Differential Markers of Subpopulations of Epithelial Cells of the Larynx in Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

In squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, the population of epithelial cells in the tumor tissue is initially heterogeneous and, in addition to tumor cells invading the organ mucosa, includes normal epithelial cells of protein-mucous glands and cells of the stratified epithelium covering the mucous membrane. A search for differential markers to separate these subpopulations was carried out. The surface marker CD44 and cytokeratins 5 and 17 that are often used to verify carcinoma cells, are common markers for all epithelial cells of the larynx. In highly differentiated carcinoma, subpopulations of normal and tumor epithelial cells can be separated by the level of expression of cytokeratins 10 and 18 and nuclear markers Ki-67 and p63. However, in moderately differentiated carcinoma, tumor cells and normal cells of the basal layer of the stratified epithelium covering the mucous membrane of the larynx have similar phenotypes, which should be taken into account when conducting experimental studies.

Super-response to guselkumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: age, body weight, baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and baseline Investigator's Global Assessment scores predict complete skin clearance.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease that often leads to a diminished quality of life. Goals of treating patients with psoriasis have shifted with more focus on achieving near or complete clearance of the skin. Guselkumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-23, is effective in treating moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis achieving super-response (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] 100 response at Weeks 20 and 28) after commencing guselkumab treatment. METHODS: Pooled data from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies identified super-response; baseline demographic, disease and pharmacokinetic characteristics were compared with non-super-response. A stepwise logistic regression analysis identified which factors were potentially predictive of super-response status, with significance level of 0.1. RESULTS: A subset of patients randomized to guselkumab comprised this post hoc analysis (n = 664); 271 patients achieved super-response vs. 393 with non-super-response. Patient age at study entry and baseline body weight (≤90 kg vs. >90 kg), PASI, and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score were significant predictors of super-response status, with odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) of 0.98 (0.967-0.993; P = 0.003), 1.42 (1.026-1.977; P = 0.034), 0.97 (0.955-0.993; P = 0.007) and 0.66 (0.433-0.997; P = 0.048), respectively. More patients with super-response achieved an early response: Week 2 PASI 75 (5.5% vs. 1.8%) and Week 8 PASI 100 (22.5% vs. 3.3%) vs. non-super-response. Median serum guselkumab concentrations through Week 28 were slightly greater in patients with super-response vs. non-super-response. CONCLUSION: Guselkumab was more likely to achieve early clinical responses (complete skin clearance) in younger patients, less obese patients and patients with less severe psoriasis.

Calculation of the Biological Efficiency of the Proton Component from 14.8 MeV Neutron Irradiation in Computational Biology with Help of Video Cards.

Fast neutron therapy, which previously has demonstrated effective results, but along with a large number of complications, can again be considered a promising treatment method in the treatment of cancer. One of the ways of analyzing the relative biological efficiency and accurate biological dose of fast neutrons in body tissues is to improve the algorithms of computational biology and mathematical modeling. A high-performance computing code was written which allows to estimate in real-time mode the biological dose of the proton component from the action of neutron radiation with an energy of 14.8 MeV. A comparative analysis of the computing performance on various video cards was also performed.

Disease activity and treatment efficacy using patient-level Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores from tildrakizumab phase 3 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether primary efficacy outcomes in plaque psoriasis clinical trials represent residual disease during treatment. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate supplementing dichotomous efficacy with residual disease activity. METHODS: This post hoc analysis used pooled, patient-level data after tildrakizumab 100 mg (N = 616) or placebo (N = 309) treatment from reSURFACE 1/2 (NCT01722331/NCT01729754) phase 3 clinical trials of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. RESULTS: Median baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was 17.9 for patients receiving tildrakizumab 100 mg. At Week 12, median PASI was 2.9, whereas dichotomous PASI 90 response rate was 36.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 64.0%, 50.8%, and 23.3%, respectively. At Week 28, median PASI was 1.7, whereas PASI 90 response rate was 51.9%, and absolute PASI <5.0, <3.0, and <1.0 were 75.3%, 62.8%, and 38.0%, respectively. Dermatology Life Quality Index and PASI scores were correlated through Week 28 (r = 0.51, p ≤ .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Disease activity was more reliably estimated by PASI scores than percentage PASI improvement; this may partially explain efficacy disparities between clinical trials and practice. These results suggest supplementing dichotomous PASI improvement with PASI scores and consideration of patient treatment goals could facilitate clinical decisions.

