Identifying Core Outcome Domains in Chronic Skin Disease Using the Best-Worst Scaling Method.

Importance: The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) potentially holds promise as an opportunity to improve outcomes and quality of care for patients with skin disease, but the routine use of PROMs remains limited. While the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has several strengths and domains relevant to those with chronic skin disease, it is not clear which are most useful. Objective: To determine which PROMIS domains are most meaningful to those with chronic skin disease to develop a PROMIS profile that effectively captures the experience of living with these skin diseases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was based on data gathered from an internet survey that was administered to a sample of adult respondents in the US on the Prolific Platform and ResearchMatch and through the National Psoriasis Foundation. A list of PROMIS domains relevant to chronic skin disease was developed through literature review. These domains were included in a best-worst scaling exercise, in which participants were shown 12 sets of 4 domains and asked to choose which domain in each set was the most important and least important to their experience. Participants completed the survey between December 2022 and June 2023. Data were analyzed in June 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ratio-scaled preference score for each of the domains. Results: Of 939 total participants, 559 (59.5%) were female, 20 (2.1%) gender nonconforming, 7 (0.7%) transgender men, and 1 (0.1%) transgender women; there were 4 American Indian/Alaska Native (0.4%), 50 Asian (5.3%), 63 Black (6.7%), 66 Hispanic or Latino/a/x (7.0%), 2 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (0.2%), 749 White (79.8%), and 42 multiracial individuals (4.5%). The survey was completed by 200 participants with acne, 316 with psoriasis, 199 with atopic dermatitis, and 224 with various chronic skin diseases. For those with acne, the highest-scored domains were body image (15.66), appearance (14.96), life satisfaction (11.29), depression (9.25), and anxiety (9.18). For those with psoriasis, the highest-scored domains were life satisfaction (11.31), appearance (11.05), itch (10.98), pain (9.97), and body image (8.75). For those with atopic dermatitis, the highest-scored domains were itch (12.60), life satisfaction (11.65), appearance (11.40), body image (11.25), and pain (10.03). Conclusion and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that body image, appearance, life satisfaction, itch, pain, anxiety, and depression were highly rated across the surveys. By identifying the PROMIS domains most important to individuals with chronic skin disease, clinicians can choose the domains that are most relevant to patients. In addition, this may guide the construction of a PROMIS profile that effectively captures the experience of living with these skin diseases and can serve as a patient-reported measure of disease severity and treatment effectiveness.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

Association Between Poor Sleep and Myocardial Infarction in Patients with Psoriasis: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study with the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality occurs in patients with psoriasis at rates nearly twice that of the general population. Chronic sleep impairment is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Here, we examine the association between sleep quantity and history of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: This observational, cross-sectional study utilized data from the 2020 National Psoriasis Foundation Annual Survey. Effect estimates were obtained using a multivariate logistic regression model, which controlled for prespecified covariates. RESULTS: Based on data from 1405 individuals with psoriasis, our analysis demonstrated a significant association between sleep quantity and history of myocardial infarction: odds ratio (OR) 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.92], p = 0.012. The association was not significantly influenced by psoriasis severity (OR 1.01, [95% CI 0.99-1.03], p = 0.38), comorbid psoriatic arthritis (OR 1.06, [95% CI 0.48-2.38], p = 0.88), sleep apnea, or other traditional risk factors for myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Our analyses indicate an association between sleep quantity and history of myocardial infarction in patients with psoriasis. For each hour increase in average nightly sleep, patients with psoriasis have a 33% decrease in the odds of having a history of myocardial infarction. The chief limitation of this study is its cross-sectional design limiting ascertainment of causality.

