The rehabilitation treatment beliefs questionnaire-revised: assessing adolescents' treatment beliefs.

OBJECTIVE: While there are several studies on children's and adolescents' beliefs about illness and medication treatment, there is limited research on their treatment beliefs in the context of rehabilitation. The Rehabilitation Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire (RTBQ) was the first instrument available to assess pediatric patients' rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs. However, the RTBQ had some limitations that we aimed to address in this study: We revised the content of the RTBQ to include previously unaddressed dimensions of rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs, and we thoroughly tested its psychometric properties based on a sizeable, multicenter sample of adolescents with different chronic diseases. METHODS: Across 11 pediatric rehabilitation clinics throughout Germany, eligible patients aged 12-18 years with any chronic physical or mental health condition were invited to participate in an online survey. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and construct validity. RESULTS: The sample comprised N = 294 adolescents (M = 14.2 years) with various chronic conditions. Psychometric testing demonstrated a coherent factor structure with 6 interpretable scales covering process and outcome expectations, expectations of one's own role in the treatment process, structural expectations, concerns, and emotions, the latter three representing previously unaddressed dimensions of rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs. Internal consistency was acceptable to good. Construct validity analyses showed mostly hypotheses-consistent correlations with related constructs. CONCLUSIONS: The revised RTBQ provides a psychometrically well-tested, adolescent-specific, and disease-generic instrument that captures multiple dimensions of rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs. Practical implications include identifying adolescents' beliefs about rehabilitation treatment in order to actively involve them in their illness management.

The association of early response with the outcome of psychosomatic rehabilitation in patients with mental disorders and its link to treatment and illness beliefs-A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

Early response is considered to be an important predictor for therapy outcomes; yet little is known about its relevance in psychosomatic rehabilitation. This paper aims to describe the association of early response in psychosomatic rehabilitation, as well as the associations of early response with pre-rehabilitative factors such as illness and treatment beliefs.A longitudinal study with three measurement points was applied. Early response was defined using the percent improvement method after two weeks of treatment. Its association with therapy outcome and with illness and treatment beliefs was analyzed using multiple regression analyses.A total of 264 participants took part. Early response was a significant predictor of psychosomatic rehabilitation outcome, explaining an incremental variance of 1-30% after controlling for initial symptom burden. Illness and treatment beliefs predicted 6-20% variance in early response. Important illness beliefs referred to perceived symptoms, consequences and comprehensibility of the illness. Important treatment beliefs referred to expectations about rehabilitation structure, processes and concerns.Early response is associated with the therapy outcome of psychosomatic rehabilitation, with illness and treatment beliefs found to be associated with early response. Further research on the predictors of early response in psychosomatic rehabilitation is needed.

The concept of treatment beliefs in children and adolescents with chronic health conditions: a scoping review.

Children and adolescents with chronic health conditions are faced with ongoing challenges, making self-regulation crucial. As children grow up, they gradually develop differentiated beliefs about illness and treatment. While research indicates treatment beliefs as relevant factor on outcomes like adherence, the specific contents and dimensions of children's and adolescents' treatment beliefs remained unclear. This scoping review therefore aimed at the identification of treatment beliefs dimensions in children and adolescents with chronic health conditions, the underlying theoretical frameworks, and methodological operationalisation. Published literature was examined by applying systematic searches in electronic databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL) and comprehensive selection criteria, resulting in 49 included studies. The predominant treatment beliefs dimensions were necessity, concerns, perceived benefits and costs/barriers, and expectations. The latter can be differentiated into outcome, social, process, and structural expectations, and expectations of one's own role in the treatment process. In addition, dimensions that cover emotions and reasons for treatment were identified. The results are related to the methods and theoretical models applied, which were often adapted from adult research. However, additional and possibly more child-specific dimensions such as social expectations and emotions were found. This scoping review indicates several research gaps and discusses practical implications.

Efficacy of a novel patient-focused intervention aimed at increasing adherence to guideline-based preventive measures in asplenic patients: the PrePSS trial.

