Modified anterior maxillary distraction using "Winged Osteotomy": A technical note.

Hypoplasia of the maxilla is common in cleft lip and palate (CLP) deformities. Orthognathic surgery has been the traditional method of correction in such developmental anomalies since 1970's, with Le-Fort I advancement as its long-established management modality, which results in significant speech alteration and relapse rate. In contrast, anterior maxillary distraction (AMD) has the advantage of lesser chances of relapse, velopharyngeal insufficiency, and alteration of speech. This modified AMD technique carries a handful of its advantages as it is an easier procedure compared to the Le-Fort I osteotomy as it gives positive soft tissue changes by improving the projection of the nose and the upper lip, normalizes naso-labial angle, and changes the facial prominence from concave to convex simultaneously as it gives nasolabial and sub-malar prominence post-operatively due to the extension of horizontal cuts up to to the zygomatic region, leading to lesser complications. Also, the hollowing caused by the conventional AMD osteotomy cuts is eliminated by the extension of the winged osteotomy.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis of initial displacement and stress on the craniofacial structures of unilateral cleft lip and palate model during protraction therapy with variable forces and directions.

Maxillary protraction and expansion is recommended to treat midfacial deficiency in patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP), where amount and direction of forces can change displacement and stress. This study assessed the initial displacement and stresses using Facemask and Maxgym forces with and without RME at +20∘, 0∘, and -20∘ angulation using a finite element (FE) model of unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCCLP). The Initial displacement and stress were more for protraction with expansion as compared to only protraction. Asymmetric displacement was observed with more on cleft than on noncleft side and more on dental than skeletal structures. Palatal plane rotated less upward, increased arch width and decreased arch length was observed with protraction with expansion.

Efficacy of morpho-functional repair in management of different morphological variants of unilateral complete cleft lip.

BACKGROUND: To study the surgical outcome in various morphological variants of unilateral complete cleft lip in our high volume centre over a period of 4 years, using Morpho-Functional technique in all cases by indirect two dimensional photographic analysis. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, 749 patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip with palate were included over a period of 4 years from January 2010 to December 2014. All Subjects underwent surgery before the age of 1 year with the follow-up two dimensional photographs taken at 4 years post-operatively. Eight measurements were performed on the photographs. All parameters were measured on both Cleft & Non cleft sides and the ratio was considered with the normal side as the base line. Shapiro-Wilk and Kolmogrov-Smirnoff tests were used to confirm that the data was normally distributed. One way ANOVA was done to find out if there were any significant differences amongst the different groups along various parameters, respectively. Further Tukey post hoc analysis was done to confirm where the differences occurred between groups. RESULTS: None of the groups showed any statistical differences on any parameters. There were minor variations between the different groups due to the ranging morphology of the defect but overall satisfactory to good results were seen on all measured parameters evaluated. CONCLUSION: This shows that the Morphofunctional technique, with its combinations & modifications of various school of thought, is versatile enough to achieve good surgical outcomes despite the wide variations seen in size and type of defects in unilateral cleft lip. This comes about because of the comprehensive nature of the technique & the balance that it creates among the affected structures.