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics associated with multiple biologic failure in psoriasis: A 2015-2022 prospective cohort analysis of the CorEvitas psoriasis registry.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis patients with poor therapeutic response to multiple biologic agents are not well-characterized. OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics associated with development of multiple biologic failure (MBF) versus good clinical response (GR) to the first biologic. METHODS: This prospective cohort analysis evaluated patients in the multicenter CorEvitas Psoriasis Registry who initiated their first biologic between 2015 and 2020 and were followed for ≥24 months. Multivariable logistic regression identified sociodemographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes that differed between MBF (discontinued ≥2 biologics of different classes, each used for ≥90 days, due to inadequate efficacy) and GR (continued use of first biologic for ≥2 years) patients. RESULTS: One thousand thirty-nine patients were analyzed (490 GR [47.2%], 65 MBF [6.3%]). Female sex, shorter psoriasis duration, earlier year of biologic initiation, prior nonbiologic systemic therapy use, history of hyperlipidemia, and Medicaid insurance were significantly associated with MBF, though the latter 2 variables exhibited wider confidence intervals, indicating a lower level of support. The first-to-second biologic sequence most observed with MBF was Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor to IL-17 inhibitor use. LIMITATIONS: Biologic adherence between visits was not evaluated. CONCLUSION: Approximately 6% of psoriasis patients met MBF criteria. The results identify characteristics associated with MBF that may distinguish patients warranting more frequent follow-up.

Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Remission in Psoriatic Arthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Achievement of remission in psoriatic arthritis is a key goal for patients and clinicians, yet definitions of remission may vary. Previous efforts have utilized multidomain measures such as minimal disease activity that assess the status of joints, skin, and function to determine current level of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) disease activity. The goal of this study is to identify factors associated with patient-reported psoriatic arthritis remission. METHODS: The National Psoriasis Foundation conducted a cross-sectional study using an online survey of a random stratified sample of 1570 individuals with psoriatic disease in the USA. Participants were asked about a provider diagnosis of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis, comorbid conditions, and psoriatic arthritis impact and disease activity, and demographic questions. All participants reporting a physician-given diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis were asked if they felt their psoriatic arthritis was in remission ("Do you feel your psoriatic arthritis is in remission?" Yes/No/Unsure) and, if so, length of remission. Individuals with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis reporting a body surface area impacted by psoriasis 3% or less were asked if they felt their psoriasis was in remission. Psoriatic arthritis disease activity and impact was assessed using the nine-question Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID-9) instrument and a global PsA-related quality of life question. PsAID-9 scores ≤ 4 were used to indicate acceptable disease state. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patient-perceived PsA remission. RESULTS: Of 834 participants with PsA, including 76 (4.8%) with PsA without skin involvement ever, 144 (17.3%) felt their psoriatic arthritis was in remission, with an average remission duration of 43 months. Of those in remission, 116 (78.4%) reported currently using a treatment for their PsA, with most (75.7%) reporting using a biologic therapy for their PsA in the past 12 months. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that patient-perceived psoriatic arthritis remission was independently associated with experiencing acceptable disease state (PsAID-9 ≤ 4), perception of psoriasis remission, lower impact of PsA on global quality of life, and non-white race. Age, sex, body mass index, or biologic use in the last 12 months were not associated with patient-reported PsA remission. CONCLUSION: Overall, patient perception of PsA remission was most strongly associated with patient-reported psoriasis remission.

Demographic and Clinical Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Remission in Psoriasis.

INTRODUCTION: Achievement of remission in psoriasis is a key goal for patients and providers, yet definitions of remission may vary. Some treat-to-target initiatives in psoriasis have focused on degree of skin involvement, while others have also incorporated quality of life (QoL) measures. The goal of this study is to identify factors associated with patient-reported psoriasis remission. METHODS: The National Psoriasis Foundation conducted a survey of a random stratified sample of 1570 individuals with psoriatic disease in the USA. The survey contained questions regarding provider diagnosis of psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis, as well as comorbid conditions and participant demographics. Psoriasis severity was assessed using the Patient Report of Extent of Psoriasis Involvement (PREPI), a validated self-reported measure of body surface area (BSA). Dermatologic-related quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Individuals reporting BSA ≤ 3% were asked if they believed their psoriasis was in remission. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with remission. RESULTS: Of 930 participants reporting BSA ≤ 3%, 479 (51.7%) believed their psoriasis was in remission, with an average remission duration of 31 months. Of those in remission, 79.1% reported current treatment. Multivariate regression revealed that psoriasis remission was independently associated with female sex, lower BSA, less impairment in the Dermatology Life Quality Index and global QoL, biologic use, and concomitant diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis. There was no association with age, race, body mass index, or number of comorbidities. CONCLUSION: Overall, patient perception of psoriasis remission was not solely associated with BSA, but also with sex, quality of life, and treatment type.