PURPOSE: To determine whether a novel intervention improves the adherence to guideline-based preventive measures in asplenic patients at risk of post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS). METHODS: We used a prospective controlled, two-armed historical control group design to compare a novel, health action process approach (HAPA)-based telephonic intervention involving both patients and their general practitioners to usual care. Eligible patients were identified in cooperation with the insurance provider AOK Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. Patients with anatomic asplenia (n = 106) were prospectively enrolled and compared to a historical control group (n = 113). Comparisons were done using a propensity-score-based overlap-weighting model. Adherence to preventive measures was quantified by the study-specific 'Preventing PSS score' (PrePSS score) which includes pneumococcal and meningococcal vaccination status, the availability of a stand-by antibiotic and a medical alert card. RESULTS: At six months after the intervention, we estimated an effect of 3.96 (95% CI 3.68-4.24) points on the PrePSS score scale (range 0-10) with mean PrePSS scores of 3.73 and 7.70 in control and intervention group, respectively. Substantial improvement was seen in all subcategories of the PrePSS score with the highest absolute gains in the availability of stand-by antibiotics. We graded the degree of participation by the general practitioner (no contact, short contact, full intervention) and noted that the observed effect was only marginally influenced by the degree of physician participation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who had received the intervention exhibited a significantly higher adherence to guideline-based preventive measures compared to the control group. These data suggest that widespread adoption of this pragmatic intervention may improve management of asplenic patients. Health insurance provider-initiated identification of at-risk patients combined with a patient-focused intervention may serve as a blueprint for a wide range of other preventive efforts leading to patient empowerment and ultimately to better adherence to standards of care.

Effects of a health psychology-based intervention for patients with asplenia on psychological determinants of preventive behaviour: A propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with asplenia have an increased lifelong risk of severe infections especially post splenectomy sepsis with hospital mortality rates of 30-50%. Adherence to existing guidelines for preventive measures is low. Objective of the study is the evaluation of a novel intervention to increase health psychological outcomes in patients with asplenia resulting in better adherence to preventive measures. METHODS: The intervention was evaluated by conducting a prospective, two-armed historical control group design via propensity score analysis. Focus are health-psychological outcomes: self-efficacy, intention, risk perception, behaviour planning, self-management, health literacy, patient involvement and disease-knowledge. RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group (N = 110) showed a higher increase in almost all outcomes compared to a historical control group (N = 115). The strongest increase was observed in "asplenia-specific self-management" (average treatment effect: ATE 1.14 [95% CI 0.91-1.36] p < .001) and "asplenia-specific health-literacy" (ATE 1.42 [95% CI 1.18-1.65] p < .001). Significant intervention effects were also found in behaviour planning, perceived involvement and disease-knowledge. CONCLUSION: The patient-focused intervention is effective in improving health-psychological outcomes in patients with asplenia. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The implementation of the intervention can make an important contribution to care and lead to an improvement of health-psychological outcomes that may result in a higher adherence to prevention measures.

Availability and quality of assessment instruments on patient-centredness in older adults with multimorbidity: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-centredness (PC) is central to the health care of older adults with multimorbidity, but knowledge about the psychometric quality of instruments measuring it in this group is scarce. Based on an integrative model of PC, we aimed to identify assessment instruments of PC for this particular group and evaluate their psychometric properties. METHODS: We systematically searched six electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and PSYNDEX), initially covering research published up to 2018 and updated later to include work up to July 2022. In evaluating the psychometric properties of identified instruments, we followed the COSMIN methodology. RESULTS: We identified 12 studies reporting on 10 instruments measuring PC in the health care of older adults with multimorbidity. For these instruments, structural validity and internal consistency were the psychometric properties reported most often. Based on the COSMIN criteria, eight instruments received favourable ratings for internal consistency with respect to methodological quality ('very good'), measurement property ('sufficient') and overall quality of evidence ('moderate'). Ratings of structural validity varied more largely, with three to seven instruments showing at least adequate methodological quality, sufficient structural validity or moderate quality of evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Similar to comparable previous reviews, evidence on the psychometric properties of instruments assessing PC in the health care of older adults with multimorbidity was rather limited. Informed by comprehensive models of PC, further research should aim at developing measures of PC that stand out on a broader range of psychometric properties.

