Correlation between measured and predicted mismatch with valve hemodynamics in transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A sex-based analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the reliability of predicted effective orifice area indexed (pEOAi) is scarce in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). AIMS: To assess the validity of the pEOAi in TAVR by correlating its value with echocardiography-derived hemodynamic data. METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of TAVR patients from 2012 to 2021 with available echocardiograms was conducted. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was defined based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 criteria. The main endpoints were the congruence of measured effective orifice area indexed (EOAi) and pEOAi with the hemodynamic data obtained by echocardiography. The secondary endpoint included a correlation of predicted PPM (pPPM) and measured PPM (mPPM) with postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) status. RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were included. pPPM was more frequent than mPPM (54 [17%]; all moderate PPM vs. 39 [12.3%]: 32 moderate and 7 severe PPM). Predicted and measured EOAi were statistically correlated with postprocedural transvalvular mean gradient and Doppler velocity index (all p < 0.001), including in both sex-based subgroups. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of pPPM for postprocedural transvalvular mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg were 16% and 97%, respectively. Only pPPM was significantly more prevalent in the group in which NYHA failed to improve than in those with symptom improvement (30.1% vs. 16%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Predicted PPM has an excellent NPV for postprocedural transvalvular mean gradient ≥ 20 mmHg and seems to be a good predictor of NYHA status evolution as opposed to measured PPM. Predicted EOAi can be used in procedural planning to reduce the risk of PPM in both TAVR male and female patients.

The Use of Three-Dimensional Printing in Cardiac Structural Disease: A Review.

OBJECTIVE: Three-dimensional printing (3DP), or additive fabrication, is a process in which a physical 3D model is created using a multitude of 2-dimensional images. This process has been applied to numerous surgical subspecialties with growing interest for the use of 3DP in adult structural heart disease. This scoping review evaluates the use of 3DP in transcatheter and surgical aortic and mitral valve interventions as well as left atrial appendage occlusion in terms of its practical and clinical application. METHODS: Articles were identified through PubMed and Embase using MeSH search terms as well as independent searches. A total of 645 articles were screened, and 37 were retained for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Operative planning was coded in 100% of articles, complication prevention in 43%, medical education in 5.4%, patient education in 0%, and simulation in 5.4%. CONCLUSIONS: The main uses of 3DP in acquired structural heart disease are centered around operative planning and complication prevention, with moderate use regarding surgical simulation and infrequent use regarding medical and/or patient education. Although patient anatomy varies greatly, deploying 3DP as a large-scale tool remains a possibility. The more 3D models are made, the more can be learned about demographic subsets of patient populations. Due to the lack of standard operating procedures for the creation of 3DP models, the cost-effectiveness of these models is hard to determine and likely center specific. More research into this facet could inform centers that wish to implement this tool.

Does "Obesity Paradox" Apply for Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement?

BACKGROUND: Data is controversial regarding the existence of an "obesity paradox" in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). We sought to investigate the prognostic value of the body mass index (BMI) on outcomes following TAVR. METHODS: This is an observational, single-center study involving all patients who underwent TAVR from 2009 to 2019. BMI was calculated in all patients before TAVR. The cohort was subdivided into four groups: underweight (<20 kg/m2), normal weight (≥20 to <25 kg/m2), overweight (≥25 to <30 kg/m2) and obese (≥30 kg/m2). The main endpoint was all-cause 30-day and one-year mortality. RESULTS: A total of 412 patients (mean age 79.6 ± 7.8 years, mean STS score 5.3 ± 3.6) were included. Patients were grouped as follows: underweight (n = 35, 8.5%), normal weight (n = 121, 29.4%), overweight (n = 140, 34%) and obese (n = 116, 28.1%). Obese patients were younger, included more females and had lower STS score than the rest of the cohort whereas underweight patients were older, had higher STS score, more chronic kidney disease, more left ventricular dysfunction and more often underwent non-transfemoral TAVR. BMI predicted 30-day survival (AUC:0.692 [95%CI 0.522-0.862]; p = 0.030) with an optimal cut-off of 24.4 (sensitivity = 66.6%, specificity = 63.6%). On multivariate analysis, higher BMI trended toward lower 30-day mortality (HR = 0.87 [95%CI 0.75-1.01]; p = 0.071). Thirty-day mortality was higher in the underweight group (8.3%) in comparison with other BMI subgroups (normal weight 2.5%, overweight 1.4%, obese 0.9%; p = 0.045). However, no significant difference was found after adjustment of confounders (all p = NS). BMI did not predict one-year mortality. No significant difference in one-year survival was observed between the four BMI subgroups (log rank p = 0.925). CONCLUSION: BMI could represent an interesting prognostic tool for short-term mortality in patients undergoing TAVR. BMI < 20 kg/m2 was associated with higher 30-day mortality. Symptoms improved similarly in obese patients compared to lower BMI patients. For 30-day survivors, no evidence of the existence of an obesity paradox was observed in this cohort.

Evolution of Antithrombotic Management of Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Over 10 Years and Guidelines Uptake.

BACKGROUND: The management of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (AF) patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly. The Canadian Cardiovascular Society AF guidelines, last updated in 2020, seek to aid physicians in balancing both bleeding and thrombotic risks. METHODS: A tertiary academic centre registry of patients with AF who had PCI was examined for the antithrombotic therapy at discharge in 4 time periods (cohort 2010-2011; cohort 2014-2015; cohort 2017; cohort 2019). Discharge prescription patterns were compared among the cohorts, using the χ2 test. In addition, antithrombotic management in cohorts 2017 and 2019 were compared to guideline-expected therapy, using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 576 AF patients undergoing PCI were included. Clinical and procedural characteristics were similar among cohorts, except for an increase in drug-eluting stent use in the most recent cohort (94% vs 99%; P = 0.04). The rate of oral anticoagulation increased over time (75% vs 89%; P < 0.01), driven primarily by an increase in direct oral anticoagulants prescription (63% vs 84%; P < 0.01). In contrast to previous cohorts, there was no significant difference between the observed and the guideline-expected anticoagulation rate in cohort 2019 (89% vs 94%; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: A combination of expert guidance and educational initiatives in the past decade contributed to dramatic changes in the management of patients with AF undergoing PCI.

