Characterizing the frequency, morbidity, and types of traumatic brain injuries after the Mexico-San Diego border wall extension: a retrospective cohort review.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the US-Mexico border wall height extension on traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) and related costs. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who presented to the UC San Diego Health Trauma Center for injuries from falling at the border wall between 2016 and 2021 were considered. Patients in the pre-height extension period (January 2016-May 2018) were compared with those in the post-height extension period (January 2020-December 2021). Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and hospital charges were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients were identified: 51 (0 TBIs, 68.6% male) in the pre-height extension cohort and 332 (14 TBIs, 77.1% male) in the post-height extension cohort, with mean ages of 33.5 and 31.5 years, respectively. There was an increase in the average number of TBIs per month (0.0 to 0.34) and operative TBIs per month (0.0 to 0.12). TBIs were associated with increased Injury Severity Score (8.8 vs 24.2, p < 0.001), median (IQR) hospital length of stay (5.0 [2-11] vs 8.5 [4-45] days, p = 0.03), and median (IQR) hospital charges ($163,490 [$86,369-$277,918] vs $243,658 [$136,769-$1,127,920], p = 0.04). TBIs were normalized for changing migration rates on the basis of Customs and Border Protection apprehensions. CONCLUSIONS: This heightened risk of intracranial injury among vulnerable immigrant populations poses ethical and economic concerns to be addressed regarding border wall infrastructure.

The Effects of Cross-Border Transport on Patients With Tibia Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Tibia fractures are common after trauma. Prior studies have shown that delays in treatment are associated with poor outcomes. A subpopulation of our patients are transported from Mexico, adding barriers to prompt care. We hypothesized that patients with tibia fractures crossing from Mexico would have delays in treatment and subsequently worse outcomes. METHODS: The trauma registry of an American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center was retrospectively reviewed for all tibia fractures admitted from 2010 to 2015. Data collection included demographics, country of injury, characterization of injuries, interventions, complications, and outcomes. Patients were subdivided into those injured in the United States and in Mexico, and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A total of 498 patients were identified, 440 from the United States and 58 from Mexico. Mexico patients were more severely injured overall, with higher injury severity scores and a higher percentage of patients with abbreviated injury scale scores ≥3 for both head and chest regions. Mexico patients had longer times from injury to admission, as well as increased times to both debridement of open fractures and operative fixation after admission. On subgroup analysis of patients with isolated tibia fractures (other system abbreviated injury scale < 3), times from arrival to treatment and injury severity score were no longer statistically different. CONCLUSIONS: Patients crossing the border from Mexico with tibia fractures have delays in time to admission and from admission to operative management, although this is primarily due to other severe injuries. Ongoing systems development is required to minimize delays in care and optimize outcomes.