Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 51(2): 83-91, 2013 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23387345

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The increasing abuse of amphetamine-like compounds presents a challenge for clinicians and clinical laboratories. Although these compounds may be identified by mass spectrometry-based assays, most clinical laboratories use amphetamine immunoassays that have unknown cross-reactivity with novel amphetamine-like drugs. To date, there has been a little systematic study of amphetamine immunoassay cross-reactivity with structurally diverse amphetamine-like drugs or of computational tools to predict cross-reactivity. METHODS: Cross-reactivities of 42 amphetamines and amphetamine-like drugs with three amphetamines screening immunoassays (AxSYM(®) Amphetamine/Methamphetamine II, CEDIA(®) amphetamine/Ecstasy, and EMIT(®) II Plus Amphetamines) were determined. Two- and three-dimensional molecular similarity and modeling approaches were evaluated for the ability to predict cross-reactivity using receiver-operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 34%-46% of the drugs tested positive on the immunoassay screens using a concentration of 20,000 ng/mL. The three immunoassays showed differential detection of the various classes of amphetamine-like drugs. Only the CEDIA assay detected piperazines well, while only the EMIT assay cross-reacted with the 2C class. All three immunoassays detected 4-substituted amphetamines. For the AxSYM and EMIT assays, two-dimensional molecular similarity methods that combined similarity to amphetamine/methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethampetamine most accurately predicted cross-reactivity. For the CEDIA assay, three-dimensional pharmacophore methods performed best in predicting cross-reactivity. Using the best performing models, cross-reactivities of an additional 261 amphetamine-like compounds were predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Existing amphetamines immunoassays unevenly detect amphetamine-like drugs, particularly in the 2C, piperazine, and ß-keto classes. Computational similarity methods perform well in predicting cross-reactivity and can help prioritize testing of additional compounds in the future.


Asunto(s)
Anfetaminas/análisis , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/análisis , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Anfetaminas/inmunología , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Área Bajo la Curva , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/inmunología , Reacciones Cruzadas , Cristalografía por Rayos X , Drogas Ilícitas , Modelos Químicos , Modelos Moleculares , Conformación Molecular , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Detección de Abuso de Sustancias
2.
J Forensic Sci ; 33(4): 1050-1, 1988 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2971779

RESUMEN

A murder/suicide case is reported in which a phosphoglucomutase (PGM) 1*W9 variant was detected in a woman, her child, and from blood collected at the scene.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Legal/métodos , Homicidio , Fosfoglucomutasa/genética , Suicidio , Adulto , Niño , Electroforesis en Gel de Poliacrilamida , Femenino , Humanos , Focalización Isoeléctrica , Masculino , Fosfoglucomutasa/sangre
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA