Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
AEM Educ Train ; 7(2): e10856, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36970557

RESUMEN

Introduction: Pediatric emergency medicine physicians struggle to maintain their critical procedural and resuscitation skills. Continuing professional development programs incorporating simulation and competency-based standards may help ensure skill maintenance. Using a logic model framework, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a mandatory annual competency-based medical education (CBME) simulation program. Methods: The CBME program, evaluated from 2016 to 2018, targeted procedural, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) and resuscitation skills. Delivery of educational content included a flipped-classroom website, deliberate practice, mastery-based learning, and stop-pause debriefing. Participants' competence was assessed using a 5-point global rating scale (GRS; 3 = competent, 5 = mastery). Statistical process control charts were used to measure the effect of the CBME program on team performance during in situ simulations (ISS), measured using the Team Emergency Assessment Measure (TEAM) scale. Faculty completed an online program evaluation survey. Results: Forty physicians and 48 registered nurses completed at least one course over 3 years (physician mean ± SD 2.2 ± 0.92). Physicians achieved competence on 430 of 442 stations (97.3%). Mean ± SD GRS scores for procedural, POCUS, and resuscitation stations were 4.34 ± 0.43, 3.96 ± 0.35, and 4.17 ± 0.27, respectively. ISS TEAM scores for "followed standards and guidelines" improved significantly. No signals of special cause variation emerged for the other 11 TEAM items, indicating skills maintenance. Physicians rated CBME training as highly valuable (mean question scores 4.15-4.85/5). Time commitment and scheduling were identified as barriers to participation. Conclusions: Our mandatory simulation-based CBME program had high completion rates and very low station failures. The program was highly rated and faculty improved or maintained their ISS performance across TEAM scale domains.

2.
Adv Simul (Lond) ; 6(1): 17, 2021 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33957994

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Maintaining acute care physician competence is critically important. Current maintenance of certification (MOC) programs has started to incorporate simulation-based education (SBE). However, competency expectations have not been defined. This article describes the development of a mandatory annual SBE, competency-based simulation program for technical and resuscitation skills for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians. METHODS: The competency-based medical education (CBME) program was introduced in 2016. Procedural skill requirements were based on a needs assessment derived from Royal College PEM training guidelines. Resuscitation scenarios were modified versions of pre-existing in-situ mock codes or critical incident cases. All full-time faculty were required to participate annually in both sessions. Delivery of educational content included a flipped classroom website, deliberate practice, and stop-pause debriefing. All stations required competency checklists and global rating scales. RESULTS: Between 2016 and 2018, 40 physicians and 48 registered nurses attended these courses. Overall course evaluations in 2018 were 4.92/5 and 4.93/5. Barriers to implementation include the need for many simulation education experts, time commitment, and clinical scheduling during course events. CONCLUSION: We have developed a mandatory simulation-based, technical, and resuscitation CBME program for PEM faculty. This simulation-based CBME program could be adapted to other acute care disciplines. Further research is required to determine if these skills are enhanced both in a simulated and real environment and if there is an impact on patient outcomes.

3.
Simul Healthc ; 14(2): 121-128, 2019 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30407960

RESUMEN

STATEMENT: The rigorous evaluation of simulation in healthcare to improve resuscitations and team functioning can be challenging. Statistical process control (SPC) charts present a unique methodology to enable statistical rigor when evaluating simulation. This article presents a brief overview of SPC charts and its advantages over traditional before and after methodologies, followed by an exemplar using SPC to evaluate an in situ team training program with embedded interprofessional education sessions.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Control de Calidad , Resucitación/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado/organización & administración , Competencia Clínica , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Entrenamiento Simulado/normas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...