RESUMEN
Background: Although most patients do not develop hypersensitivity reactions to metals in implanted devices, when they do occur, significant morbidity can result. Titanium-based systems are often considered as an alternative option in metal-allergic patients; however, there are few studies published on titanium allergy and allergic reactions to titanium in implants may be overlooked in clinical practice. Methods: Our aim was to further characterize a single institution's experience with titanium patch testing and evaluation of titanium allergy. We performed a retrospective medical record review of 166 patients evaluated for titanium contact allergy between January 2018-August 2023. Of the 166 patients in our cohort, 67 were referred for pre-implant patch testing and 64 for post-implant patch testing; 35 were tested for reasons unrelated to an implant. Results: Twenty-six of the 166 patients were PTP to titanium (15.7% positive rate). Titanium PTP rates were higher for post-implant cases (28.1%, 18/64) compared to pre-implant cases (6.0%, 4/67) (χ2 9.97, p = 0.002). Among 18 titanium PTPs identified for the 64 post-implant cases, 8 were likely relevant, 8 possibly relevant, and 2 not likely relevant. Conclusions: Further studies should be performed to evaluate the incidence of allergy to titanium implants and to continue surveillance of changes in sensitization rates.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Pruebas del Parche , Titanio , Humanos , Titanio/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Prótesis e Implantes/efectos adversos , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As both allergic contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis (AD) have similar clinical presentations and are characterized by spongiotic dermatitis on skin biopsy, many children with AD are not referred for patch testing and allergic contact dermatitis is underdiagnosed. OBJECTIVE: To provide updated prevalence data of common contact allergens in children with and without AD. METHODS: This is a retrospective case-control study using the Pediatric Allergic Contact Dermatitis Registry from 2018 to 2022. RESULTS: A total of 912 children were included (615 with AD and 297 without AD). Children with AD were more likely to have a longer history of dermatitis (4.1 vs 1.6 years, P < .0001), have seen more providers (2.3 vs 2.1, P = .003), have greater than 1 positive patch test (PPT) result (P = .005), have a greater number of PPT results overall (2.3 vs 1.9, P = .012), and have a more generalized distribution of dermatitis (P = .001). PPT to bacitracin (P = .030), carba mix (P = .025), and cocamidopropyl betaine (P = .0007) were significantly increased in children with AD compared to those without AD. LIMITATIONS: Technical variation between providers and potential for misclassification, selection, and recall biases. CONCLUSION: Children with AD are significantly more likely to have PPT reactions and should be referred for evaluation of allergic contact dermatitis and obtain patch testing.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Administración Tópica , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/tratamiento farmacológico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapéutico , Glucocorticoides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche , PrescripcionesRESUMEN
Contact dermatitis (CD) is among the most common inflammatory dermatological conditions and includes allergic CD, photoallergic CD, irritant CD, photoirritant CD (also called phototoxic CD) and protein CD. Occupational CD can be of any type and is the most prevalent occupational skin disease. Each CD type is characterized by different immunological mechanisms and/or requisite exposures. Clinical manifestations of CD vary widely and multiple subtypes may occur simultaneously. The diagnosis relies on clinical presentation, thorough exposure assessment and evaluation with techniques such as patch testing and skin-prick testing. Management is based on patient education, avoidance strategies of specific substances, and topical treatments; in severe or recalcitrant cases, which can negatively affect the quality of life of patients, systemic medications may be needed.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prolonged wear of facial protective equipment can lead to occupational dermatoses. OBJECTIVE: To identify important causes of occupational dermatoses from facial protective equipment. METHODS: A systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. Articles were included if they reported occupational dermatoses caused by surgical/procedure masks or N95 respirators, or both. RESULTS: We identified 344 articles, and 16 were suitable for inclusion in this review. Selected articles focused on facial occupational dermatoses in health care workers. Allergic contact dermatitis to the elastic straps, glue, and formaldehyde released from the mask fabric was reported. Irritant contact dermatitis was common on the cheeks and nasal bridge due to pressure and friction. Irritant dermatitis was associated with personal history of atopic dermatitis and prolonged mask wear (>6 hours). Acneiform eruption was reported due to prolonged wear and occlusion. Contact urticaria was rare. LIMITATIONS: Only publications listed in PubMed or Embase were included. Most publications were case reports and retrospective studies. CONCLUSION: This systematic review from members of the American Contact Dermatitis Society highlights cases of occupational dermatitis to facial protective equipment, including potential offending allergens. This work may help in the diagnosis and treatment of health care workers with facial occupational dermatitis.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatosis Facial/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Máscaras/efectos adversos , Respiradores N95/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/terapia , Dermatosis Facial/diagnóstico , Dermatosis Facial/etiología , Dermatosis Facial/terapia , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & controlAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Parche , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Massachusetts , Missouri , Sistema de RegistrosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Desinfectantes/efectos adversos , Dermatosis Facial/inducido químicamente , Hipoclorito de Sodio/efectos adversos , Purificación del Agua , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prurito/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
: Wine, beer, liquor, and spirits are widely consumed in many cultures across the globe, and for some individuals, ingestion, cutaneous contact, or other exposure can lead to dermatologic findings. However, there currently exist no comprehensive reviews on alcohol-related dermatitis. Herein, we will provide an overview of alcohol-related dermatitis and contact urticaria, including the epidemiology and clinical manifestations, potential allergens found in alcoholic beverages, testing approaches, and strategies for allergen avoidance.
Asunto(s)
Bebidas Alcohólicas/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Urticaria/epidemiología , Bálsamos/efectos adversos , Cerveza/efectos adversos , Cromo/efectos adversos , Citrus/efectos adversos , Cobalto/efectos adversos , Dermatitis/epidemiología , Dermatitis/fisiopatología , Dermatitis/terapia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/fisiopatología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/terapia , Conservantes de Alimentos/efectos adversos , Oro/efectos adversos , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/fisiopatología , Hipersensibilidad Tardía/terapia , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/etiología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/fisiopatología , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/terapia , Isotiocianatos/efectos adversos , Níquel/efectos adversos , Propilenglicol/efectos adversos , Sulfitos/efectos adversos , Urticaria/etiología , Urticaria/fisiopatología , Urticaria/terapia , Vino/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dispositivos de Protección de los Ojos/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de los Párpados/diagnóstico , Natación , Adolescente , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Enfermedades de los Párpados/etiología , Párpados/fisiopatología , Femenino , HumanosRESUMEN
Nickel hypersensitivity is a rarely reported complication of percutaneous patent foramen ovale/atrial septal defect closure. Herein, we report a case of systemic allergic contact dermatitis to nickel present in a GORE CARDIOFORM (W.L. Gore, Flagstaff, Arizona) septal occluder that resolved following explanation. To our knowledge this is the first published case of nickel hypersensitivity associated with this device. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).
RESUMEN
An interaction between light's radiation and certain exogenous and endogenous substances can lead to the development of photoallergic and/or phototoxic dermatoses. Clinically, reactions may range from acute and self-limited to chronic and recurrent. Delays in diagnosis are not uncommon due to complex clinical presentations, broad differentials, and limited number of specialists who perform phototesting. Therefore, a critical understanding of these dermatoses is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. The epidemiology, light sources, mechanisms, clinical presentations, evaluation protocols, common culprits, treatments, key challenges, and future directions related to photoallergy and phototoxicity are reviewed herein.