Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Administration in Hospitalized Patients With Solid Tumor Malignancies.

PURPOSE: More oncologists desire to treat their patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the inpatient setting as their use has become more widespread for numerous oncologic indications. This is cost-prohibitive to patients and institutions because of high drug cost and lack of reimbursement in the inpatient setting. We sought to examine current practice of inpatient ICI administration to determine if and in which clinical scenarios it may provide significant clinical benefit and therefore be warranted regardless of cost. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients who received at least one dose of an ICI for treatment of an active solid tumor malignancy during hospitalization at a single academic medical center between January 2017 and June 2018. Patient, disease, and admission characteristics including mortality data were examined, and cost analysis was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-five doses of ICIs were administered to 58 patients during the study period. Nearly 40% and 80% of patients died within 30 days and 180 days of ICI administration, respectively. There was a trend toward longer overall survival in patients with good prognostic factors including positive programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status. Slightly over 70% of patients were discharged within 7 days of ICI administration. The total cost of inpatient ICI administration over the 18-month study period was $615,016 US dollars. CONCLUSION: Inpatient ICI administration is associated with high costs and poor outcomes in acutely ill hospitalized patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies and therefore should largely be avoided. Careful discharge planning to expedite outpatient treatment after discharge will be paramount in ensuring patients with good prognostic features who will benefit most from ICI therapy can be promptly treated in the outpatient setting as treating very close to discharge in the inpatient setting appears to be unnecessary, regardless of tumor features.

The utility of procalcitonin for diagnosing bacteremia and bacterial pneumonia in hospitalized oncology patients.

PURPOSE: Procalcitonin (PCT) is an inflammatory marker elevated in bacteremia and bacterial pneumonia. We aimed to assess the real-world diagnostic accuracy of PCT in hospitalized patients with malignancy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 715 patients with cancer who had PCT measured during 750 admissions was analyzed. Diagnosis of bacteremia was determined using blood culture data. Diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia was based on radiographic infiltrate and/or sputum culture. PCT's performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, and specificity. RESULTS: Patients had bacteremia, bacterial pneumonia, or both during 210 admissions (28%). PCT elevation above 0.5 ng/mL was significantly associated with diagnosed infection in the overall population (p < 0.0001) and in subgroups with solid tumor malignancies (p < 0.0001) and hematologic malignancies (p = 0.008). PCT was associated with infectious status in patients with any metastases, but not those with primary lung cancer, lung metastases, neuroendocrine tumors, febrile neutropenia, or history of bone marrow transplant (BMT). The area under the ROC curve for PCT in the overall population was 0.655. An ideal cutoff of 0.21 ng/mL led to a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 59%. At cutoffs of 0.5 ng/mL and 0.05 ng/mL, PCT's sensitivity was 39% and 94%, while specificity was 79% and 17%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of hospitalized oncology patients, PCT elevation was associated with diagnosed bacteremia and/or bacterial pneumonia. However, specificity was limited, and PCT elevation was not associated with diagnosed infection in some subpopulations. While PCT may have some diagnostic utility for hospitalized oncology patients, values must be interpreted cautiously and considering clinical context.

Risk factors for the development of orthostatic hypotension during autologous stem cell transplant in patients with multiple myeloma.

Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a well-recognized phenomenon occurring in multiple myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A retrospective analysis of patients admitted for first ASCT between June 2012 and April 2014 found that 161/222 (73%) patients were diagnosed with OH during the course of ASCT, including 51 patients who were found to have OH on the day of first orthostatic vitals check. Excluding these 51 patients, 110/171 (64%) patients developed OH during the peri-transplant period, at a median of 7 days post ASCT (95% CI: 6.5-8.5). OH did not significantly impact length of hospitalization, progression free and overall survival. Multivariable analysis revealed four risk factors (i.e. ≥0.5% weight loss/day, white race, gabapentin, antihypertensives) and two protective factors (i.e. antihistamine, proton pump inhibitor) associated with the development of peri-transplant OH.

Biosimilar strategic implementation at a large health system.

