[The six most frequent peripheral vestibular syndromes]. / Die sechs häufigsten peripheren vestibulären Syndrome.

Three forms of peripheral vestibular disorders, each with its typical symptoms and clinical signs, can be differentiated functionally, anatomically and pathophysiologically: 1. inadequate unilateral paroxysmal stimulation or rarely inhibition of the peripheral vestibular system, e. g., BPPV, Menière's disease, vestibular paroxysmia or syndrome of the third mobile windows; 2. acute unilateral vestibulopathy leading to an acute vestibular tone imbalance manifesting as an acute peripheral vestibular syndrome; and 3. loss or impairment of function of the vestibular nerve and/or labyrinth: bilateral vestibulopathy. For all of these diseases, current diagnostic criteria by the Bárány-Society are available with a high clinical and scientific impact, also for clinical trials. The treatment depends on the underlying disease. It basically consists of 5 principles: 1. Explaining the symptoms and signs, pathophysiology, aetiology and treatment options to the patient; this is important for compliance, adherence and persistence. 2. Physical therapy: A) For BPPV specific liberatory maneuvers, depending on canal involved. Posterior canal: The new SémontPLUS maneuver is superior to the regular Sémont and Epley maneuvers; horizontal canal: the modified roll-maneuver; anterior canal the modified Yacovino-maneuver; 3. Symptomatic or causative drug therapy. There is still a deficit of placebo-controlled clinical trials so that the level of evidence for pharmacotherapy is most often low. 4. Surgery, mainly for the syndrome of the third mobile windows. 5. Psychotherapeutic measures for secondary functional dizziness.

[What's behind cerebellar dizziness? - News on diagnosis and therapy]. / Zerebellärer Schwindel, was steckt dahinter?

Vertigo and dizziness comprise a multisensory and multidisciplinary syndrome of different etiologies. The term "cerebellar vertigo and dizziness" comprises a heterogenous group of disorders with clinical signs of cerebellar dysfunction and is caused by vestibulo-cerebellar, vestibulo-spinal or cerebellar systems. About 10 % of patients in an outpatient clinic for vertigo and balance disorders suffer from cerebellar vertigo and dizziness. According to the course of the symptoms, one can considers 3 types: permanent complaints, recurrent episodes of vertigo and balance disorders, or an acute onset of complaints. The most common diagnoses in patients with cerebellar vertigo and dizziness were as follows: degenerative disease, hereditary forms and acquired forms. In a subgroup of patients with cerebellar vertigo, central cerebellar oculomotor dysfunction is indeed the only clinical correlate of the described symptoms. 81 % of patients with cerebellar vertigo suffer from permanent, persistent vertigo and dizziness, 31 % from vertigo attacks, and 21 % from both. Typical clinical cerebellar signs, including gait and limb ataxia or dysarthria, were found less frequently. Key to diagnosis is a focused history as well as a thorough clinical examination with particular attention to oculomotor function. Regarding oculomotor examination, the most common findings were saccadic smooth pursuit, gaze-evoked nystagmus, provocation nystagmus, rebound nystagmus, central fixation nystagmus, most commonly downbeat nystagmus, and disturbances of saccades. Thus, oculomotor examination is very sensitive in diagnosing cerebellar vertigo and dizziness, but not specific in distinguishing different etiologies. Laboratory examinations using posturography and a standardized gait analysis can support the diagnosis, but also help to estimate the risk of falls and to quantify the course and possible symptomatic treatment effects. Patients with cerebellar vertigo and dizziness should receive multimodal treatment.

Examination of betahistine bioavailability in combination with the monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, selegiline, in humans-a non-randomized, single-sequence, two-period titration, open label single-center phase 1 study (PK-BeST).

