Lectin-Like Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor 1 Inhibition in Type 2 Diabetes: Phase 1 Results.

Background Blockade of the lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 (LOX-1) is a potentially attractive mechanism for lowering inflammatory and lipid risk in patients with atherosclerosis. This study aims to assess the safety, tolerability, and target engagement of MEDI6570, a high-affinity monoclonal blocking antibody to LOX-1. Methods and Results This phase 1, first-in-human, placebo-controlled study (NCT03654313) randomized 88 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive single ascending doses (10, 30, 90, 250, or 500 mg) or multiple ascending doses (90, 150, or 250 mg once monthly for 3 months) of MEDI6570 or placebo. Primary end point was safety; secondary and exploratory end points included pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, free soluble LOX-1 levels, and change in coronary plaque volume. Mean age was 57.6/58.1 years in the single ascending doses/multiple ascending doses groups, 31.3%/62.5% were female, and mean type 2 diabetes duration was 9.7/8.7 years. Incidence of adverse events was similar among cohorts. MEDI6570 exhibited nonlinear pharmacokinetics, with terminal half-life increasing from 4.6 days (30 mg) to 11.2 days (500 mg), consistent with target-mediated drug disposition. Dose-dependent reductions in mean soluble LOX-1 levels from baseline were observed (>66% at 4 weeks and 71.61-82.96% at 10 weeks in the single ascending doses and multiple ascending doses groups, respectively). After 3 doses, MEDI6570 was associated with nonsignificant regression of noncalcified plaque volume versus placebo (-13.45 mm3 versus -8.25 mm3). Conclusions MEDI6570 was well tolerated and demonstrated dose-dependent soluble LOX-1 suppression and a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with once-monthly dosing. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT03654313.

Biomarker context-of-use: how organizational design can impact the implementation of the appropriate biomarker assay strategy.

Since 2011, the European Bioanalysis Forum has been discussing the topic of context-of-use for biomarker assays, in support of a cross-industry implementation of its principles. The discussions have led to the acknowledgement of the challenges that we face as an industry in implementing these principles. In addition to scientific recommendations, the European Bioanalysis Forum has addressed these challenges by providing recommendations on organizational design, and what works in both sponsor and contract research organizations, to support and enable context-of-use across biomarker strategies. Here, we highlight the key considerations for organizational design to help ensure that biomarker assays are characterized and validated according to the right context-of-use, to ensure that the right decisions based on the biomarker data can be made during drug development.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Expression In Vitro and Hematologic Effects in Mice Vaccinated With AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19).

Severe COVID-19 can be associated with a prothrombotic state, increasing risk of morbidity and mortality. The SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein is purported to directly promote platelet activation via the S1 subunit and is cleaved from host cells during infection. High plasma concentrations of S1 subunit are associated with disease progression and respiratory failure during severe COVID-19. There is limited evidence on whether COVID-19 vaccine-induced spike protein is similarly cleaved and on the immediate effects of vaccination on host immune responses or hematology parameters. We investigated vaccine-induced S1 subunit cleavage and effects on hematology parameters using AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19), a simian, replication-deficient adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccine. We observed S1 subunit cleavage in vitro following AZD1222 transduction of HEK293x cells. S1 subunit cleavage also occurred in vivo and was detectable in sera 12 hours post intramuscular immunization (1x1010 viral particles) in CD-1 mice. Soluble S1 protein levels decreased within 3 days and were no longer detectable 7-14 days post immunization. Intravenous immunization (1x109 viral particles) produced higher soluble S1 protein levels with similar expression kinetics. Spike protein was undetectable by immunohistochemistry 14 days post intramuscular immunization. Intramuscular immunization resulted in transiently lower platelet (12 hours) and white blood cell (12-24 hours) counts relative to vehicle. Similarly, intravenous immunization resulted in lower platelet (24-72 hours) and white blood cell (12-24 hours) counts, and increased neutrophil (2 hours) counts. The responses observed with either route of immunization represent transient hematologic changes and correspond to expected innate immune responses to adenoviral infection.

When to Extend Monitoring of Anti-drug Antibodies for High-risk Biotherapeutics in Clinical Trials: an Opinion from the European Immunogenicity Platform.

