Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Relatedness of Clostridioides difficile Isolates in Pediatric Oncology and Transplant Patients Using Whole Genome Sequencing.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has been rising among hospitalized children, with poor understanding of genomic variability of C. difficile isolates in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of CDI in inpatient and outpatient pediatric oncology and cell transplant patients (POTPs) in 2016 and 2017. CDI cases were identified by positive C. difficile toxin polymerase chain reaction tests. Retrieved residual stool specimens were cultured anaerobically and toxin-producing C. difficile isolates underwent whole genome sequencing (WGS) followed by core genome multilocus sequence typing. Plausible time and location epidemiologic links among the closely related strains were evaluated to identify potential transmission events. RESULTS: Among 226 CDI episodes in 157 patients, 202 stool samples were cultured and had positive cytotoxicity tests. Sequencing identified 33 different strain types in 162 (80%) isolates. Thirty-nine (28%) patients had multiple episodes of CDI, and 31 clusters of related isolates were identified, 15 (47%) of which involved exclusively multiple specimens from the same patient. For the 16 clusters involving multiple patients, epidemiologic investigation revealed only 2 (12.5%) clusters with potential transmission events. CONCLUSIONS: WGS identified a highly diverse group of C. difficile isolates among POTPs with CDI. Although WGS identified clusters of closely related isolates in multiple patients, epidemiologic investigation of shared inpatient exposures identified potential transmission in only 2 clusters. Clostridioides difficile transmission was uncommon in this population. More than 70% of new CDI reinfections in POTPs are actually recurrences caused by a previous CDI strain.

Evaluation of the respiratory NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays.

BACKGROUND: December 2021 witnessed an unprecedented increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections in addition to the circulation of influenza A and respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV). Due to increased testing demands for SARS-CoV-2, influenza, and RSV associated with the overall increase in symptomatic respiratory infections, there is an urgent need for multiplex, automated, and high throughput assays in the diagnostic laboratories. METHODS: We compared the performance of the NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and the Alinity m Resp-4-Plex to the standard of care influenza A, B, RSV, and SARS-CoV-2 assays used at the Johns Hopkins Microbiology Laboratory. A total of 181 remnant nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens positive for influenza A (n = 29), influenza B (n = 34), RSV (n = 40), SARS-CoV-2 (n = 33), influenza A/RSV (n = 1), and negatives (n = 44) were tested by either or both assays. RESULTS: Both the NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and the Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays showed 100% total agreement for all the tested analytes. For samples with available cycle threshold (Ct) values, comparable ranges were noted for all targets between the two assays and to the standard of care Ct values as well. CONCLUSION: The NeuMoDx™ Flu A-B/RSV/SARS-CoV-2 Vantage and the Alinity m Resp-4-Plex assays showed high sensitivity and accuracy for all the analytes included in both tests. Implementing these assays will assist the diagnostic laboratories with the surge of testing during the 2021-2022 influenza season.

Multicenter evaluation of the NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 Test.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has caused millions of confirmed COVID-19 cases worldwide and hundreds of thousands of deaths in less than 6 months. Mitigation measures including social distancing were implemented to control disease spread, however, thousands of new cases continue to be diagnosed daily. To resume some suspended social activities, early diagnosis and contact tracing are essential. To meet this required diagnostic and screening capacity, high throughput diagnostic assays are needed. The NeuMoDx™ SARS-CoV-2 assay, performed on a NeuMoDx molecular system, is a rapid, fully automated, qualitative real-time RT-PCR diagnostic test with throughput of up to 288 tests in an 8 -h shift. The assay received emergency use authorization from the FDA and is used in some large testing centers in the US. This paper describes the analytical and clinical performance of the assay at three centers: Johns Hopkins Hospital, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, and the Wadsworth Center.

Comparing the analytical performance of three SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostic assays.

In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) was first isolated from Wuhan city, China and within three months, the global community was challenged with a devastating pandemic. The rapid spread of the virus challenged diagnostic laboratories to rapidly develop molecular diagnostic methods. As SARS CoV-2 assays became available for testing on existing molecular platforms, laboratories devoted unprecedented energy and resources into evaluating the analytical performance of the new tests and in some cases developed their own diagnostic assays under FDA-EUA guidance. This study compares the validation of three different molecular assays at the Johns Hopkins Molecular Virology laboratory: the RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, ePlex® SARS-CoV-2, and the CDC COVID-19 RT-PCR tests. Overall, our studies indicate a comparable analytical performance of the three assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Evaluation of a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay for direct detection of the clostridium difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens.

The ProGastro Cd assay (Prodesse, Inc., Waukesha, WI) is a new commercial TaqMan PCR assay that detects tcdB. The ProGastro Cd assay was compared to the Wampole Clostridium difficile toxin B test (TOX-B test; TechLab, Blacksburg, VA), a cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCCNA), and to anaerobic toxigenic bacterial culture, as the "gold standard," for 285 clinical stool specimens. Assays were independently performed according to manufacturers' directions. A 1.0-ml sample was removed from the stool specimen, of which 20 microl was used for extraction on the NucliSENS easyMAG platform (bioMérieux, Inc., Durham, NC) for the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay and 200 microl of the stool filtrate was used for the TOX-B CCCNA. Anaerobic toxigenic culture was done by heating an additional 1.0 ml of the stool sample to 80 degrees C for 10 min before inoculation onto modified cycloserine, cefoxitin, and fructose agar with horse blood (Remel, Lenexa, KS) and into a prereduced chopped meat glucose broth (BBL, BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD). The prevalence of toxin-producing strains of C. difficile was 15.7% (n = 44) as determined by anaerobic toxigenic culture. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay compared to the TOX-B test were 83.3%, 95.6%, 69.4%, and 98%, respectively. Compared to toxigenic culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay were 77.3%, 99.2%, 94.4%, and 95.9%, respectively, and those of the TOX-B test were 63.6%, 99.2%, 93.3%, and 93.6%, respectively. Although no statistical difference (Fisher's exact test) was detected (P = 0.242) between the sensitivities of the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay and a standard CCCNA compared to anaerobic culture for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile, the Prodesse ProGastro Cd assay did detect more toxigenic C. difficile isolates than the CCCNA.