A new marker cluster anchored to the iliotibial band improves tracking of hip and thigh axial rotations.

Tracking hip and thigh axial rotation has limited accuracy due to the large soft tissue artifact. We proposed a tracking-markers cluster anchored to the prominent distal part of the iliotibial band (ITB) to improve thigh tracking. We investigated if the ITB cluster improves accuracy compared with a traditionally used thigh cluster. We also compared the hip kinematics obtained with these clusters during walking and step-down. Hip and thigh kinematics were assessed during a task of active internal-external rotation with the knee extended, in which the shank rotation is a reference due to smaller soft-tissue artifact. Errors of the hip and thigh axial rotations obtained with the thigh clusters compared to the shank cluster were computed as root-mean-square errors, which were compared by paired t-tests. The angular waveforms of this task were compared using the statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Additionally, the hip waveforms in all planes obtained with the thigh clusters were compared during walking and step-down, using Coefficients of Multiple Correlation (CMC) and SPM (α = 0.05 for all analyses). The ITB cluster errors were approximately 25 % smaller than the traditional cluster error (p < 0.001). ITB cluster errors were smaller at external rotation angles while the traditional cluster error was smaller at internal rotation angles (p < 0.001), although the clusters' waveforms were not significantly different (p ≥ 0.005). During walking and step-down, both clusters provided similar hip kinematics (CMC ≥ 0.75), but differences were observed in parts of the cycles (p ≤ 0.04). The findings suggest that the ITB cluster may be used in studies focused on hip axial rotation.

Foot pronation during walking is associated to the mechanical resistance of the midfoot joint complex.

BACKGROUND: The demonstration of the relationship between midfoot passive mechanical resistance and foot pronation during gait may guide the development of assessment and intervention methods to modify foot motion during gait and to alter midfoot passive mechanical resistance. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is foot pronation during the stance phase of gait related to the midfoot passive mechanical resistance to inversion? METHODS: The resistance torque and stiffness provided by midfoot soft tissues of 33 participants (21 females and 12 males) with average of 26.21 years were measured. In addition, the participants' forefoot and rearfoot kinematic data during the stance phase of gait were collected with the Qualisys System (Oqus 7+). Correlation Coefficients were calculated to test the association between kinematic variables representing pronation (forefoot-rearfoot inversion, forefoot-rearfoot dorsiflexion and rearfoot-shank eversion) and maximum resistance torque and maximum stiffness of the midfoot with α = 0.05. RESULTS: Reduced maximum midfoot resistance torque was moderately associated with increased forefoot-rearfoot inversion peak (p = 0.029; r = 0.38), with forefoot-rearfoot dorsiflexion peak (p = 0.048; r = -0.35) and with rearfoot-shank eversion peak (p = 0.008; r = -0.45). Maximum midfoot stiffness was not associated to foot pronation. SIGNIFICANCE: The smaller the midfoot resistance torque, the greater the forefoot-rearfoot inversion and dorsiflexion peaks and the rearfoot-shank eversion peak during gait. The findings suggest the existence of a relationship between foot pronation and midfoot passive mechanical resistance. Thus, changes in midfoot passive mechanical resistance may affect foot pronation during gait.