The determination of a tailored anti-drug antibody (ADA) testing strategy is based on the immunogenicity risk assessment to allow a correlation of ADAs with changes to pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety. The clinical impact of ADA formation refines the immunogenicity risk assessment and defines appropriate risk mitigation strategies. Health agencies request for high-risk biotherapeutics to extend ADA monitoring for patients that developed an ADA response to the drug until ADAs return to baseline levels. However, there is no common understanding in which cases an extension of ADA follow-up sampling beyond the end of study (EOS) defined in the clinical study protocol is required. Here, the Immunogenicity Strategy Working Group of the European Immunogenicity Platform (EIP) provides recommendations on requirements for an extension of ADA follow-up sampling in clinical studies where there is a high risk of serious consequences from ADAs. The importance of ADA evaluation during a treatment-free period is recognized but the decision whether to extend ADA monitoring at a predefined EOS should be based on evaluation of ADA data in the context of corresponding clinical signals. If the clinical data set shows that safety consequences are minor, mitigated, or resolved, further ADA monitoring may not be required despite potentially detectable ADAs above baseline. Extended ADA monitoring should be centered on individual patient benefit.

AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCov-19): A Single-Dose biodistribution study in mice.

Biodistribution studies of adenovirus-based vaccines support their clinical development by evaluating their spread and persistence following in vivo administration. AZD1222 (ChAdox1 nCov-19) is a replication-deficient non-human adenovirus-vectored vaccine for coronavirus disease 2019. In this nonclinical study, the biodistribution of AZD1222 was assessed in mice for 29 days following intramuscular injection. Results show that AZD1222 was safe and well tolerated, with a spread that was largely confined to administration sites and the proximal sciatic nerve, with low levels observed in sites that are involved in rapid clearance of particulates by the reticuloendothelial system. Accordingly, levels of AZD1222 decreased from Day 2 to Day 29, indicating clearance. There were no quantifiable levels of AZD1222 in the blood, brain, spinal cord, and reproductive tissue, suggesting a lack of widespread or long-term distribution of AZD1222 vector DNA throughout the body following its administration.

Conference Report from the European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop: toward harmonized implementation of the ICH M10 guideline.

In this report, the European Bioanalysis Forum shares the proposals for harmonized implementation of the ICH M10 guideline on bioanalytical method validation and study sample analysis from the ICH M10 workshop. The focus of the discussions was to understand new, changed or still ambiguous regulatory expectations in the guideline, as identified in feedback from the pre-workshop surveys or during the workshop. The proposals from the workshop aim at stimulating and helping a harmonized implementation of the guideline, and using our community as a sounding board during and after implementation to highlight areas of misalignment and to create a platform for continued sharing with the regulatory authorities in an effort to contribute to industry and regulators developing similar interpretations on guideline expectations.

Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization.

Evolving immunogenicity assay performance expectations and a lack of harmonized anti-drug antibody validation testing and reporting tools have resulted in significant time spent by health authorities and sponsors on resolving filing queries. Following debate at the American Association of Pharmaceutical Sciences National Biotechnology Conference, a group was formed to address these gaps. Over the last 3 years, 44 members from 29 organizations (including 5 members from Europe and 10 members from FDA) discussed gaps in understanding immunogenicity assay requirements and have developed harmonization tools for use by industry scientists to facilitate filings to health authorities. Herein, this team provides testing and reporting strategies and tools for the following assessments: (1) pre-study validation cut point; (2) in-study cut points, including procedures for applying cut points to mixed populations; (3) system suitability control criteria for in-study plate acceptance; (4) assay sensitivity, including the selection of an appropriate low positive control; (5) specificity, including drug and target tolerance; (6) sample stability that reflects sample storage and handling conditions; (7) assay selectivity to matrix components, including hemolytic, lipemic, and disease state matrices; (8) domain specificity for multi-domain therapeutics; (9) and minimum required dilution and extraction-based sample processing for titer reporting.

Recommendations and discussion points on immunogenicity, biomarkers, automation/technology and protein-MS from the 2021 European Bioanalysis Forum Focus Workshops.

During the first half of 2021, and due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic preventing in-person meetings, the European Bioanalysis Forum organized four workshops as live interactive online meetings. The themes discussed at the workshops were carefully selected to match the cyberspace dynamics of the meeting format. The first workshop was a training day on challenges related to immunogenicity. The second one focused on biomarkers and continued the important discussion on integrating the principles of Context of Use (CoU) in biomarker research. The third workshop was dedicated to technology, that is, cutting-edge development in cell-based and ligand-binding assays and automation strategies. The fourth was on progress and the continued scientific and regulatory challenges related to peptide and protein analysis with MS. In all four workshops, the European Bioanalysis Forum included a mixture of scientific and regulatory themes, while reminding the audience of important strategic aspects and our responsibility toward the patient.

Developmental and reproductive safety of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) in mice.

AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) is a COVID-19 vaccine that is not yet licensed for use during pregnancy. To support the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding people in AZD1222 clinical studies, a non-clinical developmental and reproductive toxicity study was performed to evaluate its effects on fertility and reproductive processes of female CD-1 mice during the embryofetal development phase, and postnatal outcomes during the littering phase. Immunogenicity assessments were also made in dams, fetuses, and pups. There were no vaccine-related unscheduled deaths throughout the study. Furthermore, there were no vaccine-related effects on female reproduction, fetal or pup survival, fetal external, visceral, or skeletal findings, pup physical development, and no abnormal gross pathology findings in pups or dams. Antibody responses raised in dams were maintained throughout gestation and postnatal periods, and seroconversion in fetuses and pups indicate placental and lactational transfer of immunoglobulins. Together with clinical data from non-pregnant people, these results support the inclusion of pregnant and breastfeeding people in AZD1222 clinical studies.

A strategic approach to nonclinical immunogenicity assessment: a recommendation from the European Bioanalysis Forum.

Immunogenicity assays are required to evaluate anti-drug antibody (ADA) responses that can be generated against biotherapeutic modalities. Regulatory guidelines focus on clinical requirements, yet it has become apparent that industry has applied these clinical recommendations for immunogenicity assessment to nonclinical studies in varying degrees. ADAs are an anticipated outcome of dosing a humanized or fully human biotherapeutic into an animal. However, a nonclinical ADA response is rarely predictive of the immunogenic potential in humans. The addendum to ICH S6 recommends that immunogenicity should be explicitly examined where there is: evidence of altered pharmacodynamic activity; unexpected changes in exposure in the absence of a pharmacodynamic marker or evidence of immuno-mediated reactions. The European Bioanalytical Forum has extensively discussed and reached a consensus on a minimal strategic approach of when and what to include for nonclinical immunogenicity assessments. Additionally, this paper recommends a strategy for ADA assay validation and sample analysis for those cases when it is considered necessary to include an immunogenicity assessment in nonclinical toxicology studies.

Update to the European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on biomarkers assays; bringing context of use into practice.

In 2012, the European Bioanalysis Forum published a recommendation on biomarker method development and the bioanalysis of biomarkers in support of drug development. Since then, there has been significant discussion on how to bring the topic of context of use of biomarker assays to the forefront so that the purpose of the assay, the use of the data and the decisions being made with the data are well defined and clearly understood, not just by the bioanalytical scientist, but across all stakeholders. Therefore, it is imperative that discussions between the bioanalytical laboratory and the end users of the data happen early (and regularly) in the drug development process to enable the right assays to be developed and appropriately validated to generate the correct data and allow suitable decisions to be made. This updated refinement to the previous European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation will highlight the items to consider when discussing context of use for biomarker assay development and validation, thus enabling the correct conversations to occur and the move away from the misapplication of PK assay validation criteria to biomarker assays.

European Bioanalysis Forum feedback on draft ICH M10 guideline on bioanalytical method validation during the Step 2b public consultation period.

Once released, the ICH M10 Guideline on bioanalytical method validation will become one of the most important milestones in the history of regulated bioanalysis, closing a chapter on intense discussions among the industry and health authorities started in Crystal City in 2001. In this manuscript, the European Bioanalysis Forum community reports back on their feedback on the ICH M10 draft guideline gathered during the public consultation period. The comments given are intended to contribute to a guideline that combines several decades of experience and current scientific vision. They should provide future generations of bioanalytical scientist a regulatory framework so their bioanalytical work can contribute to safe, effective and high-quality medicines, which can be developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner.

Developing an injectable co-formulation of two antidiabetic drugs: Excipient impact on peptide aggregation and pharmacokinetic properties.

Combination therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is necessary to achieve tight glycaemic control and reduce complication risk. Current treatment plans require patients to take several drugs concomitantly leading to low therapy adherence. This study describes the development and characterisation of a stable parenteral co-formulation of a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (dapagliflozin) and a therapeutic lipidated peptide, using hydroxypropyl-ß-cyclodextrin as an enabling excipient. Using NMR, calorimetry, computational modelling and spectroscopic methods, we show that besides increasing the solubility of dapagliflozin, cyclodextrin prevents self-association of the peptide through interaction with the lipid chain and amino acids prone to aggregation including aromatic groups and ionisable residues. While those interactions cause a dramatic secondary structure change, no impact on potency was seen in vitro. A subcutaneous administration of the co-formulation in rat showed that both drugs reach exposure levels previously shown to be efficacious in clinical mono-therapy studies. Interestingly, a faster absorption rate was observed for the peptide formulated within the cyclodextrin vehicle with respect to the buffer vehicle, which could trigger an earlier onset of action. The cyclodextrin based co-formulation is therefore a promising approach to develop a fixed dose combination of a therapeutic peptide and a small molecule drug for increased patient adherence and better blood glucose control.

European Bioanalysis Forum recommendation on singlicate analysis for ligand binding assays: time for a new mindset.

