Risk Factors and Reasons for Emergency Department Visits Within 30 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: An Analysis of 3,261 Patients.

Background: The frequency of hand and elbow surgeries occurring in outpatient and elective settings is on the rise. Emergency department (ED) visits in the postoperative period are increasingly used as quality measures for surgical care. The aim of this study is to determine the number of postoperative ED visits, the primary reason for these visits, and to identify risk factors associated with these visits. Methods: We examined all elective hand and elbow procedures performed at two hospitals within a single healthcare network between 2008 and 2017. A total of 3,261 patients met the study criteria. Descriptive statistics were calculated for our population, followed by univariate and multivariate analyses, to identify risk and protective factors associated with ED visits in the first 30 days after surgery. Results: Eighty-seven of 3,261 patients presented to the ED within 30 days of their operation (2.7%). The most common reasons for ED visits were related to pain (28.7%), swelling (26.4%), and concerns for infection (20.7%). Univariate analysis indicated history of drug use, number of procedures, smoking history, and serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL as risk factors for returns to the ED. Multivariate analysis identified history of drug use, number of procedures, and serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL as independent risk factors. Smoking history failed to achieve statistical significance as an independent risk factor. Both univariate and multivariate analyses identified age >60 years as protective for postoperative ED visits. Conclusions: ED visits within the first 30 days after elective hand surgery are relatively common, despite remarkably low complication rates among these procedures. This information may help to improve risk stratification in these patients, and to aid in the development of enhanced postoperative follow-up strategies to reduce unnecessary utilization of emergency medical services. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).

Effect of Smoking on Short-term Postoperative Complications After Elective Upper Extremity Surgery.

Background: There is a paucity of literature exploring the impact of smoking on short-term complications, readmissions, and reoperations after elective upper extremity surgery using a large multicenter national database. We hypothesized that smokers will have an increased rate of complications, readmissions, and reoperations compared with a cohort of nonsmokers undergoing elective upper extremity surgery. Methods: Patient data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between the years 2012 and 2017. Patients were included if they underwent elective surgery of the upper extremity using 338 predetermined Current Procedural Terminology codes. The data collected were divided into patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative variables, and 30-day complications. Current smoking status was defined as smoking within 1 year prior to surgery. The incidence of surgical complications, reoperations, and readmissions was compared between the 2 cohorts using multivariable regression analysis. Results: Of the 107 943 patients undergoing elective surgeries of the upper extremity, 73 806 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 57 986 (78.6%) were nonsmokers in the year prior to surgery, and 15 820 (21.4%) were current smokers. Between these groups, current smokers were younger (P < .001), more often men (P < .001), had lower body mass index (P < .001), and more often underwent procedures that involved bone manipulation (P < .001). Multivariate regression analysis defined current smoking as significantly associated with overall surgical site complications, superficial surgical site infections, deep surgical site infections, reoperation, and readmission. Conclusion: Current smoking was significantly associated with an increase in all surgical site complications, readmissions, and reoperations after elective upper extremity surgery. Surgeons should consider smoking a modifiable risk factor for postoperative complications and appropriately counsel patients on outcomes and complications given the elective nature of upper extremity surgery.

Effect of Diabetes and Hemoglobin A1c on Complications Following Elective Hand Surgery.

Background: Limited research exists investigating the association between diabetes and glycemic control on complications following elective hand surgery. The goal of this research was to assess the incidence of complications within 30 days of elective hand surgery in a large population of diabetic patients compared to a population of non-diabetics. Furthermore, we sought to examine the relationship of glycemic control, as measured by HbA1c, and postoperative complications. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of electronic medical records at our institution of all patients who underwent elective hand, forearm, or elbow surgery from the dates of January 1st, 2008 to December 31st, 2017. Patients were categorized as diabetic or non-diabetic and most recent HbA1c was documented. Multivariable analysis was employed to compare the incidence of surgical complications within 30 days between the diabetics and non-diabetic populations, adjusting for baseline patient characteristics. Results: A total of 3,261 patients met the inclusion criteria. There were 646 (20%) diabetic patients and 2,615 (80%) non-diabetic patients. No difference was found in the overall rate of complications between the cohort of diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Additionally, statistical analysis found no difference in the complication rate between insulin and non-insulin controlled diabetics. Rates of complications were stratified based on HbA1c level and statistical analysis found no increased risk of complications with increased hemoglobin A1c value. Conclusions: In our present study we were not able to demonstrate any significant difference in the 30 day complication rates between and non-diabetics undergoing elective hand surgery. This study attempted to aid in risk stratification of diabetic patients by evaluating preoperative glycemic indices in the form of HbA1c.

Distal Radius Fractures and the Dorsal Spanning Plate in the Management of the Polytraumatized Patient.

SUMMARY: Distal radius fractures are some of the most common fractures treated by the orthopaedic surgeon. There are a variety of methods of fixation to treat these fractures; however, in patients with polytrauma and in high-energy fracture patterns, fixation options can be limited. In the past, these fractures were treated with plaster, Kirschner wires, or external fixators that were fraught with complications. The dorsal spanning plate is an excellent option in the treatment of high-energy fractures and patients with polytrauma, fractures with dorsal or volar comminution, fracture dislocations, and shear injuries, and in geriatric patients with poor bone quality. The dorsal spanning plate not only allows for fixation of these complex fractures but also allows for weight-bearing through the wrist, an advantage for patients with concomitant lower extremity fractures and geriatric patients who need mobility aides. Understanding the risks and benefits of dorsal spanning plates and their use for the treatment of polytraumatized patient is a vital base of knowledge for the orthopaedic traumatologist.