Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 38(6): 1131-1139, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38404163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: GPP is a rare, chronic, neutrophilic skin disease, with limited real-world data characterizing patients with flares and the impact of flares on disease progression and morbidity. OBJECTIVE: Describe the clinical characteristics of patients with GPP, comorbidities, disease epidemiology and frequency and severity of flares, and compare patients with GPP with a matched severe psoriasis population. METHODS: In this population-based real-world cohort study an algorithm was developed to identify patients with GPP flares. Three cohorts were identified using the Système National des Données de Santé (SNDS) database covering almost the entire French population; a prevalent cohort (2010-2018), an incident cohort (2012-2015). A severe psoriasis cohort was compared with the GPP incident cohort using propensity score matching. RESULTS: The prevalent and incident cohorts comprised 4195 and 1842 patients, respectively. In both cohorts, mean age was 58 years; 53% were male. Comorbidities were significantly more common in the incident cohort versus matched psoriasis cohort, respectively, including hypertension (44% vs. 26%), ischaemic heart disease (26% vs. 18%) and hyperlipidaemia (25% vs. 15%). In the incident cohort, the flare rate was 0.1 flares/person-year and 0.4 flares/person-year among the 569 out of 1842 patients hospitalized with flares. These patients had a mean (±SD) stay of 11.6 ± 10.4 days; 25% were admitted to the intensive care unit. In 2017, the cumulative incidence and cumulative GPP age-sex standardized prevalence were 7.1 and 45.2 per million, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GPP had a distinct comorbidity profile compared to patients with severe psoriasis, and GPP flares were associated with long hospitalizations.


Asunto(s)
Psoriasis , Humanos , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Francia/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Comorbilidad , Incidencia , Prevalencia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estudios de Cohortes , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Adolescente
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38334243

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare, chronic, inflammatory skin disease associated with considerable patient burden. The Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) and pain-Visual Analogue Scale (pain-VAS) are patient-reported outcomes (PROs) that have not yet been validated in patients with GPP. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the PSS, FACIT-Fatigue and pain-VAS using data from Effisayil 1, a randomised trial of spesolimab in patients with moderate-to-severe GPP. METHODS: Inter-item correlations and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed using Week 1 data. Internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's α coefficient using baseline and Week 1 data. Test-retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs); change data for the GPP Physician Global Assessment total score and pustulation subscore were used to define a stable population. Convergent validity was assessed at baseline and Week 1 using Spearman's rank-order correlations. Known-groups validity was measured by analysis of variance using Week 1 data. Ability to detect change from baseline to Week 1 was evaluated by analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Inter-item and item-to-total correlations were moderate or strong for most PSS and FACIT-Fatigue items. CFA demonstrated the unidimensionality of the PSS and FACIT-Fatigue, with high factor loadings for most items (PSS range, 0.75-0.94; FACIT-Fatigue range, 0.11-0.93) and acceptable fit statistics. Both scores demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's α, 0.71 and 0.95, respectively). The PSS, FACIT-Fatigue and pain-VAS demonstrated test-retest reliability (ICCs ≥0.70) and good evidence of convergent validity. Furthermore, the PROs could differentiate between known groups of varying symptom severity (range, p < 0.0001-0.0225) and detect changes in symptom severity from baseline to Week 1 (range, p < 0.0001-0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, these results support the reliability, validity and ability to detect change of the PSS, FACIT-Fatigue and pain-VAS as PROs in patients with GPP.

