RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to select the minimum effective dose of estetrol (E4) for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Postmenopausal women (nâ=â257, of whom 32 were hysterectomized) aged 40 to 65 years, with ≥7 moderate to severe hot flushes (HFs) per day, or 50 or more moderate to severe HFs weekly, received 2.5, 5, 10, or 15âmg E4, or placebo once-daily for a period of 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by recording the frequency and severity of HFs. Overall safety was assessed by recording adverse events, measuring endometrial thickness, and monitoring bleeding patterns. Treatment groups were compared using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: The frequency of moderate to severe HFs decreased with all E4 doses. The difference in the percentage change of weekly HF frequency was significant for 15âmg E4 versus placebo at both W4 (-66% vs -49%, Pâ=â0.032) and W12 (-82% vs -65%, Pâ=â0.022). The decrease in severity of HFs was significantly more pronounced for 15âmg E4 than for placebo at both W4 (-0.59 vs -0.33, Pâ=â0.049) and W12 (-1.04 vs -0.66, Pâ=â0.049); the other doses failed to achieve statistical significance. In nonhysterectomized women, endometrial thickness increased during treatment and normalized following progestin treatment at study completion. No endometrial hyperplasia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Estetrol 15âmg is considered to be the minimum effective daily oral dose for treatment of vasomotor symptoms. Its current seemingly favorable safety profile is further to be confirmed in phase 3 clinical development. : Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A591.
Video Summary:http://links.lww.com/MENO/A591.
Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Endometrial , Estetrol , Adulto , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Estrógenos , Femenino , Sofocos/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Posmenopausia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a new levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) called Levosert(®) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) in comparison to the reference product Mirena(®). METHODS: A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial, in non-menopausal women diagnosed with functional HMB (defined as menstrual blood loss [MBL] ≥ 80 mL) randomised to either Levosert(®) or Mirena(®) and followed for up to one year. MBL was evaluated using a validated modified version of the Wyatt pictogram. RESULTS: A total of 280 women were randomised (141 to Levosert(®) and 139 to Mirena(®)). During the one-year treatment period, both Levosert(®) and Mirena(®) dramatically decreased MBL and increased haemoglobin and ferritin levels. There were no statistically significant differences between Levosert(®) and Mirena(®) regarding any of the parameters evaluated during the study. Similar bleeding patterns were observed in both groups. Levosert(®) was inserted with the same ease as Mirena(®). Both treatments were associated with identical expulsion rates and no perforations occurred in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: Levosert(®), a new LNG-IUS designed to release the same daily amount of LNG as Mirena(®), is highly effective in the treatment of HMB. No differences were observed between Levosert(®) and Mirena(®) regarding all evaluated outcomes, including safety profile.