RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Meningiomas account for approximately one third of all brain tumors in the United States. In high-volume medical centers, the average length of stay (LOS) for a patient is 6.8 days compared with 8.8 days in low-volume centers with median total admission charges equaling approximately $55,000. To our knowledge, few studies have evaluated day of surgery and its effect on hospital LOS. Our primary goal was to analyze patient outcome as a direct result of surgical date, as well as to characterize the individual variables that may impact their hospital course, early access to rehabilitation, and long-term functional status. METHODS: A retrospective database was generated for cranial meningioma patients who underwent elective surgical resection at our institution over a 3-year study period (2011-2014). Inclusion criteria included any patient who underwent elective meningioma resection and was discharged either home or to a rehabilitation facility with at least 6 months of follow-up. Exclusion criteria included any patient who was not discharged after resection (i.e., expired). Each patient's medical record was evaluated for a subset of demographics and clinical variables. Given that patients who undergo surgical resection of meningiomas have a national median LOS of 6 days, we subdivided the patients into 2 cohorts: early discharge (LOS < 3) and late discharge (LOS ≥ 3). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0 to assess the significance of the results. RESULTS: We identified 139 (25 male, 114 female) meningioma patients who underwent surgical resection. Seventy of these patients had surgery during the early week (defined as Monday-Wednesday), and 69 had surgery in the later week (Thursday-Friday). The median age for both early and late groups was 58, and the median diameter of the tumor was 3.1 cm and 3.3 cm, respectively. Overall, 55% of the patients had public insurance and 43% had private insurance, with no significant variation between the early and late groups. The median LOS for the early and late populations was 3 and 4 days, respectively. Physical therapy recommendations for rehabilitation facility were made in 26% of early-week patients and in 42% of late-week patients. Additionally, we found a statistically significant decreased LOS (<3 days) in those patients who underwent surgery during the early week (Monday-Wednesday), as opposed to those who received surgery in the later week (Thursday, Friday) (P = 0.045, Mann-Whitney test). CONCLUSION: Day of surgery may play a significant role in LOS for meningioma patients. Clinicians should remain aware of those factors that may delay optimal patient discharge and early access to rehabilitation facilities. Further studies will need to be performed to assess the social variables that may affect LOS, as well as the financial implications for such extended hospital courses.
Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/rehabilitación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Meníngeas/terapia , Meningioma/terapia , Rehabilitación Neurológica/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Meníngeas/epidemiología , Meningioma/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/rehabilitación , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Revisión de Utilización de Recursos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although technical skills are fundamental in neurosurgery, there is little agreement on how to describe, measure, or compare skills among surgeons. The primary goal of this study was to develop a quantitative grading scale for technical surgical performance that distinguishes operator skill when graded by domain experts (residents, attendings, and nonsurgeons). Scores provided by raters should be highly reliable with respect to scores from other observers. METHODS: Neurosurgery residents were fitted with a head-mounted video camera while performing craniotomies under attending supervision. Seven videos, 1 from each postgraduate year (PGY) level (1-7), were anonymized and scored by 16 attendings, 8 residents, and 7 nonsurgeons using a grading scale. Seven skills were graded: incision, efficiency of instrument use, cauterization, tissue handling, drilling/craniotomy, confidence, and training level. RESULTS: A strong correlation was found between skills score and PGY year (P < 0.001, analysis of variance). Junior residents (PGY 1-3) had significantly lower scores than did senior residents (PGY 4-7, P < 0.001, t test). Significant variation among junior residents was observed, and senior residents' scores were not significantly different from one another. Interrater reliability, measured against other observers, was high (r = 0.581 ± 0.245, Spearman), as was assessment of resident training level (r = 0.583 ± 0.278, Spearman). Both variables were strongly correlated (r = 0.90, Pearson). Attendings, residents, and nonsurgeons did not score differently (P = 0.46, analysis of variance). CONCLUSIONS: Technical skills of neurosurgery residents recorded during craniotomy can be measured with high interrater reliability. Surgeons and nonsurgeons alike readily distinguish different skill levels. This type of assessment could be used to coach residents, to track performance over time, and potentially to compare skill levels. Developing an objective tool to evaluate surgical performance would be useful in several areas of neurosurgery education.