Background: Betahistine was registered in Europe in the 1970s and approved in more than 80 countries as a first-line treatment for Menière's disease. It has been administered to more than 150 million patients. However, according to a Cochrane systematic review of betahistine and recent meta-analyses, there is insufficient evidence to say whether betahistine has any effect in the currently approved dosages of up to 48 mg/d. A combination with the monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor, selegiline, may increase the bioavailability of betahistine to levels similar to the well-established combination of L-DOPA with carbidopa or benserazide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. We investigated the effect of selegiline on betahistine pharmacokinetics and the safety of the combination in humans. Methods: In an investigator-initiated prospective, non-randomized, single-sequence, two-period titration, open label single-center phase 1 study, 15 healthy volunteers received three single oral dosages of betahistine (24, 48, and 96 mg in this sequence with at least 2 days' washout period) without and with selegiline (5 mg/d with a loading period of 7 days). Betahistine serum concentrations were measured over a period of 240 min at eight time points (area under the curve, AUC0-240 min). This trial is registered with EudraCT (2019-002610-39) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Findings: In all three single betahistine dosages, selegiline increased the betahistine bioavailability about 80- to 100-fold. For instance, the mean (±SD) of the area under curve for betahistine 48 mg alone was 0.64 (+/-0.47) h*ng/mL and for betahistine plus selegiline 53.28 (+/-37.49) h*ng/mL. The half-life time of around 30 min was largely unaffected, except for the 24 mg betahistine dosage. In total, 14 mild adverse events were documented. Interpretation: This phase 1 trial shows that the MAO-B inhibitor selegiline increases betahistine bioavailability by a factor of about 80 to 100. No safety concerns were detected. Whether the increased bioavailability has an impact on the preventive treatment of Menière's disease, acute vestibular syndrome, or post-BPPV residual dizziness has to be evaluated in placebo-controlled trials. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05938517?intr=betahistine%20and%20selegiline&rank=1, identifier: NCT05938517.

The Semont-Plus Maneuver or the Epley Maneuver in Posterior Canal Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo: A Randomized Clinical Study.

Importance: Questions remain concerning treatment efficacy for the common condition of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the Semont-plus maneuver (SM-plus) and the Epley maneuver (EM) for treatment of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (pcBPPV) canalolithiasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed at 3 national referral centers (in Munich, Germany; Siena, Italy; and Bruges, Belgium) over 2 years, with a follow-up to 4 weeks after the initial examination. Recruitment took place from June 1, 2020, until March 10, 2022. Patients were selected randomly during routine outpatient care after being referred to 1 of the 3 centers. Two hundred fifty-three patients were assessed for eligibility. After consideration of the exclusion criteria as well as informed consent, 56 patients were excluded and 2 declined to participate, with 195 participants included in the final analysis. The analysis was prespecified and per-protocol. Interventions: After being randomized to the SM-plus or the EM group, patients received 1 initial maneuver from a physician, then subsequently performed self-maneuvers at home 3 times in the morning, 3 times at noon, and 3 times in the evening. Main Outcome and Measures: Patients had to document whether they could provoke positional vertigo every morning. The primary end point was the number of days until no positional vertigo could be induced on 3 consecutive mornings. The secondary end point was the effect of the single maneuver performed by the physician. Results: Of the 195 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 62.6 (13.9) years, and 125 (64.1%) were women. The mean (SD) time until no positional vertigo attacks could be induced in the SM-plus group was 2.0 (1.6) days (median, 1 [range, 1-8] day; 95% CI, 1.64-2.28 days); in the EM group, 3.3 (3.6) days (median, 2 [range, 1-20] days; 95% CI, 2.62-4.06 days) (P = .01; α = .05, 2-tailed Mann-Whitney test). For the secondary end point (effect of a single maneuver), no significant difference was detected (67 of 98 [68.4%] vs 61 of 97 [62.9%]; P = .42; α = .05). No serious adverse event was detected with both maneuvers. Nineteen patients (19.6%) in the EM group and 24 (24.5%) in the SM-plus group experienced relevant nausea. Conclusions and Relevance: The SM-plus self-maneuver is superior to the EM self-maneuver in terms of the number of days until recovery in pcBPPV. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05853328.

Triple Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo and the Strength of Remote Video-Based Management.