Long-term safety of risankizumab from 17 clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Risankizumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in randomized clinical trials. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate safety data from risankizumab psoriasis phase I-III clinical trials. METHODS: Short-term safety (through week 16) was analysed using integrated data from five phase II and III clinical trials. Long-term safety was evaluated using integrated data from 17 phase I-III completed and ongoing trials. RESULTS: Short-term safety analyses included 1306 patients receiving risankizumab 150 mg and 300 patients receiving placebo [402·2 and 92·0 patient-years (PY) of exposure, respectively]. Long-term analyses included 3072 risankizumab-treated patients (exposure: 7927 PY). The median (excluding four outliers) treatment duration was 2·9 years (range 2 days to 5·9 years). Exposure-adjusted adverse event rates did not increase with long-term treatment (318 vs. 171 events per 100 PY for short- and long-term analyses). With long-term risankizumab treatment, rates of serious adverse events were 7·8 per 100 PY, serious infections 1·2 per 100 PY, nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) 0·7 per 100 PY, malignant tumours excluding NMSC 0·5 per 100 PY, and adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular events 0·3 per 100 PY, with no important identified risks. Limitations include that the study inclusion and exclusion criteria varied and that three studies enrolled ≤ 50 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab demonstrated a favourable safety profile over short- and long-term treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Proton Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment: State of the Problem and Development Prospects (Review).

Proton therapy (PT) due to dosimetric characteristics (Bragg peak formation, sharp dose slowdown) is currently one of the most high-tech techniques of radiation therapy exceeding the standards of photon methods. In recent decades, PT has traditionally been used, primarily, for head and neck cancers (HNC) including skull base tumors. Regardless of the fact that recently PT application area has significantly expanded, HNC still remain a leading indication for proton radiation since PT's physic-dosimetric and radiobiological advantages enable to achieve the best treatment results in these tumors. The present review is devoted to PT usage in HNC treatment in the world and Russian medicine, the prospects for further technique development, the assessment of PT's radiobiological features, a physical and dosimetric comparison of protons photons distribution. The paper shows PT's capabilities in the treatment of skull base tumors, HNC (nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, nasopharynx, oropharynx, and laryngopharynx, etc.), eye tumors, sialomas. The authors analyze the studies on repeated radiation and provide recent experimental data on favorable profile of proton radiation compared to the conventional radiation therapy. The review enables to conclude that currently PT is a dynamic radiation technique opening up new opportunities for improving therapy of oncology patients, especially those with HNC.

Five-year maintenance of clinical response and health-related quality of life improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab: results from VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic disease requiring long-term therapy. OBJECTIVES: Physician- and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated through week 252 in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2. METHODS: In total, 1829 patients were randomized at baseline to receive guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks, placebo or adalimumab. Patients receiving placebo crossed over to guselkumab at week 16. Patients receiving adalimumab crossed over to guselkumab at week 52 in VOYAGE 1, and randomized withdrawal and retreatment occurred at weeks 28-76 in VOYAGE 2; all patients then received open-label guselkumab through week 252. Efficacy and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) endpoints were analysed through week 252. Safety was monitored through week 264. RESULTS: The proportions of patients in the guselkumab group who achieved clinical responses at week 252 in VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2, respectively, were 84·1% and 82·0% [≥ 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)]; 82·4% and 85·0% [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0 or 1]; 52·7% and 53·0% (100% improvement in PASI) and 54·7% and 55·5% (IGA 0). HRQoL endpoints were achieved as follows: 72·7% and 71·1% of patients (Dermatology Life Quality Index 0 or 1: no effect on patient's life); 42·4% and 42·0% [Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary (PSSD) symptom score = 0] and 33·0% and 31·0% (PSSD sign score = 0). As measured in VOYAGE 2 only, approximately 45% of patients achieved ≥ 5-point reduction in Short Form-36 physical and mental component scores, and 80% reported no anxiety or depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores < 8). Similar findings were reported for adalimumab crossovers. These effects were maintained from week 52 in VOYAGE 1 and week 100 in VOYAGE 2. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Guselkumab maintains high levels of clinical response and improvement in patient-reported outcomes through 5 years in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Long-term efficacy of certolizumab pegol for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: 3-year results from two randomized phase III trials (CIMPASI-1 and CIMPASI-2).