Treatment Beliefs of Children and Adolescents With Chronic Diseases: Development of the Rehabilitation Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: Rehabilitation is an important component in the health care of children and adolescents with chronic diseases and aims at supporting patients' self-regulation for dealing with the disease. Patients' beliefs about illness and treatment are core elements in the self-regulation process. While questionnaires measuring illness beliefs for children and adolescents exist, questionnaires about their rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs are lacking. We therefore developed a questionnaire to assess the rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs of children and adolescents with chronic diseases (Rehabilitation Treatment Beliefs Questionnaire, RTBQ) and tested its psychometric properties. METHODS: Ahead of their rehabilitation, children and adolescents, aged 12-17 years, answered 129 items, which were developed based on previous qualitative findings exploring children and adolescents' rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs. Psychometric testing included item analyses, exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency and bivariate correlations of the extracted scales, and the discriminatory power and difficulty of the final items. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 170 participants with a mean age of 14.3 years (SD = 1.6); 53.5% were female. After item analyses, 47 items remained for the exploratory factor analysis which revealed 22 items allocated to 4 scales: "expectations of communication and interaction," "expectations of the treatment process," "expectations of treatment success and sustainability," and "expectations of one's own role in the rehabilitation process." The psychometric properties were acceptable to good. CONCLUSIONS: The RTBQ assesses various dimensions of rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs of children and adolescents with chronic diseases. While first psychometric results are promising, further psychometric testing is needed.

Psychometric properties of the rehabilitation treatment beliefs questionnaire for psychosomatic rehabilitation.

PURPOSE: Treatment beliefs play a crucial role for patient satisfaction and the treatment outcome in psychosomatic rehabilitation. The aim of this study was the development and the psychometric evaluation of an indication-specific questionnaire of beliefs about psychosomatic rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic. The primary item list comprised k = 125 items. After a descriptive item analysis, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis. Furthermore, we tested reliability via McDonald's Omega and construct validity by analyzing correlations of the scales with related constructs. RESULTS: Of the N = 264 participants, 50% were female and the mean age was 50.4 (SD = 9.8) years. K = 85 items were suitable for factor analysis, which resulted in k = 30 items constituting six scales, explaining of 57% the overall variance. The corrected item-total correlations were between r = 0.48 and r = 0.83. Internal consistency ranged from ω = 0.81 to ω = 0.86. CONCLUSION: The newly developed questionnaire assesses specific treatment beliefs about inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation. The psychometric properties of the six scales are acceptable. Further studies should confirm the psychometric results, such as the factorial structure of the questionnaire.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONTreatment beliefs are known to play an important role for the adherence, therapy outcome and satisfaction in psychosomatic rehabilitation.We developed and tested a indication-specific questionnaire assessing treatment beliefs in psychosomatic rehabilitation.The questionnaire can be used to explore patient's rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs, predict treatment outcomes, and to develop interventions attempting to modify these.

Illness Beliefs, Treatment Beliefs, and Fulfilled Treatment Expectations in Psychosomatic Rehabilitation: Associations with Patient Satisfaction.