PURPOSE: This article highlights one health system's response to the market influx of biosimilars with the establishment of a process for formulary review and selection of preferred agents and support for therapeutic interchanges. SUMMARY: Through assessment of available literature, insurance payor coverage, and manufacturer-anticipated approvals of biosimilars, a strategic stance was developed to guide biosimilar order preparation, review, adoption, and implementation. The electronic medical record (EMR) is prepared for biosimilar implementation at least 6 to 12 months ahead of anticipated formulary review. The review includes assessment of a class (reference product and available biosimilars) after at least 2 biosimilars become available. Key health-system departments and clinicians are enlisted to support review of clinical, safety, and economic implications. Implementation of a preferred product relies on standard education, formulary availability, and staff awareness to address any perceived patient safety concerns and gather provider support. The standard steps developed now apply to all future biosimilar reviews, adoption plans, and ongoing monitoring. Barriers evaluated include changes in payor coverage and challenges in preparation of the EMR for future biosimilars, meeting precertification team education needs, and providing operational support for pharmacy inventory. CONCLUSION: To date, use of 5 preferred biosimilar products has led to significant cost savings to the institution, and the process has been endorsed by providers. The institution's successes can be attributed to clear communication with stakeholders and the development of a deliberate process, led by a multidisciplinary leadership team, for managing formulary, safety, and operational barriers in a thoughtful and systematic manner.

Resident-Reported Impact of a Novel Oncology Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents.

The Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education mandates that all internal medicine residents gain exposure to internal medicine subspecialties including hematology and oncology. While many residents meet this criterion through inpatient oncology rotations, the current structure of many inpatient oncology rotations leaves little opportunity for formal education. We therefore designed a novel oncology curriculum consisting of one-page oncology teaching sheets to increase the number, breadth, and quality of formal teaching sessions on our resident inpatient oncology services. In order to evaluate the curriculum, we conducted pre- and post-intervention surveys of residents. From these surveys, we found that 72.2% of residents used the teaching sheets on their inpatient oncology rotation and that the teaching sheets led to an increase in the number of formal oncology teaching sessions (mean 3.4 ± 2.1 post-implementation vs 2.6 ± 2.0 pre-implementation, p = 0.008), the breadth of oncology topics taught (% reporting ≥ 5 topics; 26.1% vs 16.3%, p = 0.035), the proportion of residents reporting improvement in overall oncology knowledge (80.2% vs 62.4%, p = 0.012), and the proportion of residents reporting improvement in their ability to care for patients (70.8% vs 48.9%, p = 0.013). These results demonstrate that formal oncology teaching can be improved on inpatient oncology rotations through a simple and easily replicable oncology curriculum.

Randomized Study of enterade® to Reduce Diarrhea in Patients Receiving High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

High-dose chemotherapy frequently causes injury to the gastrointestinal mucosa, resulting in diarrhea. The purpose of the current study was to assess the tolerability and efficacy of enterade® in reducing ≥ grade 2 diarrhea (G2D) in association with high-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We conducted a prospective, double blinded, multi-center trial in which 114 subjects were randomized to receive enterade® or placebo twice daily during the transplant hospitalization. Gastrointestinal toxicities (nausea, vomiting, oral mucositis and dysphagia) resulted in poor study compliance in both arms. Among subjects who were able to complete planned therapy (13%), the incidence of G2D was lower for those receiving enterade® as compared to placebo (16% vs 86%, p <0.03). Twice daily oral administration of enterade® and placebo following high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT was not feasible due to significant gastrointestinal toxicities.  Future explorations of enterade® should be conducted in populations capable of reasonable oral intake.
.

Efficacy and cost-benefit of filgrastim administered after early assessment bone marrow biopsy during induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

The role of filgrastim during acute myeloid leukemia (AML) induction therapy remains controversial. At our institution, newly diagnosed AML patients from 2003 through 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were stratified on whether they received filgrastim within 5 days after early assessment bone marrow (BMBx) and divided into early GCSF group (eGCSF) and no-eGCSF group. A total of 121 patients were included. We found significantly shorter hospital stay (median 24 vs 26 days, p < .01), absolute neutrophil count recovery days (median 23 vs 25 days, p = .03), and intravenous antibiotics days (mean 18.5 vs 21.4 days, p = .01) in patients with eGCSF comparing with no-eGCSF. There was no significant difference regarding complete response rates; however, for those failed to achieve remission, eGCSF was associated with higher blast count. There was no significant difference regarding overall survival or progression-free survival. The use of eGCSF was associated with cost savings of $5199 per patient over no-eGCSF.