It is well accepted that chromatographic assay methods employ singlicate analysis for toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic analysis. While conversely, it has been the norm for ligand-binding assays to be run in at least duplicate analyses, stemming mainly from concerns over inherent assay variability and reagent quality. Regulatory guidelines and guidance on bioanalytical method validation has, in the most part, recommended multiple replicates for immunoassays and this has led to the industry being comfortable and familiar with duplicate analysis. Over the last few years, the discussion on whether singlicate analysis is acceptable for ligand-binding assays has grown and the status quo is being challenged for regulated bioanalysis performed using immunoassays. Through interrogation of preclinical and clinical pharmacokinetic assay data from the European Bioanalysis Forum community, the application of a singlicate analysis strategy has shown to have no impact on toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic parameters when compared with duplicate analysis from the same studies. Therefore, now is the time to adopt a new mindset when it comes to sample analysis for toxicokinetic and pharmacokinetic ligand-binding assays and embrace singlicate analysis in the regulated environment.

EBF recommendation on practical management of critical reagents for antidrug antibody ligand-binding assays.

Immunogenicity assays are required to measure antidrug antibodies that are generated against biotherapeutic modalities. As for any ligand-binding assays, critical reagents (CR) play a crucial role in immunogenicity assays, as the robustness and reliability of an assay are defined by the quality and long-term availability of these reagents. The current regulatory guidelines do not provide clear directions on how to implement and verify lot-to-lot changes of CR during an assay life cycle, or the acceptance criteria that should be used when implementing new lots of CR. These aspects were extensively discussed within the European Bioanalysis Forum community. In this paper, CR for immunogenicity assays are identified and the minimum requirements for introducing new lots of CR in immunogenicity assays are described.

EBF recommendation on practical management of critical reagents for PK ligand-binding assays.

Critical reagents play a crucial role in ligand-binding assays; the robustness and reliability of an assay is defined by the quality and long-term availability of these reagents. However, neither regulatory guidelines nor relevant scientific papers provide clear directions for set-up, life cycle management and, more importantly, the acceptance criteria required for the testing of the critical reagents for pharmacokinetic, biomarker and immunogenicity assays. The ambiguity from current guidelines can be a challenge for the bioanalytical community. Members of the European Bioanalysis Forum community undertook a more pragmatic approach on how to assess the impact of critical reagents. In this paper, a review and corresponding gap analysis of the current guidelines and relevant papers will be provided as well as decision trees proposed for lot-to-lot changes of critical reagents for pharmacokinetic assays.

Feedback from the European Bioanalysis Forum: focus workshop on current analysis of immunogenicity: best practices and regulatory hurdles.

European Bioanalysis Forum Workshop, Lisbon, Portugal, September 2016: At the recent European Bioanalysis Forum Focus Workshop, 'current analysis of immunogenicity: best practices and regulatory hurdles', several important challenges facing the bioanalytical community in relation to immunogenicity assays were discussed through a mixture of presentations and panel sessions. The main areas of focus were the evolving regulatory landscape, challenges of assay interferences from either drug or target, cut-point setting and whether alternative assays can be used to replace neutralizing antibody assays. This workshop report captures discussions and potential solutions and/or recommendations made by the speakers and delegates.

Addressing the challenges of biomarker calibration standards in ligand-binding assays: a European Bioanalysis Forum perspective.

The analysis of biomarkers by ligand-binding assays offers significant challenges compared with the bioanalysis of small and large molecule drugs. The presence of endogenous analyte is a commonly cited issue. Also the sourcing and application of appropriate calibration or reference standards can present many issues. One of the main challenges is ensuring the continuity and validity of biomarker data when the source or lot number of calibration standard changes within or between studies. Several strategies exist in attempting to deal with this and standardize the biomarker data through the assay life or looking for ways to compare and normalize biomarker data. In this manuscript, the European Bioanalysis Forum view on dealing with calibration standards in biomarker assays is described.

Engineering the surface properties of a human monoclonal antibody prevents self-association and rapid clearance in vivo.

Uncontrolled self-association is a major challenge in the exploitation of proteins as therapeutics. Here we describe the development of a structural proteomics approach to identify the amino acids responsible for aberrant self-association of monoclonal antibodies and the design of a variant with reduced aggregation and increased serum persistence in vivo. We show that the human monoclonal antibody, MEDI1912, selected against nerve growth factor binds with picomolar affinity, but undergoes reversible self-association and has a poor pharmacokinetic profile in both rat and cynomolgus monkeys. Using hydrogen/deuterium exchange and cross-linking-mass spectrometry we map the residues responsible for self-association of MEDI1912 and show that disruption of the self-interaction interface by three mutations enhances its biophysical properties and serum persistence, whilst maintaining high affinity and potency. Immunohistochemistry suggests that this is achieved via reduction of non-specific tissue binding. The strategy developed represents a powerful and generic approach to improve the properties of therapeutic proteins.