European Malignant Hyperthermia Group guidelines for investigation of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

It is 30 yr since the British Journal of Anaesthesia published the first consensus protocol for the laboratory diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility from the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group. This has subsequently been used in more than 10 000 individuals worldwide to inform use of anaesthetic drugs in these patients with increased risk of developing malignant hyperthermia during general anaesthesia, representing an early and successful example of stratified medicine. In 2001, our group also published a guideline for the use of DNA-based screening of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. We now present an updated and complete guideline for the diagnostic pathway for patients potentially at increased risk of developing malignant hyperthermia. We introduce the new guideline with a narrative commentary that describes its development, the changes to previously published protocols and guidelines, and new sections, including recommendations for patient referral criteria and clinical interpretation of laboratory findings.

Recognizing and managing a malignant hyperthermia crisis: guidelines from the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group.

Survival from a malignant hyperthermia (MH) crisis is highly dependent on early recognition and prompt action. MH crises are very rare and an increasing use of total i.v. anaesthesia is likely to make it even rarer, leading to the potential risk of reduced awareness of MH. In addition, dantrolene, the cornerstone of successful MH treatment, is unavailable in large areas around the world thereby increasing the risk of MH fatalities in these areas. The European Malignant Hyperthermia Group collected and reviewed all guidelines available from the various MH centres in order to provide a consensus document. The guidelines consist of two textboxes: Box 1 on recognizing MH and Box 2 on the treatment of an MH crisis.

A multicenter study of 4-chloro-m-cresol for diagnosing malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

UNLABELLED: Standardization of the in vitro contracture test (IVCT) for malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility has resulted in very rare false negative tests. However, false positive results stigmatizing the patient seem to be more frequent than false negative results and make supplementary tests desirable. This multicenter approach studied the usefulness of an IVCT with 4-chloro-m-cresol (4-CmC), a ryanodine receptor-specific agonist for a better definition of MH susceptibility. Diagnosis made by the standard IVCT was compared with the results of this 4-CmC test on muscle specimens of 202 individuals from 6 European MH centers. In the 4-CmC test, the results of the MH susceptible group differed significantly from both the MH normal and the MH equivocal group. 4-CmC revealed a qualitatively dose response-curve similar to caffeine. A correlation index of r = 0.79 for the concentration thresholds underlined the strong concordance of the caffeine and the 4-CmC effects. The optimal threshold concentration was determined to be 75 microM in the pooled data of all centers and is much lower than that of caffeine (2 mM), suggesting a more than 25-fold higher affinity of 4-CmC. The predictive value of 4-CmC is as high as that of caffeine and consequently higher than that of halothane. 4-CmC seems to be a suitable drug to refine diagnosis of MH susceptibility and could be used as an additional test substance. IMPLICATIONS: Although in vitro contracture testing for malignant hyperthermia diagnosis is well standardized, with a relatively high sensitivity and specificity, false test results cannot be excluded and may be associated with serious disabilities for the concerned individuals. In this multicenter study, 4-chloro-m-cresol was evaluated as a new test substance for the in vitro contracture testing. Its use improves the accuracy of in vitro diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

4-Chloro-m-cresol test--a possible supplementary test for diagnosis of malignant hyperthermia susceptibility.

BACKGROUND: In vitro contracture test (IVCT) for diagnosis of MH in our laboratory has a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 93%. The results are equivocal in 10-15%, and supplementary tests may thus be required. We have tested the hypothesis that 4-chloro-m-cresol (4-cmc) may be useful for a supplementary test. METHODS: Muscle from 41 consecutive patients from 7 families undergoing diagnostic muscle biopsy with IVCT was exposed in vitro to increasing concentrations of 4-cmc (25, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 mumol l-1), and the force development recorded. Diagnosis of MH susceptibility was made with standard halothane and caffeine tests and included as results MHS (MH susceptible), MHN (MH negative), and MHE (equivoval result). RESULTS: At all concentrations of 4-cmc, the increase in baseline force was significantly greater in the MHS group compared to the MHN group (P < 0.05). Muscle from 15 MH-susceptible (MHS) patients responded to 4-cmc with increasing force at a threshold concentration of 75 mumol l-1 or less, whereas muscle from 23 MH-non-susceptible (MHN) patients had thresholds of 100 mumol l-1 or more. The accuracy of the chlorocresol test was thus 100% (95% confidence limits 90.75-100%) at a threshold of 75 mumol l-1. Amplitude of contractures at 2 mmol l-1 caffeine was not different from contractures at 75 mumol l-1 of 4-cmc in either the MHS or the MHN group (P > 0.05). In vivo concentrations of chlorocresol from clinical use of insulin and somatropin are estimated to be 20 times less than the threshold concentration and thus these drugs seem safe in MH patients. CONCLUSION: 4-chloro-m-cresol may be a suitable aid to clarify puzzling results of standard testing of MH susceptibility.