This case report describes remote video-based diagnosis and management of triple posttraumatic benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

Efficacy and Safety of N-Acetyl-l-Leucine in Children and Adults With GM2 Gangliosidoses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: GM2 gangliosidoses (Tay-Sachs and Sandhoff diseases) are rare, autosomal recessive, neurodegenerative diseases with no available symptomatic or disease-modifying treatments. This clinical trial investigated N-acetyl-l-leucine (NALL), an orally administered, modified amino acid in pediatric (≥6 years) and adult patients with GM2 gangliosidoses. METHODS: In this phase IIb, multinational, open-label, rater-blinded study (IB1001-202), male and female patients aged ≥6 years with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of GM2 gangliosidoses received orally administered NALL for a 6-week treatment period (4 g/d in patients ≥13 years, weight-tiered doses for patients 6-12 years), followed by a 6-week posttreatment washout period. For the primary Clinical Impression of Change in Severity analysis, patient performance on a predetermined primary anchor test (the 8-Meter Walk Test or the 9-Hole Peg Test) at baseline, after 6 weeks on NALL, and again after a 6-week washout period was videoed and evaluated centrally by blinded raters. Secondary outcomes included assessments of ataxia, clinical global impression, and quality of life. RESULTS: Thirty patients between the age of 6 and 55 years were enrolled. Twenty-nine had an on-treatment assessment and were included in the primary modified intention-to-treat analysis. The study met its CI-CS primary end point (mean difference 0.71, SD = 2.09, 90% CI 0.00, 1.50, p = 0.039), as well as secondary measures of ataxia and global impression. NALL was safe and well tolerated, with no serious adverse reactions. DISCUSSION: Treatment with NALL was associated with statistically significant and clinically relevant changes in functioning and quality of life in patients with GM2 gangliosidosis. NALL was safe and well tolerated, contributing to an overall favorable risk:benefit profile. NALL is a promising, easily administered (oral) therapeutic option for these rare, debilitating diseases with immense unmet medical needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03759665; registered on November 30, 2018), EudraCT (2018-004406-25), and DRKS (DRKS00017539). The first patient was enrolled on June 7, 2019. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that NALL improves outcomes for patients with GM2 gangliosidoses.

Case report: Bitter vertigo.

Background: There are many causes of episodes of vertigo and very few causes of episodes of changes in taste, and the combination of the two is very rare. Here, we describe a patient with recurrent short episodes of vertigo in combination with simultaneous episodes of recurrent paroxysmal dysgeusia and altered feeling on the left side of face. The symptoms were caused by compression of the vestibulocochlear nerve and the facial nerve due to dolichoectasia of the basilar artery. Methods: The patient was diagnosed in our routine clinical practice and underwent a complete neurological and neuro-otological examination, including video head impulse test, caloric irrigation, ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials, acoustic-evoked potentials, neuro-orthoptic examination, cranial MRI, and MR angiography. The patient was seen twice for follow-up. Case: A 71-year-old patient primarily presented with a 2-year history of recurrent short episodes of spinning vertigo. Each of the episodes began with an altered feeling on the left side of the face, followed by a bitter taste on the left half of the tongue, and subsequently vertigo lasting for up to 15 s. The frequency of the attacks was high: up to 80 times per day. Laboratory tests revealed signs of a peripheral vestibular deficit on the left side. There were no signs of sensory or motor deficits or of altered taste between the episodes. An MRI of the brain showed an elongated basilar artery leading to an indentation of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves on the left side. Conclusion: We propose a neurovascular compression in the proximal part of two cranial nerves because of pulsatile compression by the elongated basilar artery with ephatic discharges as the cause of the recurrent episodes. Consistent with the theory of ephatic discharges, treatment with the sodium channel blocker lacosamide for over six months with a final dosage of 200 mg per day p.o. led to a significant reduction of the attack frequency and intensity. This treatment option with a sodium channel blocker should therefore not only be considered in vestibular paroxysmia but also in cases of paroxysmal dysgeusia.

