RESUMEN
Quantification of analysis results for the suspect and non-targeted screening is essential for obtaining meaningful insight from the measurements. Ionization efficiency predictions is a possible approach to enable quantitation without standard substances. This is, however, especially challenging for the analysis carried out by combining the full scan mode either with fragmentation experiments in data-dependent or data-independent acquisition mode. Here we investigate the correlation of ionization efficiency values measured in full scan mode with the response factors measured in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode for derivatized amino acids. We observe good correlation (R2 of 0.80) for 6-Aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate (AQC) derivatized amino acids. This encourages the use of the measured ionization efficiency values to estimate amino acid concentrations in different beverages. We apply the measured ionization efficiency values for estimating the concentration of amino acids for measurements done both in full scan as well as in MRM mode in wines and beers. We show that the calculated concentrations are in very good correlation with measured values (R2 of 0.71 to 1.00). The method possesses average trueness of 70.5% and shows an insignificant matrix effect.
Asunto(s)
Aminoácidos/análisis , Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Espectrometría de Masa por Ionización de Electrospray/métodos , Vino/análisis , Aminas/análisis , Aminoácidos/química , Aminoquinolinas/química , Cerveza/análisis , Carbamatos/química , Indicadores y Reactivos , Malonatos/química , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
RATIONALE: The choice of mobile phase components and optimal ion source, mainly electrospray ionization (ESI) or atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI), is a crucial part in liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) method development to achieve higher sensitivity and lower detection limits. In this study we demonstrate how to rigorously solve these questions by using ionization efficiency scales. METHODS: Four ionization efficiency scales are used: recorded with both APCI and ESI sources and using both methanol- and acetonitrile-containing mobile phases. Each scale contains altogether more than 50 compounds. In addition, measurements with a chromatographic column were also performed. RESULTS: We observed a correlation between calibration graph slopes under LC conditions and logIE values in ESI (but not APCI) thereby validating the use of logIE values for choosing the ion source. Most of the studied compounds preferred ESI as an ion source and methanol as mobile organic phase. APCI remains the ion source of choice for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. For APCI, both acetonitrile and methanol provide similar ionization efficiencies with few exceptions. CONCLUSIONS: Overall the results of this work give a concise guideline for practitioners in choosing an ion source for LC/MS analysis on the basis of the chemical nature of the analytes.
RESUMEN
Ionization efficiency (IE) in mass spectrometry (MS) has been studied for many different compounds, and different IE scales have been constructed in order to quantitatively characterize IE. In the case of MS, derivatization has been used to increase the sensitivity of the method and to lower the limits of detection. However, the influence of derivatization on IE across different compounds and different derivatization reagents has not been thoroughly researched, so that practitioners do not have information on the IE-enhancing abilities of different derivatization reagents. Moreover, measuring IE via direct infusion of compounds cannot be considered fully adequate. Since derivatized compounds are in complex mixtures, a chromatographic method is needed to separate these compounds to minimize potential matrix effects. In this work, an IE measurement system with a chromatographic column was developed for mainly amino acids and some biogenic amines. IE measurements with liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (LC/ESI/MS) were carried out, and IE scales were constructed with a calibration curve for compounds with and without derivatization reagent diethyl ethoxymethylenemalonate. Additionally, eluent composition effects on ionization were investigated. Results showed that derivatization increases IE for most of the compounds (by average 0.9 and up to 2-2.5 logIE units) and derivatized compounds have more similar logIE values than without derivatization. Mobile phase composition effects on ionization efficiencies were negligible. It was also noted that the use of chromatographic separation instead of flow injection mode slightly increases IE. In this work, for the first time, IE enhancement of derivatization reagents was quantified under real LC/ESI/MS conditions and obtained logIE values of derivatized compounds were linked with the existing scale.