Purpose: Patients' illness and treatment beliefs have been shown to predict health outcomes in many health care settings. However, information about their impact on patient satisfaction is scarce. The aim of this study was to investigate illness- and rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs and met rehabilitation-related treatment expectations and their relationship with patient satisfaction in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Methods: In a repeated measures study design, patients filled out questionnaires 2 to 3 weeks before the start of rehabilitation and at the end of an inpatient rehabilitation 6 to 7 weeks later. The predictive value of illness beliefs, treatment beliefs, and fulfilled treatment expectations regarding patient satisfaction was analyzed with multiple hierarchical regression analyses controlling for sociodemographic and clinical variables. Results: Two hundred sixty-four patients participated. The sample was composed of equal numbers of men and women (n = 129 each). The mean age was 50.4 years. Most patients had diagnoses from the ICD-10 diagnostic group F3 (affective disorders; n = 145) or F4 (neurotic, stress-related and somatoform disorders; n = 94). Sociodemographic and clinical variables were not associated with patient satisfaction. The explained variance of patient satisfaction increased to 10% by adding illness beliefs (namely personal control and coherence) (p = 0.006), to 5% by adding rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs (namely concerns) (p = 0.063), and to 49% by adding fulfilled expectations (namely a positive discrepancy between expectations and experiences related to outcome expectations and related to participation and treatment structure, and a negative discrepancy between expectations and experiences related to concerns) (p < 0.001) as predictor variables. Conclusion: This study highlights the relationship of fulfilled (rehabilitation-related) treatment expectations with patient satisfaction in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Given the evidence underlining the importance of patients' illness and treatment beliefs and expectations, it is vital that these constructs are addressed in corresponding interventions.

Patients' with asplenia and doctors' experiences in implementing preventative measures following a novel educational intervention: a qualitative analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' with asplenia and general practitioners' (GPs) (1) perceptions of a novel, Health Action Process Approach (HAPA)-based, educational intervention which targets to increase adherence to post-splenectomy sepsis (PSS) prevention measures and (2) their experience in implementing prevention measures following this intervention. DESIGN: A process evaluation conducted on average 3.5 (for patients) and 3.8 (for GPs) months after the intervention between January 2020 and April 2021 individually by means of semi-structured guideline-based telephone interviews. Data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer subsample of N=25 patients with asplenia and N=8 GPs who received the intervention. Inclusion criteria were met by prior participation in the intervention (German-speaking, of full age and insured by the cooperating health insurance). Patient selection was done by purposeful selection aiming at maximum variability in terms of adherence to preventative measures prior to intervention participation. Participating GPs are a non-purposeful selected convenience sample. For reasons of data protection, no personal data was collected. RESULTS: The intervention was positively evaluated and its personal relevancy for patients and for the GPs' professional work became apparent. The intervention promoted risk awareness, intention to action, action planning and subsequently, improved adherence to preventative measures. Helpful factors for implementation among the patients were social support by relatives and GPs. Barriers to adherence identified in both groups can be divided into patient-attributed (eg, comorbidities), doctor-related (eg, lack of knowledge or support) as well as contextual factors (eg, vaccine supply constraints). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate a patient and GP perceived benefit of the intervention, but still identify prevailing barriers to implementation. In a further step, a quantitative evaluation of the intervention will be conducted and recommendations for integrating the intervention in usual care will be made. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00015238.

Kontextfaktoren der patient*innenseitigen Selbstregulation in der psychosomatischen Rehabilitation ­ eine Querschnittsanalyse vor Rehabilitationsbeginn.

BACKGROUND: Contextual factors are a central element of the ICF and important factors for therapy planning in psychosomatic rehabilitation. At the same time, little is known about the relationship between contextual factors and patient self-regulation, an important goal of rehabilitation.The aim of this study is therefore to investigate the relationship between contextual factors and illness belies. Illness beliefs are a core element of self-regulation in psychosomatic rehabilitation and part of the common sense model of self-regulation. METHODS: Between April 2019 and January 2020, a cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic, in which registered rehabilitation patients were questioned about their illness beliefs using the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R). Contextual factors were divided into clinically modifiable and non-clinically modifiable and included gender, age, duration of illness, subjective social status, main diagnosis (dichotomised: F3/F4), occupational stress, depressive stress as well as activity and participation (operationalised by the Health-49). Multiple regressions were used for the analysis, in which the scales of the IPQ-R served as dependent variables. RESULTS: N=264 rehabilitants took part in the survey, 50% of them were female. The average age was 50 years. With regard to the non-clinically modifiable contextual factors, it was shown that a younger age was associated with higher control assumptions, but that younger rehabilitation patients simultaneously perceived more symptoms due to their illness (identity). A longer duration of illness showed a connection with the chronic timeline assumptions. A lower social status showed correlations with lower control assumptions and more assumptions about the cyclical timeline. Regarding clinically modifiable contextual factors, an F3 diagnosis was associated with more expected consequence, but also with a higher perceived personal control than an F4 diagnosis. A higher occupational burden was associated with the assumption of a more chronic course of the disease. Reduced activity and participation were associated with more expected consequences and more perceived symptoms (identity). Depressive stress showed associations with six out of eight domains of illness beliefs. CONCLUSION: The study supports the relevance of contextual factors, which in majority can be discussed as person-related factors, for patient self-regulation in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Interventions to increase self-regulation, e. g. by taking illness beliefs into account, have already achieved promising results, also in the context of rehabilitation. The patient-oriented approach of these interventions could be further strengthened by a stronger inclusion of contextual factors.