No evidence for a specific vitamin D deficit in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim was to investigate whether there is a difference in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentration between patients with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), patients with other vestibular diseases and patients with other neurological non-vestibular diseases presenting in a tertiary neurological academic outpatient clinic. METHODS: The serum 25(OH)D concentration was measured in 680 patients (368 male, mean age ± SD 58 ± 17 years, 661 Caucasian) without vitamin D supplementation. 158 patients had BPPV; 221 had other vestibular diseases (including 122 with peripheral vestibular disorders, such as unilateral vestibulopathy or Ménière's disease; 46 with central vestibular disorders, such as vestibular migraine or cerebellar dizziness; 53 with functional dizziness); and 301 patients with other neurological non-vestibular diseases. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the serum 25(OH)D concentration between patients with BPPV (mean ± SD 23.4 ± 9.4 ng/ml) and those with other vestibular disorders (24.9 ± 10.1 ng/ml, p = 0.324). Patients with other neurological disorders had even lower concentrations (21.4 ± 10.6 ng/ml) than patients with BPPV (p < 0.005), patients with other vestibular disorders (p < 0.005) and all patients with vestibular disorders (24.9 ± 10.1 ng/ml, p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Our analysis does not support the theory of a specific relationship between serum 25(OH)D concentration and the occurrence of BPPV or other vestibular disorders.

BPPV: Comparison of the SémontPLUS With the Sémont Maneuver: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of the Sémont maneuver (SM) with the new "SémontPLUS maneuver" (SM+) in patients with posterior canal BPPV canalolithiasis (pcBPPVcan). Methods and Patients: In a prospective trinational (Germany, Italy, and Belgium) randomized trial, patients with pcBPPVcan were randomly assigned to SM or SM+; SM+ means overextension of the head by 60+° below earth horizontal line during the movement of the patient toward the affected side. The first maneuver was done by the physician, and the subsequent maneuvers by the patients 9 times/day on their own. Each morning the patient documented whether vertigo could be induced. The primary endpoints were: "How long (in days) does it take until no attacks can be induced?" and "What is the efficacy of a single SM/SM+?" Results: In the 194 patients analyzed (96 SM, 98 SM+), it took 2 days (median, range 1-21 days, mean 3.6 days) for recovery with SM and 1 day (median, range 1-8 days, mean 1.8 days) with SM+ (p = 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test). There was no difference in the second primary endpoint (chi2-test, p = 0.39). Interpretation: This prospective trial shows that SM+ is more effective than SM when repeated therapeutic maneuvers are performed but not when a single maneuver is performed. It also supports the hypothesis of the biophysical model: overextension of the head during step 2 brings the clot of otoconia beyond the vertex of the canal, which increases the effectivity. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that SM+ is superior to SM for multiple treatment maneuvers of pcBPPVcan.

Acute binocular diplopia: peripheral or central?

OBJECTIVES: Acute diplopia is a diagnostic challenge for clinicians, in particular in the emergency department. The most common cause of acute diplopia are ocular motor nerve palsies (OMP). In this prospective study, we focused on identifying the most crucial signs and symptoms for differentiating between peripheral and central OMP. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 56 non-consecutive patients who presented at our emergency department with acute binocular diplopia (≤ 10 days). The patient history was taken using a standardized questionnaire and patients underwent a neurological, neuro-ophthalmological and neuro-otological examination, including measurement of the subjective visual vertical (SVV), Harms tangent screen test, and cranial MRI. RESULTS: Forty-six out of 56 patients were diagnosed with an ocular motor cranial nerve palsy (OMP), 21 of peripheral and 23 of central origin; in two patients, the etiology remained unknown. The following features were different in peripheral and central OMP: (1) the presence of vertigo/dizziness was more frequent in central (43.5%) than in peripheral (9.5%) OMP. (2) Central ocular motor signs, such as saccadic smooth pursuit, additional internuclear ophthalmoplegia, skew deviation, and saccade palsies, were also found more frequently in the central than in the peripheral group (86.7% vs. 33.3%). (3) Further, a pathological SVV deviation by monocular testing of the non-affected eye was also more common in central (77.3%) than in peripheral OMP (38.9%). The presence of all three factors has a positive predictive value of 100% (CI 50-100%) for the presence of a central lesion. CONCLUSIONS: In acute diplopia due to central OMP, the most important accompanying symptom is vertigo/dizziness, and the most important clinical signs are central ocular motor disorders (which require examination of the non-paretic eye) and an SVV deviation in the non-paretic eye.

