The Cardiovascular Event Risk Associated with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and the Lipid Profile in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Second- and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are now available to treat chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) in the first and second line. However, vascular adverse events (VAEs) have been reported for patients with CML treated with some TKIs. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the cumulative incidence (CI) and cardiovascular risk for 210 patients included in the Canarian Registry of CML. RESULT: With a mean follow up of 6 years, 19/210 (9.1%) patients developed VAEs, all of whom presented at least one cardiovascular risk factor at diagnosis. The mean time to VAE presentation was 54 months from the start of TKI treatment. We found a statistically significant difference between the CI for nilotinib-naïve vs. nilotinib-treated patients (p = 0.005), between dasatinib-naïve and dasatinib-treated patients (p = 0.039), and for patients who received three lines of treatment with first-line imatinib vs. first-line imatinib (p < 0.001). From the multivariable logistic regression analyses, the Framingham risk score (FRS) and patients with three lines of TKI with first-line imatinib were the only variables with statistically significant hazard ratios for VAE development. Significant increases in HDL-C and total cholesterol may also be predictive for VAE. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, it is important to estimate the cardiovascular risk at the diagnosis of CML as it can help determine whether a patient is likely to develop a VAE during TKI treatment.

Presence of Myeloid Mutations in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Increases Risk of Cardiovascular Event on Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

For chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients with a known risk of cardiovascular events (CVE), imatinib is often recommended for first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment rather than a second-generation TKI (2G-TKI) such as nilotinib or dasatinib. To date, very few studies have evaluated the genetic predisposition associated with CVE development on TKI treatment. In this retrospective study of 102 CML patients, 26 CVEs were reported during an average follow-up of over 10 years. Next-generation sequencing identified pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations in genes associated with myeloid malignancies in 24.5% of the diagnostic samples analyzed. Patients with a recorded CVE had more myeloid mutations (0.48 vs. 0.14, p = 0.019) and were older (65.1 vs. 55.7 years, p = 0.016). Age ≥ 60 years and receiving a 2G-TKI in first-line were CVE risk factors. The presence of a pathogenic somatic myeloid mutation was an independent risk factor for CVE on any TKI (HR 2.79, p = 0.01), and significantly shortened the CV event-free survival of patients who received first-line imatinib (by 70 months, p = 0.011). Indeed, 62% of patients on imatinib with mutations had a CVE vs. the 19% on imatinib with a mutation and no CVE. In conclusion, myeloid mutations detectable at diagnosis increase CVE risk, particularly for patients on imatinib, and might be considered for first-line TKI choice.

Drug-to-drug interactions of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukemia patients. Is it a real problem?

With tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients are achieving similar rates of survival to the general population and some treatment aspects such as adherence and drug-to-drug interactions (DDI) are becoming increasingly important. Our aim was to investigate the frequency and real clinical consequences of DDI between TKI and concurrent medications in CML. We performed a retrospective multicenter study including 105 patients receiving 134 TKI treatments. Sixty-three patients (60%) had at least one potential DDI. The mean number of concomitant medications was 4.8 (0-19). The mean number of DDI by TKI treatment was 1.2 (0-8); it increased with the number of concomitant medications and age in a significant manner. A total of 159 DDI were detected, involving 55 different drugs. The most common drug classes involved were proton pump inhibitors, statins, and antidepressants. A DDI-related clinical effect (toxicity and/or lack of efficacy) was suspected during the common course of patient follow-up in only five patients (4.7%). This number increased to 20% when data were centrally reviewed. Most of the adverse events (AE) attributed to DDIs were mild. The most common were diarrhea, vomiting, edema, cramps, and transaminitis. Nilotinib and dasatinib showed a tendency towards a higher risk of DDI compared with imatinib. There were no significant differences in AE frequency or in treatment response between patients with or without DDI. Due to their frequency, and their potential to cause clinically relevant effects, DDI are an important aspect of CML management.

Tandem transplants with different high-dose regimens improve the complete remission rates in multiple myeloma. Results of a Grupo Español de Síndromes Linfoproliferativos/Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Osea phase II trial.

Between 1994 and 1999, 88 multiple myeloma (MM) patients were included in a phase II study to evaluate a tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) programme. The first was conditioned with melphalan 200 mg/m2 (MEL200-ASCT1), and the second with cyclophosphamide, etoposide and BCNU (CBV-ASCT2). All patients were in response after MEL200-ASCT1. A control group of MM patients with response to a single ASCT was selected to compare outcomes. After MEL200-ASCT1, 26 patients (30%) achieved complete remission (CR). Of the remaining 48 evaluable patients, 16 (33%) achieved CR with CBV-ASCT2. The final CR rate was 48%. The 5-year survival (OS) was 55%[95% confidence interval (CI) 43-67%] while the event-free survival (EFS) was 28% (95% CI 15-39%). CR status after CBV-ASCT2 was the most important prognostic factor for OS and EFS (P = 0.00001), although no differences in outcomes were detected when the patients in CR after MEL200-ASCT1 were compared with those who obtained CR after CBV-ASCT2. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed improved OS and EFS for the tandem series as compared with the control series treated with a single MEL200-ASCT. However, in a stratified comparison by response, there were no prognostic differences between tandem patients and control patients treated with a single ASCT. In summary, our study suggests that the benefit of a second high-dose therapy course depends on its capacity to result in CR for MM patients who have not attained CR after ASCT1.