The ultrastructure of the apical organ of Curini-Galletti's larva, a new polyclad larval type.

Polycladida are the only free-living flatworms with a planktonic larval stage in some species. Currently, it is not clear if a larval stage is ancestral in polyclads, and which type of larva that would be. Known polyclad larvae are Müller's larva, Kato's larva and Goette's larva, differing by body shape and the number of lobes and eyes. A valuable character for the comparison and characterisation of polyclad larval types is the ultrastructural composition of the apical organ. This organ is situated at the anterior pole of the larva and is associated with at least one ciliary tuft. The larval apical organ of Theama mediterranea features two multiciliated apical tuft sensory cells. Six unfurcated apical tuft gland cell necks are sandwiched between the apical tuft sensory cells and two anchor cells and have their cell bodies located lateral to the brain. Another type of apical gland cell necks is embedded in the anchor cells. Ventral to the apical tuft, ciliated sensory neurons are present, which are neighbouring the cell necks of two furcated apical tuft gland cells. Based on the ultrastructural organisation of the apical organ and other morphological features, like a laterally flattened wedge-shaped body and three very small lobes, we recognise the larva of T. mediterranea as a new larval type, which we name Curini-Galletti's larva after its first discoverer. The ultrastructural similarities of the apical organ in different polyclad larvae support their possible homology, that is, all polyclad larvae have likely evolved from a common larva.

Do Not Lose Your Head Over the Unequal Regeneration Capacity in Prolecithophoran Flatworms.

One of the central questions in studying the evolution of regeneration in flatworms remains whether the ancestral flatworm was able to regenerate all body parts, including the head. If so, this ability was subsequently lost in most existent flatworms. The alternative hypothesis is that head regeneration has evolved within flatworms, possibly several times independently. In the well-studied flatworm taxon Tricladida (planarians), most species are able to regenerate a head. Little is known about the regeneration capacity of the closest relatives of Tricladida: Fecampiida and Prolecithophora. Here, we analysed the regeneration capacity of three prolecithophoran families: Pseudostomidae, Plagiostomidae, and Protomonotresidae. The regeneration capacity of prolecithophorans varies considerably between families, which is likely related to the remaining body size of the regenerates. While all studied prolecithophoran species were able to regenerate a tail-shaped posterior end, only some Pseudostomidae could regenerate a part of the pharynx and pharynx pouch. Some Plagiostomidae could regenerate a head including the brain and eyes, provided the roots of the brain were present. The broad spectrum of regeneration capacity in Prolecithophora suggests that head regeneration capacity is not an apomorphy of Adiaphanida.