeconomic deprivation on evaluation for heart transplantation at an urban academic medical center.

INTRODUCTION: For patients with advanced heart failure, socioeconomic deprivation may impede referral for heart transplantation (HT). We examined the association of socioeconomic deprivation with listing among patients evaluated at our institution and compared this against the backdrop of our local community. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for HT between January 2017 and December 2020. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were recorded. Block group-level area deprivation index (ADI) decile was obtained at each patient's home address and Socioeconomic Status (SES) index was determined by patient zip code. RESULTS: In total, 400 evaluations were initiated; one international patient was excluded. Among this population, 111 (27.8%) were women, 219 (54.9%) were White, 94 (23.6%) Black, and 59 (14.8%) Hispanic. 248 (62.2%) patients were listed for transplant. Listed patients had significantly higher SES index and lower ADI compared to those who were not listed. However, after adjustment for clinical factors, ADI and SESi were not predictive of listing. Similarly, patient sex, race, and insurance did not influence the likelihood of listing for HT. Notably, the distribution of the referral cohort based on ADI deciles was not reflective of our center's catchment area, indicating opportunities for improving access to transplant for disadvantaged populations. CONCLUSIONS: Although socioeconomic deprivation did not predict listing in our analysis, we recognize the need for broader outreach to combat upstream bias that prevents patients from being referred for HT.

Are the current evaluation tools for advanced therapies biased?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite attention to racial disparities in outcomes for heart failure (HF) and other chronic diseases, progress against these inequities has been gradual at best. The disparities of COVID-19 and police brutality have highlighted the pervasiveness of systemic racism in health outcomes. Whether racial bias impacts patient access to advanced HF therapies is unclear. RECENT FINDINGS: As documented in other settings, racial bias appears to operate in HF providers' consideration of patients for advanced therapy. Multiple medical and psychosocial elements of the evaluation process are particularly vulnerable to bias. SUMMARY: Reducing gaps in access to advanced therapies will require commitments at multiple levels to reduce barriers to healthcare access, standardize clinical operations, research the determinants of patient success and increase diversity among providers and researchers. Progress is achievable but likely requires as disruptive and investment of immense resources as in the battle against COVID-19.

Psychological distress, coping behaviors, and preferences for support among New York healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: The mental health toll of COVID-19 on healthcare workers (HCW) is not yet fully described. We characterized distress, coping, and preferences for support among NYC HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional web survey of physicians, advanced practice providers, residents/fellows, and nurses, conducted during a peak of inpatient admissions for COVID-19 in NYC (April 9th-April 24th 2020) at a large medical center in NYC (n = 657). RESULTS: Positive screens for psychological symptoms were common; 57% for acute stress, 48% for depressive, and 33% for anxiety symptoms. For each, a higher percent of nurses/advanced practice providers screened positive vs. attending physicians, though housestaff's rates for acute stress and depression did not differ from either. Sixty-one percent of participants reported increased sense of meaning/purpose since the COVID-19 outbreak. Physical activity/exercise was the most common coping behavior (59%), and access to an individual therapist with online self-guided counseling (33%) garnered the most interest. CONCLUSIONS: NYC HCWs, especially nurses and advanced practice providers, are experiencing COVID-19-related psychological distress. Participants reported using empirically-supported coping behaviors, and endorsed indicators of resilience, but they also reported interest in additional wellness resources. Programs developed to mitigate stress among HCWs during the COVID-19 pandemic should integrate HCW preferences.

Approach to Acute Cardiovascular Complications in COVID-19 Infection.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019, otherwise known as COVID-19, is a global pandemic with primary respiratory manifestations in those who are symptomatic. It has spread to >187 countries with a rapidly growing number of affected patients. Underlying cardiovascular disease is associated with more severe manifestations of COVID-19 and higher rates of mortality. COVID-19 can have both primary (arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and myocarditis) and secondary (myocardial injury/biomarker elevation and heart failure) cardiac involvement. In severe cases, profound circulatory failure can result. This review discusses the presentation and management of patients with severe cardiac complications of COVID-19 disease, with an emphasis on a Heart-Lung team approach in patient management. Furthermore, it focuses on the use of and indications for acute mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic and/or mixed shock.

Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported with Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) are increasingly used in advanced heart failure patients. Recent studies suggest that low socioeconomic status (SES) predicts worst survival after heart transplantation. Both individual-level and neighborhood-level SES (nSES) have been linked to cardiovascular health; however, the impact of SES in CF-LVAD patients remains unknown. We hypothesized that SES is a major determinant of CF-LVAD candidacy and postimplantation outcomes. A retrospective chart review was conducted on 362 patients between February 2009 and May 2016. Neighborhood-level SES was measured using the American Community Survey data and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SES index score. Individual-level SES was self reported. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression determined survival statistics. Patients in the highest SES tertile were older (58 ± 13 vs. 53 ± 14; p < 0.001), less likely to be black or Hispanic (26% vs. 70%; p < 0.001), more likely to be married (87% vs. 65%; p < 0.001), more likely to have private insurance (50% vs. 39%; p < 0.001), and more likely to have employment (29% vs. 15%; p < 0.001) compared with patients in the lowest tertile. Low nSES was associated with a decreased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.580; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.347-0.970; p = 0.038) in comparison to the high nSES. However, after adjusting for baseline clinical morbidities, the relationship was no longer present. When selecting patients for a LVAD, SES should not be thought of as an immutable risk factor. Carefully selected low-SES patients could be safely implanted with CF-LVAD with outcomes comparable to high-SES patients.

Sex-Related Differences in Use and Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Bridge to Transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined sex-related differences in use and outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) among individuals awaiting heart transplantation using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry. BACKGROUND: Advanced therapies for heart failure including CF-LVADs remain underused in women. There have been contradictory results regarding sex-specific outcomes. Many studies have been limited by small sample sizes or included pulsatile-flow devices. METHODS: De-identified patient-level data were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. The database was queried to identify adult patients (≥18 years of age) who required mechanical circulatory support with HeartWare HVAD (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota), HeartMate II (Abbott, Lake Bluff, Illinois), or HeartMate 3 (Abbott) as bridge to heart transplantation between 2008 and 2018. Each patient was assigned a propensity score. The primary outcomes of interest were rates of transplantation and death. RESULTS: A total of 13,305 patients (2,771 women, 20.8%) received support with CF-LVAD in the study period. There were significant sex disparities in CF-LVAD use in listed patients (29.9% men vs. 18.9% women in 2017). Female patients receiving CF-LVAD support had lower chances of heart transplantation (55.1% vs. 67.5%), increased risk of waitlist mortality (7.0% vs. 4.2%), and delisting for worsening clinical status (8.5% vs. 4.7%) at 2 years post-implantation (all p < 0.001). After adjusting for device type, sex was still a significant predictor of waitlist mortality (hazard ratio: 1.51; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Durable mechanical circulatory support with CF-LVADs remains underused in women. When matched with similar male control subjects, women experienced higher mortality and lower rates of heart transplantation.

Aortic Insufficiency During Contemporary Left Ventricular Assist Device Support: Analysis of the INTERMACS Registry.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the impact of moderate to severe aortic insufficiency (AI) on outcomes in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs). BACKGROUND: Development of worsening AI is a common complication of prolonged CF-LVAD support and portends poor prognosis in single-center studies. Predictors of worsening AI and its impact on clinical outcomes have not been examined in a large cohort. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with CF-LVAD in the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) study. Development of significant AI was defined as the first instance of at least moderate AI. Primary outcomes of interest were survival after development of significant AI and time to adverse events, including device complications and rehospitalizations. RESULTS: Among 10,603 eligible patients, 1,399 patients on CF-LVAD support developed moderate to severe AI. Prevalence of significant AI progressively increased over time. Predictors of worsening AI included older age, female sex, smaller body mass index, mild pre-implantation AI, and destination therapy strategy. Moderate to severe AI was associated with significantly higher left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, reduced cardiac output, and higher levels of brain natriuretic peptide. Significant AI was associated with higher rates of rehospitalization (32.1% vs. 26.6%, respectively, at 2 years; p = 0.015) and mortality (77.2% vs. 71.4%, respectively, at 2 years; p = 0.005), conditional upon survival to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Development of moderate to severe AI has a negative impact on hemodynamics, hospitalizations, and survival on CF-LVAD support. Pre- and post-implantation management strategies should be developed to prevent and treat this complication.