3.
BMJ Open ; 13(4): e064159, 2023 04 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37094891

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the experiences and perceptions of patients participating in a simulated clinical trial and identify ways to enhance future patient-centric trial designs. DESIGN: International, multicentre, non-interventional, virtual clinical trial visits with patient debriefs and advisory boards. SETTING: Virtual clinic visits and accompanying advisory boards. PARTICIPANTS: Nine patients with palmoplantar pustulosis for simulated trial visits; 14 patients and patient representatives for advisory boards. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Qualitative responses to trial documentation, visit schedule and logistics, and trial design were collected during patient debriefs. Results were discussed at two virtual advisory board meetings. RESULTS: Patients identified key barriers to participation and potential difficulties encountered when attending trial visits and completing assessments. They also proposed recommendations to overcome these challenges. Patients recognised the need for comprehensive informed consent forms, but recommended use of non-technical language, brevity and additional support to aid understanding. Other trial documentations should be relevant to the disease and include known efficacy and safety of the study drug. Patients were concerned about receiving placebo, stopping existing medications and being unable to receive the study drug after trial completion; therefore, patients and physicians recommended an open-label extension following trial completion. Trial visits were too numerous (n=20) and too long (3-4 hours each); patients recommended improvements to the design to make best use of their time and reduce unnecessary waiting. They also requested financial and logistical support. Patients expressed a desire for study outcomes that matter to them, related to their ability to undertake normal daily activities and not be a burden to others. CONCLUSIONS: Simulated trials are an innovative method for assessing trial design and acceptance from a patient-centric perspective, enabling specific improvements to be made prior to trial initiation. Incorporation of recommendations from simulated trials could enhance trial recruitment and retention, and optimise trial outcomes and data quality.

4.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 37(7): 1327-1335, 2023 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36854864

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and life-threatening skin disease often accompanied by systemic inflammation. There are currently no standardized or validated GPP-specific measures for assessing severity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability, validity and responder definitions of the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) and Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI). METHODS: The GPPGA and GPPASI were validated using outcome data from Week 1 of the Effisayil™ 1 study. The psychometric analyses performed included confirmatory factor analysis, item-to-item/item-to-total correlations, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, convergent validity, known-groups validity, responsiveness analysis and responder definition analysis. RESULTS: Using data from this patient cohort (N = 53), confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated unidimensionality of the GPPGA total score (root mean square error of approximation <0.08), and GPPGA item-to-item and item-to-total correlations ranged from 0.58 to 0.90. The GPPGA total score, pustulation subscore and GPPASI total score all demonstrated good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.70, 0.91 and 0.95 respectively), and good evidence of convergent validity. In anchor-based analyses, all three scores were able to detect changes in symptom and disease severity over time; reductions of -1.4, -2.2 and - 12.0 were suggested as clinically meaningful improvement thresholds for the GPPGA total score, GPPGA pustulation subscore and GPPASI total score respectively. Anchor-based analyses also supported the GPPASI 50 as a clinically meaningful threshold for improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our findings indicate that the GPPGA and GPPASI are valid, reliable and responsive measures for the assessment of GPP disease severity, and support their use in informing clinical endpoints in trials in GPP.


Asunto(s)
Médicos , Psoriasis , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vesiculoampollosas , Humanos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Psoriasis/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crónica , Enfermedades Cutáneas Vesiculoampollosas/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda
5.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) ; 12(6): 1367-1381, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35590037

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We sought to understand key symptoms of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) and to confirm the relevance to patients and content validity of the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) in GPP. METHODS: A targeted literature review and clinical expert interviews were conducted as background research. Patients were interviewed individually (involving concept elicitation and cognitive interviews), and a separate patient workshop was conducted to determine disease-specific symptoms of importance. RESULTS: Seven participants with moderate (n = 4), severe (n = 2), and mild (n = 1) GPP and clinician diagnosis were interviewed. During concept elicitation, all participants indicated that pustules may underlie other symptoms. Symptoms reported by all patients were pain, redness, itch, burning, and discomfort. The PSS symptoms of pain, itching, burning, and redness were reported by ≥ 86% of patients as most frequently experienced. Upon debriefing, the PSS was well understood. Relevance and importance of these symptoms was confirmed in the GPP patient workshop. CONCLUSION: Participant feedback found the PSS measure to be relevant and easy to understand. The symptoms included in the instrument, pain, redness, itch, and burning, were most frequently reported, important, and well understood by patients. Study results provided support for the content validity of the PSS for use as endpoints in GPP clinical trials.


Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a severe rare disease, including redness and boils that sometimes come with fever and other general symptoms. This study asked patients with GPP about their key symptoms, and whether the Psoriasis Symptom Scale (PSS) is relevant to them as patients. The PSS is a questionnaire with the symptoms pain, itching, burning, and redness. We searched the literature and interviewed clinical experts to guide the patient interviews. Patients were recruited through clinical sites and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF). The interviews discussed GPP symptoms and the PSS questionnaire. Patients with GPP were also asked about commonly experienced symptoms in a workshop. Most patients had moderate to severe GPP. Patients in both the interviews and workshop described experiencing pain, redness, itch, burning, and discomfort with their boils. During interviews, the patients said the PSS questionnaire was easy to understand. Patients in the workshop also found the PSS to be relevant and easy to understand. Patients agreed the symptoms in the PSS, pain, redness, itch, and burning, were common and important. Study results support the PSS for use with patients in clinical trials.

