RESUMEN
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) comprises a spectrum of chronic inflammatory manifestations affecting the axial skeleton and represents a challenge for diagnosis and treatment. Our objective was to generate a set of evidence-based recommendations for the management of axSpA for physicians, health professionals, rheumatologists and policy decision makers in Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology (PANLAR) countries. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation-ADOLOPMENT methodology was used to adapt existing recommendations after performing an independent systematic search and synthesis of the literature to update the evidence. A working group consisting of rheumatologists, epidemiologists and patient representatives from countries within the Americas prioritized 13 topics relevant to the context of these countries for the management of axSpA. This Evidence-Based Guideline article reports 13 recommendations addressing therapeutic targets, the use of NSAIDs and glucocorticoids, treatment with DMARDs (including conventional synthetic, biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs), therapeutic failure, optimization of the use of biologic DMARDs, the use of drugs for extra-musculoskeletal manifestations of axSpA, non-pharmacological interventions and the follow-up of patients with axSpA.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Espondiloartritis Axial , Productos Biológicos , Reumatología , Espondiloartritis , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Humanos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Productos Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Espondiloartritis/diagnóstico , Espondiloartritis/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Introducción: las necesidades y perspectivas de los pacientes son determinantes para tratar la artritis reumatoidea (AR). Objetivos: evaluar el impacto de la respuesta inadecuada a los fármacos antirreumáticos modificadores de la enfermedad (DMARD) sobre la satisfacción con el tratamiento, los resultados y las perspectivas de pacientes adultos con control inadecuado de la AR de actividad moderada/alta. Materiales y métodos: se evaluó la satisfacción mediante el cuestionario Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) v1.4. Se recolectaron datos sobre la calidad de vida, la adherencia y las estrategias de manejo. Se presentan los resultados para Argentina, Chile y Uruguay (n=202). Resultados: el promedio de la escala de satisfacción global TSQM fue de 62,3±21,8. El 83% informó buena adherencia. Las principales expectativas del tratamiento fueron "alivio duradero de los síntomas" y "menos dolor articular". El 53,47% prefirió tratamiento oral y el 75,74% eligió un rápido inicio de acción. El efecto secundario menos aceptado fue "mayor riesgo de neoplasias". Se planificó rotar el DMARD en el 55% de los casos. De estos, el 84,7% se consideraron terapias avanzadas. La mayoría estaba abierto a un esquema combinado, pero el 25,2% prefirió no utilizarlo. Conclusiones: los resultados reafirman el compromiso con las estrategias treat-to-target, considerando la individualización de las decisiones terapéuticas en el contexto regional.
Introduction: patients' needs and perspectives are determinants for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Objectives: to evaluate the impact of inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) on treatment satisfaction, outcomes and perspectives of adult patients with inadequate control of moderate/high activity RA. Materials and methods: satisfaction was assessed using the TSQM v1.4 questionnaire. Data on quality of life, adherence and management strategies were collected. Results are presented for Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (n=202). Results: the mean of the TSQM global satisfaction score was 62.3±21.8. Eighty-three percent reported good adherence. The main expectations of treatment were "lasting relief of symptoms" and "less joint pain". The 53.47% of patients preferred an oral treatment; 75.74% chose a rapid onset of action. The least accepted side effect was "increased risk of malignant neoplasms". Fifty-five percent planned to rotate DMARD. Of these, advanced therapies were considered in only 84.7%. Most were open to a combination treatment, but 25.2% preferred not to use it. Conclusions: the results reaffirm the commitment to treat-to-target strategies, considering the individualization of therapeutic decisions in the regional context.