Ventricular Assist Device Utilization in Heart Transplant Candidates: Nationwide Variability and Impact on Waitlist Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) have become a standard treatment choice in advanced heart failure patients. We hypothesized that practice patterns with regards to CF-LVAD utilization vary significantly among transplant centers and impact waitlist outcomes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The United Network for Organ Sharing registry was queried to identify adult patients who were waitlisted for heart transplantation (HT) between 2008 and 2015. Each patient was assigned a propensity score based on likelihood of receiving a durable CF-LVAD before or while waitlisted. The primary outcomes of interest were death or delisting for worsening status and HT at 1 year. A total of 22 863 patients from 92 centers were identified. Among these, 9013 (39.4%) were mechanically supported. CF-LVAD utilization varied significantly between and within United Network for Organ Sharing regions. Freedom from waitlist death or delisting was significantly lower in propensity-score-matched patients who were mechanically supported versus medically managed (83.5% versus 79.2%; P<0.001). However, cumulative incidence of HT was also lower in mechanically supported patients (53.3% versus 63.6%; P<0.001). Congruous mechanical and medical bridging strategies based on clinical risk profile were associated with lower risk of death or delisting (hazard ratio, 0.88; P=0.027) and higher likelihood of HT (hazard ratio, 1.14; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CF-LVAD utilization may lower waitlist mortality at the expense of lower likelihood of HT. Decision to use CF-LVAD and timing of transition should be individualized based on patient-, center-, and region-level risk factors to achieve optimal outcomes.

Socioeconomic Disparities in Adherence and Outcomes After Heart Transplant: A UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing) Registry Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is mixed evidence of racial and socioeconomic disparities in heart transplant outcomes. Their underlying cause-and whether individual- or community-level traits are most influential-remains unclear. The current study aimed to characterize socioeconomic disparities in outcomes and identify time trends and mediators of these disparities. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used United Network for Organ Sharing registry data and included 33 893 adult heart transplant recipients between 1994 and 2014. Socioeconomic status (SES) indicators included insurance, education, and neighborhood SES measured using a composite index. Black race and multiple indicators of low SES were associated with the primary outcome of death or retransplant, independent of baseline clinical characteristics. Blacks had lower HLA and race matching, but further adjustment for these and other graft characteristics only slightly attenuated the association with black race (HR, 1.25 after adjustment). This and the associations with neighborhood SES (HR, 1.19 for lowest versus highest decile), Medicare (HR, 1.17), Medicaid (HR, 1.29), and college education (HR, 0.90) remained significant after full adjustment. When comparing early (1994-2000) and late (2001-2014) cohorts, the disparities associated with the middle (second and third) quartiles significantly decreased over time, but those associated with lowest SES quartile and black race persisted. Low neighborhood SES was also associated with higher risks of noncompliance (HR, 1.76), rejection (HR, 1.28), hospitalization (HR, 1.13), and infection (HR, 1.10). CONCLUSIONS: Racial and socioeconomic disparities exist in heart transplant outcomes, but the latter may be narrowing over time. These disparities are not explained by differences in clinical or graft characteristics.

Renal risk stratification in left ventricular assist device therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy has greatly reduced mortality for patients with advanced heart failure (HF), both as a bridge to heart transplantation and as destination therapy. However, among other comorbidities, LVAD recipients face a risk of renal dysfunction, related to either the residual effects of HF or to LVAD support, which complicates the management of these patients and increases the risk of an adverse clinical outcome, including death. AREAS COVERED: The authors summarize the current understanding of pre-LVAD predictors of post-LVAD renal dysfunction and need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), including emerging data about the risk conferred by proteinuria. The authors also discuss dynamics changes in renal function after LVAD placement, the importance of perioperative hemodynamic management in lowering renal risk, and the challenges of managing LVAD patients requiring chronic RRT. EXPERT COMMENTARY: A requirement for RRT before or after LVAD placement portends a high risk of mortality, suggesting a need to identify patients at high risk for post-LVAD RRT. Proteinuria and reduced renal function prior to LVAD placement predict RRT and should be included in the risk assessment of patients being considered for LVAD therapy.

Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Patients Supported With a Left Ventricular Assist Device: An Analysis of the UNOS Database (United Network for Organ Sharing).

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a known risk factor for heart failure, mortality among those with heart failure, and poor post heart transplant (HT) outcomes. This study sought to determine whether SES is associated with decreased waitlist survival while on left ventricular assist device (LVADs) support and after HT. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 3361 adult patients bridged to primary HT with an LVAD between May 2004 and April 2014 were identified in the UNOS database (United Network for Organ Sharing). SES was measured using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SES index using data from the 2014 American Community Survey. In the study cohort, SES did not have an association with the combined end point of death or delisting on LVAD support (P=0.30). In a cause-specific unadjusted model, those in the top (hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.11; P=0.005) and second greatest SES quartile (hazard ratio 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-2.04; P=0.01) had an increased risk of death on device support compared with the lowest SES quartile. Adjusting for clinical risk factors mitigated the increased risk. There was no association between SES and complications. Post-HT survival, both crude and adjusted, was decreased for patients in the lowest quartile of SES index compared with all other SES quartiles. CONCLUSIONS: Freedom from waitlist death or delisting was not affected by SES. Patients with a higher SES had an increased unadjusted risk of waitlist mortality during LVAD support, which was mitigated by adjusting for increased comorbid conditions. Low SES was associated with worse post-HT outcomes. Further study is needed to confirm and understand a differential effect of SES on post-transplant outcomes that was not seen during LVAD support before HT.

Effect of regional competition on heart transplant waiting list outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Heterogeneity of risk within heart transplant urgency designations is undesirable. Regional competition for donor hearts may contribute to this variation in risk. In this study we assessed whether an association exists between center competition and variation in event rates within status designations on the waiting list. METHODS: Our study sample included 20,237 adult transplant registrants initially listed between July 1, 2006 and July 1, 2013. Market competition was quantified using the Herfindahl-Hirshman Index (HHI) and number of centers within a donor service area (DSA) per 1 million people. A Cox model was used to assess for variation in waiting list outcomes within status designation by both HHI and DSA density. The primary outcome was death or delisting as too ill. RESULTS: Outcome rates within status designations differed significantly between centers: Status 1A, center p < 0.0001; Status 1B, center p < 0.0001; and Status 2, center p < 0.0001. Market competition (decreasing HHI) was associated with differential outcome rates within higher urgency status designation [Status 1A hazard ratio (HR) 0.94, p = 0.012; Status 1B HR 0.95, p = 0.010; and Status 2 HR 1.02, p = 0.360]. Center density within the DSA was not associated with outcome rates within each status designation (Status 1A HR 0.99, p = 0.961; Status 1B HR 1.03, p = 0.901; and Status 2 HR 1.20, p = 0.399). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of death or delisting as too ill within urgency designations varies between transplant centers and is partially explained by competition between transplant programs. Further methods of normalizing risk within status designations are necessary.

Outcomes of Multiple Listing for Adult Heart Transplantation in the United States: Analysis of OPTN Data From 2000 to 2013.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the association of multiple listing with waitlist outcomes and post-heart transplant (HT) survival. BACKGROUND: HT candidates in the United States may register at multiple centers. Not all candidates have the resources and mobility needed for multiple listing; thus this policy may advantage wealthier and less sick patients. METHODS: We identified 33,928 adult candidates for a first single-organ HT between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2013 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database. RESULTS: We identified 679 multiple-listed (ML) candidates (2.0%) who were younger (median age, 53 years [interquartile range (IQR): 43 to 60 years] vs. 55 years [IQR: 45 to 61 years]; p < 0.0001), more often white (76.4% vs. 70.7%; p = 0.0010) and privately insured (65.5% vs. 56.3%; p < 0.0001), and lived in zip codes with higher median incomes (US$90,153 [IQR: US$25,471 to US$253,831] vs. US$68,986 [IQR: US$19,471 to US$219,702]; p = 0.0015). Likelihood of ML increased with the primary center's median waiting time. ML candidates had lower initial priority (39.0% 1A or 1B vs. 55.1%; p < 0.0001) and predicted 90-day waitlist mortality (2.9% [IQR: 2.3% to 4.7%] vs. 3.6% [IQR: 2.3% to 6.0]%; p < 0.0001), but were frequently upgraded at secondary centers (58.2% 1A/1B; p < 0.0001 vs. ML primary listing). ML candidates had a higher HT rate (74.4% vs. 70.2%; p = 0.0196) and lower waitlist mortality (8.1% vs. 12.2%; p = 0.0011). Compared with a propensity-matched cohort, the relative ML HT rate was 3.02 (95% confidence interval: 2.59 to 3.52; p < 0.0001). There were no post-HT survival differences. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple listing is a rational response to organ shortage but may advantage patients with the means to participate rather than the most medically needy. The multiple-listing policy should be overturned.