No Evidence of a Contribution of the Vestibular System to Frequent Falls in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conflicting results about vestibular function in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) prompted a systematic examination of the semicircular canal function, otolith function, and postural stability. METHODS: Sixteen patients with probable PSP [9 females, age=72±6 years (mean±SD), mean disease duration=3.6 years, and mean PSP Rating Scale score=31] and 17 age-matched controls were examined using the video head impulse test, caloric testing, ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (o- and cVEMPs), video-oculography, and posturography. RESULTS: There was no evidence of impaired function of the angular vestibulo-ocular reflex (gain=1.0±0.1), and caloric testing also produced normal findings. In terms of otolith function, there was no significant difference between PSP patients and controls in the absolute peakto-peak amplitude of the oVEMP (13.5±7.2 µV and 12.5±5.6 µV, respectively; p=0.8) or the corrected peak-to-peak amplitude of the cVEMP (0.6±0.3 µV and 0.5±0.2 µV, p=0.3). The total root-mean-square body sway was significantly increased in patients with PSP compared to controls (eyes open/head straight/hard platform: 9.3±3.7 m/min and 6.9±2.1 m/min, respectively; p=0.032). As expected, the saccade velocities were significantly lower in PSP patients than in controls: horizontal, 234±92°/sec and 442±66°/sec, respectively; downward, 109±105°/sec and 344±72°/sec; and upward, 121±110°/sec and 348±78°/sec (all p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of impairment of either high- or low-frequency semicircular function or otolith organ function in the examined PSP patients. It therefore appears that other causes such as degeneration of supratentorial pathways lead to postural imbalance and falls in patients with PSP.

What Is Behind Cerebellar Vertigo and Dizziness?

The differential diagnosis of vertigo or dizziness as a result of cerebellar disorders can be difficult as many patients with a cerebellar pathology do not present with the full spectrum of cerebellar signs. The main goal of this study was to describe the typical clinical features of these patients with vertigo or dizziness of a cerebellar origin. We reviewed the medical records of 5400 patients with vertigo and dizziness from our tertiary outpatient clinic for vertigo and balance disorders. In 459 the diagnosis of "cerebellar vertigo or dizziness" was made; 90 patients were excluded from further analysis due to evident structural changes in MRI. Of the remaining 369 patients (67.0 ± 15.1, 54% female, symptom duration until diagnosis 5.5 ± 6.9 years), 81% suffered from persistent vertigo or dizziness, 31% from attacks of vertigo and dizziness and 21% from both. Neuro-ophthalmologically, 95% had saccadic smooth pursuit, 80% gaze-holding deficits, 64% a pathological fixation suppression of the VOR, 24% central fixation nystagmus (in 64% of these cases downbeat nystagmus (DBN)), 23% rebound nystagmus, and an ocular misalignment in 84% in near view and 50% in distance view. Eleven percent had isolated mild to moderate cerebellar ocular motor disturbances without any other typical cerebellar signs. The most common diagnoses were sporadic adult-onset degenerative ataxia in 26%; idiopathic DBN syndrome in 20%; cerebellar ataxia, neuropathy, and vestibular areflexia syndrome in 10%; episodic ataxia type 2 in 7%; and multiple system atrophy cerebellar type in 6%. In posturography, a typical cerebellar 3-Hz sway was found in 16%. The diagnostic key to patients with cerebellar vertigo or dizziness is a careful examination of eye movements since practically all of them have cerebellar ocular disturbances.

Predictive Capability of an iPad-Based Medical Device (medx) for the Diagnosis of Vertigo and Dizziness.