Effect of One-Stage versus Two-Stage Palatoplasty on Hypernasality and Fistula Formation in Children with Complete Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Is one-stage or two-stage palatoplasty more effective for preventing fistula formation and hypernasality in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate? METHODS: This parallel blocked randomized controlled trial included 100 patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate with a repaired cleft lip, divided into two equal groups. Group A had one-stage palatoplasty patients at age 12 to 13 months while group B had two-stage palatoplasty patients with soft palatoplasty at age 12 to 13 months and hard palatoplasty at age 24 to 25 months. Presence of a fistula was tested clinically at 3 years and speech was tested using nasometry and perceptual analyses at 6 years. Group C consisted of noncleft controls (n = 20, age 6 years) for speech using nasometry. Fistula rates, hypernasality ratings, and nasalance scores were compared between groups A and B. Nasometry recordings of groups A and B were compared with control group C. RESULTS: There was no difference in fistula rates between groups A and B (p = 0.409; 95 percent CI, 0.365 to 11.9). Mean nasalance scores of group A showed higher nasalance than group B (p = 0.006; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 6.53). Perceptual analysis showed no difference between groups A and B (p = 0.837 and p = 1.000). Group A showed higher mean nasalance than group C (p = 0.837 and p = 1.000), whereas group B showed no difference (p = 0.088; 95 percent CI, -0.14 to 2.02). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in fistula rates between groups. Nasalance was slightly higher in patients in the one-stage palatoplasty group than two-stage palatoplasty group, but the difference was not clinically significant. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Maxillofacial growth and speech outcome after one-stage or two-stage palatoplasty in unilateral cleft lip and palate. A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The number of surgical procedures to repair a cleft palate may play a role in the outcome for maxillofacial growth and speech. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the relationship between the number of surgical procedures performed to repair the cleft palate and maxillofacial growth, speech and fistula formation in non-syndromic patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in PubMed/old MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Scopus and CINAHL databases for publications between 1960 and December 2015. Publications before 1950-journals of plastic and maxillofacial surgery-were hand searched. Additional hand searches were performed on studies mentioned in the reference lists of relevant articles. Search terms included unilateral, cleft lip and/or palate and palatoplasty. Two reviewers assessed eligibility for inclusion, extracted data, applied quality indicators and graded level of evidence. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met the inclusion criteria. All were retrospective and non-randomized comparisons of one- and two-stage palatoplasty. The methodological quality of most of the studies was graded moderate to low. The outcomes concerned the comparison of one- and two-stage palatoplasty with respect to growth of the mandible, maxilla and cranial base, and speech and fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the lack of high-quality studies there is no conclusive evidence of a relationship between one- or two-stage palatoplasty and facial growth, speech and fistula formation in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Primary septoplasty in the repair of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare nasal symmetry in patients who underwent correction of a complete unilateral cleft lip using the Afroze incision without and with primary septoplasty using a standardized two-dimensional photographic analysis. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 190 consecutive patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and alveolus with cleft palate treated with or without septoplasty using the Afroze incision technique was conducted at a high-volume center. Eighty-two patients operated on without primary septoplasty and 76 patients operated on with primary septoplasty were evaluated. Nasal symmetry was compared between patients using two-dimensional photographic analysis. Ratios between the cleft side and the non­cleft side for five parameters were used to assess symmetry: alar base­to­interpupillary line distance, columella-to­Cupid's bow distance, nostril gap area, nostril width, and nostril height. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to calculate differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Patients operated on with primary septoplasty showed more nasal symmetry compared with patients operated on without septoplasty. This difference was statistically significant for columella-to­Cupid's bow distance, nostril gap area, and nostril height (p = 0.008, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively) and for the distance between alar base and the alar base­to­interpupillary line distance (p = 0.145) the difference was present but not statistically significant. For nostril width, no difference was found (p = 0.850). CONCLUSION: Patients treated with primary septoplasty showed better results in terms of nasal symmetry when analyzed using two-dimensional photographic analyses.

Comparison of three incisions to repair complete unilateral cleft lip.

BACKGROUND: The incision design for correcting a unilateral cleft lip is important because all subsequent stages of surgery depend on the access and maneuverability of the incision. This prospective cohort study compares the aesthetic and functional outcomes of three different skin incisions for primary unilateral cleft lip repair. METHODS: Patients with complete unilateral cleft lips (n = 1200) were enrolled and divided into three groups of 400 patients. Each group of patients was operated on with the Millard incision, Pfeifer wave line incision, or Afroze incision. Outcome assessments were performed 2 years postoperatively and consisted of assessment of the white roll, vermilion border, scar, Cupid's bow, lip length, nostril symmetry, and appearance of alar dome and base. RESULTS: With regard to white roll, vermilion border, scar, Cupid's bow, and lip length, the Afroze incision always gave superior results compared with the Millard or Pfeifer incision. Depending on the cut-off for treatment success, the Afroze incision also showed better results regarding nostril symmetry. With respect to the alar base and alar dome, all three incisions showed comparable outcomes. CONCLUSION: The Afroze incision is superior regarding a broad spectrum of outcomes in a heterogeneous population of patients with unilateral cleft lip.