RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO) removal reflects a critical moment and factors of adverse outcomes are incompletely understood. Thus, we studied various patient-related factors during vaECMO removal to determine their association with outcomes. METHODS: A total of 58 patients from a university hospital were included retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic parameters were recorded while under vaECMO support, as well as the need for inotropic and vasoactive-inotropic scores (VIS). Successful weaning was defined as 28-day survival without reinitiation of vaECMO. RESULTS: Patient age differed significantly between patients with a successful and a failed vaECMO weaning (54 ± 14 vs. 62 ± 12 years, p = 0.029). In univariable logistic regression, age (OR 0.952 (0.909-0.997), p = 0.038), the necessities for inotropic agents at the time of echocardiography (OR 0.333 (0.113-0.981), p = 0.046), and vaECMO removal (OR 0.266 (0.081-0.877), p = 0.030) as well as the dobutamine dose during removal (OR 0.649 (0.473-0.890), p = 0.007), were significantly associated with a successful weaning from vaECMO. Age (HR 1.048 (1.006-1.091), p = 0.024) and the VIS (HR 1.030 (1.004-1.056), p = 0.025) at the time of vaECMO removal were independently associated with survival in bivariable Cox regression. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, a VIS of >5.1 at vaECMO removal was associated with impaired survival (log-rank p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, age and the extent of vasoactive-inotropic agents were associated with adverse outcomes following vaECMO, whereas echocardiographic biventricular function during vaECMO support was not.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic reached Germany in spring 2020. No proven treatment for SARS-CoV-2 was available at that time, especially for severe COVID-19-induced ARDS. We determined whether the infusion of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) would help to improve pulmonary function and overall outcome in patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS. We offered MSC infusion as an extended indication to all critically ill COVID-19 patients with a Horovitz index <100. We treated 5 out of 23 patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS with an infusion of MSCs. One million MSCs/kg body weight was infused over 30 minutes, and the process was repeated in 3 patients twice and in 2 patients 3 times. RESULT: Four out of 5 MSC-treated patients compared to 50% of control patients (9 out of 18) received ECMO support (80%). The MSC group showed a higher Murray score on admission than control patients, reflecting more severe pulmonary compromise (3.5 ± 0.2 versus 2.8 ± 0.3). MSC infusion was safe and well tolerated. The MSC group had a significantly higher Horovitz score on discharge than the control group. Compared to controls, patients with MSC treatment showed a significantly lower Murray score upon discharge than controls. In the MSC group, 4 out of 5 patients (80%) survived to discharge and exhibited good pulmonary function, whereas only 8 out of 18 patients (45%) in the control group survived to discharge. CONCLUSION: MSC infusion is a safe treatment for COVID-19 ARDS that improves pulmonary function and overall outcome in this patient population.