BACKGROUND: Making the correct diagnosis of patients presenting with vertigo and dizziness in clinical practice is often challenging. OBJECTIVE: In this study we examined the performance of the iPad based program medx in the prediction of different clinical vertigo and dizziness diagnoses and as a diagnostic tool to distinguish between them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The data collection was done in the outpatient clinic of the German Center of Vertigo and Balance Disorders. The "gold standard diagnosis" was defined as the clinical diagnosis of the specialist during the visit of the patient based on standardized history and clinical examination. Another independent and blinded physician finalized each patient's case in the constellatory diagnostic system of medx based on an algorithm using all available clinical information. These diagnoses were compared to the "gold standard" by retrospective review of the charts of the patients. The accuracy provided by medx was defined as the number of correctly classified diagnoses. In addition, the probability of being test positive when a disease was present (sensitivity), of being test negative when a disease was absent (specificity), of having the disease when the test is positive (positive predictive value) and of not having the disease when the test is negative (negative predictive value) for the most common diagnoses were reported. Sixteen possible different vertigo and dizziness diagnoses could be provided by medx. RESULTS: A total of 610 patients (mean age 58.1 ± 16.3 years, 51.2% female) were included. The accuracy for the most common diagnoses was between 82.1 and 96.6% with a sensitivity of 40 to 80.5% and a specificity of more than 80%. When analyzing the quality of medx in a multiclass problem for the six most common clinical diagnoses, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were as follows: Bilateral vestibulopathy (81.6, 97.1, 71.1, and 97.5%), Menière's disease (77.8, 97.6, 87.0, and 95.3%), benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (61.7, 98.3, 86.6, and 93.4%), downbeat nystagmus syndrome (69.6, 97.7, 71.1, and 97.5%), vestibular migraine (34.7, 97.8, 76.1, and 88.3%), and phobic postural vertigo (80.5, 82.5, 52.5, and 94.6%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that medx is a new and easy approach to screen for different diagnoses. With the high specificity and negative predictive value, the system helps to rule out differential diagnoses and can therefore also lead to a cost reduction in the health care system. However, the sensitivity was unexpectedly low, especially for vestibular migraine. All in all, this device can only be a complementary tool, in particular for non-experts in the field.

Unilateral Asterixis in Arm and Leg Caused by Internal Capsula Stroke.

We report an unusual clinical manifestation of ischemic stroke with acute right-sided asterixis affecting the arm as well as the leg due to a lesion in the left posterior limb of the internal capsula. After treatment with intravenous thrombolysis the patient made a good recovery. Notably, in this case unilateral asterixis affected the arm as well as the leg, resulting in postural and gait instability. In addition, damage in the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network, as in our patient, has to be distinguished from other supratentorial causes of acute asterixis like thalamic or frontal lobe lesions linked to the cerebello-brainstem-thalamo-frontal lobe circuits.

Decompression in Chiari Malformation: Clinical, Ocular Motor, Cerebellar, and Vestibular Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of Chiari malformation can include suboccipital decompression with resection of one cerebellar tonsil. Its effects on ocular motor and cerebellar function have not yet been systematically examined. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether decompression, including resection of one cerebellar tonsil, leads to ocular motor, vestibular, or cerebellar deficits. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients with Chiari malformation type 1 were systematically examined before and after (1 week and 3 months) suboccipital decompression with unilateral tonsillectomy. The work-up included a neurological and neuro-ophthalmological examination, vestibular function, posturography, and subjective scales. Cerebellar function was evaluated by ataxia rating scales. RESULTS: Decompression led to a major subjective improvement 3 months after surgery, especially regarding headache (5/5 patients), hyp-/dysesthesia (5/5 patients), ataxia of the upper limbs (4/5 patients), and paresis of the triceps and interosseal muscles (2/2 patients). Ocular motor disturbances before decompression were detected in 50% of the patients. These symptoms improved after surgery, but five patients had new persisting mild ocular motor deficits 3 months after decompression with unilateral tonsillectomy (i.e., smooth pursuit deficits, horizontally gaze-evoked nystagmus, rebound, and downbeat nystagmus) without any subjective complaints. Impaired vestibular (horizontal canal, saccular, and utricular) function improved in five of seven patients with impaired function before surgery. Posturographic measurements after surgery did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: Decompression, including resection of one cerebellar tonsil, leads to an effective relief of patients' preoperative complaints. It is a safe procedure when performed with the help of intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring, although mild ocular motor dysfunctions were seen in half of the patients, which were fortunately asymptomatic.