Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 142: 333-370, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34785346

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to systematically identify and critically assess the clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 with the AGREE II instrument. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We searched Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, CNKI, CBM, WanFang, and grey literature from November 2019 - November 2020. We did not apply language restrictions. One reviewer independently screened the retrieved titles and abstracts, and a second reviewer confirmed the decisions. Full texts were assessed independently and in duplicate. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We included any guideline that provided recommendations on the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by two reviewers. We descriptively summarized CPGs characteristics. We assessed the quality with the AGREE II instrument and we summarized relevant therapeutic interventions. RESULTS: We retrieved 3,907 records and 71 CPGs were included. Means (Standard Deviations) of the scores for the 6 domains of the AGREE II instrument were 65%(SD19.56%), 39%(SD19.64%), 27%(SD19.48%), 70%(SD15.74%), 26%(SD18.49%), 42%(SD34.91) for the scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity of presentation, applicability, editorial independence domains, respectively. Most of the CPGs showed a low overall quality (less than 40%). CONCLUSION: Future CPGs for COVID-19 need to rely, for their development, on standard evidence-based methods and tools.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Consenso , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto
2.
Matern Child Health J ; 25(8): 1305-1315, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33945084

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Adverse birth outcomes, including low birth weight (LBW), remain the leading causes of child morbidity and mortality in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the strength and consistency of the association between maternal education and LBW in LMICs. METHODS: We conducted an electronic search of studies published between 2000 and 2014 in four databases using three MeSH keywords - birth outcomes including LBW; individual-level socioeconomic measures including maternal education; and a list of LMICs. The methodological quality of each eligible study was evaluated following the GRADE approach. A total of 26 studies were entered into meta-analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed to account for heterogeneity in the measurement of exposure and country development level. FINDINGS: The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant pooled estimate (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.61-0.74) indicating that maternal education is protective against LBW in LMICs. Heterogeneity was found high in subgroup analyses in studies from lower-middle income countries and in those measuring maternal education in academic classes, but drops considerably in studies from low-income countries and those measuring it in number of years of schooling. The quality of the overall body of evidence is moderate due to high observed heterogeneity in some subgroup analyses and the presence of studies with high risk of bias. INTERPRETATION: Higher maternal education associates with a moderate but statistically significant decrease in the risk of delivering a LBW infant in LMICs. Enhancing girls' and women's access to education operates through a number of pathways to improve birth outcomes and reduce LBW in LMICs.


Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Recién Nacido de Bajo Peso , Peso al Nacer , Niño , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Renta , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pobreza
3.
East Mediterr Health J ; 24(4): 393-400, 2018 Jun 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29972234

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue rheumatic disorders (STRDs) are very common and impact enormously general population, working groups and physiotherapist practices. However, they do not have neither a clear case definition nor objective tests to be accurately diagnosed rendering them neglected with poorly-estimated burden. Shoulder is one of the most frequent sites for STRDs. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for shoulder STRDs among Lebanese adults aged ≥ 15 years. METHODS: A case-control study was designed based on data from the Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Diseases (COPCORD) study conducted in Lebanon in 2009. Cases were defined as those who recently suffered from shoulder pain, tenderness or stiffness with duration not exceeding 12 months (52 cases). These were frequency-matched by age and gender with 208 controls who never experienced any musculoskeletal pain. RESULTS: Area of residence, physical activity, family history and stress-induced sleep difficulty were significantly associated with shoulder STRDs after adjusting for cigarette smoking, job nature and family monthly income. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with shoulder STRD among the Lebanese population include geographical location, psychosocial factors, physical activity and familial predisposition. Further longitudinal studies are needed to establish a temporal sequence and explore other potential determinants, especially among the working population.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Reumáticas/epidemiología , Hombro , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Líbano/epidemiología , Masculino , Dimensión del Dolor , Factores de Riesgo
4.
J Glob Health ; 7(2): 020412, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29302318