Evaluation of a cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden: a study protocol of a controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Family risk factors, e.g. low socioeconomic status or parental mental health disorders, can affect children's health and development. Thus, targeted preventive services for families with psychosocial burden are crucial. The German Early Childhood Intervention (ECI) program is a preventive approach that aims to strengthen parent's resources by supportive services. However, research has revealed that only a proportion of the families considered to have substantial risk factors access the ECI program. To increase pediatricians' skills in identifying risk factors, and to improve the cross-sectoral collaboration between relevant professionals and the referral of families to supportive services, the PATH-intervention (Pediatric Attention To Help) was developed. The PATH-intervention includes interprofessional quality circles and a one-day training program for the pediatricians. This study aims to evaluate this complex cross-sectoral care intervention for families with psychosocial burden. METHODS: Using a prospective quasi-experimental, controlled (matched-pair), longitudinal mixed-method design, we will compare families under treatment of pediatricians trained in the PATH-intervention with families under treatment of a control group of pediatricians. Participating families are asked to complete online-surveys. As a primary outcome, we will examine the use of supportive services of the ECI by burdened families. Secondary outcomes are the proportion of correctly identified families with psychosocial burden by the pediatricians, as well as information provision and motivation of the families to use the supportive services. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness ratio will be investigated. In the process evaluation, we will qualitatively explore the acceptance of the PATH-intervention of all involved stakeholders and the treatment fidelity of the trained pediatricians. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether the PATH-intervention enables the pediatricians to identify and recommend supportive services to burdened families, as well as the families' use of the supportive services of the ECI. Qualitative data will give insight into the acceptance of the intervention from the perspective of all stakeholders and the treatment fidelity. Results of this study could be the starting point for the broader implementation of the PATH-intervention as standard care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00023461 (3rd December 2020); WHO UTN: U1111- 260-6575.

Illness and treatment beliefs as predictors of rehabilitation outcome in patients with mental disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Illness and treatment beliefs are important predictors of health outcomes. However, little is known about their impact on outcomes in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of illness and rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs in patients with mental disorders attending psychosomatic rehabilitation. METHODS: We applied a longitudinal study with two measurement points (before rehabilitation; end of rehabilitation) in a psychosomatic rehabilitation clinic. Patients with mood disorders, anxiety or fear-related disorders, stress associated disorders or bodily distress disorders were included. Using regression models, we analysed whether illness and rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs predicted the rehabilitation outcome (operationalised through "Health-49"). Illness beliefs were assessed using the IPQ-R, while treatment beliefs were assessed using the RTBQ-Psych. Analyses were conducted separately for patients with a F3 and F4 diagnosis in accordance with the ICD-10. RESULTS: N = 239 patients were included, sample size per regression model ranged between n = 48 and n = 85. Mean age was 50.8 years, and n = 120 were female. Initial symptom burden was the strongest predictor in all models with 12% to 64% explained variance. Concerning illness beliefs, perceived consequences, treatment control, and cyclic timeline were negatively linked to the outcome, whereas coherence and emotional representations were shown to be positive predictors. Regarding treatment beliefs, expectations towards treatment results were positively and concerns were negatively associated predictors. CONCLUSION: Illness and treatment beliefs are predictors of the rehabilitation outcome. Patients´ beliefs might therefore be good starting points for interventions in the context of rehabilitation.