Phase II trial of natalizumab with corticosteroids as initial treatment of gastrointestinal acute graft-versus-host disease.

The α4ß7 integrin is upregulated on naive and memory T cell subsets in patients who subsequently develop gastrointestinal (GI) acute GVHD. Natalizumab (Tysabri®, Biogen Inc.) acts against the α4 subunit that mediates homing of lymphocytes to the GI tract. We initiated a phase II study of natalizumab with corticosteroids for initial treatment of acute GI GVHD. In total, 300 mg IV of natalizumab was given, with steroids initiated up to 3 days prior. Twenty-one subjects were treated, median age was 63 years (range 38-74), and 15 (71%) were male. Eighteen (86%) underwent RIC, 15 (71%) received MUD, and all received PBSCs. Overall GVHD at enrollment was grade II in 4 and grade III in 17. The primary endpoint, day 56 GVHD-free survival rate, was attained in 33.3%. The overall response rate at day 28 and 56 was 57% and 52%, respectively. Six of eight CRs were durable for 1 year. Five experienced toxicity possibly related to natalizumab and ten had infections before day 100. 2-year OS was 43% (95% CI 22-62%) and 2-year NRM was 52% (95% CI 29-71%). Natalizumab with corticosteroids as initial treatment of acute GI GVHD is safe, effective, and durable.

Information Needs for Treatment Decision-making of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Patients 65 Years or Older and Caregivers.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a complex and potentially life-threatening treatment option for patients with hematologic malignant and non-malignant diseases. Advances have made HCT a potentially curative treatment option for patients 65 years of age and older (older patients), and patient education resources should be adapted to meet their needs. To better understand the information needs of older patients and their caregivers for HCT treatment decision-making, the National Marrow Donor Program® (NMDP)/Be The Match® conducted a qualitative comprehensive needs assessment. Focus groups, offered in person or by phone, were conducted with older HCT patients and primary caregivers of older HCT patients at three transplant centers in the USA that were selected based on the number of older adults treated and geographic diversity. The one-hour, semi-structured discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim. The analysis was performed with the NVivo 10 software for identification of conceptual themes. Five telephone and six in person focus groups of patients (n = 35) and caregivers (n = 10) were conducted. Themes that emerged included the following: (1) the need for tailored resources with age-specific recovery expectations; (2) the need for the right amount of information at the right times; and (3) the benefit of peer support. Effective patient education supports learning and treatment decision-making. As HCT increasingly becomes a treatment option for older patients, tailored educational resources are needed. These focus group results can inform and guide the development of new educational resources for older adults with hematologic diseases considering and planning for HCT.

Improvements in Sepsis-associated Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer versus Those without Cancer. A 12-Year Analysis Using Clinical Data.

Rationale: There have been advances in both cancer and sepsis treatment over the past several decades, yet little is known about trends in sepsis-associated mortality in patients with versus without cancer.Objectives: To assess trends in sepsis-associated mortality in hospitalized patients with and without cancer using objective clinical criteria to identify sepsis and detailed clinical data to adjust for severity of illness.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral hospital and cancer center. Adult in-patients with clinical indicators of sepsis (U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Sepsis Event criteria) were identified between 2003 and 2014. Patients with cancer were identified using diagnosis codes from their hospitalization or the preceding 90 days. Sepsis-associated in-hospital mortality rates were assessed in 3-year intervals. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to adjust for case mix and severity of illness and to test for subgroup interactions in trends.Results: The cohort included 20,975 patients with sepsis, of whom 7,489 (35.7%) had cancer (61.7% solid and 38.3% hematologic). Sepsis-associated mortality rates in patients with cancer decreased from 31.3% in 2003-2005 to 26.0% in 2012-2014 (absolute decrease, 5.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.3-8.2%]). This mortality reduction persisted after risk adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.45-0.63] in 2012-2014 relative to 2003-2005). In contrast, sepsis-associated mortality rates increased in patients without cancer from 20.9% in 2003-2005 to 23.9% in 2012-2014 (absolute increase, 2.1% [95% CI, 0.1-4.1%]), but were stable after risk-adjustment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.79-1.03]) (P < 0.001 for comparison of trends between patients with vs. without cancer on both crude and adjusted analysis). Among patients with cancer, declines in risk-adjusted sepsis-associated mortality were observed in both solid and hematologic cancer subgroups, with both community-onset and hospital-onset sepsis, in patients receiving active cancer treatments, and in patients requiring mechanical ventilation at sepsis onset.Conclusions: Sepsis-associated mortality rates declined significantly over a 12-year period in patients with cancer, but not in patients without cancer. Potential explanations include advances in the management of cancer and/or better sepsis treatments specifically in patients with cancer. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons for our findings and to assess their generalizability to other hospitals.

Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome after Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

fludarabine with intravenous busulfan at doses of 3.2 mg/kg (Flu/Bu1) or 6.4 mg/kg (Flu/Bu2). Hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) that is felt to be triggered, at least in part, by damage to the liver sinusoidal endothelium from cytotoxic conditioning regimens. Accordingly, the incidence of VOD/SOS after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT is low compared with myeloablative transplantation, and the natural history, risk factors, and outcomes of VOD/SOS after RIC have not been well characterized. We retrospectively reviewed 1583 consecutive patients receiving RIC HCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2007 and 2017 and ascertained 26 cases of VOD/SOS. The median day of VOD/SOS onset was 26 days (range, 5 to 48) and the cumulative incidence at day 50 was 1.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1% to 2.4%). Day 100 nonrelapse mortality rate was 23% in the VOD/SOS cohort compared with 6.4% in patients without VOD/SOS (P = .006). Cumulative incidence of VOD/SOS at day 50 was 3.1% after RIC regimen with Flu/Bu2 ± ATG (fludarabine with two doses of busulfan, total dose 6.4 mg/kg, with or without anti-thymocyte globulin), compared with 0.15% after Flu/Bu1 ± ATG (fludarabine with single busulfan dose 3.2 mg/kg, with or without anti-thymocyte globulin) (P = .0002); the incidence rate was 2.1% after RIC HCT with sirolimus-containing graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis, compared with 0.8% for RIC without sirolimus (P = .06). Significant risk factors identified in multivariable analysis for the development of VOD/SOS were sirolimus use (hazard ratio [HR], 5.1; 95% CI, 1.8 to 14.2; P = .002) and RIC regimen with Flu/Bu2 ± ATG (HR, 34; 95% CI, 4.5 to 252; P < .001) or other (HR, 32; 95% CI, 3.9 to 257; P = .001) compared with Flu/Bu1 ± ATG. Rising serum tacrolimus or sirolimus levels, new acute kidney injury, and increasing platelet transfusion requirements were significant early predictors of onset in the week preceding prior VOD/SOS diagnosis. When compared with a previously published cohort of 76 patients with VOD/SOS who developed VOD/SOS after myeloablative HCT in the same time period, VOD/SOS after RIC occurred later and was associated with a lower peak bilirubin level and better overall survival. The variability in presenting features for RIC VOD/SOS highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for this entity in RIC HCT.

Risk of Latent Tuberculosis Reactivation After Hematopoietic cell Transplantation.

There were no cases of tuberculosis in a cohort of 2531 patients who underwent hematopoietic cell transplantation from 2010 to 2015 after 7323 person-years of follow up (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0-0.05 cases/100 person-years), including 29 (1.15%) patients with untreated latent tuberculosis after 89 person-years of follow-up (95% CI, 0.0-4.06 cases/100 person-years).

Evaluating the adverse effects of melphalan formulations.