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adaptation refers to the systematic approach for considering the endorsement or modification of recommendations produced in one setting for application in another as an alternative to de novo development. OBJECTIVE: To describe and assess the methods used for adapting health-related guidelines published in peer-reviewed journals, and to assess the quality of the resulting adapted guidelines. METHODS: We searched Medline and Embase up to June 2015. We assessed the method of adaptation, and the quality of included guidelines. RESULTS: Seventy-two papers were eligible. Most adapted guidelines and their source guidelines were published by professional societies (71% and 68% respectively), and in high-income countries (83% and 85% respectively). Of the 57 adapted guidelines that reported any detail about adaptation method, 34 (60%) did not use a published adaptation method. The number (and percentage) of adapted guidelines fulfilling each of the ADAPTE steps ranged between 2 (4%) and 57 (100%). The quality of adapted guidelines was highest for the "scope and purpose" domain and lowest for the "editorial independence" domain (respective mean percentages of the maximum possible scores were 93% and 43%). The mean score for "rigor of development" was 57%. CONCLUSION: Most adapted guidelines published in peer-reviewed journals do not report using a published adaptation method, and their adaptation quality was variable.


Asunto(s)
Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos , Técnicas de Planificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas
5.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 80: 50-56, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27565977

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low- and middle-income countries adapt World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines instead of de novo development for financial, epidemiologic, sociopolitical, cultural, organizational, and other reasons. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate reported processes used in the adaptation of WHO guidelines for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and tuberculosis (TB). METHODS: We searched three online databases/repositories: United States Agency for International Development (USAID) AIDS Support and Technical Resources - Sector One program (AIDSTAR-One) National Treatment Database; the AIDSspace Guideline Repository, and WHO Database of national HIV and TB guidelines. We assessed the rigor and quality of reported adaptation methodology using the ADAPTE process as benchmark. RESULTS: Of 170 eligible guidelines, only 32 (19%) reported documentation on the adaptation process. The median and interquartile range of the number of ADAPTE steps fulfilled by the eligible guidelines were 11.5 (10, 13.5) (out of 23 steps). The number of guidelines (out of 32 steps) fulfilling each ADAPTE step was 18 (interquartile range, 5-27). Seventeen of 32 guidelines (53%) met all steps relevant to the setup phase, whereas none met all steps relevant to the adaptation phase. CONCLUSION: The number of well-documented adaptation methodologies in national HIV and/or TB guidelines is very low. There is a need for the use of standardized and systematic framework for guideline adaptation and improved reporting of processes used.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Tuberculosis/terapia , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Humanos , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico
6.
BMC Res Notes ; 8: 720, 2015 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26606971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that physicians' prescription behavior is negatively affected by the extent of their interactions with pharmaceutical companies. In order to develop and implement policies and interventions for better management of interactions, we need to understand physicians' perspectives on this issue. Surveys addressing physicians' interactions with pharmaceutical companies need to use validated tools to ensure the validity of their findings. OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of tools used in surveys of physicians about the extent and nature of their interactions with pharmaceutical companies, and about their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes towards such interactions; and to identify those tools that have been formally validated. METHODS: We developed a search strategy with the assistance of a medical librarian. We electronically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases in September 2015. Teams of two reviewers conducted data selection and data abstraction. They identified eligible studies in one table and then abstracted the relevant data from the studies with validated tools in another table. Tables were piloted and standardized. RESULTS: We identified one validated questionnaire out of the 11 assessing the nature and extent of the interaction, and three validated questionnaires out of the 47 assessing knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of physicians toward the interaction. None of these validated questionnaires were used in more than one survey. CONCLUSION: The available supporting evidence of the issue of physicians' interaction with pharmaceutical company is of low quality. There is a need for research to develop and validate tools to survey physicians about their interactions with pharmaceutical companies.


Asunto(s)
Industria Farmacéutica/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Recolección de Datos/métodos , Recolección de Datos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...