BACKGROUND: Certolizumab pegol (CZP) is an Fc-free, PEGylated anti-tumour necrosis factor biologic. OBJECTIVES: To report the 3-year efficacy of CZP in plaque psoriasis, pooled from the CIMPASI-1 (NCT02326298) and CIMPASI-2 (NCT02326272) phase III trials. METHODS: Adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis for ≥ 6 months were randomized 2 : 2 : 1 to CZP 200 mg, CZP 400 mg or placebo, every 2 weeks (Q2W) for up to 48 weeks. Patients entering the open-label period (weeks 48-144) from double-blinded CZP initially received CZP 200 mg Q2W. Patients not achieving ≥ 50% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 16 entered an open-label CZP 400 mg Q2W escape arm (weeks 16-144). Dose adjustments based on PASI response were permitted during open-label treatment. Outcomes included PASI 75, PASI 90 and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 0/1 responder rates, based on a logistic regression model (missing data imputed using Markov Chain Monte Carlo methodology). RESULTS: In total, 186 patients were randomized to CZP 200 mg Q2W and 175 to CZP 400 mg Q2W. At week 48, PASI 75/90 was achieved by 72·7%/51·3% of patients randomized to CZP 200 mg and 84·4%/62·7% randomized to CZP 400 mg. Patients entering the open-label period at week 48, from blinded treatment, received CZP 200 mg Q2W. At week 144, PASI 75/90 was achieved by 70·6%/48·7% patients randomized to CZP 200 mg and 72·9%/42·7% randomized to CZP 400 mg. At week 16, 72 placebo-randomized patients entered the CZP 400 mg Q2W escape arm; 75.7%/58.5% achieved PASI 75/90 at week 144. CONCLUSIONS: Both CZP 200 mg and 400 mg Q2W demonstrated sustained, durable efficacy, with numerically higher responses for some outcomes with 400 mg Q2W.

A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 12-week efficacy, safety and speed of response from a randomized, double-blinded trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with psoriasis value rapid and complete skin clearance. No head-to-head studies have focused on early responses to interleukin (IL)-17 vs. IL-23 inhibitors. OBJECTIVES: To compare early and complete skin clearance by the IL-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab. METHODS: IXORA-R, a 24-week, randomized, double-blinded study, enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [static Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (sPGA) score of ≥ 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, and ≥ 10% body surface area]. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive the approved dose of subcutaneous ixekizumab or guselkumab. Primary end point was 100% improvement in PASI (PASI 100) at week 12. Major secondary end points included other levels of improved PASI and sPGA at different time points. Comparisons were made using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with a multiple testing strategy. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. After the completion of the study, the final secondary end point (PASI 100 at 24 weeks) and safety data through week 24 will be reported. RESULTS: In total, 1027 patients were randomized. The primary end point PASI 100 at week 12 was met [215/520 ixekizumab (41%); 126/507 guselkumab (25%); P < 0·001]. All major secondary end points measured up to week 12 were met, including PASI 50 at week 1 and PASI 75 at week 2. Serious adverse event frequency was 3% for each group; no new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab was superior to guselkumab for rapidly improving signs and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by week 12. Adverse events were similar to previous ixekizumab and guselkumab studies. Compared with the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab, ixekizumab can offer complete skin clearance more rapidly to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, has demonstrated greater and faster skin clearance than etanercept and ustekinumab, with consistent long-term efficacy, safety and durability of response. Clinical trial data and systematic reviews have suggested that IL-17 inhibitors can improve a patient's psoriasis more rapidly than IL-23 inhibitors. What does this study add? The head-to-head study design directly compares the efficacy and speed of response of ixekizumab and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The primary end point was met, showing superiority of ixekizumab over guselkumab for achieving complete skin clearance at week 12. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies. Ixekizumab can deliver patients complete skin clearance and improved quality of life more rapidly than guselkumab.