[Changes in Somatic, Behavioral, and Psychosocial Outcomes during the Inpatient Rehabilitation of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome - A Longitudinal Study of the META-Program]. / Veränderungen somatischer, verhaltensbezogener und psychosozialer Zielkriterien im Kontext der Rehabilitation von Patientinnen und Patienten mit Metabolischem Syndrom.

PURPOSE: This study analyzed whether clinical, behavioral and psychosocial outcomes changed in patients who participate in a five weeks inpatient rehabilitation program addressing the metabolic syndrome (META-program) and whether changes were maintained at a three months follow-up. METHODS: At the beginning of the program, N=114 eligible patients consented to participate in the study. Behavioral and psychosocial outcomes were measured with standardized questionnaires at program entry, program completion and three months later. These outcome measures included eating behaviors, illness beliefs, health literacy and psychosocial health. Data analysis used t-tests for dependent samples and repeated measures ANOVAs for assessing change. RESULTS: Most of the outcomes improved significantly across time with effect sizes frequently medium or larger. At program completion, this included, e. g., blood pressure, fasting blood glucose and blood lipids. Improvements in self-reported eating behaviors at three months included an increase in eating and eating-related health promoting behaviors in terms of a more flexible control of one's eating, sports, and compliance with nutrition recommendations. Illness beliefs also changed significantly: Symptom burden and concern decreased, while understanding of one's illness increased towards the end of the program. Similarly, facets of psychosocial health also improved towards program completion. At three months follow-up, some facets of psychosocial health like somatoform disorder and depression deteriorated again slightly. CONCLUSION: The significant and in part marked changes of the included outcomes are in line with the goals the META-program attempts to achieve. Future research on programs like the one under study here should include longer follow-up intervals and should use designs that allow interpreting observed changes as effects of participating in the program. This also would allow determining how changes in outcomes can be stabilized or even be enhanced in the long term.

Rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs in adolescents: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Medical rehabilitation plays an important role in the health care of chronically ill children and adolescents. During medical rehabilitation, supporting illness-related self-regulation is a central goal. Beliefs about illness and beliefs about treatment are core elements of patients' self-regulation, and there is evidence that these beliefs are relevant predictors of different health- and treatment-related outcomes such as adherence. However, little is known about adolescents' beliefs about rehabilitation. This study therefore explores adolescents' treatment beliefs in the context of inpatient medical rehabilitation. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted in a German rehabilitation clinic for children and adolescents. Using a purposive sampling method, 13 adolescents (12-16 years old) were recruited. Semi-structured, audiotaped interviews were conducted and analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Results demonstrate that adolescents have differentiated rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs. Twelve themes, with various subthemes, emerged, which include access to and knowledge about rehabilitation, the rehabilitation-related individual position and normative aspects, expectations of oneself, as well as in respect of the social context (fellow patients, contact with family and friends), expectations of the structure, process and outcome of rehabilitation, concerns and barriers and emotional aspects. CONCLUSIONS: Our explorative study revealed a broad range of rehabilitation-related treatment beliefs in adolescents, indicating parallels, but also differences, to research results with adults. Treatment beliefs are assumed to be an influencing factor for various health- and treatment-related outcomes. Thus, implications of our findings for clinical practice and further research are discussed.

