Pharmacogenetic differences in response to albuterol between Puerto Ricans and Mexicans with asthma.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, Puerto Ricans and Mexicans have the highest and lowest asthma prevalence, morbidity, and mortality, respectively. Ethnic-specific differences in the response to drug treatment may contribute to differences in disease outcomes. Genetic variants at the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor (beta(2)AR) may modify asthma severity and albuterol responsiveness. We tested the association of beta(2)AR genotypes with asthma severity and bronchodilator response to albuterol in Puerto Ricans and Mexicans with asthma. METHODS: We used both family-based and cross-sectional tests of association with 8 beta(2)AR single nucleotide polymorphisms in 684 Puerto Rican and Mexican families. Regression analyses were used to determine the interaction between genotype, asthma severity, and bronchodilator drug responsiveness. RESULTS: Among Puerto Ricans with asthma, the arginine (Arg) 16 allele was associated with greater bronchodilator response using both family-based and cross-sectional tests (p = 0.00001-0.01). We found a strong interaction of baseline FEV(1) with the Arg16Glycine (Gly) polymorphism in predicting bronchodilator response. Among Puerto Ricans with asthma with baseline FEV(1) < 80% of predicted, but not in those with FEV(1) > 80%, there was a very strong association between the Arg16 genotype and greater bronchodilator responsiveness. No association was observed between Arg16Gly genotypes and drug responsiveness among Mexicans with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: Ethnic-specific pharmacogenetic differences exist between Arg16Gly genotypes, asthma severity, and bronchodilator response in Puerto Ricans and Mexicans with asthma. These findings underscore the need for additional research on racial/ethnic differences in asthma morbidity and drug responsiveness.

Particular HLA-DRB1 shared epitope genotypes are strongly associated with rheumatoid vasculitis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) to rheumatoid vasculitis, using individual patient data (IPD) meta-analytic methods. METHODS: Published studies that enrolled adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were identified by searches of Medline and Embase, and by manual searches of medical journals. All authors were contacted for IPD. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the association of SE presence, dose, and genotype with rheumatoid vasculitis. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies and 1,568 patients (129 with vasculitis) were included in the analysis. RA patients with vasculitis were significantly more likely to have rheumatoid nodules (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.5-3.9], but there was no significant association with male sex, rheumatoid factor positivity, or erosive disease. No significant association was observed between the presence of the SE (i.e., 1 or 2 alleles versus 0 alleles) and rheumatoid vasculitis (summary OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.7-2.7). Analysis by SE genotype, however, demonstrated a striking relationship of vasculitis to 3 genotypes containing a double dose of the SE, specifically HLA-DRB1*0401/*0401 (OR 6.2, 95% CI 1.01-37.9), *0401/*0404 (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.1-16.2), and *0101/*0401 (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.4-11.6). CONCLUSION: The HLA-DRB1 SE genotypes *0401/*0401, *0401/*0404, and *0101/*0401 may be of particular importance to rheumatoid vasculitis. It is hoped that additional investigation of these and other SE genotypes will lead to improved insight into the mechanisms influencing the clinical expression of RA.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses synthesize data from existing primary research, and well-conducted reviews offer clinicians a practical solution to the problem of staying current in their fields of interest. A whole generation of secondary journals, pre-appraised evidence libraries and periodically updated electronic texts are now available to clinicians. However, not all systematic reviews are of high quality, and it is important to be able to critically assess their validity and applicability. This article is an illustrated guide for conducting systematic reviews. A clear understanding of the process will provide clinicians with the tools to judiciously appraise reviews and interpret them. We hope that it will enable clinicians to conduct systematic reviews, generate high-quality evidence, and contribute to the evidence-based medicine movement.

Lack of association of the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope with rheumatoid nodules: an individual patient data meta-analysis of 3,272 Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was to examine the relationship of rheumatoid nodules to the HLA-DRB1 shared epitope (SE) and to individual SE genotypes. METHODS: English-language studies that enrolled adult non-Hispanic Caucasian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were identified by searches of Medline and Embase, and by manual searches of medical journals. All authors were contacted for IPD. Meta-analysis was performed to assess the association of SE presence, dose, and genotype with rheumatoid nodules. Meta-analyses adjusted for disease duration and cumulative meta-analyses were also performed to assess the influence of RA duration and year of study publication on the results. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies and 3,272 patients were available for analysis. IPD were obtained for 22 of the studies. There was a nonsignificant association between the presence of the SE (i.e., 1 or 2 alleles versus 0 alleles) and rheumatoid nodules (summary odds ratio [OR] 1.3, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.97-1.6). Analysis by SE genotype, however, demonstrated a weak relationship with inheritance of a single DRB1*0401 SE allele (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.8). No other genotypes achieved statistical significance in the adjusted or unadjusted analyses. CONCLUSION: The presence of the HLA-DRB1 SE does not appear to significantly increase the risk of rheumatoid nodules among Caucasian patients with RA. Analysis by DRB1 SE genotype was uninformative, suggesting only a potential (and at most modest) role of the DRB1*0401 SE allele. Results from this IPD meta-analysis implicate other genetic, stochastic, and/or environmental factors in the susceptibility to rheumatoid nodules.

Responsiveness and discriminative capacity of the assessments in ankylosing spondylitis disease-controlling antirheumatic therapy core set and other outcome measures in a trial of etanercept in ankylosing spondylitis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the responsiveness and discriminative capacity, and the relationship between both, of instruments selected for the disease-controlling antirheumatic therapy (DC-ART) core set by the Assessments in Ankylosing Spondylitis Working Group (ASAS). METHODS: Responsiveness and discriminative capacity of different measures reflecting disease activity and function, either included in the ASAS DC-ART core set or not, were evaluated in a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing etanercept with placebo in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Guyatt's method was used as the primary analysis for responsiveness, and Student's t-test for discriminative capacity. RESULTS: At day 28 of therapy, almost all measures indicated moderate to large responsiveness in the etanercept group (Guyatt 0.60-3.11). Some scales of the Short Form 36 (general health, mental component summary, and role emotional), the modified Schober's test, and the Fatigue Severity Scale were not responsive. The results were similar if analyzed at day 112 of therapy. Peripheral joint counts, joint scores, and occiput-to-wall distance could not be evaluated due to a floor effect. In general, the relation between responsiveness and discriminative capacity was strong: Measures that demonstrated high responsiveness also showed high between-group t values. CONCLUSION: Measures included in the ASAS DC-ART core set, except modified Schober's test, have good responsiveness and good discriminatory capacity. Some measures could not be evaluated due to a floor effect.

Impact of shared epitope genotype and ethnicity on erosive disease: a meta-analysis of 3,240 rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: The strongest known genetic association in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is with HLA-DRB1 alleles that share a similar amino acid sequence, termed the shared epitope (SE). Although many studies have examined the association of the SE with disease severity, the results have been inconsistent, which may reflect the relatively small sample sizes or ethnic differences. The aim of this study was to assess the association of HLA-DRB1 SE alleles and genotype with the development of bony erosions in RA by meta-analysis. METHODS: We identified English-language articles published between January 1, 1987 and June 1, 1999 through Medline, EMBase, and manual searches of 6 relevant journals. Included were studies in which molecular typing of HLA-DRB1 alleles was performed and in which the presence or absence of bony erosions was reported. Data were extracted from the studies, and erosions were coded as present or absent. Authors were contacted for missing information and data on individual patients. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies and 3,240 patients were available for analysis. The summary odds ratios (ORs), when all patients were evaluated as a single group, demonstrated a significant association of the presence of the SE (2 or 1 versus 0 SE alleles) with erosions (OR 2.0; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.8-2.2), although significant heterogeneity was present (P = 0.002). Subgroup analyses demonstrated the important influence of ethnic background. For example, no association of the SE with erosions was demonstrated in Greeks (OR 0.8 [95% CI 0.2-1.5]). In contrast, there was a striking dose-dependent relationship in southern European Caucasians and Asians, with ORs as high as 6.2 and 5.4, respectively, in patients with 2 SE alleles. Although our ability to assess the relationship between SE genotype and erosions was limited, particular importance of the DRB1*0401 SE allele was suggested in an analysis restricted to northern European Caucasians. CONCLUSION: The SE is associated with the development of erosive disease in many ethnic groups; however, striking exceptions exist. These variations may be due to allele differences between populations, such as the frequency of DRB1*0401 among different ethnic groups. Further study to better understand the genetic and environmental differences between these populations may provide insight into mechanisms that influence the clinical expression of RA.

Treatment of ankylosing spondylitis by inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha.

BACKGROUND: There are few effective treatments for ankylosing spondylitis, which causes substantial morbidity. Because of the central role of tumor necrosis factor alpha in the spondyloarthritides, we performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept, a recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor (p75):Fc fusion protein, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. METHODS: Forty patients with active, inflammatory ankylosing spondylitis were randomly assigned to receive twice-weekly subcutaneous injections of etanercept (25 mg) or placebo for four months. The primary end point was a composite of improvements in measures of morning stiffness, spinal pain, functioning, the patient's global assessment of disease activity, and joint swelling. Patients were allowed to continue taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, oral corticosteriods (< or =10 mg per day), and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs at stable doses during the trial. RESULTS: Treatment with etanercept resulted in significant and sustained improvement. At four months, 80 percent of the patients in the etanercept group had a treatment response, as compared with 30 percent of those in the placebo group (P=0.004). Improvements over base-line values for various measures of disease activity, including morning stiffness, spinal pain, functioning, quality of life, enthesitis, chest expansion, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and C-reactive protein, were significantly greater in the etanercept group. Longitudinal analysis showed that the treatment response was rapid and did not diminish over time. Etanercept was well tolerated, with no significant differences in rates of adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with etanercept for four months resulted in rapid, significant, and sustained improvement in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

The shared epitope and severity of rheumatoid arthritis.

After two decades of research involving thousands of RA patients, it is still not possible to precisely define the relation of HLA-DRB1 SE alleles to RA severity. Improvements in our understanding require more careful consideration of several factors such as ethnicity, gender, and the specific SE allele and genotype inherited. Large studies of heterogeneous groups of patients are required and indicate the need for collaborative efforts among researchers. In the interim, meta-analysis of the existing literature may provide some insight, because it allows utilization of the tremendous amount of research already completed. A preliminary meta-analysis highlighted the significant heterogeneity among the existing literature, and a more ambitious meta-analysis that uses individual patient-level data is currently ongoing. Profound implications exist for determination of the precise relationship between the SE and RA severity. This information could be valuable in identifying patients at greater risk of severe complications or as a stratification variable for clinical trials. Moreover, patients genetically predisposed to severe disease may benefit from early initiation of more aggressive therapy. Ultimately, clarification of the role of the SE may be valuable for the development of specific therapies directed toward DRB1 and related targets.