Ixekizumab sustains high level of efficacy and favourable safety profile over 4 years in patients with moderate psoriasis: results from UNCOVER-3 study.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis, a chronic disease usually requires long-term disease management. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of recommended ixekizumab (IXE) dose over 4 years (204 weeks) from UNCOVER-3 study. METHODS: UNCOVER-3 was a randomised, double-blind, multicenter, phase 3 study wherein patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis received placebo, IXE 80 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W), IXE 80 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) (both IXE groups had 160 mg starting dose) or etanercept 50 mg twice weekly. At week 12, all patients switched to IXE Q4W dose for the long-term extension (264 weeks). After week 60 and at investigator's discretion, patients could receive dose adjustment to IXE Q2W. The efficacy endpoints at week 204 were percentage of patients achieving PASI 75/90/100, sPGA score of 1 or 0, and those achieving PSSI = 0, NAPSI = 0 and PPASI 100. Efficacy data were summarised through 204 weeks using as-observed, multiple imputation (MI) and modified non-responder imputation (mNRI) methods. RESULTS: The proportion of patients achieving PASI 75/90/100 at week 204 using mNRI method were 82.8%, 66.4% and 48.3%, respectively. Using as-observed and MI methods, 98.2% and 94.8% patients achieved PASI 75, 87.8% and 73.3% achieved PASI 90, and 67.1% and 52.7% achieved PASI 100 response, respectively, at week 204. The response rates for sPGA (0, 1) were 88.7%, 76.2% and 68.5% and for sPGA (0) were 68.9%, 54.6% and 49.7% using as-observed, MI and mNRI methods, respectively. Similar trends were observed with NAPSI = 0, PSSI = 0, PPASI 100 and itch NRS = 0. There were no new safety concerns through year 4. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated sustained high-efficacy response through 4 years of continuous treatment with ixekizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The safety profile remained consistent with prior findings, with no new or unexpected safety concerns.

Anxiety and depression in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and comparison of change from baseline after treatment with guselkumab vs. adalimumab: results from the Phase 3 VOYAGE 2 study.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are clinically significant comorbidities associated with psoriasis. Improvements in psoriasis are known to decrease anxiety and depression. Guselkumab, an anti-interleukin-23 monoclonal antibody, has demonstrated efficacy and safety for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: Assess improvements in anxiety and depression with guselkumab vs. placebo and adalimumab using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). METHODS: In VOYAGE 2, a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and adalimumab-controlled study, patients received placebo (through week 16 followed by crossover to guselkumab), guselkumab, or adalimumab through week 24. HADS consists of two subscales measuring anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), with scores ranging from 0 to 21 and higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Scores ≥8 indicate instrument-defined anxiety or depression. Severity of psoriasis was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). RESULTS: Among 989 patients randomized (with baseline HADS measurements), mean HADS-A and HADS-D scores were 6.8 ± 4.2 and 5.3 ± 4.2, respectively; 38.6% of patients reported HADS-A ≥8 and 27.7% HADS-D ≥8 at baseline. At week 16, a significantly greater proportion of guselkumab patients with baseline HADS-A or HADS-D ≥8 reported HADS-A <8 (51.4% vs. 25.9%; P < 0.001) or HADS-D <8 (59.2% vs. 27.0%; P < 0.001) vs. placebo patients. At week 24, a greater proportion of guselkumab patients with baseline HADS-A or HADS-D ≥8 reported HADS-A <8 (58.4% vs. 42.9%; P = 0.028) or HADS-D <8 (59.8% vs. 46.4%; P = 0.079) vs. adalimumab patients. PASI improvements correlated with improvement in anxiety (r = 0.27; P < 0.0001) and depression (r = 0.25; P < 0.0001) scores in patients with baseline HADS-A or HADS-D ≥8. Greater improvements in HADS were also observed at week 16 in guselkumab-treated patients vs. placebo using a more stringent cut-off of HADS ≥11. CONCLUSION: Guselkumab treatment was associated with greater improvements in symptoms of anxiety and depression scores in patients with psoriasis compared with placebo and adalimumab.

Impact of previous biologic use on the efficacy and safety of brodalumab and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: integrated analysis of the randomized controlled trials AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3.