Patient-centeredness in the multimorbid elderly: a focus group study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-centeredness (PC) aims to adapt health care to the individual needs and preferences of patients. An existing integrative model of PC comprises several dimensions of PC which have not yet been investigated from the patients' perspective. Older patients with multimorbidity represent a target group for patient-centered care, as their care needs are particularly complex and should be addressed individually. We aimed to assess the perspective that older patients with multimorbidity have of patient-centered care and to examine the transferability of the integrative model of PC to this specific population. METHOD: We performed 4 guided focus group interviews with a total of 20 older individuals with multimorbidity. The focus group interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Patients' statements were content-analyzed applying an a priori designed system of categories that included the dimensions of PC from the integrative model and the additional category 'prognosis and life expectancy', which had emerged from an initial literature search on aspects of PC specific to the multimorbid elderly. RESULTS: The new category 'prognosis and life expectancy' was confirmed and expanded to 'individual care needs related to aging and chronic disesase'. All dimensions of our integrative PC model were confirmed for older patients with multimorbidity. Among these, we found that eight dimensions (individual care needs related to aging and chronic disease, biopsychosocial perspective, clinician-patient communication, essential characteristics of the clinician, clinician-patient-relationship, involvement of family and friends, coordination and continuity of care, access to care) were complemented by aspects specific to this target population. CONCLUSIONS: The integrative PC model is applicable to the population of older patients with multimorbidity. For a population-specific adaptation, it might be complemented by the dimension 'individual care needs in aging and chronic disease', in conjunction with age-specific aspects within existing dimensions. Together with corresponding results from a Delphi survey, our adapted PC model will serve as the basis for a subsequent systematic review of instruments measuring PC in older patients with multimorbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO ( https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero; CRD42018084057; 2018/02/01), German Clinical Trials Register ( www.drks.de ; DRKS00013309; 2018/01/23).

Patient-Centeredness in Older Adults With Multimorbidity: Results of an Online Expert Delphi Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Older adults suffering from multimorbidity represent a priority target group for patient-centeredness (PC). We aimed to investigate the transferability of an existing integrated model of PC comprising 15 dimensions on the care of older adults with multimorbidity from an expert perspective. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 242 experts were invited to participate in a 2-round online Delphi study. In round 1, they were asked to (a) individually rate relevance and clarity of the dimensions, (b) add missing dimensions, and (c) prioritize the dimensions. In round 2, experts received results of round 1 and were asked to rerate their ratings. RESULTS: Forty-eight experts participated in round 1 and 39 in round 2. Ten dimensions were rated as sufficiently relevant and clear, including one new dimension ("prognosis and life expectancy, burden of treatment"). Four dimensions were rated as relevant but insufficiently clear. One dimension failed to reach our validation threshold on both criteria. The 5 dimensions rated as most important were: "patient as a unique person," "clinician-patient communication," "patient involvement in care," "physical, cognitive, and emotional support," and "involvement of family and friends." DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The experts' ratings were higher regarding relevance than regarding clarity, which emphasizes the still existing conceptual uncertainty of PC. Our results give further directions regarding the operationalization of PC in older adults with multimorbidity, which is essential for its implementation in routine care. Further refined using focus groups with geriatric patients, our adapted model serves as a basis for a systematic review of assessment instruments.

Contextual factors of self-regulation in children and adolescents with chronic diseases - a qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: In recent decades, the prevalence of chronic diseases in children and adolescents has increased significantly. Contextual factors play a central role in the self-regulation of chronic diseases. They influence illness and treatment representations, disease management, and health outcomes. While previous studies have investigated the influence of contextual factors on children's beliefs about their illness, little is known about subjective contextual factors of treatment representations of children and adolescents with chronic diseases, especially in the context of rehabilitation. Therefore, the aim of this qualitative analysis was to examine the contextual factors reported by chronically ill children and adolescents in relation to their treatment representations. Furthermore, we aimed to assign the identified themes to classifications of environmental and personal contextual factors in the context of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). METHODS: Between July and September 2018, semi-structured interviews were conducted with N = 13 children and adolescents in rehabilitation to explore their rehab-related treatment representations and associated contextual factors. The interviews started with an open narrative question about expectations and beliefs about rehabilitation, followed by further detailed questions. The interviews were recorded on audio tape, transcribed, and analysed using thematic content analysis. RESULTS: Participants raised six themes associated with their rehab-related treatment representations that were interpreted as contextual factors: the living situation before rehabilitation, the idea of rehabilitation, previous solution attempts, rehab pre-experiences, information that the children and adolescents received from the clinic or sought themselves, and the assumed attitudes of their parents concerning rehabilitation. All the themes could be assigned to the classification of environmental and personal factors in the context of the ICF for children and youth. CONCLUSIONS: Although contextual factors have an important impact on self-regulation, little attention is paid to their investigation. Personal and environmental factors probably influence patients' treatment representations in terms of expectations and concerns as well as emotions regarding the treatment. Considering contextual factors could lead to the more appropriate allocation of medical care and the better customisation of treatment.