6.
Gesundheitswesen ; 80(8-09): 744-753, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28521377

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cost-of-illness (CoI) studies are important instruments for estimating the socioeconomic burden of specified diseases. CoI studies provide important information about the cost structure of a disease, the resulting research need, approaches to improve aspects of care and, monetary consequences from different perspectives. This information can be useful for healthcare research and health policy. Due to heterogeneity of available Cost-of-Illness studies, the working group 'Health Economics' of the German Network for Healthcare Research (DNVF) in accordance with the German Society for Health Economics (DGGÖ) developed an instrument for the planning, conduct and assessment of CoI studies. METHODS: The checklist was developed based on a systematic literature search of published national and international checklists as well as guidelines and recommendations for development and assessment of CoI studies and health economic evaluations. Structure and subject matter of the generic checklist was designed, approved and, finally, examined in a pretest by the working group. RESULTS: Based on the results of the literature search (n=2 454), 58 articles were used for the identification of relevant criteria for the checklist. With respect to the results of the pretest, 6 dimensions were included in the checklist: (i) general aspects, (ii) identification of resources, (iii) description and quantification of resource consumption, (iv) valuation of resources (v) analysis and presentation of results and (vi) discussion and conclusion. In total, the 6 dimensions were operationalized through 37 items. CONCLUSION: This checklist is an initial approach to improve transparency and understanding of CoI studies in terms of the extent, structure and development of the socioeconomic burden of diseases. The checklist supports the comparability of different studies and facilitates study conception.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Economía Médica , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Alemania
7.
J Cancer Educ ; 32(3): 571-579, 2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28110419

RESUMEN

In cancer care, where patients and their families experience significant emotional distress and patients have to deal with complex medical information, patient centeredness is an important aspect of quality of care. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of patients' trust in their oncologists and patients' enablement on changes in health-related quality of life of colon cancer patients during follow-up care. We conducted a prospective study in a representative sample of private practices of German oncologists (N = 44). Patients (N = 131) filled out a standardized questionnaire prior to their first consultation (T0), directly after the first consultation (T1) and after two months (T2). Data were analyzed by structural equation modeling. Significant associations were found between trust in physician and changes in physical functioning between T1 and T2, and between trust in physician and patient enablement. Patient enablement is significantly associated with changes in physical functioning between T1 and T2. The results underline the importance of building a close and trustful patient-physician relationship in the oncology encounter. A central mechanism of the association between the quality of the relationship and health outcomes seems to be patient enablement. To enable patients to cope with their situation by making them understand their diagnosis, treatments, and side effects can impact health-related quality of life in physical domains.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/terapia , Oncólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Calidad de Vida , Confianza , Adaptación Psicológica , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Oncología Médica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
8.
Support Care Cancer ; 23(4): 977-84, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25253087

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A common phenomenon among cancer patients is a fear of cancer recurrence or cancer progression (FOP). The aim of the present study was to analyze whether the oncologist is able to reduce patients' FOP at the initial clinical interview. METHOD: A prospective, longitudinal study included patients who were consulting private-practice oncologists in Germany for the first time. Recruitment was carried out by 44 members of the Professional Organization of Office-Based Hematologists and Oncologists. In the patient surveys, data on colon cancer patients' perceptions of communications with their oncologist and on patient-reported outcomes were collected over a period of 6 months. The present study analyzed the patients' data before their first consultation (T 0) and within 3 days after the first consultation (T 1). RESULTS: A total of 169 patients agreed to participate in the study. Backwards multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine whether the change (T 0-T 1) in FOP is associated with demographic, medical, or psychosocial determinants, or with the physician-patient communication. A significant association was found between the change in FOP and interruptions to the conversation, the comprehensibility of the information provided, the extent of perceived empathy from the physician, and the patient's social support and family status. CONCLUSION: Private social support and the initial medical encounter can help reduce FOP. Particularly, oncologists should ensure that they facilitate the presentation of information in a comprehensible way while avoiding interruptions and that they take particular care of patients with poor social support.