BACKGROUND: Biologics are being used increasingly to treat moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Efficacy may differ in patients with previous exposure to biologics. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the impact of previous biologic exposure on the efficacy and safety of brodalumab and ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Two placebo- and ustekinumab-controlled phase III clinical trials. There was an initial 12-week induction phase where patients were treated with brodalumab [210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W)], ustekinumab or placebo. Efficacy end points included ≥ 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and static Physician's Global Assessment (score of 0 or 1) vs. placebo, PASI 100 vs. ustekinumab, Dermatology Life Quality Index and Psoriasis Symptom Inventory. Adverse events were monitored throughout. RESULTS: In total, 493 patients [334 (27%) brodalumab 210 mg Q2W and 159 (26%) ustekinumab] had received prior biologics; 150 (12%) and 62 (10%), respectively, reported previously failed treatment with a biologic. Brodalumab efficacy in patients with or without previous exposure to biologics was statistically equivalent: 40·9% and 39·5% of biologic-naive and -experienced patients achieved PASI 100 at week 12, compared with 21·1% and 17·0% with ustekinumab (both P < 0·001). In patients where prior biologics had been successful or failed, 41·7% and 32·0% achieved PASI 100, compared with 21·1% and 11·3% with ustekinumab. Tolerability was similar, and did not appear to be influenced by previous treatment with biologics. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of brodalumab 210 mg Q2W was similar regardless of prior biological therapy (P = 0·31, 0·32 and 0·64 for PASI 75, 90 and 100, respectively). Almost twice as many patients achieved PASI 100 or complete clearance with brodalumab at week 12 compared with ustekinumab; the differences were most noticeable where previous biologics had failed. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Long-term optimization of outcomes with flexible adalimumab dosing in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: The recently updated dosing recommendation for adalimumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis states that patients with inadequate response to adalimumab every other week (EOW) after 16 weeks may benefit from an increase in dosing frequency to 40 mg every week (EW). OBJECTIVE: To determine the long-term efficacy of adalimumab in patients with psoriasis with flexibility to escalate and de-escalate between EOW and EW dosing. METHODS: Data from an open-label study in patients with psoriasis who had received adalimumab in phase 2/3 studies and their extensions were included. Patients initially received 40 mg adalimumab EOW for 24 weeks. From weeks 24-252, patients whose Psoriasis Area and Severity Index response was <50% (PASI 50) could have their dose-escalated to 40 mg EW and were re-evaluated at 6 and 12 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter. Patients who had their dose-escalated and achieved a PASI 75 response were de-escalated to EOW and could re-escalate to EW if response fell below PASI 50 again; no further de-escalation was allowed. Changes in PASI scores were reported at the last visit before dose escalation or de-escalation. RESULTS: By week 24, 64.1% of patients in the overall population (n = 1256) achieved ≥PASI 75 response, 40.3% ≥PASI 90 response and 21.7% PASI 100 response. Patients who had a

Efficacy of guselkumab in subpopulations of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a pooled analysis of the phase III VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 studies.

BACKGROUND: Significant advances have been made in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with biological therapies; however, these agents may not work equally in all populations. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of guselkumab in patient subgroups with moderate-to-severe psoriasis from the pooled guselkumab VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 phase III studies. METHODS: Using data from the pooled VOYAGE 1 and VOYAGE 2 psoriasis studies, analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of efficacy [Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 (cleared or minimal psoriasis) and IGA 0 (cleared)] across subpopulations defined by demographics, baseline disease characteristics and previous psoriasis treatment. RESULTS: A total of 1829 patients were randomized. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics and previous psoriasis treatment were comparable across treatment groups in the pooled population. Guselkumab, an anti-interleukin (IL)-23 monoclonal antibody that binds to the p19 subunit of IL-23, provided substantial benefit across almost all subpopulations, with greater proportions of patients achieving IGA 0/1 vs. placebo at week 16, and vs. adalimumab (an antitumour necrosis factor monoclonal antibody) at week 24. Patients treated with guselkumab achieved greater efficacy (IGA 0/1 and IGA 0) compared with adalimumab at week 24 across all weight quartiles, most notably among patients weighing ≥ 100 kg. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrates a high degree of efficacy with guselkumab treatment compared with placebo at week 16 and with adalimumab at week 24 among broad subpopulations of patients with varying baseline demographics, disease characteristics and previous psoriasis treatments.