Analysis of Specialist and Patient Perspectives on Strategies to Improve Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Among Persons With Psoriatic Disease.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with psoriatic disease are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), which is a leading cause of mortality in this population. However, many of these patients do not have an active relationship with a primary care physician, and there may be a role for specialist-led care in prevention of CVD. OBJECTIVE: To explore clinician and patient perspectives regarding strategies to improve CVD prevention via specialist-led care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using electronically collected surveys, a best-worst scaling experimental survey study was conducted among dermatologists through the National Psoriasis Foundation as well as the American Academy of Dermatology from October 27, 2020, to April 1, 2021, to rank the strategies according to their potential to improve CVD prevention among patients with psoriatic disease. Participants were asked about the feasibility of specialist-led screening through an electronically delivered survey from the National Psoriasis Foundation conducted between February 1 and April 21, 2021. Patients with psoriatic disease were asked about whether they would like the specialist to screen for CVD risk factors. In addition, patients reported their likelihood to engage in CVD risk screening and management behaviors in scenarios in which either the primary care physician or specialist was making the recommendations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: For the clinician surveys, the primary outcome was the ratio scaled preference score (range, 0-100; higher is more preferred), as well as whether they think calculating a 10-year CVD risk score and prescribing statins seems feasible. For the patient surveys, the primary outcome was the likelihood to check cholesterol level, incorporate diet and exercise, or use statin therapy depending on whether recommended by the specialist or primary care physician, whether they would like their specialist to educate them about CVD risk, and whether they would find it convenient to have their cholesterol level checked by their specialist. RESULTS: Among 183 dermatologists (102 [55.7%] women; mean [SD] age not collected), clinical decision support (preference score, 22.3; 95% CI, 20.7-24.0), patient education (preference score, 14.1; 95% CI, 12.5-15.7), and clinician education (preference score, 15.8; 95% CI, 14.3-17.3) were ranked as strategies likely to improve CVD prevention in patients with psoriatic disease. In addition, 69.3% (95% CI, 62.2%-76.0%) of dermatologists agreed or strongly agreed that checking lipid levels was feasible. Among 160 patients with psoriasis and 162 patients with psoriatic arthritis (226 [70.2%] women; mean [SD] age, 54 [13.3] years), patients reported they were as likely to engage in cardiovascular risk screening and management behaviors whether recommended by their primary care physician or their specialist. In addition, 60.0% (95% CI, 52.0%-67.7%) of patients with psoriasis and 75.3% (95% CI, 67.9%-81.7%) of those with psoriatic arthritis agreed that it would be convenient for them to have their cholesterol checked by their dermatologist/rheumatologist. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this survey study, dermatologists and patients with psoriatic disease expressed positive perspectives about engaging in a specialist-led model of care to improve CVD prevention. Dermatologists appear to view several strategies as having potential to improve cardiovascular risk prevention.

Psoriasis Prevalence in Adults in the United States.

