Rewards and advancements for clinical pharmacists.

The American College of Clinical Pharmacy charged the Clinical Practice Affairs Committee to review and update the College's 1995 White Paper, "Rewards and Advancements for Clinical Pharmacy Practitioners." Because of the limited data on the present state of rewards and advancements for clinical pharmacists, an online survey of "front-line" clinical pharmacists and pharmacy managers was conducted (1126 total respondents, 14% response rate). The resulting White Paper discusses motivators and existing systems of rewards and advancements for clinical pharmacists, as well as perceived barriers to implementation of these systems. Clinical pharmacists reported work-life balance, a challenging position, and opportunities for professional advancement as the most important factors for career success. At the time of the survey, financial rewards appeared not to be a major motivator for clinical pharmacists. Managers underestimated the importance that clinical pharmacists place on work-life balance and favorable work schedules. Although almost two thirds of the clinical pharmacists surveyed had not developed a professional development plan, 84% indicated an interest in career planning. Both clinical pharmacists and managers rated the lack of a clear reward and advancement structure as the most important barrier to effective systems of rewards and advancements. Pharmacy managers and administrators are encouraged to develop effective systems of rewards and advancements for clinical pharmacists that positively impact patient care and the institution's mission; these systems will benefit the clinical pharmacist, the health care institution, and the patient.

Impact of an educational program on efficacy and adherence with a twice-daily lamivudine/zidovudine/abacavir regimen in underrepresented HIV-infected patients.

A 24-week open-label clinical trial was conducted in 195 HIV-infected adults commonly underrepresented in research (35% female, 71% African American, 21% Hispanic, and 20% injection drug users [IDUs]) to evaluate the effect of an HIV educational program on efficacy and adherence with a simple, compact, twice-daily triple nucleoside regimen containing a lamivudine (150 mg)/zidovudine (300 mg) combination (COM) tablet plus abacavir (ABC), 300 mg. At baseline, the patients' median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.18 log10 copies/mL and the median CD4+ cell count was 379 cells/mm3. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 4 modules of the Tools for Health and Empowerment HIV education intervention plus routine counseling (EI + RC; n = 96) or to routine counseling alone (RC; n = 99). No differences between the EI + RC and RC treatment arms were observed with respect to the proportion of patients achieving plasma HIV-1 RNA levels <40 copies/mL (60% [33/55] vs. 55% [38/69]; P = 0.529) or <400 copies/mL (80% [44/55] vs. 80% [55/69]; P = 0.689) at week 24 (intent-to-treat observed analysis), increase in median CD4 cell count above baseline at week 24 (78.3 vs. 104.8 cells/mm3; P = 0.498), or mean overall adherence rates as measured by the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) (70% vs. 74%). COM + ABC was generally well tolerated, and no association was observed between interruptions in treatment and the development of ABC hypersensitivity (5 suspected cases). In conclusion, in underrepresented patients, the EI used in this study did not affect the efficacy and adherence results with ABC + COM to any greater degree than did RC.

Lamivudine 300 mg QD versus continued lamivudine 150 mg BID with stavudine and a protease inhibitor in suppressed patients.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy (sustained virologic suppression) and safety/tolerability of a switch to lamivudine 300 mg once daily (QD) versus continued lamivudine 150 mg twice daily (BID) in virologically suppressed patients (HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL for > or =3 months) on stable (> or =6 months) therapy with lamivudine 150 mg BID plus stavudine and either indinavir or nelfinavir. METHOD: Eighty-nine suppressed patients > or =18 years old with CD4 counts >50 cells/mm(3) were enrolled in this phase II, open-label, multicenter, randomized, stratified (by pretrial protease inhibitor [PI]), parallel-group clinical trial. Eighty-one patients received either lamivudine 300 mg QD (n = 39) or 150 mg BID (n = 42) with their pretrial stavudine/PI regimens for 24 weeks. RESULTS: A high rate of virologic suppression was sustained with both regimens throughout the trial. At week 24, intent-to-treat:exposed (missing = failure) analyses showed no statistically significant differences in the percentage of patients with HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL (95% [QD] vs. 90% [BID]) or <50 copies/mL (82% [QD] vs. 81% [BID]) or in the median change from baseline in CD4 counts (+42 cells/mm(3) [QD] vs. +22 cells/mm(3) [BID]). Both regimens were well tolerated. No patient experienced virologic failure, clinical disease progression, or a drug-related serious adverse event during the trial. Self-reported medication adherence was high in both groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who experience virologic suppression with a regimen of lamivudine 150 mg BID in combination with stavudine/PI can maintain that suppression by continuing their regimen or switching to lamivudine 300 mg QD and continuing the other components. Adverse event profiles were comparable among treatment regimens, and no new safety concerns were raised.

Once-daily quadruple-drug therapy with adefovir dipivoxil, Lamivudine, Didanosine, and efavirenz in treatment-naive human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

A 48-week open-label study of 11 antiretroviral-naive, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected adults evaluated once-daily treatment with adefovir dipivoxil, lamivudine, didanosine, and efavirenz. At baseline, the median plasma HIV-1 RNA level was 4.99 log(10) copies/mL, and the median CD4 cell count was 471 cells/mm(3). At 24 and 48 weeks after initiation of treatment, median HIV-1 RNA levels decreased from baseline by 4.77 and 4.99 log(10) copies/mL, respectively, and median CD4 cell counts increased by 135 and 177 cells/mm(3), respectively. The regimen was generally well tolerated. No patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events. However, 7 patients developed adefovir-related nephrotoxicity after >/=20 weeks of treatment; this resolved without sequelae after adefovir was discontinued. Overall adherence was 85%. Once-daily quadruple-drug therapy with adefovir, lamivudine, didanosine, and efavirenz provides pronounced and durable suppression of HIV-1 RNA and elevation of CD4 cell counts over the course of 48 weeks, with generally good tolerability and adherence.