Continuous dosing versus interrupted therapy with ixekizumab: an integrated analysis of two phase 3 trials in psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Continuous treatment is recommended for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis; however, treatment may need to be interrupted in routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes in patients continuously treated with ixekizumab versus those who interrupted therapy and were subsequently retreated with ixekizumab (IXE). METHODS: This analysis used data pooled from two phase 3 trials, UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2. Patients were randomized to placebo (PBO), IXE every 4 (Q4W) or IXE every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 12 weeks. Patients with a static Physician's Global Assessment (sPGA) 0, 1 at Week 12 were rerandomized to IXEQ4W, IXE every 12 weeks (not presented) or PBO. We examined outcomes in patients who were continuously treated (IXEQ2W/IXEQ4W; IXEQ4W/IXEQ4W) or withdrawn (IXEQ2W/PBO; IXEQ4W/PBO), and in patients who were withdrawn and retreated with IXEQ4W for 24 weeks after disease relapse (sPGA ≥3). RESULTS: A total of 1226 treated patients achieved an sPGA 0, 1 at Week 12 and entered the maintenance phase; of these patients, 402 and 416 were rerandomized to PBO and IXEQ4W, respectively. Among patients interrupting treatment, 157 (82.2%) of IXEQ4W/PBO and 176 (83.4%) of IXEQ2W/PBO had an sPGA ≥3 by Week 60; median time to relapse was approximately 20 weeks irrespective of induction dose. At Week 60, continuously treated patients maintained high levels of PASI and sPGA responses (90.0% PASI 75 IXEQ2W/IXEQ4W; 81.9% sPGA 0, 1 IXEQ2W/IXEQ4W, non-responder imputation). After 24 weeks of retreatment with IXEQ4W (IXEQ2W/PBO/IXEQ4W and IXEQ4W/PBO/IXEQ4W), 87.0% (107 of 123) and 95.1% (97 of 102) (observed), respectively, of patients recaptured PASI 75 and 70.7% (104 of 147) and 82.3% (107 of 130) (observed) recaptured an sPGA 0, 1. Overall, adverse events in continuously treated and retreated patients were comparable. CONCLUSION: High levels of response were sustained with continuous ixekizumab treatment through 60 weeks. Most patients who were withdrawn experienced disease relapse, and most of those patients recaptured response after 24 weeks of retreatment.

Adalimumab retreatment successfully restores clinical response and health-related quality of life in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who undergo therapy interruption.

BACKGROUND: Published evaluations of skin disease signs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) upon therapy withdrawal and retreatment in psoriatic patients are limited to results of drug withdrawal after short-term treatment. Analyses are lacking that evaluate patients' response to retreatment for patients treated successfully long-term. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with long-term clinical responses to adalimumab who then discontinue therapy and are retreated with the same dosing regimen as the initial course. Skin disease signs and patients' HRQoL are evaluated. METHODS: This post hoc analysis of an open-label study (NCT00195676) included patients who had responded favourably to adalimumab during initial treatment (≥75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI 75 response]) and had maintained good clinical response for an extended period (up to 252 weeks); patients had Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) 0 or 1 before treatment interruption. Following drug withdrawal (up to 40 weeks), all patients were retreated with adalimumab 80 mg initial dose, followed by 40 mg every-other-week for 16 weeks. PASI response and HRQoL were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients in this analysis, 24 (18%) relapsed during therapy withdrawal. After 16 weeks of retreatment, 75% who relapsed and 89.9% who did not relapse, had a PASI 75 response; 89.5% achieved European Consensus Programme treatment goals after 16 weeks of retreatment. During drug withdrawal, HRQoL disproportionally worsened compared to skin disease signs; HROoL also considerably worsened for patients who did not relapse. Patients regained HRQoL upon retreatment with adalimumab. No new safety signals were identified in this study. CONCLUSION: Retreatment with adalimumab was successful in improving psoriasis skin signs and HRQoL in this subgroup with initial and extended responses to therapy followed by relapse after treatment withdrawal. Patient's HRQoL should be considered, as it may substantially worsen during therapy interruption.

Impact of brodalumab treatment on psoriasis symptoms and health-related quality of life: use of a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis symptoms have a significant negative impact on health-related quality of life, impairing physical functioning and well-being. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of brodalumab, a human anti-interleukin-17R monoclonal antibody, on psoriasis symptom severity as measured by a novel patient-reported outcome measure, the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory, and dermatology-specific health-related quality of life as measured by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (n = 198) treated with brodalumab or placebo. This analysis assessed Psoriasis Symptom Inventory scores and DLQI scores over time. Analyses were conducted on all patients who were randomized and received one or more injections of the study drug according to intention to treat using last observation carried forward to impute missing data. RESULTS: At week 12, subjects in the brodalumab groups had significant improvements in mean Psoriasis Symptom Inventory total scores [8.5 (70 mg), 15.8 (140 mg), 16.2 (210 mg) and 12.7 (280 mg)] compared with placebo (4.8). Mean improvements in DLQI were clinically meaningful (≥ 5.7) in the brodalumab groups (6.2, 9.1, 9.6 and 7.1, respectively) and significantly greater than placebo (3.1). Improvements in Psoriasis Symptom Inventory were observed as early as week 2 and in DLQI by week 4. All eight Psoriasis Symptom Inventory item scores improved significantly among the brodalumab groups by week 12. CONCLUSIONS: Results were from a single randomized clinical trial and may not generalize to broader patient populations. However, treatment with brodalumab provided significant improvement in psoriasis symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.