Asunto(s)
Miedo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/organización & administración , Sobrevivientes/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Miedo/psicología , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , Apoyo Social
9.
Stroke ; 45(11): 3389-94, 2014 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25342028

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stroke is costly, although little is known about the long-term costs of survivors of stroke. In previous cost-of-illness studies, lifetime costs have been modeled based on estimates to 5 years after stroke. Building on previous work from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS), we aimed to describe resource use at 10 years and recalculate the lifetime societal costs of ischemic and hemorrhagic (intracerebral hemorrhage) stroke. METHODS: Ten-year patient-level resource use data were obtained and updated prices and population demographic statistics for 2010 were applied to our cost-of-illness models. We incorporated incidence data from a larger study region of NEMESIS than that used in the previous model and new 10-year survival and recurrent stroke rates. One-way sensitivity and probabilistic multivariable uncertainty analyses were undertaken. RESULTS: For ischemic stroke, the overall average annual direct costs at 10 years (US dollars [USD] 5207) were comparable to those for survivors between 3 and 5 years (USD5438). However, the contribution of some costs varied (eg, medications contributed 13% at 5 years and 20% at 10 years). For intracerebral hemorrhage, annual direct costs were considerably (24%) greater at 10 years than estimated using 3 to 5 year data. Greater average lifetime costs per case were found using the updated models (ischemic stroke: previous model USD51806 and current USD68 769; intracerebral hemorrhage: previous model USD43 786 and current USD54 956 per case). Following sensitivity and multivariable uncertainty analyses, the findings were robust. CONCLUSIONS: Costs to 10 years after stroke have not previously been reported. Our findings demonstrate the importance of estimating resource use over longer periods for forecasting lifetime estimates.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/economía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Factores de Tiempo , Victoria/epidemiología
10.
J Interprof Care ; 27(2): 171-6, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23016540

RESUMEN

Effective coordination among all members of hospital staff has been shown to be associated with better quality of care. The literature indicates that social capital, a form of organizational resource, may facilitate the task of coordination. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has yet examined this link within a healthcare setting. Thus, the objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between social capital and coordination among hospital staff, as perceived by the medical director being a key informant of the hospital. In 2008, we surveyed the medical directors of 1224 German hospitals by the use of a standardized questionnaire. We conducted stepwise multivariate linear regression and controlled for hospital size, ownership and teaching status. In total, 551 medical directors (45%) responded to the survey. We found social capital to be a significant predictor of coordination (ß = 0.444, p < 0.001). The regression model explained 28% of the variance in coordination. Higher levels of social capital can be associated with better coordination among members of hospital staff, as perceived by the medical director. Therefore, investment in social capital may facilitate better organization of work processes in hospitals and may therefore help to improve patient outcomes. However, longitudinal studies are needed in order to explain the causal relationship between social capital and coordination among hospital staff.


Asunto(s)
Conducta Cooperativa , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/organización & administración , Ejecutivos Médicos/psicología , Apoyo Social , Alemania , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Confianza
11.
Int J Public Health ; 55(6): 561-70, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20938798

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to measure the determinants of the innovative climate in German banks with a focus on workplace health management (WHM). METHODS: We analyze the determinants of innovative climate with multiple regressions using a dataset based on standardized telephone interviews conducted with health promotion experts from 198 randomly selected German banks. RESULTS: The regression analysis provided a good explanation of the variance in the dependent variable (R² = 55%). Communication climate (ß = 0.55; p < 0.001), social capital (ß = 0.21; p < 0.01), the establishment of a WHM program (ß = 0.13; p < 0.05) as well as company size (ß = 0.15; p < 0.01) were found to have a significant impact on an organization's innovative climate. CONCLUSIONS: In order to foster an innovation-friendly climate, organizations should establish shared values. An active step in this direction involves strengthening the organizations' social capital and communication climate through trustworthy management decisions such as the implementation of a WHM program.


Asunto(s)
Comercio , Comunicación , Difusión de Innovaciones , Salud Laboral , Apoyo Social , Alemania , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Análisis de Regresión , Lugar de Trabajo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...