INTRODUCTION: La prise en charge des patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire et/ou de flutter (FA) qui ont besoin d'une intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) a considérablement évolué. La dernière révision, en 2020, des lignes directrices sur la FA de la Société canadienne de cardiologie vise à aider les médecins à établir l'équilibre entre les risques d'hémorragie et de thrombose. MÉTHODES: Nous avons fouillé le registre d'un centre universitaire en soins tertiaires portant sur des patients atteints de FA qui avaient subi une ICP pour nous pencher sur le traitement antithrombotique offert à la sortie de l'hôpital de quatre périodes (cohorte 2010­2011; cohorte 2014­2015; cohorte 2017; cohorte 2019). Nous avons comparé les pratiques en matière d'ordonnances à la sortie de l'hôpital entre les cohortes à l'aide du test du χ2 . De plus, nous avons comparé la prise en charge des cohortes de 2017 et de 2019 qui avaient reçu le traitement antithrombotique à celles qui avaient reçu le traitement prévu dans les lignes directrices à l'aide du test du χ2 . RÉSULTATS: Nous avons sélectionné un total de 576 patients atteints de FA qui avaient subi une ICP. Les caractéristiques cliniques et interventionnelles étaient similaires entre les cohortes, à l'exception d'une augmentation de l'utilisation d'une endoprothèse médicamentée dans la plus récente cohorte (94 % vs 99 %; P = 0,04). Le taux d'anticoagulation par voie orale qui avait augmenté au fil du temps (75 % vs 89 %; P < 0,01) était principalement attribuable à l'augmentation des ordonnances d'anticoagulants d'action directe par voie orale (63 % vs 84 %; P < 0,01). Contrairement aux cohortes précédentes, il n'y avait aucune différence significative entre le taux d'anticoagulation observé et le taux d'anticoagulation prévu dans les lignes directrices dans la cohorte de 2019 (89 % vs 94 %; P = 0,23). CONCLUSIONS: La combinaison des conseils d'experts et des initiatives éducationnelles de la dernière décennie a contribué à des changements radicaux dans la prise en charge des patients atteints de FA qui subissaient une ICP.

Changes in outcomes over time in intermediate-risk patients treated for severe aortic stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The advent of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has changed the practice of treating patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). Heart-Teams have improved their decision-making process to refer patients to the best and safest treatment. The evidence allowed centers to increase funding and TAVR volume and extend indications to different risk categories of patients. This study evaluates the outcomes of intermediate-risk patients treated for severe AS in an academic center. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2019, 812 patients with AS underwent TAVR or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). A propensity score-matching analytic strategy was used to balance groups and adjust for time periods. Outcomes were recorded according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Guidelines; the primary outcome being 30-day mortality and the secondary outcomes being perioperative course and complications. RESULTS: No difference in mortality was seen but complications differed: more postoperative transient ischemic attacks, permanent pacemaker implantations, and perivalvular leaks in the transcatheter group, while more acute kidney injuries, atrial fibrillation, delirium, postoperative infections and bleeding, tamponade and need for reoperation in the surgical group as well as a longer hospital length-of-stay. However, over the years, morbidities/mortality decreased for all patients treated for AS. CONCLUSIONS: Data showed an improvement in morbidities/mortality for intermediate-risk patients treated with SAVR or TAVR. Increased funding allowed for a higher TAVR volume by increasing access to this technology. Also, the difference in complications could impact healthcare costs. By incorporating important metrics such as length-of-stay, readmission rates, and complications into decision-making, the Heart-Team can improve clinical outcomes, healthcare economics, and resource utilization.

Structural Heart Disease Intervention: The Canadian Landscape.

Cardiovascular disease encompasses coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease, and the prevalence of both increases with age. Over the past decade, the landscape of interventional cardiology has evolved to encompass a new set of percutaneous procedures outside the coronary tree, including transcatheter aortic valve implantation, transcatheter mitral valve repair, and left atrial appendage occlusion. These interventions have sparked a new discipline within interventional cardiology referred to as structural heart disease (SHD) intervention. The access to and numbers of such procedures performed in Canada is currently unknown. This "first of its kind" survey of structural interventions provides insight into the landscape of SHD intervention in Canada and the challenges faced by cardiologists to deliver this important care.

Valve-in-Valve Implantation of a Sapien 3 Transcatheter Heart Valve for Reduction of Paravalvular Regurgitation Despite Optimal Placement of the First Transcatheter Heart Valve.

Valve-in-valve implantation is generally successful in reducing paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) in cases in which the first transcatheter heart valve is deployed in a suboptimal location. We describe a case of severe PVR 2 months after implantation of a 26-mm Sapien XT valve (Edwards Lifesciences Inc, Irvine, CA) in the optimal location. Valve-in-valve implantation of a Sapien 3 valve (Edwards Lifesciences Inc), and enough left ventricular outflow tract tissue at the inflow edge the Sapien XT to appose the sealing cuff of the Sapien 3 combined for successful PVR treatment. To our knowledge, this is the first case of PVR reduction with valve-in-valve despite the original valve being appropriately sized and placed.