INTRODUCTION: For multiple myeloma patients who respond to primary therapy, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is considered standard of care with high-dose melphalan for transplant candidates. There are now two different melphalan formulations available, including a propylene glycol containing (PG-MEL) product and a propylene glycol-free (PG-free MEL) product. Although considered bioequivalent, there remains limited literature directly evaluating the adverse events between the two agents. We seek to assess the tolerability and severity of side effects between the two formulations in a real-life practice setting. METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive analysis was conducted of multiple myeloma patients who received autologous stem cell conditioning with either melphalan formulation when dosed at 100 mg/m2/dose for two consecutive doses. The primary outcome was the assessment of tolerability and severity of side effects. Tolerability was split into four major categories including hematologic toxicity, gastrointestinal toxicity, renal toxicity, and highest recorded mucositis grade. RESULTS: There were a total of 78 patients who received a melphalan preparation during the study. The median time to myeloablation and neutrophil engraftment was five and seven days post-HSCT, respectively, for all patients. Patients who received PG-free MEL were less likely to develop mucositis, with 22 (56%) reported highest grade 0, defined by World Health Organization oral toxicity scale, compared to those who received PG-MEL (33%), p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: There were minimal differences in tolerability or side effects observed between PG-free MEL and PG-MEL. These data may assist in better understanding the anticipated adverse effects of a high-dose melphalan conditioning therapy.

Early Clinical Predictors of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease/Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome after Myeloablative Stem Cell Transplantation.

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD), or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with mortality in its severe form exceeding 80%. Although the incidence of VOD/SOS has fallen with contemporary transplantation practices, the increasing use of inotuzumab, the return of gemtuzumab, and the popularity of pharmacokinetic-guided high-dose busulfan may impact incidence. Early intervention with defibrotide improves survival, but prompt diagnosis can be difficult. We aimed to identify clinical parameters that could aid in early detection of VOD/SOS in a large, retrospective, cohort study. Of the 1823 adult patients who underwent myeloablative HSCT between 1996 and 2015 in our center, 205 (11%) developed VOD/SOS, with a median onset of day +14. We compared parameters in the 7 days preceding VOD/SOS onset for cases to 447 randomly selected control subjects in an analogous time frame to determine those with predictive value. Between 7 days before and the day of diagnosis, VOD/SOS patients had higher serum creatinine levels and were more likely to develop acute kidney injury (61% versus 33%, P < .0001), more commonly experienced refractoriness to platelet transfusion (48% versus 24%, P < .0001), and had higher trough serum tacrolimus levels (7 days before VOD/SOS onset: median 8.8 versus 7.3, P = .0002; day of onset: median 9.3 versus 7.2, P < .0001) compared with control subjects. Acute renal dysfunction, platelet refractoriness, and elevated or abnormal tacrolimus levels are dynamic clinical markers that should alert clinicians to the development of VOD/SOS before the presence of classical diagnostic criteria. Using these clinical features to recognize VOD/SOS earlier in its clinical course could promote earlier treatment and lead to improved outcomes of this potentially serious complication.

Integrative omics to detect bacteremia in patients with febrile neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Cancer chemotherapy-associated febrile neutropenia (FN) is a common condition that is deadly when bacteremia is present. Detection of bacteremia depends on culture, which takes days, and no accurate predictive tools applicable to the initial evaluation are available. We utilized metabolomics and transcriptomics to develop multivariable predictors of bacteremia among FN patients. METHODS: We classified emergency department patients with FN and no apparent infection at presentation as bacteremic (cases) or not (controls), according to blood culture results. We assessed relative metabolite abundance in plasma, and relative expression of 2,560 immunology and cancer-related genes in whole blood. We used logistic regression to identify multivariable predictors of bacteremia, and report test characteristics of the derived predictors. RESULTS: For metabolomics, 14 bacteremic cases and 25 non-bacteremic controls were available for analysis; for transcriptomics we had 7 and 22 respectively. A 5-predictor metabolomic model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 (95%CI: 0.972,1.000), 100% sensitivity, and 96% specificity for identifying bacteremia. Pregnenolone steroids were more abundant in cases and carnitine metabolites were more abundant in controls. A 3-predictor gene expression model had corresponding results of 0.961 (95%CI: 0.896,1.000), 100%, and 86%. Genes involved in innate immunity were differentially expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Classifiers derived from metabolomic and gene expression data hold promise as objective and accurate predictors of bacteremia among FN patients without apparent infection at presentation, and can provide insights into the underlying biology. Our findings should be considered illustrative, but may lay the groundwork for future biomarker development.

