RESUMEN
Abstract Introduction: The coronavirus-19 pandemic threatens the lives of all people, but results in higher mortality rates for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) including those on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Telemedicine was the main alternative to reduce exposure to the virus, but it was introduced in the Brazil without proper training. Objective: To investigate the impact of telemedicine on metabolic control, peritonitis rates, and hospitalization in PD patients during the pandemic. Methods: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study. We included all adult patients on chronic PD from 9 clinics selected by convenience during the pandemic. The outcomes of interest were measured and compared between before and after switching to telemedicine using repeated measure analysis and multilevel Poisson regression. Results: The study included 747 patients with a mean age of 59.7±16.6 years, of whom 53.7% were male and 40.8% had diabetes. Biochemical parameters including hemoglobin, potassium, phosphate, calcium, and urea serum levels did not change significantly after transition to telemedicine. There was no association between telemedicine and peritonitis rates. In contrast, hospitalization rates increased significantly in the telemedicine period. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for hospitalization in the telemedicine period was 1.54 (95%CI 1.10-2.17; p 0.012) and 1.57 (95%CI 1.12-2.21; p 0.009) in the mixed-effects Poisson regression before and after adjustment for the presence of confounders. Admissions for hypervolemia and infections not related to PD doubled after transition to telemedicine. Conclusion: The implementation of telemedicine without proper training may lead to an increase in adverse events in PD patients.
Resumo Introdução: A pandemia do coronavírus-19 ameaça a vida de todas as pessoas, mas resulta em uma alta taxa de mortalidade em pacientes com doença renal em estágio terminal (DRET), incluindo aqueles em diálise peritoneal (DP). A telemedicina foi a principal alternativa para reduzir a exposição ao vírus, mas foi introduzida no Brasil sem treinamento adequado. Objetivo: Investigar o impacto da telemedicina no controle metabólico, taxas de peritonite e hospitalização em pacientes em DP na pandemia. Métodos: Estudo de coorte multicêntrico retrospectivo. Incluímos todos os pacientes adultos em DP crônica de 9 clínicas selecionadas por conveniência durante a pandemia. Desfechos de interesse foram medidos e comparados entre antes e depois da mudança para telemedicina usando análise de medidas repetidas e regressão multinível de Poisson. Resultados: Incluiu-se 747 pacientes com idade média de 59,7±16,6 anos, sendo 53,7% homens e 40,8% diabéticos. Parâmetros bioquímicos, incluindo níveis séricos de hemoglobina, potássio, fosfato, cálcio e ureia não mudaram significativamente após transição para telemedicina. Não houve associação entre telemedicina e taxas de peritonite. Em contraste, taxas de hospitalização aumentaram significativamente no período de telemedicina. A razão de taxas de incidência (RTI) para internação no período de telemedicina foi 1,54 (IC95% 1,10-2,17; p 0,012) e 1,57 (IC95% 1,12-2,21; p 0,009) na regressão multinível de Poisson antes e após ajuste para presença de fatores de confusão. As internações por hipervolemia e infecções não relacionadas à DP dobraram após transição para telemedicina. Conclusão: A implementação da telemedicina sem treinamento adequado pode levar ao aumento de eventos adversos em pacientes em DP.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Catheter implantation techniques for peritoneal dialysis (PD) have advanced significantly in recent years. We aimed to analyze the survival and associated complications of catheters inserted using a new technique that is guided by ultrasound and fluoroscopy and requires minimal tissue dissection. The procedure was performed by nephrologists in the outpatient basis, we compared these results of the minimally invasive insertion with traditional implantation using trocars. METHODS: A total of 152 PD catheters were placed in 152 patients with stage 5 chronic kidney disease; 62.5% of the patients were men, with a mean age of 56.6 ± 18.5 years. The following two methods were used: minimally invasive insertion (MI group, n = 73) and trocar insertion (T group, n = 79). Patients in both the groups were followed prospectively for 26 months from the date of the first implantation. RESULTS: Gender, age, and prevalence of diabetes mellitus were not significantly different between the groups, while the body mass index, presence of obesity, and abdominal scars from previous surgeries were higher in the MI group (p = 0.021). The incidence of catheter dysfunction was lower in the MI group compared to group T (6.8% vs 20.3%; p = 0.019). Exit site infection was also lower with the new technique (4.1% vs. 18.9%; p = 0.005). Further, the cumulative incidence of peritonitis also reduced with MI (p = 0.034). Finally, the overall catheter survival at 1 year was 89%, which has been shown as higher in group MI (95% vs 82% in group T; p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: The MI technique for catheter insertion showed low complication rates and excellent catheter survival as compared to traditional implantation methods; thus, it may be an alternative method for PD catheter placement.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus-19 pandemic threatens the lives of all people, but results in higher mortality rates for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) including those on peritoneal dialysis (PD). Telemedicine was the main alternative to reduce exposure to the virus, but it was introduced in the Brazil without proper training. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of telemedicine on metabolic control, peritonitis rates, and hospitalization in PD patients during the pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicenter cohort study. We included all adult patients on chronic PD from 9 clinics selected by convenience during the pandemic. The outcomes of interest were measured and compared between before and after switching to telemedicine using repeated measure analysis and multilevel Poisson regression. RESULTS: The study included 747 patients with a mean age of 59.7±16.6 years, of whom 53.7% were male and 40.8% had diabetes. Biochemical parameters including hemoglobin, potassium, phosphate, calcium, and urea serum levels did not change significantly after transition to telemedicine. There was no association between telemedicine and peritonitis rates. In contrast, hospitalization rates increased significantly in the telemedicine period. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for hospitalization in the telemedicine period was 1.54 (95%CI 1.10-2.17; p 0.012) and 1.57 (95%CI 1.12-2.21; p 0.009) in the mixed-effects Poisson regression before and after adjustment for the presence of confounders. Admissions for hypervolemia and infections not related to PD doubled after transition to telemedicine. CONCLUSION: The implementation of telemedicine without proper training may lead to an increase in adverse events in PD patients.