The principles of enhanced recovery after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (ERaPEG): a UK tertiary center experience.

PURPOSE: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways have been shown to improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. The aim of the study was to assess whether the implementation of a perioperative enhanced recovery after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (ERaPEG) pathway based on ERAS principles was safe, satisfactory to parents and improved outcomes. METHODS: Following a quality improvement project, a multimodal ERaPEG pathway was introduced as standard practice within the department and children undergoing elective same-day admission percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) at a single UK tertiary center were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria were patients undergoing other concurrent procedures and those who underwent a laparoscopic assisted/open procedure. Data included patient demographics, underlying diagnosis, indication, length of stay (LOS) and 30-day readmission. Parental experience and satisfaction were determined using a questionnaire including 5-point Likert scales. A retrospective cohort was used for comparison. Data were analyzed using Chi-Square test and Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS: Ninety-five patients met the inclusion criteria: 50 pre and 45 post the implementation of ERaPEG. Median age was 3 and 2 years, respectively. Neurodisability was the underlying diagnosis in most patients (84%-pre-ERaPEG; 76%-post-ERaPEG). Most common PEG indication was medication/nutritional supplementation (52%-pre-ERaPEG; 51%-post-ERaPEG). The LOS significantly decreased from a median of 51.5 h (pre-ERaPEG) to 32 h (post-ERaPEG) (p < 0.001). Thirty-day readmission rates were similar (6% vs 11%). Most parents felt that the educational material was easy to access and understand. Post-operatively the majority of parents (≥ 80%) were confident in managing the gastrostomy device, setting up/giving the feeds and also felt that the LOS was appropriate. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the implementation of an ERaPEG pathway significantly reduced LOS following PEG. In addition, the pathway was satisfactory to parents and offered the benefit of improved resource utilization.

How good is quality-of-life for children receiving home parenteral nutrition? - A pilot study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Children on home parenteral nutrition and their parents not only engage with complex nutritional issues but also have to manage difficult social and financial problems with social and clinical support that may not always meet their needs. Baxter's HPN-QOL questionnaire, assesses the QOL of adult patients treated with HPN, and has been developed rigorously using standard guidelines, measuring various dimensions of QOL. Our aim was to use this tool to explore how HPN influences the QOL of paediatric patients. METHODS: The HPN-QOL questionnaire was modified to suit a paediatric HPN population. Data on demographics, aetiology of intestinal failure and duration of HPN were collected from a departmental database. Quality-of-Life grading of functional and symptom scales, HPN specific items and overall QOL Numerical Rating Scales were determined. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 17 families returned the completed questionnaires. QOL was significantly impaired by increased dependency regarding items of daily living such as eating, dressing, washing, and mobility, but was not affected in the domains of school attendance, general fatigue, pain and body image. There were no significant differences in QOL when patients with and without enterostomy were compared. Patients felt well supported by the hospital nutrition team in managing logistics related to HPN. CONCLUSIONS: QOL in HPN patients was not significantly affected by the medical aspects of care. This descriptive study highlights the need for further integration of medical and social care in order to support families of children receiving HPN as QOL was impaired in relation to activities of daily living and social functioning.