Blood-based microRNA signatures differentiate various forms of cardiac hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is caused by mutations in different structural genes and induces pathological hypertrophy with sudden cardiac death as a possible consequence. HCM can be separated into hypertrophic non-obstructive and obstructive cardiomyopathy (HNCM/HOCM) with different clinical treatment approaches. We here distinguished between HNCM, HOCM, cardiac amyloidosis and aortic stenosis by using microRNA profiling and investigated potential interactions between circulating miRNA levels and the most common mutations in MYH7and MYBPC3 genes. METHODS: Our study included 4 different groups: 23 patients with HNCM, 28 patients with HOCM, 47 patients with aortic stenosis and 22 healthy controls. Based on previous findings, 8 different cardiovascular known microRNAs (miR-1, miR-21, miR-29a, miR-29b, miR-29c, miR-133a, miR-155 and miR-499) were studied in serum of all patients and compared with clinically available patient data. RESULTS: We found miR-29a levels to be increased in patients with HOCM and correlating markers of cardiac hypertrophy. This was not the case in HNCM patients. In contrast, we identified miR-29c to be upregulated in aortic stenosis but not the other patient groups. ROC curve analysis of miR-29a/c distinguished between HOCM patients and aortic stenosis patients. MiR-29a and miR-155 levels discriminated HNCM patients from patients with senile cardiac amyloidosis. MiR-29a increased mainly in HOCM patients with a mutation in MYH7, whereas miR-155 was decreased in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with a mutation in MYBPC3. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that miR-29a and miR-29c show a specific signature to distinguish between aortic stenosis, hypertrophic non-obstructive and obstructive cardiomyopathies and thus could be developed into clinically useful biomarkers.

Reduced handgrip strength as a marker of frailty predicts clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure undergoing ventricular assist device placement.

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is associated with the derangement of muscle structure and metabolism, contributing to exercise intolerance, frailty, and mortality. Reduced handgrip strength is associated with increased patient frailty and higher morbidity and mortality. We evaluated handgrip strength as a marker of muscle function and frailty for prediction of clinical outcomes after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation in patients with advanced HF. METHODS AND RESULTS: Handgrip strength was measured in 72 patients with advanced HF before VAD implantation (2.3 ± 4.9 days pre-VAD). We analyzed dynamics in handgrip strength, laboratory values, postoperative complications, and mortality. Handgrip strength correlated with serum albumin levels (r = 0.334, P = .004). Compared with baseline, handgrip strength increased post-VAD implantation by 18.2 ± 5.6% at 3 months (n = 29) and 45.5 ± 23.9% at 6 months (n = 27). Patients with a handgrip strength <25% of body weight had an increased risk of mortality, increased postoperative complications, and lower survival after VAD implantation. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced HF show impaired handgrip strength indicating a global myopathy. Handgrip strength <25% of body weight is associated with higher postoperative complication rates and increased mortality after VAD implantation. Thus, the addition of measures of skeletal muscle function underlying the frailty phenotype to traditional risk markers might have incremental prognostic value in patients undergoing evaluation for VAD placement.

Comparison of cardiac amyloidosis due to wild-type and V122I transthyretin in older adults referred to an academic medical center.

