Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fertil Steril ; 117(3): 612-619, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35105443

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether endometrial scratching increases the chance of live birth in women with unexplained infertility attempting to conceive without assisted reproductive technology. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, participant-blind, multicenter international trial. SETTING: Fertility clinics. PATIENT(S): Women with a diagnosis of unexplained infertility trying to conceive without assistance. INTERVENTION(S): Participants were randomly assigned to receive an endometrial biopsy or a placebo procedure (placement of a biopsy catheter in the posterior fornix, without inserting it into the external cervical os). Both groups performed regular unprotected intercourse with the intention of conceiving over three consecutive study cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome was live birth. RESULT(S): A total of 220 women underwent randomization. The live birth rate was 9% (10 of 113 women) in the endometrial-scratch group and 7% (7 of 107 women) in the control group (adjusted OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 0.50-4.03). There were no differences between the groups in the secondary outcomes of clinical pregnancy, viable pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and miscarriage. Endometrial scratching was associated with a higher pain score on a 10-point scale (adjusted mean difference, 3.07; 95% CI, 2.53-3.60). CONCLUSION(S): This trial did not find evidence that endometrial scratching improves the live birth rate in women with unexplained infertility trying to conceive without assistance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12614000656639.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo/métodos , Endometrio/fisiología , Fertilización/fisiología , Infertilidad Femenina/epidemiología , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Nacimiento Vivo/epidemiología , Biopsia , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Endometrio/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad Femenina/diagnóstico , Internacionalidad , Embarazo , Método Simple Ciego , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 44(2): 316-323, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34893436

RESUMEN

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does endometrial scratching improve the chance of a live birth in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing ovulation induction and trying to conceive? DESIGN: An international, multicentre, randomized, sham-controlled trial across six fertility clinics in three countries (New Zealand, UK and Brazil). Women with a diagnosis of PCOS who were planning to commence ovulation induction cycles (at least three cycles) in order to conceive were randomly assigned to receive the pipelle (scratch) procedure or a sham (placebo) procedure in the first cycle of ovulation induction. Women kept a diary of ovulation induction and sexual intercourse timing over three consecutive cycles and pregnancies were followed up to live birth. Primary outcome was live birth and secondary outcomes were clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, adverse pregnancy outcomes, neonatal outcomes, bleeding following procedure and pain score following procedure. RESULTS: A total of 117 women were randomized; 58 to the scratch group and 59 to the sham group. Live birth occurred in 11 (19%) women in the scratch group and 14 (24%) in the sham group (odds ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-1.92). Secondary outcomes were similar in each group. Significantly higher pain scores were reported in the scratch group (adjusted mean difference 3.2, 95% CI 2.5-3.9) when measured on a visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: No difference was detected in live birth rate for women with PCOS who received an endometrial scratch when trying to conceive using ovulation induction; however, uncertainty remains due to the small sample size in this study.


Asunto(s)
Infertilidad Femenina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Infertilidad Femenina/complicaciones , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Nacimiento Vivo , Masculino , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Dolor , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo
3.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 60(5): 667-670, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32776327

RESUMEN

Good evidence that oil-soluble contrast media (OSCM) enhances pregnancy rates when used to assess fallopian tube patency by hysterosalpingogram has prompted rapid clinical uptake by some fertility doctors and imaging specialists in Australia and New Zealand. The ACCEPT group met in July 2019 to develop a consensus document outlining the indications for and safe use of OSCM, to inform and guide clinicians interested in offering procedures using this media to couples with infertility.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Australia , Consenso , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Trompas Uterinas , Femenino , Humanos , Histerosalpingografía , Infertilidad Femenina/terapia , Nueva Zelanda , Embarazo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...