Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in a Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipient With Immunosuppressive Therapy of Cyclosporine A: A Case Report.

A 54-year-old woman underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) three years earlier. She took cyclosporine A (CyA) 150 mg/day as immunosuppression for prevention of rejection and PBC recurrence. Routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed chronic atrophic gastritis and hyperplastic polyp, and rapid urease test was positive. Anti-Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) serum IgG was elevated to 51 U/ml. We performed H. pylori eradication therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin and lansoprazole measuring the blood CyA concentration every day. Although the blood CyA concentration reached a peak (the concentration 2 hours after the administration: 818 ng/ml) on the second day, she did not develop renal dysfunction or other obvious adverse effects. Five weeks after the treatment, we confirmed eradication of H. pylori with the urea breath test. We herein reported a case of successful eradication of H. pylori in a LDLT recipient on immunosuppressive therapy with CyA without adverse effects.

Significance of Portal Venous Velocity in Short-term Graft Function in Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Graft regeneration and functional recovery after reperfusion of transplanted graft are very important for successful living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the significance of postoperative portal venous velocity (PVV) in short-term recovery of graft function in LDLT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 2007 through December 2015, we performed 17 primary LDLTs, which were included in the present study. The patients ranged in age from 12 to 65 years (mean: 50 years), and 11 were female patients. Postoperatively, Doppler ultrasonography was performed daily to measure PVV (cm/s), and liver function parameters were measured daily. The change in PVV (ΔPVV) was defined as follows: ΔPVV = PVV on postoperative day (POD) 1 - PVV on POD 7. Maximal value of serum aspartate aminotransferase (ASTmax) and maximal value of serum alanine transaminase (ALTmax) at 24 hours after graft reperfusion were used as parameters of reperfusion injury. Correlation analyses were performed as follows: (1) correlation of ΔPVV and PVV on POD 1 (PVV-POD 1) with the values such as ASTmax, ALTmax, other liver function parameters on POD 7 and graft regeneration rate; (2) correlation of ASTmax and ALTmax with other liver function parameters on POD 7. RESULTS: ΔPVV significantly correlated with the values of serum total bilirubin (P < .01), prothrombin time (P < .01), and platelet count (P < .05), and PVV-POD 1 significantly correlated with the values of serum total bilirubin (P < .05) and prothrombin time (P < .05). CONCLUSION: ΔPVV and PVV-POD 1 may be useful parameters of short-term functional recovery of the transplant liver in LDLT.

Living-related liver transplantation in Diego blood group disparity: a case report.

To date, only limited cases of Diego blood group disparity in liver transplantation have been reported, and no cases with a long-term clinical course have been documented. Herein, we report a case of Diego blood group disparity in liver transplantation with details of long-term follow-up. The recipient was a 47-year-old woman with primary biliary cirrhosis; her 18-year-old daughter was the donor. Both recipient and donor were of blood type O according to the ABO blood group system. Preoperative serological tests showed the presence of antibodies against the Di(a) antigen only in the recipient, and not in the donor. Thus, the Diego phenotype was Di(a+) in the donor and Di(a-) in the recipient. Living-related liver transplantation was performed in July 2009. Immediate graft function was obtained, and no signs of humoral or cellular rejection were observed during the postoperative period. Further, anti-Di(a) antibodies were not detected throughout the postoperative course. The patient is alive and shows no signs of humoral rejection 34 months after liver transplantation. Liver transplantation has been performed successfully in cases of Diego blood group disparity.

A phase I study of full-dose gemcitabine and regional arterial infusion of nafamostat mesilate for advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The primary end points of this study were to determine the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, and a recommended phase II dose of a synthetic serine protease inhibitor, nafamostat mesilate, in combination with full-dose gemcitabine in patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. The secondary end point was to assess therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine (1 000 mg/m(2) i.v. for 30 min) on days 1, 8, and 15, with nafamostat mesilate (continuous regional arterial infusion for 24 h through a port-catheter system) on days 1, 8, and 15; this regimen was repeated at 28-day intervals. The initial dose of nafamostat mesilate was 2.4 mg/kg and was escalated in increments of 1.2 mg/kg until a dose of 4.8 mg/kg was achieved. A standard '3+3' phase I dose-escalation design was used. Therapeutic response and clinical benefit response were assessed. RESULTS: Twelve patients were enrolled in this study. None of the patients experienced DLTs, and nafamostat mesilate was well tolerated at doses up to 4.8 mg/kg in combination with full-dose gemcitabine. This combination chemotherapy yielded a reduction of a high serum level of the tumor marker CA19-9. Pain was reduced in three of seven patients without oral morphine sulfate. Overall survival was 7.1 months for all patients. CONCLUSION: This phase I study was carried out safely. This combination chemotherapy showed beneficial improvement in health-related quality of life. The recommended phase II dose of nafamostat mesilate in combination with full-dose gemcitabine is 4.8 mg/kg.