AIMS: In the USA, transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis usually results from 'wild-type' transthyretin (senile cardiac amyloidosis [SCA]) or the V122I variant. PATIENTS & METHODS: We compared presentations and outcomes among SCA and V122I patients referred to the Center for Advanced Cardiac Care at Columbia University Medical Center (NY, USA) between 2001 and 2012. RESULTS: V122I patients were younger (mean: 71 years, standard deviation [SD]: 7) than SCA patients (mean: 77, SD: 6; p = 0.0002) and 96% were black compared with 3% of SCA patients (p < 0.0001). Average ejection fraction was lower among V122I patients (mean: 25% [SD: 12] vs mean: 47% [SD: 15]; p = 0.0001), as was mean cardiac index. Median time to death or orthotopic heart transplant was 36.4 months for V122I patients and 66.5 for SCA patients (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: In this study of patients with transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis, V122I patients presented to a tertiary academic medical center at a younger age than SCA patients but had higher levels of cardiac dysfunction, despite genetic screening availability. There was a trend toward shorter time to orthotopic heart transplant or death among V122I patients. Whether this is a result of a different biologic progression or late diagnosis requires further study.

Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and its modified versions, which are established measures of liver dysfunction, as a tool to assess heart transplantation (HTx) urgency in ambulatory patients with heart failure. BACKGROUND: Liver abnormalities have a prognostic impact on the outcome of patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 343 patients undergoing HTx evaluation between 2005 and 2009. The prognostic effectiveness of MELD and 2 modifications (MELDNa [includes serum sodium levels] and MELD-XI [does not include international normalized ratio]) for endpoint events, defined as death/HTx/ventricular assist device requirement, was evaluated in our cohort and in subgroups of patients on and off oral anticoagulation. RESULTS: The MELD and MELDNa scores were excellent predictors for 1-year endpoint events (areas under the curve: 0.71 and 0.73, respectively). High scores (>12) were strongly associated with poor survival at 1 year (MELD 69.3% vs. 90.4% [p < 0.0001]; MELDNa 70.4% vs. 96.9% [p < 0.0001]). Increased scores were associated with increased risk for HTx (hazard ratio: 1.10 [95% confidence interval: 1.06 to 1.14]; p < 0.0001 for both scores), which was independent of other known risk factors (MELD p = 0.0055; MELDNa p = 0.0083). Anticoagulant use was associated with poor survival at 1 year (73.7% vs. 86.4%; p = 0.0118), and the statistical significance of MELD/MELDNa was higher in patients not receiving oral anticoagulation therapy. MELD-XI was a fair but limited predictor of the endpoint events in patients receiving oral anticoagulation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of liver dysfunction according to the MELD scoring system provides additional risk information in ambulatory patients with heart failure.

The influence of CYP3A5 expression on the extent of hepatic CYP3A inhibition is substrate-dependent: an in vitro-in vivo evaluation.

Despite several studies suggesting that CYP3A5 expression can influence the extent of hepatic CYP3A-mediated inhibition, a systematic in vitro-in vivo evaluation of this potential clinically important issue has not been reported. Using representative probes from two distinct CYP3A substrate subgroups (midazolam, erythromycin), the inhibitory potency of fluconazole was evaluated in pooled human liver microsomes (HLM) with a low or high specific CYP3A5 content, in recombinant CYP3A enzymes (rCYP3A), and in healthy volunteers lacking or carrying the CYP3A5(*)1 allele. Fluconazole was a slightly more potent inhibitor of CYP3A activity in CYP3A5-HLM than in CYP3A5+ HLM with midazolam (K(i) of 15 and 25 microM, respectively) but not with erythromycin (IC(50) of 70 and 54 microM, respectively). In comparison, fluconazole was a much more potent inhibitor of rCYP3A4 than rCYP3A5 with both midazolam (K(i) of 7.7 and 54 microM, respectively) and erythromycin (IC(50) of 100 and 350 microM, respectively). As predicted from HLM, with i.v. midazolam, the average (+/- S.D.) in vivo K(i) (K(i,iv)) was significantly higher in CYP3A5(*)1 carriers (24 +/- 17 and 17 +/- 8 microM for homozygous and heterozygous groups, respectively) than in noncarriers (13 +/- 6 microM) (p = 0.02). With the erythromycin breath test, the average K(i,iv) was not different between homozygous CYP3A5(*)1 carriers (30 +/- 12 microM) and noncarriers (58 +/- 53 microM). In conclusion, the effect of CYP3A5 on hepatic CYP3A-mediated inhibitory drug-drug interactions is substrate-dependent, and HLM, rather than rCYP3A, are the preferred in vitro system for predicting these interactions in vivo.