A Comparison of the Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen Fludarabine/Busulfan with Cyclophosphamide/Total Body Irradiation, for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Modern Era: A Cohort Analysis.

With improvement in transplantation practices in the modern era, nonrelapse mortality (NRM) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has improved, while disease relapse rates have remained unchanged. Survival outcomes are therefore driven by NRM in the modern era. Myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens are used to maximize disease control and facilitate engraftment; however, their use is often limited by toxicity. The commonly used MAC regimens incorporate either chemotherapy plus total body irradiation (TBI) or combination chemotherapy. Furthermore, reduced-toxicity myeloablative (RTM) regimens, such as fludarabine/busulfan (FluBu), have emerged as alternatives to traditional MAC and their impact on outcomes in the current era have not been fully investigated. In this study, we compare outcomes following HSCT, using the chemotherapy only RTM MAC regimens FluBu with the chemoradiotherapy regimen cyclophosphamide/TBI (CyTBI), for patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent MAC HSCT at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. We hypothesized that the chemotherapy-only regimen would fare better, primarily due to improved NRM. A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on 387 patients with myeloid or lymphoid hematologic malignancies who underwent HLA-matched related (8/8), matched unrelated (8/8), or single-antigen mismatched unrelated (7/8) HSCT following myeloablative conditioning. Patients received FluBu (n = 158) or CyTBI (n = 229). The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and all other outcomes were regarded as secondary. A subset analysis was performed for patients <55 years of age and for acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients of age <55 years. For the whole cohort, 3-year OS was similar for FluBu compared with CyTBI in unadjusted analysis. However, in multivariable analysis, FluBu resulted in superior OS compared with CyTBI (3-year adjusted estimate: 65% versus 55%, respectively; HR for death, .62; 95% CI, .40 to .97; P = .036). While relapse rates were similar between the 2 regimens, NRM and acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) (grade II to IV) were significantly worse with CyTBI compared with FluBu. Rates of chronic GVHD were similar between 2 regimens. These results were consistent in a subset of patients <55 years of age and in acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome patients below 55 years of age. The RTM chemotherapy-only regimen FluBu appears to be as effective and more tolerable than the chemoradiotherapy regimen CyTBI, leading to better OS driven by better NRM. The improvement in NRM was attributable chiefly to lower rates of grade II to IV acute GVHD. Relapse rates were not increased with FluBu. In the absence of randomized data, FluBu appears to be the optimal regimen for myeloablative HSCT in patients of all age groups.

Bortezomib-based immunosuppression after reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: randomized phase II results.

Aprior phase I/II trial of bortezomib/tacrolimus/methotrexate prophylaxis after human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation documented low acute graft-versus-host disease incidence, with promising overall and progression-free survival. We performed an open-label three-arm 1:1:1 phase II randomized controlled trial comparing grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease between conventional tacrolimus/methotrexate (A) versus bortezomib/tacrolimus/methotrexate (B), and versus bortezomib/sirolimus/tacrolimus (C), in reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation recipients lacking HLA-matched related donors. The primary endpoint was grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease incidence rate by day +180. One hundred and thirty-eight patients (A 46, B 45, C 47) with a median age of 64 years (range: 24-75), varying malignant diagnoses and disease risk (low 14, intermediate 96, high/very high 28) received 7-8/8 HLA-mismatched (40) or matched unrelated donor (98) grafts. Median follow up in survivors was 30 months (range: 14-46). Despite early immune reconstitution differences, day +180 grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease rates were similar (A 32.6%, B 31.1%, C 21%; P=0.53 for A vs B, P=0.16 for A vs C). The 2-year non-relapse mortality incidence was similar (A 14%, B 16%, C 6.4%; P=0.62), as were relapse (A 32%, B 32%, C 38%; P=0.74), chronic graft-versus-host disease (A 59%, B 60% C 55%; P=0.66), progression-free survival (A 54%, B 52%, C 55%; P=0.95), and overall survival (A 61%, B 62%, C 62%; P=0.98). Overall, the bortezomib-based regimens evaluated did not improve outcomes compared with tacrolimus/methotrexate therapy. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: 01754389.