IMPORTANCE: Determining psoriasis prevalence is fundamental to understanding the burden of the disease, the populations most affected, and health policies to address the disease. OBJECTIVE: (1) To determine the prevalence of psoriasis among adults in the US and (2) to evaluate the change in psoriasis prevalence over time since the 2003-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cross-sectional study used 2011-2014 NHANES data (collected from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014) with sampling from a general, noninstitutionalized US civilian population. Participants were 20 years or older and were selected via a multistage probability sampling design to ensure that surveys were nationally representative. Eligible participants had an in-person interview followed by a medical examination by medical professionals. Data were analyzed from July 15, 2019, to December 23, 2020. EXPOSURES: None. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Psoriasis prevalence in the US, as measured by the percentage of people in the representative sample with psoriasis, and trend statistics comparing prevalence estimates from the 2003-2004, 2009-2010, and 2011-2014 NHANES cycles. RESULTS: A total of 12 625 participants (mean [SD] age, 32.8 [24.1] years; 6492 women [51.4%]; and 4828 non-Hispanic White participants [38.2%]) answered the question of whether they were given the diagnosis of psoriasis by a physician or another health care professional. Psoriasis prevalence among US adults 20 years or older was 3.0% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.4%). Based on the 2020 US census data, this outcome translates to an estimated 7.55 million US adults with psoriasis. Psoriasis prevalence was similar between women and men, with 3.2% (95% CI, 2.6%-3.8%) in women and 2.8% (95% CI, 2.4%-3.3%) in men. Psoriasis prevalence was highest in White individuals at 3.6% (95% CI, 2.9%-4.2%), followed by other racial/ethnic groups (non-Hispanic, including multiracial) at 3.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-5.1%), Asian individuals at 2.5% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.3%), Hispanic individuals (including Mexican American and other Hispanic individuals) at 1.9% (95% CI, 1.3%-2.5%), and Black individuals at 1.5% (95% CI, 1.0%-2.0%). Psoriasis prevalence was not different based on patients' marital status, education, income, or medical insurance status. The prevalence of psoriasis among US adults did not differ significantly since 2003. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this cross-sectional study suggest that psoriasis remains a common, immune-mediated disease that affects 3.0% of the US adult population, or more than 7.5 million adults. Its prevalence has not differed since evaluation in 2003. These prevalence data are foundational to determining the burden of psoriasis and for supporting efforts in research, education, and health policy.

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force guidance for management of psoriatic disease during the pandemic: Version 2-Advances in psoriatic disease management, COVID-19 vaccines, and COVID-19 treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To update guidance regarding the management of psoriatic disease during the COVID-19 pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: The task force (TF) includes 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by inquiries received by the National Psoriasis Foundation. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF updated evidence for the original 22 statements and added 5 new recommendations. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements, 13 with high consensus and 14 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is variable in quality and/or quantity. CONCLUSIONS: These statements provide guidance for the treatment of patients with psoriatic disease on topics including how the disease and its treatments affect COVID-19 risk, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (including novel vaccination), and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is a living document that is continuously updated by the TF as data emerge.

National Psoriasis Foundation COVID-19 Task Force Guidance for Management of Psoriatic Disease During the Pandemic: Version 1.

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidance about management of psoriatic disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. STUDY DESIGN: A task force (TF) of 18 physician voting members with expertise in dermatology, rheumatology, epidemiology, infectious diseases, and critical care was convened. The TF was supplemented by nonvoting members, which included fellows and National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) staff. Clinical questions relevant to the psoriatic disease community were informed by questions received by the NPF. A Delphi process was conducted. RESULTS: The TF approved 22 guidance statements. The average of the votes was within the category of agreement for all statements. All guidance statements proposed were recommended, 9 with high consensus and 13 with moderate consensus. LIMITATIONS: The evidence behind many guidance statements is limited in quality. CONCLUSION: These statements provide guidance for the management of patients with psoriatic disease on topics ranging from how the disease and its treatments impact COVID-19 risk and outcome, how medical care can be optimized during the pandemic, what patients should do to lower their risk of getting infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and what they should do if they develop COVID-19. The guidance is intended to be a living document that will be updated by the TF as data emerge.

Impact of limb loss in the United States.

The amputee gets lost in the American health care system because of fragmentation across the continuum. The journey of the diabetic patient with limb loss through the health care system is even more precarious than that of the traumatic amputee. Interventions to address these secondary conditions and improve the health and outcomes of persons with disability have focused on standard medical treatments, such as medication or physical rehabilitation therapies, often to the exclusion of psychosocial interventions. Each member of the amputee rehabilitation team plays a specific and important role in the care and recovery of the person with limb loss.