Evaluation of a Mobile Phone App for Patients With Pollen-Related Allergic Rhinitis: Prospective Longitudinal Field Study.

BACKGROUND: Mobile health apps have great potential to support the self-management of chronic conditions such as allergic diseases, which constitute significant challenges in health care. However, the health app market is confusing for users, as it is vast, dynamic, and lacks scientific evidence regarding the effectiveness of the apps on offer. To our knowledge, no health app for pollen-related allergic rhinitis has been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to evaluate the Husteblume mobile phone health app, developed in Germany to facilitate the self-management of pollen-related allergic rhinitis. METHODS: We evaluated usability and changes in quality of life, health literacy, and self-efficacy for managing one's chronic disease. We conducted 2 online surveys of registered users of the app, 1 before and 1 after the 2017 pollen season, allowing for the analysis of both cross-sectional and longitudinal data in a field setting. RESULTS: The sample comprised 661 app users at the first measurement point and 143 users at follow-up. The subgroup of study participants at follow-up rated the usability of the app as good or very good. There were no significant changes in patient-reported outcomes such as quality of life, health literacy, and self-efficacy between the 2 measurement points (P>.05). However, those reached at follow-up perceived subjective improvements due to the app: 55.9% (80/143) reported being subjectively better informed about their allergy, 27.3% (39/143) noted improved quality of life, 33.6% (48/143) reported subjectively better coping with their allergy, and 28.0% (40/143) felt better prepared for the consultation with their physician. Finally, 90.9% (130/143) users did not identify any adverse effects of the app. CONCLUSIONS: Despite some methodological caveats, the results of the evaluation of the Husteblume app are encouraging for the subgroup using the app in the long term. However, further studies evaluating the effectiveness of the app are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00011897; https://tinyurl.com/yxxrg9av.

Availability and Quality of Assessment Instruments on Patient-Centredness in the Multimorbid Elderly (AQuA-PCE): a study protocol of a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly, multimorbid patients are a primary target group for patient-centred care, and fostering patient-centredness (PC) in this group has been associated with different healthcare aims such as safety and quality of healthcare. However, evidence on effects of patient-centred interventions is still limited and mixed. In part, the lack of consistent evidence has its roots in a conceptual uncertainty of the term 'PC', which also hampers the development of assessment tools for PC. Consequently, reviews on assessment instruments of PC reveal problems regarding the quality of identified assessment instruments and regarding their comparability. Some of these reviews focus on the elderly. However, while the concept of multimorbidity is partly inherent, this focus is not explicit in any of the reviews.The aim of this systematic review is to identify assessment instruments of PC in the multimorbid elderly, using a subgroup-specific definition of PC ('subgroup-specific integrative model of PC') as the conceptual underpinning, and to provide a critical quality appraisal of their psychometric properties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive systematic literature search for assessment tools on PC will be conducted in the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science and PSYNDEX electronic databases. The search strategy will be informed by the subgroup-specific integrative model of PC. The electronic literature search will be complemented by a hand-search combining citation tracking, search in project databases, and contacting authors from relevant studies/reviews. The literature search (systematic and hand-search) will cover the period from November, 2018 to December 2019.The retrieval of relevant studies will be conducted via title screening, abstract screening, and full-text eligibility assessment applying defined inclusion criteria. Full texts will be independently assessed by two team members. Data from the included articles will be extracted using a standardised extraction form and evaluated based on the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures, which focuses on the methodological quality of included studies as well as on the measurement properties of the assessment instruments. Data extraction and quality assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of the University of Freiburg (reference number 587/17). The results of the project will be disseminated via scientific oral presentations at national and international conferences and will be published in scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: CRD42018084057; DRKS00013309.